Psoriasis: Prinz J

Nast A, Kopp IB, Augustin M, Banditt KB, Boehncke WH, Follmann M, Friedrich M, Huber M, Kahl C, Klaus J, Koza J, Kreiselmaier I, Mohr J, Mrowietz U, Ockenfels HM, Orzechowski HD, Prinz J, Reich K, Rosenbach T, Rosumeck S, Schlaeger M, Schmid-Ott G, Sebastian M, Streit V, Weberschock T, Rzany B, Anonymous00272, Anonymous00273. · Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. · Pubmed #17615051 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1 to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed lack of satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. These resulting Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaquetype psoriasis in adults. The Guidelines include evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy of all currently available therapeutic options in Germany. In addition, they offer detailed information on how best to administer the various treatments and give information on contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions as well as estimates of practicability and cost. The Guidelines were developed following the recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft wissenschaftlicher medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). The therapeutic recommendations were developed by an expert group and finalized during interdisciplinary consensus conferences.

Nast A, Kopp I, Augustin M, Banditt KB, Boehncke WH, Follmann M, Friedrich M, Huber M, Kahl C, Klaus J, Koza J, Kreiselmaier I, Mohr J, Mrowietz U, Ockenfels HM, Orzechowski HD, Prinz J, Reich K, Rosenbach T, Rosumeck S, Schlaeger M, Schmid-Ott G, Sebastian M, Streit V, Weberschock T, Rzany B. · Division of Evidence Based Medicine, Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie, Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, Berlin, Germany. · Arch Dermatol Res. · Pubmed #17497162 links to  free full text

Abstract: Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and chronic inflammatory skin disease which has the potential to significantly reduce the quality of life in severely affected patients. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1.5 to 2%. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed insufficient satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of medication non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) have initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. The guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults. The short version of the guidelines reported here consist of a series of therapeutic recommendations that are based on a systematic literature search and subsequent discussion with experts in the field; they have been approved by a team of dermatology experts. In addition to the therapeutic recommendations provided in this short version, the full version of the guidelines includes information on contraindications, adverse events, drug interactions, practicality, and costs as well as detailed information on how best to apply the treatments described (for full version, please see Nast et al., JDDG, Suppl 2:S1-S126, 2006; or http://www.psoriasis-leitlinie.de ).

Nast A, Kopp IB, Augustin M, Banditt KB, Boehncke WH, Follmann M, Friedrich M, Huber M, Kahl C, Klaus J, Koza J, Kreiselmaier I, Mohr J, Mrowietz U, Ockenfels HM, Orzechowski HD, Prinz J, Reich K, Rosenbach T, Rosumeck S, Schlaeger M, Schmid-Ott G, Sebastian M, Streit V, Weberschock T, Rzany B, Anonymous00487. · Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. · Pubmed #17187649 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Boehncke WH, Prinz J, Gottlieb AB. · Department of Dermatology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16724367 No free full text.

Abstract: Alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab are currently approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and phase 3 trials for adalimumab are ongoing. The high level of evidence from large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies for each of these biologics allows high-grade recommendations and helps define uncertainties, one of which is longterm safety. For tumor necrosis factor-a blocking agents, safety profiles are available from clinical experience in other indications. In general, biologics are safe and effective in the treatment of psoriasis, with potential to address unmet medical needs. Their distinct profiles allow dermatologists to match the biologic agent to individual characteristics of patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. In this evidence-based review of the literature, we assess the effects on psoriasis of induction therapy with 5 biologics and provide preliminary treatment guidelines.

Sterry W, Barker J, Boehncke WH, Bos JD, Chimenti S, Christophers E, De La Brassinne M, Ferrandiz C, Griffiths C, Katsambas A, Kragballe K, Lynde C, Menter A, Ortonne JP, Papp K, Prinz J, Rzany B, Ronnevig J, Saurat JH, Stahle M, Stengel FM, Van De Kerkhof P, Voorhees J. · Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany. · Br J Dermatol. · Pubmed #15265063 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder that usually requires long-term treatment for control. Approximately 25% of patients have moderate to severe disease and require phototherapy, systemic therapy or both. Despite the availability of numerous therapeutic options, the long-term management of psoriasis can be complicated by treatment-related limitations. With advances in molecular research and technology, several biological therapies are in various stages of development and approval for psoriasis. Biological therapies are designed to modulate key steps in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Collectively, biologicals have been evaluated in thousands of patients with psoriasis and have demonstrated significant benefit with favourable safety and tolerability profiles. The limitations of current psoriasis therapies, the value of biological therapies for psoriasis, and guidance regarding the incorporation of biological therapies into clinical practice are discussed.

Papp KA, Tyring S, Lahfa M, Prinz J, Griffiths CE, Nakanishi AM, Zitnik R, van de Kerkhof PC, Melvin L, Anonymous00039. · Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada. · Br J Dermatol. · Pubmed #15948997 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In previous studies, etanercept significantly improved plaque psoriasis and was well tolerated. OBJECTIVES: To examine further the efficacy and safety of etanercept and to assess maintenance of treatment effect after dose reduction of etanercept. METHODS: In this multicentre 24-week study in the U.S.A., Canada and Western Europe, patients were at least 18 years old; had active, clinically stable plaque psoriasis involving at least 10% of body surface area; had a minimum Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 10 at screening; and had received or were a candidate to receive systemic psoriasis therapy or phototherapy. During the first 12 weeks of the study, patients were randomly assigned to receive by subcutaneous injection etanercept twice weekly (BIW) at a dose of 50 mg or 25 mg, or placebo BIW in a double-blind fashion. During the second 12 weeks, all patients received etanercept 25 mg BIW. The primary endpoint was a 75% or greater improvement from baseline in PASI (PASI 75) at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-three subjects were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug. At week 12, a PASI 75 was achieved by 49% of patients in the etanercept 50 mg BIW group, 34% in the 25 mg BIW group, and 3% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001 for each etanercept group compared with placebo). At week 24 (after 12 weeks of open-label 25 mg etanercept BIW), a PASI 75 was achieved by 54% of patients whose dose was reduced from 50 mg BIW to 25 mg BIW, by 45% of patients in the continuous 25 mg BIW group, and by 28% in the group that received placebo followed by etanercept 25 mg BIW. Etanercept was well tolerated throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept provided clinically meaningful benefit to patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, with no apparent decrease in efficacy after dose reduction.

Schöffski O, Augustin M, Prinz J, Rauner K, Schubert E, Sohn S, Reich K. · University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. · Pubmed #17338796 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study evaluated costs, disease severity and health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a 'psoriasis area and severity index' (PASI) > 12 and/or a body surface area (BSA) > 10 were enrolled in dermatological practices and hospital outpatient departments (n = 184) and the total costs of illness generated during the last 12 months were retrospectively calculated. QoL was assessed using the SF-36 and the DLQI. Participants were stratified into three subgroups according to the treatment received during the 1 year documentation period; a) patients without and b) patients with phototherapy or standard systemic therapy, and c) patients who had failed, were intolerant or had contraindications to at least two standard systemic therapies. The study was performed before biologics became available for the treatment of psoriasis in Germany. RESULTS: Included patients had severe skin symptoms (mean PASI 18.2) and a highly impaired QoL (mean DLQI 10.6). Total annual costs amounted to euro 6,709. Patients belonging to subgroup C had the most severe skin symptoms (mean PASI 22.2), the lowest QoL (mean DLQI 12.6), the highest hospitalization rate and largest loss of productivity.These patients produced the highest total costs of 8.831 euro/y. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who cannot (or can no longer) be adequately managed with standard treatments are characterized by high disease activity, high costs and reduced QoL. Improved treatment options particularly for these patients are medically necessary and appear economically sensible.

Sohn S, Schoeffski O, Prinz J, Reich K, Schubert E, Waldorf K, Augustin M. · Chair for Health Management, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Lange Gasse 20, DE-90403 Nuremberg, Germany. · Dermatology. · Pubmed #16484820 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is little information concerning the costs of psoriasis and patients' quality of life (QoL) in Germany. OBJECTIVE: To obtain data on the annual costs and QoL(to follow in a further publication) of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Between October 2003 and February 2004, six office-based dermatologists and eight dermatology outpatient departments retrospectively documented cost-of-illness data from a societal cost perspective in 184 patients over a 12-month period. Patients were stratified into three subgroups according to their treatment scheme. RESULTS: Mean total costs amounted to euro 6,709 per patient and year. The mean PASI score was 18.2 and PBSA 28.9%. Annual costs were highest with euro 8,831 in high-need patients. They also showed the highest PASI score (22.2). CONCLUSION: Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis is associated with tremendous costs, particularly in patients not adequately controlled by conventional therapies, while the outcomes of patients were unsatisfactory.

Ghoreschi K, Thomas P, Breit S, Dugas M, Mailhammer R, van Eden W, van der Zee R, Biedermann T, Prinz J, Mack M, Mrowietz U, Christophers E, Schlöndorff D, Plewig G, Sander CA, Röcken M. · Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany. · Nat Med. · Pubmed #12461524 No free full text.

Abstract: Selective skewing of autoreactive interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-producing T helper cells (Th1) toward an interleukin-4 (IL-4)-producing (Th2) phenotype can in experimental animals alleviate autoimmune disease without inducing general immunosuppression. In a prospective dose escalation study, we assessed treatment with human IL-4 (rhuIL-4) in 20 patients with severe psoriasis. The therapy was well tolerated, and within six weeks all patients showed decreased clinical scores and 15 improved more than 68%. Stable reduction of clinical scores was significantly better at 0.2-0.5 microg rhuIL-4 than at < or =0.1 microg rhuIL-4 (P = 0.009). In psoriatic lesions, treatment with 0.2-0.5 microg/kg rhuIL-4 reduced the concentrations of IL-8 and IL-19, two cytokines directly involved in psoriasis; the number of chemokine receptor CCR5+ Th1 cells; and the IFN-gamma/IL-4 ratio. In the circulation, 0.2-0.5 microg/kg rhuIL-4 increased the number of IL-4+CD4+ T cells two- to three-fold. Thus, IL-4 therapy can induce Th2 differentiation in human CD4+ T cells and has promise as a potential treatment for psoriasis, a prototypic Th1-associated autoimmune disease.