Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders: Walsh JK

Walsh JK. · No affiliation provided · Sleep. · Pubmed #16494080 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Walsh JK. · No affiliation provided · Sleep. · Pubmed #15683131 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Curry DT, Eisenstein RD, Walsh JK. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St John's Mercy Medical Center and St Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, MO 63017, USA. · Psychiatr Clin North Am. · Pubmed #17118273 No free full text.

Abstract: Views on the etiology and morbidities associated with insomnia are evolving and affect clinicians' approach to the pharmacologic management of insomnia. Currently, benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BzRAs) and a single melatonin receptor agonist are recognized as safe and efficacious hypnotics. Variability in BzRAs, pharmacokinetics, and manipulation of dose provide clinicians with options that meet the needs of most patients. Other drugs (eg, sedating antidepressants) also are used commonly in clinical practice to treat insomnia, but evidence is lacking to support this most cases. Improvement in managing insomnia will result from systematic research with these drugs, with drugs in development, and with novel uses, such as co-therapy.

Walsh JK. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. John's Mercy and St. Luke's Hospitals, Department of Psychiatry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #15575804 No free full text.

Abstract: Pharmacotherapy is indicated for many types of insomnia, most notably transient insomnia associated with stress, acute illness, or jet lag. Many patients with chronic insomnia, including primary insomnia and insomnia secondary to a variety of medical and psychiatric disorders, also benefit from pharmacotherapy. Relatively few individuals receive prescription medication to help them sleep, and the majority use medication for a few nights to several weeks, as opposed to continuous use for months or years. The hypnotics available on the U.S. market today are benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs). The BZRAs are efficacious in reducing sleep latency, increasing total sleep time, reducing awakenings, and improving sleep quality without the development of tolerance in studies as long as 6 months. Side effects of the BZRAs are infrequent, dose-related, and related to the sedative properties of the drug. Sedating antidepressants are also frequently prescribed to promote sleep despite inadequate data to support their efficacy for this indication and a greater potential for clinically troublesome side effects.

Walsh JK. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center at St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, MO, USA. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #15153063 No free full text.

Abstract: Insomnia is characterized by difficulty falling asleep (sleep onset disturbance), difficulty staying asleep (sleep maintenance disturbance), or poor quality (nonrestorative) sleep, leading to impairment of next-day functioning, including psychological distress. Published prevalence estimates of insomnia vary considerably, very likely due to differences in definitions, study setting, and data collection methods. However, estimates based on large population-based surveys provide a rather constant prevalence rate for chronic insomnia in the United States of about 10% (approximately 25 million people). Chronic insomnia is associated with numerous physical and psychiatric conditions and is more common in women and the elderly. Although it is often perceived as a symptom of depression, insomnia is also a precursor of depression and is associated with a substantial increase in the relative risk of major depression. Chronic insomnia is correlated with impaired mood, subjective functioning, and quality of life and, in some cases, with increased daytime sleepiness and accident risk. Those reporting insomnia have higher rates of absenteeism and health care utilization. Direct costs of insomnia have been estimated to be $13.9 billion annually, with a large majority of costs attributable to nursing home care. Chronic insomnia is a common problem, often associated with negative waking mood or function. As such, heightened clinical attention and clinical research appear warranted.

Hajak G, Cluydts R, Allain H, Estivill E, Parrino L, Terzano MG, Walsh JK. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. · Eur Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12927320 No free full text.

Abstract: The adverse effects of insomnia on health and quality of life are matters receiving increasing attention. Yet, surveys have consistently shown that most people suffering from insomnia do not seek medical help, perhaps, in part, because of a concern of becoming dependent on hypnotic medication. The treatment of chronic insomnia poses a particular dilemma in that continuous hypnotic treatment is restricted in many countries to a maximum of 4 weeks, and behavioural treatment is not readily available. Non-nightly hypnotic treatment of chronic insomnia offers a promising alternative option for the many patients whose symptoms do not necessitate nightly drug intake, allaying fears of psychological dependence on medication and respecting regulatory constraints on hypnotic use while providing patients with adequate symptom relief. The practical feasibility and efficacy of this approach has been demonstrated with zolpidem using various treatment regimens and study designs. So far, six clinical trials have been completed on over 4000 patients. Published results show effective treatment of insomnia without any evidence of either adverse event associated with a discontinuous regimen or increased hypnotic use over the treatment period.

Perlis ML, McCall WV, Krystal AD, Walsh JK. · Sleep and Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, and the University of Rochester Medical Center, Neurosciences Program, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #15323600 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: While it is common practice that hypnotics are used on a non-nightly basis, few investigations have been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the intermittent dosing strategy. The present study was designed to further evaluate this issue within a large scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term trial. METHOD: Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia participated in the study from January 2000 through October 2001. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups (zolpidem 10 mg or placebo) for a period of 12 weeks. Ten pills were provided in foil packs on an every-other-week basis, and patients were instructed to take no fewer than 3 and no more than 5 pills per week. Sleep was evaluated daily with sleep diaries. Pill use was recorded in the sleep diaries. RESULTS: 199 patients (mean +/- SD age = 41.0 +/- 12.8 years; 71% female) were randomly assigned to treatment. On mean, patients receiving zolpidem exhibited (vs. baseline) a 42% decrease in sleep latency, a 52% reduction in number of awakenings, a 55% decrease in wake time after sleep onset, and a 27% increase in total sleep time. These positive clinical gains did not diminish with time and were not associated with dose escalation. There was also no evidence of rebound insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: Over a period of 12 weeks of intermittent treatment with zolpidem, sleep continuity was significantly improved, the clinical gains were sustained, and there was no evidence of subjective rebound insomnia between doses or increases in the amount of medication used during the study interval.

Krystal AD, Walsh JK, Laska E, Caron J, Amato DA, Wessel TC, Roth T. · Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #14655910 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term efficacy of eszopiclone in patients with chronic insomnia. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled. SETTING: Out-patient, with monthly visits. PATIENTS: Aged 21 to 69 years meeting DSM IV criteria for primary insomnia and reporting less than 6.5 hours of sleep per night, and/or a sleep latency of more than 30 minutes each night for at least 1 month before screening. INTERVENTIONS: Eszopiclone 3 mg (n = 593) or placebo (n = 195), nightly for 6 months MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated weekly using an interactive voice-response system. Endpoints included sleep latency; total sleep time; number of awakenings; wake time after sleep onset; quality of sleep; and next-day ratings of ability to function, daytime alertness, and sense of physical well-being. At the first week and each month for the study duration, eszopiclone produced significant and sustained improvements in sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset, number of awakenings, number of nights awakened per week, total sleep time, and quality of sleep compared with placebo (P < or = 0.003). Monthly ratings of next-day function, alertness, and sense of physical well-being were also significantly better with the use of eszopiclone than with placebo (P < or = 0.002). There was no evidence of tolerance, and the most common adverse events were unpleasant taste and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout 6 months, eszopiclone improved all of the components of insomnia as defined by DSM-IV, including patient ratings of daytime function. This placebo-controlled study of eszopiclone provides compelling evidence that long-term pharmacologic treatment of insomnia is efficacious.

Walsh JK. · Sleep Medicine Research Center, St Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, USA. · Sleep Med Rev. · Pubmed #12607571 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Walsh JK, Roth T, Randazzo A, Erman M, Jamieson A, Scharf M, Schweitzer PK, Ware JC. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. Luke's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #11145323 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: Intermittent use (i.e., a few nights per week) of hypnotic medication is often recommended for the treatment of chronic insomnia despite an absence of efficacy and safety data using this regimen. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intermittent pharmacotherapy for chronic insomnia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel groups, clinical trial at six sleep research sites. PATIENTS: One hundred-sixty-three (115 women, 48 men; mean age 44.1+ SE. 0.9 years), DSM-IV-defined primary insomnia patients were randomized, 134 patients completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Eight weeks of treatment with either zolpidem 10 mg or placebo. Patients were instructed to take medication when they felt they needed it, but at least three and no more than five times per week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Investigator and Patient Global Ratings were the primary outcome variables. Secondary measures from daily questionnaires to assess efficacy, rebound insomnia and drug taking behavior. RESULTS: The Investigator's Global Rating indicated that intermittent use of zolpidem produced a significantly better therapeutic effect and significantly reduced insomnia severity throughout the 8-week study relative to placebo. Zolpidem was found to be effective in initiating and maintaining sleep on nights taken, as compared to placebo, based upon the Patient's Global Ratings and all subjective sleep variables. No evidence of rebound insomnia was found on nights that zolpidem was not taken. The number of nights a pill was taken did not differ between groups, nor did frequency of pill taking change in either group across the duration of the study. There were no significant effects of treatment upon quality of life or neurocognitive measures. CONCLUSIONS: Zolpidem 10 mg is effective in treating insomnia when used intermittently, without evidence of discontinuation effects or increased frequency of pill taking.

Walsh JK, Pollak CP, Scharf MB, Schweitzer PK, Vogel GW. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, MO 63017, USA. · Clin Neuropharmacol. · Pubmed #10682226 No free full text.

Abstract: The present randomized, double-blind, placebo and active-drug controlled, crossover study assessed residual sedation after zaleplon 10 mg, flurazepam 30 mg (as an active control), and placebo, taken during a nocturnal awakening in patients with sleep maintenance insomnia. Twenty-two healthy sleep maintenance insomniacs (11 men; mean age, 42 y) received zaleplon, flurazepam, or placebo after an experimental awakening 3.5 hours after bedtime on two consecutive nights in each of three conditions. Residual sedation was measured with sleep latency testing (5 and 6.5 h postdrug), digit symbol substitution, symbol copying, and subjective sleepiness by visual analog scale, each twice each morning. Zaleplon did not differ from placebo on any measure of residual sedation; flurazepam showed significant sedation on all measures. No residual sedative effects were detected 5 or 6.5 hours after ingestion of zaleplon during the middle of the night by sleep maintenance insomniacs.

Asnis GM, Chakraburtty A, DuBoff EA, Krystal A, Londborg PD, Rosenberg R, Roth-Schechter B, Scharf MB, Walsh JK. · Department of Psychiatry, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #10549683 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Depressed individuals effectively treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) often report persistent insomnia and require adjunctive sleep-promoting therapy. METHOD: Men (N = 40) and women (N = 150) with a mean age of 41.6 years who had persistent insomnia in the presence of effective and stable treatment (at least 2 weeks) with fluoxetine (< or =40 mg/day), sertraline (< or =100 mg/day), or paroxetine (< or =40 mg/day) for DSM-IV major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, or minor depressive disorder of mild-to-moderate severity (and score of < or =2 on item 3 of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]) participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. At study entry, patients were required to score < or =12 on the HAM-D. During a 1-week single-blind placebo period, patients had to report on at least 3 nights a latency of > or =30 minutes or a sleep time of <6.5 hours and clinically significant daytime impairment. Patients received either placebo (N = 96) or zolpidem, 10 mg (N = 94) nightly, for 4 weeks and single-blind placebo for 1 week thereafter. Sleep was measured with daily questionnaires and during weekly physician visits. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, zolpidem was associated with improved sleep: longer sleep times (weeks 1 through 4, p<.05), greater sleep quality (weeks 1 through 4, p<.01), and reduced number of awakenings (weeks 1, 2, and 4; p<.05), together with feeling significantly more refreshed, less sleepy, and more able to concentrate. After placebo substitution, the zolpidem group showed significant worsening relative to pretreatment sleep on the first posttreatment night in total sleep time and sleep quality, reverted to pretreatment insomnia levels on the other hypnotic efficacy measures, or maintained improvement (fewer number of awakenings). There was no evidence of dependence or withdrawal from zolpidem (DSM-IV criteria). Incidence rates of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups (74% and 83% for placebo and zolpidem, respectively), but 7 zolpidem patients discontinued compared with 2 placebo patients. CONCLUSION: In this defined patient population, zolpidem, 10 mg, was effectively and safely co-administered with an SSRI, resulting in improved self-rated sleep, daytime functioning, and well-being.

Erman MK, Zammit G, Rubens R, Schaefer K, Wessel T, Amato D, Caron J, Walsh JK. · Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #18595435 links to  free full text

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the polysomnographic efficacy and the safety of a range of doses of eszopiclone relative to placebo in patients with primary insomnia. Zolpidem 10 mg was included as an active control. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, crossover study enrolled patients aged 21-64 years meeting the DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia (n = 65). Patients received 2 nights treatment each with placebo, eszopiclone 1 mg, 2 mg, 2.5 mg, or 3 mg, and zolpidem 10 mg after randomization to one of 6 treatment sequences. Visits were separated by a 3-7 day washout. Objective efficacy was assessed by polysomnography (PSG). The primary endpoint was latency to persistent sleep (LPS); key secondary endpoints were sleep efficiency (SE) and wake time after sleep onset (WASO); other endpoints included wake time during sleep (WTDS) and number of awakenings (NAW), as well as patient-reported variables. RESULTS: LPS and SE were significantly different than placebo for all active treatments (p < 0.05 for all). Significant differences from placebo were noted in the 3 objective sleep maintenance measures (WASO, WTDS, and NAW) for eszopiclone 3 mg (p < 0.05), which was not the case for zolpidem 10 mg or the other eszopiclone doses. The incidence of central nervous system adverse events was 23.4% for zolpidem 10 mg, 6.2% to 12.5% for the eszopiclone doses, and 7.9% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to placebo, all active treatments were effective in reducing LPS and increasing SE. Eszopiclone 3 mg was significantly different from placebo on the 3 PSG measures of sleep maintenance (WASO, WTDS, and NAW). Significant differences between zolpidem 10 mg and eszopiclone (2 mg or 3 mg) were not observed for PSG-measured outcomes, although the study was not powered to detect differences between the active drug conditions.

Walsh JK, Soubrane C, Roth T. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. John's Mercy and St. Luke's Hospitals, 232 S. Woods Hill Road, Chesterfield, MO 63017, USA. · Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #18165461 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of zolpidem extended release for the treatment of primary insomnia in elderly patients. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted. A total of 205 (117 women, 88 men; mean age 70.2 +/- 4.5 years) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-defined primary insomnia patients were randomized to 3 weeks of nightly treatment with either zolpidem extended release 6.25 mg or placebo; 198 patients completed the study. RESULTS: Relative to placebo, zolpidem extended release 6.25 mg significantly decreased wake time after sleep onset during the first six hours of the night, as measured by polysomnogram (PSG). PSG latency to persistent sleep was reduced and PSG total sleep time was increased, both at nights 1/2 and 15/16. Patient self-report measures were significantly better with zolpidem extended-release 6.25 mg than with placebo throughout treatment. Some PSG measures indicated a worsening of sleep for a single night after abrupt discontinuation of zolpidem extended release. No next-morning residual effects were observed. The overall incidence and nature of adverse events was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Zolpidem extended release 6.25 mg improved both sleep maintenance and sleep induction in elderly primary insomnia patients during three weeks of administration.

Walsh JK, Moscovitch A, Burke J, Farber R, Roth T. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. John's/St. Luke's Hospitals, 232 S. Woods Mill Road, Chesterfield, St. Louis, MO 63017, USA. · Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17825616 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of indiplon in elderly patients with primary insomnia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Elderly patients, 65-80 years (N=358; 55% female; mean age, 71 years) who met the criteria for primary insomnia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) for three months were randomized to two weeks of double-blind nightly treatment with 5 mg or 10 mg indiplon or placebo. Daily self-assessments by the patients included latency to sleep onset (LSO), total sleep time (TST), number of awakenings (NAW), wake time after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep quality. Data were collected between July, 2002, and October, 2003, at 52 clinical research sites in North America. RESULTS: Treatment with indiplon was associated with significant reduction in LSO at Week 1 for the 5 mg (34.6+/-1.8 min) and 10 mg doses (30.4+/-1.6 min) relative to placebo (47.4+/-2.5 min; p<0.0001 for both comparisons). During Week 2, LSO remained shorter on both indiplon doses compared to placebo (5 mg, p=0.016; and 10 mg, p=0.0028). During both study weeks, treatment with indiplon was also associated with significant improvement, relative to placebo, in TST, NAW, WASO, and sleep quality. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the indiplon 5 mg and placebo groups; somnolence, nausea, depression and decreased appetite were slightly more common in the indiplon 10 mg group. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with primary insomnia, indiplon 5 mg and 10 mg were efficacious in inducing and maintaining sleep and improving sleep quality during the two weeks of treatment. Indiplon 5mg was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events and no significant changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) or routine clinical laboratory evaluations; the 10mg dose produced slightly greater efficacy as well as somewhat increased adverse events.

Walsh JK, Mayleben D, Guico-Pabia C, Vandormael K, Martinez R, Deacon S. · St. John's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA. · Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17765013 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The hypnotic efficacy of gaboxadol, a selective extrasynaptic GABA A agonist (SEGA), was evaluated in a phase-advance model of transient insomnia. METHODS: Healthy subjects (18-64 years) completed a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study in which the sleep period was advanced 4h from habitual sleep time. Polysomnographic (PSG) and self-reported sleep measures were used to compare gaboxadol 10mg (N =271) and 15 mg (N =274) versus placebo (N =277). RESULTS: In the placebo group, the phase-advance procedure disrupted sleep maintenance as measured by PSG wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) and self-reported WASO (sWASO), and also, to a lesser extent, disrupted sleep onset as measured by PSG latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and self-reported time to sleep onset (sTSO). Both doses of gaboxadol decreased WASO and sWASO versus placebo (p <or= 0.05). Gaboxadol 15 mg also reduced LPS versus placebo (p <or= 0.01) and both doses reduced sTSO versus placebo (p <or= 0.01). PSG and self-reported total sleep time as well as ratings of sleep quality were improved with both gaboxadol doses relative to placebo (all p <or= 0.01 or better). The amount of slow wave sleep (SWS) was greater with both doses of gaboxadol than with placebo (p <or= 0.001). No group differences in the amount of rapid eye movement sleep were found. Most PSG and self-report measures indicated a mild dose response. The percentage of subjects with adverse events was low (<10% in any treatment group) and all were mild or moderate; none were serious and gaboxadol did not impact morning gait or coordination. CONCLUSIONS: Gaboxadol 10 and 15 mg were efficacious in significantly reducing the sleep maintenance and sleep onset disruption produced by this model of transient insomnia, with effects generally being most pronounced for the 15 mg dose. Gaboxadol also enhanced SWS.

Walsh JK, Krystal AD, Amato DA, Rubens R, Caron J, Wessel TC, Schaefer K, Roach J, Wallenstein G, Roth T. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. John's/St. Luke's Hospitals and the Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63017, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #17702264 links to  free full text

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 6 months' eszopiclone treatment upon patient-reported sleep, fatigue and sleepiness, insomnia severity, quality of life, and work limitations. DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: 54 research sites in the U.S. PATIENTS: 830 primary insomnia patients who reported mean nightly total sleep time (TST) < or = 6.5 hours/night and/or mean nightly sleep latency (SL) >30 min. INTERVENTION: Eszopiclone 3 mg or matching placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Patient-reported sleep measures, Insomnia Severity Index, Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Work Limitations Questionnaire, and other assessments measured during baseline, treatment Months 1-6, and 2 weeks following discontinuation of treatment. RESULTS: Patient-reported sleep and daytime function were improved more with eszopiclone than with placebo at all months (P <0.001). Eszopiclone reduced Insomnia Severity Index scores to below clinically meaningful levels for 50% of patients (vs 19% with placebo; P <0.05) at Month 6. SF-36 domains of Physical Functioning, Vitality, and Social Functioning were improved with eszopiclone vs placebo for the Month 1-6 average (P < 0.05). Similarly, improvements were observed for all domains of the Work Limitations Questionnaire with eszopiclone vs placebo for the Month 1-6 average (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first placebo-controlled investigation to demonstrate that long-term nightly pharmacologic treatment of primary insomnia with any hypnotic enhanced quality of life, reduced work limitations, and reduced global insomnia severity, in addition to improving patient-reported sleep variables.

Lydiard RB, Lankford DA, Seiden DJ, Landin R, Farber R, Walsh JK. · Department of Neuropsychiatny and Behavioral Science University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17561543 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVE: Indiplon is a nonbenzodiazepine GABA potentiator, which exhibits pharmacologic selectivity for GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha1 subunit. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 15-mg nightly dose of modified-release indiplon tablets in elderly patients with primary insomnia characterized by sleep-maintenance difficulties. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine elderly patients, aged 65 to 85 years, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for primary insomnia were randomly assigned to 2 weeks of nightly treatment with either indiplon, 15 mg, or placebo in a double-blind, parallel-group design. Daily sleep diaries were completed to collect patient reports of subjective total sleep time, wake time after sleep onset, number of awakenings after sleep-onset, latency to sleep onset, and sleep quality. Patient global impression ratings of various parameters of sleep were assessed on a weekly basis. RESULTS: The least square mean total sleep time was significantly improved with indiplon versus placebo at week 1 (377 +/- 4 min vs. 328 +/- 4 min; p < .0001) and week 2 (373 +/- 5 min vs. 337 +/- 5 min; p < .0001). Indiplon also significantly improved subjective wake after sleep onset, subjective number of awakenings after sleep onset, subjective sleep-onset latency, sleep quality, and patient global impression ratings of sleep at both weeks 1 and 2. The number and severity of adverse events and rates of discontinuation due to adverse effects were comparable in the indiplon and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with primary insomnia characterized by sleep-maintenance difficulty, indiplon, 15 mg, was well tolerated and significantly improved all patient-reported measures of sleep during 2 weeks of treatment.

Walsh JK. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. John K/St. Luke 's Hospitals, Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17557500 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Walsh JK, Perlis M, Rosenthal M, Krystal A, Jiang J, Roth T. · Sleep Medicine and Research Center, St. Johnś/St. Lukeś Hospitals, St. Louis, MO 63017, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17557435 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated dose-response effects of tiagabine on sleep in adults with primary insomnia. METHODS: Men and women with primary insomnia (DSM-IV-TR) were randomly assigned to receive tiagabine 4, 6, 8, 10 mg or placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography and self-report measures. Safety analyses included measures of residual sedation and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (31% men; mean age 44.3 years) received study drug. No significant differences were observed between tiagabine and placebo in wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, or total sleep time. Significantly greater increases from baseline in slow-wave sleep (stages 3 and 4) were found with the 3 highest doses of tiagabine compared with placebo (p < .01). Stage 1 sleep showed a significantly greater decrease from baseline for all doses of tiagabine than for placebo (p < .01). Self-report measures of sleep and daytime function did not differ from placebo, except for poorer ratings on the 10-mg dose. Similarly, psychomotor performance on the 10-mg dose was worsened compared with placebo. Tiagabine was generally well tolerated; dizziness and nausea were the most common adverse events, particularly at the 2 higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with primary insomnia, tiagabine significantly increased slow-wave sleep in a dose-dependent manner with a corresponding significant decrease in Stage 1 sleep, whereas no significant differences were observed in wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, or total sleep time compared with placebo.

Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S, Walsh JK. · Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Cornell University, Washington, D.C., USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #17425222 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct and indirect cost burden of untreated insomnia among younger adults (age 18-64), and to estimate the direct costs of untreated insomnia for elderly patients (age 65 and over). DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study comparing insomnia patients to matched samples without insomnia. SETTINGS: Self-insured, employer sponsored health insurance plans in the U.S. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 138,820 younger adults and 75,558 elderly patients with insomnia, plus equal-sized, matched comparison groups. INTERVENTIONS: NA. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Direct costs included inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy, and emergency room costs for all diseases, for six months before an index date. The index date for insomnia patients was the date of diagnosis with or the onset of prescription treatment for insomnia, some-time during July 1, 1999-June 30, 2003. Non-insomnia patients were assigned the same index dates as the insomnia patients to whom they were matched. Indirect costs included costs related to absenteeism from work and the use of short-term disability programs. Propensity score matching was used to find insomnia and non-insomnia patients who had similar demographics, location, health plan type, comorbidities, and drug use patterns. Regression analyses controlled for factors that were different even after matching was completed. We found that average direct and indirect costs for younger adults with insomnia were about $1,253 greater than for patients without insomnia. Among the elderly, direct costs were about $1,143 greater for insomnia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Insomnia is associated with a significant economic burden for younger and older patients.

Roth T, Soubrane C, Titeux L, Walsh JK, Anonymous00262. · Henri Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. · Sleep Med. · Pubmed #16815744 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of modified-release zolpidem (zolpidem-MR 12.5mg) for the treatment of primary insomnia in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twelve (123 women, 89 men; mean age 44.3+/-SD 3.0 years), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--4th Edition (DSM-IV)-defined primary insomnia patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The study was completed by 192 patients. Patients received 3 weeks of nightly treatment with either zolpidem-MR 12.5mg or placebo, preceded and followed by two nights of single-blind placebo. The main outcome measures were mean polysomnographic (PSG) sleep parameters of nights 1/2 and nights 15/16 of double-blind treatment and daily subjective sleep estimates from sleep questionnaires to assess efficacy, and PSG parameters of nights 22 and 23 of single-blind placebo substitution to assess the effect of drug discontinuation. RESULTS: Relative to placebo, zolpidem-MR 12.5mg improved sleep maintenance by significantly reducing PSG wake time after sleep onset (WASO) during the first 6h of sleep as well as the number of awakenings. Consistent with the effects of standard zolpidem, zolpidem-MR also significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep, and significantly increased sleep efficiency, both at the beginning and after 2 weeks of double-blind treatment. There was no evidence of next-day residual effects as measured objectively by psychometric tests. Rebound insomnia on the first night after abrupt discontinuation resolved the following night. Overall, zolpidem-MR was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Zolpidem-MR 12.5mg is effective and safe in treating primary insomnia in adults and improves sleep maintenance, induction and duration of sleep.

Walsh JK, Randazzo AC, Frankowski S, Shannon K, Schweitzer PK, Roth T. · Sleep Medicine & Research Center, St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Luke 's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #16477953 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dose- response effects of tiagabine on sleep and safety measures in healthy older adults. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, Latin-square design. SETTING: Sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four healthy older adults (11 men, 13 women; mean age 68.0 +/- 6.2 years) INTERVENTIONS: Tiagabine 2, 4, or 8 mg, or placebo, each given on two consecutive nights. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Polysomnography revealed that compared with placebo, tiagabine 4 mg increased total sleep time, reduced wake after sleep onset, and increased minutes of slow-wave sleep. Tiagabine 8 mg decreased wake after sleep onset, increased slow-wave sleep, and improved a sleep-continuity index. No differences were seen between the 2-mg dose and placebo. Subjective ratings indicated fewer awakenings with the 8-mg dose. Central nervous system adverse events were somewhat higher in the 8-mg condition only. Measures of morning performance were minimally affected. CONCLUSIONS: Research with tiagabine at dosages of 8 mg or less appears warranted in elderly clinical populations.

Walsh JK, Zammit G, Schweitzer PK, Ondrasik J, Roth T. · St. John's Mercy/St. Luke's Hospitals, Sleep Medicine and Research Center, Chesterfield, MO 63017, and Department of Psychology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. · Sleep Med. · Pubmed #16260179 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of tiagabine on sleep and next-morning alertness and performance in adult patients with primary insomnia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary insomnia, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), received tiagabine 4, 8, 12, 16 mg, and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, five-period, Latin square, crossover study. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnographic and self-report techniques; residual effects were evaluated using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (40f, 18m; mean age 46.6+/-8.0 years) were randomized. Results showed a significant dose-dependent increase in slow wave sleep percentage with all tiagabine doses, a trend toward a dose-dependent increase in total sleep time, and no effect on latency to persistent sleep. Wake after sleep onset also decreased in a dose-dependent manner, with the 16-mg dose differing significantly from placebo. The tolerability profiles of tiagabine 4 and 8 mg were similar to placebo. The most common adverse events reported following tiagabine 12 and 16 mg were dizziness and nausea. Residual effects were only apparent at 12- and 16-mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: Tiagabine increased slow wave sleep and reduced wake after sleep onset in a dose-dependent manner. Tiagabine dosages up to 8 mg did not compromise next-morning alertness and psychomotor performance in adult patients with primary insomnia. Further investigation of tiagabine doses up to 8 mg is warranted.

Roth T, Walsh JK, Krystal A, Wessel T, Roehrs TA. · Henry Ford Hospital Sleep Center, 2799 West Grand Blvd, CFP-3, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. · Sleep Med. · Pubmed #16230048 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A double-blind placebo-controlled study of eszopiclone found significant, sustained improvement in sleep and daytime function. The 6-month open-label extension phase is described herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults (21-64) with primary insomnia who reported sleep duration <6.5 h/night or sleep latency >30 min/night were included. Patient-reported endpoints included sleep and daytime function. Safety and compliance were assessed at monthly clinic visits. The final double-blind month was used as the baseline for efficacy analyses of the open-label period. RESULTS: Patients who were initially randomized to double-blind placebo and then switched to open-label eszopiclone (n=111) significantly reported the following: (1) decreased sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset, and number of awakenings; (2) increased total sleep time and sleep quality; and (3) improved ratings of daytime ability to function, alertness and sense of physical well-being compared to baseline (P<or=0.0001 all monthly endpoints). There was no evidence of tolerance on any measure in either group. These subjects (n=360) sustained the double-blind treatment gains for all sleep and daytime parameters, with further significant improvement in a number of measures. Eszopiclone was well tolerated in both groups; unpleasant taste was the only undesirable effect reported by >5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The significant improvements in sleep and daytime function were evident in those switched from double-blind placebo to 6 months of open-label eszopiclone therapy and were sustained during the 6 months of open-label treatment for those receiving prior double-blind eszopiclone. During 12 months of nightly treatment, eszopiclone 3mg was well tolerated; tolerance was not observed.