Sleep Apnea Syndromes: Iber C

Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, Brown LK, Gozal D, Iber C, Parthasarathy S, Quan SF, Rowley JA, Anonymous00026, Anonymous00027. · Stanford University Center of Excellence for Sleep Disorders, 401 Quarry Road, Suite 3301, Stanford, CA 94305-5730, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #18468315 links to  free full text

Abstract: Positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are used to treat patients with sleep related breathing disorders (SRBDs), including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After a patient is diagnosed with OSA, the current standard of practice involves performing attended polysomnography (PSG), during which positive airway pressure is adjusted throughout the recording period to determine the optimal pressure for maintaining upper airway patency. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) represent the two forms of PAP that are manually titrated during PSG to determine the single fixed pressure of CPAP or the fixed inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressures (IPAP and EPAP, respectively) of BPAP for subsequent nightly usage. A PAP Titration Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine reviewed the available literature. Based on this review, the Task Force developed these recommendations for conducting CPAP and BPAP titrations. Major recommendations are as follows: (1) All potential PAP titration candidates should receive adequate PAP education, hands-on demonstration, careful mask fitting, and acclimatization prior to titration. (2) CPAP (IPAP and/or EPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased until the following obstructive respiratory events are eliminated (no specific order) or the recommended maximum CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) is reached: apneas, hypopneas, respiratory effort-related arousals (RERAs), and snoring. (3) The recommended minimum starting CPAP should be 4 cm H2O for pediatric and adult patients, and the recommended minimum starting IPAP and EPAP should be 8 cm H2O and 4 cm H2O, respectively, for pediatric and adult patients on BPAP. (4) The recommended maximum CPAP should be 15 cm H2O (or recommended maximum IPAP of 20 cm H2O if on BPAP) for patients < 12 years, and 20 cm H2O (or recommended maximum IPAP of 30 cm H2O if on BPAP) for patients > or = 12 years. (5) The recommended minimum IPAP-EPAP differential is 4 cm H2O and the recommended maximum IPAP-EPAP differential is 10 cm H2O (6) CPAP (IPAP and/or EPAP for patients on BPAP depending on the type of event) should be increased by at least 1 cm H2O with an interval no shorter than 5 min, with the goal of eliminating obstructive respiratory events. (7) CPAP (IPAP and EPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 1 obstructive apnea is observed for patients < 12 years, or if at least 2 obstructive apneas are observed for patients > or = 12 years. (8) CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 1 hypopnea is observed for patients < 12 years, or if at least 3 hypopneas are observed for patients > or = 12 years. (9) CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 3 RERAs are observed for patients < 12 years, or if at least 5 RERAs are observed for patients > or = 12 years. (10) CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) may be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 1 min of loud or unambiguous snoring is observed for patients < 12 years, or if at least 3 min of loud or unambiguous snoring are observed for patients > or = 12 years. (11) The titration algorithm for split-night CPAP or BPAP titration studies should be identical to that of full-night CPAP or BPAP titration studies, respectively. (12) If the patient is uncomfortable or intolerant of high pressures on CPAP, the patient may be tried on BPAP. If there are continued obstructive respiratory events at 15 cm H2O of CPAP during the titration study, the patient may be switched to BPAP. (13) The pressure of CPAP or BPAP selected for patient use following the titration study should reflect control of the patient's obstructive respiration by a low (preferably < 5 per hour) respiratory disturbance index (RDI) at the selected pressure, a minimum sea level SpO2 above 90% at the pressure, and with a leak within acceptable parameters at the pressure.) (14) An optimal titration reduces RDI < 5 for at least a 15-min duration and should include supine REM sleep at the selected pressure that is not continually interrupted by spontaneous arousals or awakenings. (15) A good titration reduces RDI < or = 10 or by 50% if the baseline RDI < 15 and should include supine REM sleep that is not continually interrupted by spontaneous arousals or awakenings at the selected pressure. (16) An adequate titration does not reduce the RDI < or = 10 but reduces the RDI by 75% from baseline (especially in severe OSA patients), or one in which the titration grading criteria for optimal or good are met with the exception that supine REM sleep did not occur at the selected pressure. (17) An unacceptable titration is one that does not meet any one of the above grades. (18) A repeat PAP titration study should be considered if the initial titration does not achieve a grade of optimal or good and, if it is a split-night PSG study, it fails to meet AASM criteria (i.e., titration duration should be > 3 hr).

Iber C. · No affiliation provided · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17561607 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Iber C. · No affiliation provided · Sleep. · Pubmed #15124710 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Caples SM, Rosen CL, Shen WK, Gami AS, Cotts W, Adams M, Dorostkar P, Shivkumar K, Somers VK, Morgenthaler TI, Stepanski EJ, Iber C. · Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. · J Clin Sleep Med. · Pubmed #17557424 No free full text.

Abstract: Standardized guidelines for polysomnography (PSG) have not specified methods for acquiring or interpreting electrocardiographic (ECG) data. The practice of single lead ECG monitoring during PSG may allow identification of simple measures of cardiac rhythm but reduces the ability to detect myocardial ischemia and to define cardiac intervals. Although simple measures of cardiac rhythm such as heart rate and cardiac pauses are inherently reliable, there is limited data regarding outcome measures relative to sleep related heart rates and cardiac events during sleep. Several observational and cross-sectional studies demonstrate that average heart rate drops nearly 50% from infancy through young adulthood and that the average heart rate slows during sleep compared with wakefulness; the definitions of sinus bradycardia and sinus tachycardia should therefore be lower during sleep than wakefulness. Asystoles of up to 2 seconds are seen in normal populations during sleep. Although there may be an increased risk of certain arrhythmias at night, particularly in sleep disordered breathing, there is no evidence that supports different definitions for these arrhythmias during sleep compared with wakefulness. When the quality of tracings permits, the standard definitions of narrow- and wide-complex tachycardias and atrial fibrillation may be employed. In the future, expansion to multiple ECG leads and the use of alternative tools may provide better definition of heart rates and cardiac events during sleep.

Gay P, Weaver T, Loube D, Iber C, Anonymous00040, Anonymous00041, Anonymous00042. · Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #16553025 No free full text.

Abstract: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), central sleep apnea (CSA), and chronic hypoventilation. This document provides a systematic analysis and grading of peer-reviewed, published clinical studies pertaining to application of PAP treatment in adults. The paper is divided into 5 sections, each addressing a series of questions. The first section deals with whether efficacy and/or effectiveness have been demonstrated for continuous PAP (CPAP) treatment based on a variety of parameters and the level of OSA severity. Next, CPAP titration conducted with full, attended polysomnography in a sleep laboratory is compared with titration done under various other conditions. The third section investigates what can be expected regarding adherence and compliance with CPAP treatment as measured by subjective and objective methods and what factors may influence these parameters. Side effects and the influence of other specific factors on efficacy, effectiveness and safety of CPAP therapy are evaluated in the fourth section. Finally, the use of bilevel PAP therapy is reviewed for both patients with OSA and those with other selected nocturnal breathing disorders. Each section also contains a brief summary and suggestions for future research.

Iber C. · University of Minnesota, Pulmonary and Critical Care, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA. · Neurol Clin. · Pubmed #16243615 No free full text.

Abstract: Sleep-related breathing disorders are a heterogeneous group of conditions that may be associated with alterations in the structure of sleep, in sleep quality, and in gas exchange during sleep. Obstructive sleep apnea represents the most frequent cause of sleep-related breathing disorders, which encompass a diversity of conditions that either complicate coexisting disease or present as primary disorders. Many of these disorders have consequences during both sleep and wakefulness and may produce substantial burden of symptoms and disease in untreated individuals.

Iber C, Redline S, Kaplan Gilpin AM, Quan SF, Zhang L, Gottlieb DJ, Rapoport D, Resnick HE, Sanders M, Smith P. · Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #15164911 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare polysomnographic recordings obtained in the home and laboratory setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicenter study comparing unsupervised polysomnography performed in the participant's home with polysomnography supervised at an academic sleep disorders center, using a randomized sequence of study setting. Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) standardized polysomnographic recording and scoring techniques were used for both settings. PARTICIPANTS: 64 of 76 non-SHHS participants recruited from 7 SHHS field sites who had both a laboratory and home polysomnogram meeting acceptable quality criteria. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Median sleep duration was greater in the home than in the laboratory (375 vs 318 minutes, respectively, P < .0001) as was sleep efficiency (86% vs 82%, respectively, P < .0024). Very small, but significant increases in percentage of rapid eye movement sleep and decreases in stage 1 sleep were noted in the laboratory. Employing multiple definitions of respiratory disturbance index (RDI), median RDI was similar in both settings (for example, RDI with 3% desaturation: home 12.4, range 0.6-67; laboratory 9.5, range 0.1-93.4, P = .41). Quartile analysis of laboratory RDI showed moderate agreement with home RDI measurements. Based on the mean of laboratory and home RDI and using a cutpoint of 20, there was a biphasic distribution, with the RDI 3% above 20 being more common in the recordings performed in the laboratory than in the home and below 20 being more common in the recordings performed in the home than in the laboratory. These differences could not be attributed to quality of recording, age, sex, or body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Using SHHS methodology, median RDI was similar in the unattended home and attended laboratory setting with differences of small magnitude in some sleep parameters. Differences in RDI between settings resulted in a rate of disease misclassification that is similar to repeated studies in the same setting.

Quan SF, Griswold ME, Iber C, Nieto FJ, Rapoport DM, Redline S, Sanders M, Young T, Anonymous00002. · Arizona Respiratory Center and Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #12489889 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term variability of indices of disturbed respiration and sleep during 2 nights of unattended nonlaboratory polysomnography conducted several months apart. DESIGN: Participants were randomly selected using a block design with stratification on preliminary estimates of 2 criteria: respiratory disturbance index [RDI3% (apnea or hypopnea events associated with > or = 3% O2 desaturation): < 15/hour total sleep time, > or = 15/hour total sleep time] and sleep efficiency (SEff: < 85% and > or = 85%). The RDI and sleep data from initial and repeated polysomnography were compared. SETTING: NA. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of 99 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study who agreed to have a repeat polysomnogram within 4 months of their original study. INTERVENTIONS: NA. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Acceptable repeat polysomnograms were obtained in 91 subjects (mean study interval: 77 +/- 18 [sd] days; range: 31-112 days). There was no significant bias in RDI between study nights using several different RDI definitions including RDI3% and RDI4% (apnea or hypopnea events associated with > or = 4% O2 desaturation). Variability between studies estimated using intraclass correlations (ICC) ranged from 0.77 to 0.81. For subjects with a RDI3% < 15, variability increased as a function of increasing RDI, but for those with a RDI3% > or = 15, variability was constant. Body mass index, SEff, gender, or age did not directly predict RDI variability. Using RDI4% cutpoints of < or = 5, < or = 10 and < or = 15 events per hour of sleep demonstrated that 79.1%, 85.7%, and 87.9% of subjects, respectively, had the same classification of SDB status on both nights of study. There also was no significant bias in sleep staging, sleep efficiency, or arousal index between studies. However, variability was greater with ICC values ranging from 0.37 (% time in REM) to 0.76 (arousal index). CONCLUSION: In the Sleep Heart Health Study, accurate estimates of the severity of sleep-disordered breathing and the quality of sleep were obtained from a single night of unattended nonlaboratory polysomnography. These findings may be applicable to other large epidemiologic studies provided that similar recording techniques and quality-assurance procedures are followed.

Boland LL, Shahar E, Iber C, Knopman DS, Kuo TF, Nieto FJ, Anonymous00069. · Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA. · J Sleep Res. · Pubmed #12220323 No free full text.

Abstract: Epidemiologic literature suggests that persons with clinically diagnosed sleep apnoea frequently have impaired cognitive function, but whether milder degrees of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are associated with cognitive dysfunction in the general population is largely unknown. Approximately 1700 subjects free of clinically diagnosed SDB underwent at-home polysomnography (PSG) as part of the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) and completed three cognitive function tests within 1-2 years of their PSG: the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWR), the WAIS-R Digit Symbol Subtest (DSS), and the Word Fluency test (WF). A respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was calculated as the number of apnoeas and hypopnoeas per hour of sleep. After adjustment for age, education, occupation, field centre, diabetes, hypertension, body-mass index, use of CNS medications, and alcohol drinking status, there was no consistent association between the RDI and any of the three cognitive function measures. There was no evidence of a dose-response relation between the RDI and cognitive function scores and the adjusted mean scores by quartiles of RDI never differed from one another by more than 5% for any of the tests. In this sample of free-living individuals with mostly mild to moderate levels of SDB, the degree of SDB appeared to be unrelated to three measures of cognitive performance.

Kapur V, Strohl KP, Redline S, Iber C, O'Connor G, Nieto J. · Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. · Sleep Breath. · Pubmed #12075479 No free full text.

Abstract: We hypothesize that clinical recognition rates for obstructive sleep apnea-hypoapnea syndrome (OSAHS) are influenced by comorbidity and demographic factors. Data on medical disorders, symptoms of sleep disorders, and cardiovascular risk factors gathered from 15,699 individuals in the Sleep Heart Health Study were compared. Participants were classified into three groups: those with a self-reported physician diagnosis of OSAHS, those with self-reported physician-diagnosed and -treated OSAHS, and those reporting both frequent snoring and daytime sleepiness (two-symptom group). Among all participants, 4.1% reported two symptoms (range across sites: 1.55 to 7.23%), whereas 1.6% reported a physician diagnosis of OSAHS (range: 0.66 to 2.88%) and 0.6% reported physician diagnosis and treatment (range: 0.11 to 0.88%). Recognized OSAHS groups were similar to the two-symptom group in age, having a sleeping partner, measured blood pressure, total cholesterol, and race. In a logistic model that included age along with characteristics found to vary significantly among the three groups (gender, body mass index [BMI], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, hypertension), only male gender and BMI were increased in those with physician-diagnosed and -treated OSAHS. We conclude that disparities (especially in women and in those with lower BMI) exist between current recognition rates for OSAHS and the estimated prevalence by symptom report across the United States.

Meoli AL, Casey KR, Clark RW, Coleman JA, Fayle RW, Troell RJ, Iber C, Anonymous00002. · St. John's Regional Medical Center, Joplin, MO, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #11403531 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Kapur VK, Rapoport DM, Sanders MH, Enright P, Hill J, Iber C, Romaniuk J. · Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. · Sleep. · Pubmed #10947036 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate study failure and sensor loss in unattended home polysomnography and their relationship to age, gender, obesity, and severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of data gathered prospectively for the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS). SETTING: Unattended polysomnography was performed in participants' homes by the staff of the sites that are involved in SHHS. PARTICIPANTS: 6,802 individuals who met the inclusion criteria (age >40 years, no history of treatment of sleep apnea, no tracheostomy, no current home oxygen therapy) for SHHS. RESULTS: A total of 6802 participants had 7151 studies performed. 6161 of 6802 initial studies (90.6%) were acceptable. Obesity was associated with a decreased likelihood of a successful initial study. After one or more attempts, 6440 participants (94.7%) had studies that were judged as acceptable. The mean duration of scorable signals for specific channels ranged from 5.7 to 6.8 hours. The magnitudes of the effects of age, gender, BMI, and RDI on specific signal durations were not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Unattended home PSG as performed for SHHS was usually successful. Participant characteristics had very weak associations with duration of scorable signal. This study suggests that unattended home PSG, when performed with proper protocols and quality controls, has reasonable success rates and signal quality for the evaluation of SDB in clinical and research settings.

Redline S, Kapur VK, Sanders MH, Quan SF, Gottlieb DJ, Rapoport DM, Bonekat WH, Smith PL, Kiley JP, Iber C. · Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-6003, USA. · Am J Respir Crit Care Med. · Pubmed #10673173 links to  free full text

Abstract: Varying approaches to measuring the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) may lead to discrepant estimates of the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). In this study, we assessed the impact of varying the use of corroborative data (presence and degree of desaturation and/or arousal) to identify hypopneas and apneas. The relationships among 10 RDIs defined by various definitions of apneas and hypopneas were assessed in 5,046 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) who underwent overnight unattended 12-channel polysomnography (PSG). The magnitude of the median RDI varied 10-fold (i.e., 29.3 when the RDI was based on events identified on the basis of flow or volume amplitude criteria alone to 2.0 for an RDI that required an associated 5% desaturation with events). The correlation between RDIs based on different definitions ranged from 0.99 to 0.68. The highest correlations were among RDIs that required apneas and hypopneas to be associated with some level of desaturation. Lower correlations were observed between RDIs that required desaturation as compared with RDIs defined on the basis of amplitude criteria alone or associated arousal. These data suggest that different approaches for measuring the RDI may contribute to substantial variability in identification and classification of the disorder.

Gottlieb DJ, Whitney CW, Bonekat WH, Iber C, James GD, Lebowitz M, Nieto FJ, Rosenberg CE. · Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118-2394, USA. · Am J Respir Crit Care Med. · Pubmed #9927364 links to  free full text

Abstract: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is a well recognized cause of excessive sleepiness; however, the relation of sleepiness to mild sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), which affects as much as half the adult population, is uncertain. In order to explore this relation, we conducted a cross-sectional cohort study of community-dwelling adults participating in the Sleep Heart Health Study, a longitudinal study of the cardiovascular consequences of SDB. The study sample comprises 886 men and 938 women, with a mean age of 65 (SD 11) yr. Sleepiness was quantified using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Sleep-disordered breathing was quantified by the respiratory disturbance index (RDI), defined as the number of apneas plus hypopneas per hour of sleep, measured during in-home polysomnography. When RDI was categorized into four groups (< 5, 5 to < 15, 15 to < 30, >/= 30), a significantly progressive increase in mean ESS score was seen across all four levels of SDB, from 7.2 (4.3) in subjects with RDI < 5 to 9.3 (4.9) in subjects with RDI >/= 30 (p < 0.001). There was no significant modification of this effect by age, sex, body mass index, or evidence of chronic restriction of sleep time or periodic limb movement disorder. The percentage of subjects with excessive sleepiness, defined as an ESS score >/= 11, increased from 21% in subjects with RDI < 5 to 35% in those with RDI >/= 30 (p < 0. 001). We conclude that SDB is associated with excess sleepiness in community-dwelling, middle-aged and older adults, not limited to those with clinically apparent sleep apnea.