Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders: Amato D

Rosenberg R, Caron J, Roth T, Amato D. · Northside Hospital Sleep Medicine Institute, 5780 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Suite 150, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA. · Sleep Med. · Pubmed #15680290 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and safety of eszopiclone, a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent, in healthy adults using the first-night effect model of transient insomnia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 436 healthy, normal sleeping participants were randomized to receive either eszopiclone 1, 2, 3, or 3.5mg, or placebo. Efficacy and next-morning effects were evaluated via polysomnography (PSG), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and self-report. RESULTS: Patients treated with eszopiclone had significantly less PSG latency to persistent sleep (all doses except 1mg; P< or =0.0001), wake time after sleep onset (all doses; P< or =0.05) and number of awakenings (3 and 3.5mg doses; P<0.005), and greater sleep efficiency (all doses; P< or =0.02) compared with placebo. Self-reported efficacy results were similar to PSG. Self-reported morning sleepiness scores were significantly better for eszopiclone 3 and 3.5mg compared with placebo (P<0.05). Treatment was well tolerated by patients, and the most common treatment-related adverse event was unpleasant taste. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of transient insomnia, all doses of eszopiclone were more effective than placebo and were well tolerated by patients.

Erman MK, Zammit G, Rubens R, Schaefer K, Wessel T, Amato D, Caron J, Walsh JK. · Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #18595435 links to  free full text

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the polysomnographic efficacy and the safety of a range of doses of eszopiclone relative to placebo in patients with primary insomnia. Zolpidem 10 mg was included as an active control. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, crossover study enrolled patients aged 21-64 years meeting the DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia (n = 65). Patients received 2 nights treatment each with placebo, eszopiclone 1 mg, 2 mg, 2.5 mg, or 3 mg, and zolpidem 10 mg after randomization to one of 6 treatment sequences. Visits were separated by a 3-7 day washout. Objective efficacy was assessed by polysomnography (PSG). The primary endpoint was latency to persistent sleep (LPS); key secondary endpoints were sleep efficiency (SE) and wake time after sleep onset (WASO); other endpoints included wake time during sleep (WTDS) and number of awakenings (NAW), as well as patient-reported variables. RESULTS: LPS and SE were significantly different than placebo for all active treatments (p < 0.05 for all). Significant differences from placebo were noted in the 3 objective sleep maintenance measures (WASO, WTDS, and NAW) for eszopiclone 3 mg (p < 0.05), which was not the case for zolpidem 10 mg or the other eszopiclone doses. The incidence of central nervous system adverse events was 23.4% for zolpidem 10 mg, 6.2% to 12.5% for the eszopiclone doses, and 7.9% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to placebo, all active treatments were effective in reducing LPS and increasing SE. Eszopiclone 3 mg was significantly different from placebo on the 3 PSG measures of sleep maintenance (WASO, WTDS, and NAW). Significant differences between zolpidem 10 mg and eszopiclone (2 mg or 3 mg) were not observed for PSG-measured outcomes, although the study was not powered to detect differences between the active drug conditions.

Fava M, McCall WV, Krystal A, Wessel T, Rubens R, Caron J, Amato D, Roth T. · Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. · Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #16581036 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Insomnia and major depressive disorder (MDD) can coexist. This study evaluated the effect of adding eszopiclone to fluoxetine. METHODS: Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for both MDD and insomnia (n = 545) received morning fluoxetine and were randomized to nightly eszopiclone 3 mg (ESZ+FLX) or placebo (PBO+FLX) for 8 weeks. Subjective sleep and daytime function were assessed weekly. Depression was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) and the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity items (CGI-S). RESULTS: Patients in the ESZ+FLX group had significantly decreased sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset (WASO), increased total sleep time (TST), sleep quality, and depth of sleep at all double-blind time points (all p < .05). Eszopiclone co-therapy also resulted in: significantly greater changes in HAM-D-17 scores at Week 4 (p = .01) with progressive improvement at Week 8 (p = .002); significantly improved CGI-I and CGI-S scores at all time points beyond Week 1 (p < .05); and significantly more responders (59% vs. 48%; p = .009) and remitters (42% vs. 33%; p = .03) at Week 8. Treatment was well tolerated, with similar adverse event and dropout rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, eszopiclone/fluoxetine co-therapy was relatively well tolerated and associated with rapid, substantial, and sustained sleep improvement, a faster onset of antidepressant response on the basis of CGI, and a greater magnitude of the antidepressant effect.

Scharf M, Erman M, Rosenberg R, Seiden D, McCall WV, Amato D, Wessel TC. · Tri-State Sleep Disorders Center, Cincinnati, OH 45246, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #16477959 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of eszopiclone in primary insomnia. DESIGN/SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter in outpatient setting with weekly visits. PARTICIPANTS: Two-hundred thirty one men and women aged 65 to 85 years (mean age 72.3 years) with primary insomnia, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition. INTERVENTIONS: Eszopiclone 1 mg (n = 72), eszopiclone 2 mg (n = 79), or placebo (n = 80) nightly for 2 weeks. MEASUREMENTS/RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed using an interactive voice response system. Following the predefined hierarchical testing strategy, the eszopiclone 2-mg group had a significantly shorter sleep latency compared with placebo over the double-blind period (P = .0034). The eszopiclone 2-mg group had significantly longer total sleep time (P = .0003) and eszopiclone 1-mg group had significantly shorter sleep latency (P < or = .012) compared with placebo. The eszopiclone 1-mg group was not significantly different from placebo on total sleep time or any other secondary efficacy endpoint. Secondary analyses indicated that the eszopiclone 2-mg group had significantly less wake after sleep onset; significantly fewer and shorter in duration daytime naps; and significantly higher ratings of sleep quality and depth, daytime alertness, and sense of physical well-being compared with placebo (P < .05). Eszopiclone was well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event was unpleasant taste. CONCLUSION: Nightly treatment with eszopiclone 1 mg effectively induced sleep, while the 2-mg dose was effective in inducing and maintaining sleep. Eszopiclone was well tolerated in elderly patients with primary insomnia, and the sleep efficacy was accompanied by significantly less napping and significantly higher ratings of daytime alertness, sense of physical well-being, and several quality-of-life parameters at the higher dose.