Psoriasis: Wendling D

Pham T, Fautrel B, Dernis E, Goupille P, Guillemin F, Le Loët X, Ravaud P, Claudepierre P, Miceli-Richard C, de Bandt M, Breban M, Maillefert JF, Masson C, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Wendling D, Mariette X, Combe B, Anonymous00063. · Rheumatology Department, la Conception Teaching Hospital, 147 boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18065252 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To update French Society for Rheumatology guidelines regarding the use of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) antagonists for treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: We used the method recommended by Shekelle et al. to update the original recommendations: a limited group of experts selected the items that required updating, the relevant literature was critically appraised, and the experts developed new wording for the recommendations, which was then subjected to internal and external validation. As with the original recommendations, three topics were addressed, namely, indications of TNFalpha antagonist therapy, treatment initiation, and treatment adjustment and follow-up. RESULTS: Four criteria should be used to evaluate the indication of TNFalpha antagonist therapy. First, the patient must have a definitive diagnosis of AS or PsA. Thus, patients with AS must meet modified New York criteria or exhibit characteristic involvement of the sacroiliac joints, spine, or peripheral sites documented by radiographs or computed tomography (structural damage) or by magnetic resonance imaging (inflammation). Patients with PsA must meet validated criteria such as the Moll and Wright or CASPAR criteria. The second criterion is active disease for more than 1month, with a BASDAI >or=4 in patients with predominantly axial disease or a tender/swollen joint count >or=3, and with a physician assessment of disease activity of >or=4/10. The third criterion is failure of at least three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with axial disease or of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy (methotrexate, salazopyrine, or leflunomide) in patients with peripheral disease. Fourth, the patient must be free of contraindications to TNFalpha antagonist therapy. Four recommendations pertain to the initiation of TNFalpha antagonist therapy: a workup should be performed prior to treatment initiation; there is no evidence that one TNFalpha antagonist is more effective than the others, so decisions about drug selection should be shared with the patient and guided by available safety data and the patient's profile; there is no proof that greater effectiveness can be achieved by routinely combining a conventional DMARD; and patients should receive regular standardized follow-up. The last four recommendations deal with adjusting TNFalpha antagonist therapy: the treatment objective is a 2-point or greater improvement in the BASDAI in patients with axial disease and a 30% or greater improvement in the tender/swollen joint counts in patients with peripheral disease; there is no evidence to support the introduction of DMARD therapy in non-responders, who can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist or, when on infliximab, given higher dosages or more closely spaced injections; patients who fail to tolerate one TNFalpha antagonist can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist if allowed by the nature of the adverse event; and when a remission is achieved, reduction or discontinuation of concomitant anti-inflammatory therapy should be considered, followed in the event of a prolonged remission by a reduction in the dosage of the TNFalpha antagonist.

Pham T, Guillemin F, Claudepierre P, Luc M, Miceli-Richard C, Fautrel B, de Bandt M, Breban M, Goupille P, Maillefert JF, Masson C, Saraux A, Schaeverbeke T, Wendling D, Mariette X, Combe B, Anonymous00190, Anonymous00191. · Service de Rhumatologie, CHU de la Conception, 147, bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #16843030 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for TNFalpha antagonist therapy in patients with spondyloarthropathies. METHODS: The Delphi consensus procedure was used to select questions, to which evidence-based answers were sought in the literature. Expert opinion was used when needed to estimate the risks and benefits of TNFalpha antagonists. TNFalpha antagonists exert potent antiinflammatory effects but fail to provide a definitive cure. RESULTS: Recommendations were developed for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The following criteria for TNFalpha antagonist therapy were selected: definitive diagnosis of AS or PsA, active disease for at least 4 consecutive weeks documented during two physician visits, overall physician's assessment of disease activity>/=4/10 and BASDAI>/=4/10 in axial disease or at least three tender and swollen joints in peripheral disease, failure to respond adequately to at least three nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs given in optimal dosages for at least 3 months in axial disease or at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine) for at least 4 months, with local glucocorticoid injections if appropriate, in peripheral disease. Effectiveness and safety should be evaluated by a rheumatologist. The frequency of monitoring depends on the drug. Lack of effectiveness should be defined as inadequate improvement after 6-12 weeks, with a less than two-point decrease in the BASDAI in axial disease or a less than 30% decrease in the tender and swollen joint counts in peripheral disease. CONCLUSION: These clinical practice recommendations should help rheumatologists in their everyday decisions regarding the use of TNFalpha antagonist therapy in patients with AS or PsA.

Wendling D. · No affiliation provided · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18815066 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Claudepierre P, Wendling D, Cohen JD. · Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil. · Presse Med. · Pubmed #16614610 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory and possibly destructive form of arthritis. As in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, the use of biological therapy in psoriatic arthritis is a therapeutic revolution: both articular and cutaneous efficacy have been shown, and some improvement is visible on radiography. The benefit-risk ratio will improve when we learn to identify more accurately the patients likely to benefit from these treatments.

Wendling D, Balblanc JC, Briançon D, Brousse A, Lohse A, Deprez P, Humbert P, Aubin F. · Rheumatology Department, CHU Jean Minjoz, Minjoz Teaching Hospital, Franche-Comté University, Boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon Cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #18329935 No free full text.

Abstract: The widespread use of TNFalpha antagonists in recent years has led to the recognition of paradoxical adverse effects, defined as the onset or exacerbation of disorders that are usually improved by TNFalpha antagonists. Cutaneous psoriasis is an example, of which several cases have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To identify cases of psoriasis onset or exacerbation during TNFalpha antagonist therapy and to look for potential predictive factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of psoriasis onset or exacerbation during TNFalpha antagonist therapy. For each case we recorded the following data: age, sex, underlying disease, nature of the TNFalpha antagonist, effectiveness in improving the underlying disease, history of psoriasis in the patient or family, time to psoriasis development, type of psoriasis (confirmed by an experienced dermatologist), concomitant treatments, whether the TNFalpha antagonist was stopped or continued, and the outcome of the psoriasis. These data were compared to those in the literature. RESULTS: We identified 12 patients, six men and six women, with a mean age of 45.5 years. The TNFalpha antagonist was adalimumab in four patients, etanercept in six patients, and infliximab in two patients. The underlying disease was ankylosing spondylitis in six cases, rheumatoid arthritis in four, and psoriatic arthritis in two. Mean time from treatment initiation to psoriasis was 4.1 months (range, 1-15 months). A previous history of psoriasis in the patient was noted in six cases, including four of the six patients taking etanercept. TNFalpha antagonist therapy was effective on the underlying disease in 11 of the 12 patients. The drug was discontinued in five patients, of whom four experienced resolution of their psoriasis. In the remaining seven patients, the drug was continued and the skin lesions remained unchanged. Most of the patients had psoriasis vulgaris (plaque psoriasis); palmoplantar pustulosis was a feature in five patients. DISCUSSION: Over 40 cases of psoriasis onset or exacerbation during TNFalpha antagonist therapy have been reported in the literature. The prevalence of this adverse effect has been estimated at 1.5-5% of patients taking TNFalpha antagonists. The findings from our case series are consistent with data in the literature. Psoriasis is a class effect that has been reported with all the currently available TNFalpha antagonists. The skin lesions develop within the first few months of therapy. Patients with a wide range of underlying diseases can be affected. Palmoplantar pustulosis is a common feature. A previous history of psoriasis seems more common in patients who experience psoriasis onset or exacerbation during etanercept therapy (four of six patients in our study and 55% in the literature); thus, previous psoriasis may be a risk factor for psoriasis exacerbation during etanercept therapy.

Wendling D, Léaustic M, Toussirot E, Prati C. · Department of Rheumatology, University of Franche-Comté, University Teaching Hospital Minjoz, 25030 Besançon, France. · Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18204874 No free full text.

Abstract: We report a case of a woman, born in 1943, with definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS) fulfilling the revised New York criteria for AS, although human leukocyte antigen B 27 negative. After 20 years of evolution, she developed a febrile skin disease corresponding to Sweet's syndrome, confirmed by skin biopsy. No other underlying condition was found. The relationship between AS and Sweet's syndrome is discussed; only one other case is reported in the literature. Skin involvement in AS is dominated by psoriasis-type lesions. The occurrence of Sweet's syndrome is seldom reported in this condition.