Psoriasis: Leeb BF

Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JW, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Hauselmann HJ, Kaklamanis P, Kloppenburg M, Lohmander LS, Maheu E, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Watt I, Zimmermann-Gorska I, Anonymous00031. · Dr W Zhang, Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18250111 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The multidisciplinary guideline development group, representing 15 European countries, generated 10 key propositions regarding diagnosis using a Delphi consensus approach. For each recommendation, research evidence was searched for systematically. Whenever possible, the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated; relative risk and odds ratios were estimated for risk factors for hand OA. Quality of evidence was categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) hierarchy, and strength of recommendation was assessed by the EULAR visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Diagnostic topics included clinical manifestations, radiographic features, subgroups, differential diagnosis, laboratory tests, risk factors and comorbidities. The sensitivity, specificity and LR varied between tests depending upon the cut-off level, gold standard and controls. Overall, no single test could be used to define hand OA on its own (LR <10) but a composite of the tests greatly increased the chance of the diagnosis. The probability of a subject having hand OA was 20% when Heberden nodes alone were present, but this increased to 88% when in addition the subject was over 40 years old, had a family history of nodes and had joint space narrowing in any finger joint. CONCLUSION: Ten key recommendations for diagnosis of hand OA were developed using research evidence and expert consensus. Diagnosis of hand OA should be based on assessment of a composite of features.

Leeb BF, Andel I, Sautner J, Fassl C, Nothnagl T, Rintelen B. · HUMANIS Klinikum Lower Austria, Lower Austrian Center for Rheumatology, Karl Landsteiner-Institute for Clinical Rheumatology, Stockerau, Austria. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17330303 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the factorial structure of the Disease Activity Score including a 28-joint count (DAS28) if applied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: DAS28 values from 85 consecutive PsA outpatients and 2 RA patient cohorts comprising 85 patients each were compared. The first RA cohort (RA1) consisted of age- and sex-matched patients seen during the same period as the patients with PsA. The first 85 RA outpatients from September 2003 were included in the second cohort (RA2). Item weighting, factor loading, and internal consistency were assessed by factor analysis, principal component analysis, and calculation of Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD DAS28 scores of patients in the PsA, RA1, and RA2 cohorts were 3.2 +/- 1.31, 3.21 +/- 1.45, and 3.79 +/- 1.44, respectively. A significant difference between the PsA and RA2 cohorts was found for DAS28 (P = 0.0063), swollen joint count (P = 0.007), and patient's global assessment (P < 0.001), but not for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Internal consistency of the DAS28 in patients with PsA was considerably lower, item weighting showed remarkable differences, and factor analysis revealed that the DAS28 constitutes a bidimensional instrument in patients with PsA, whereas in both RA cohorts it appeared to be monodimensional. CONCLUSION: With respect to its statistical properties, the DAS28 proved to be considerably different in PsA compared with RA. Therefore its application for disease activity assessment in patients with PsA cannot be recommended without a formal validation procedure.