Psoriasis: Krueger GG

Kimball AB, Gladman D, Gelfand JM, Gordon K, Horn EJ, Korman NJ, Korver G, Krueger GG, Strober BE, Lebwohl MG, Anonymous00020. · Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #18313171 No free full text.

Abstract: There have been several articles and reports in recent months about comorbidities and risks that affect psoriasis patients in addition to their underlying disease. This piece reviews the current literature and begins to address what should be done with this new information by updating the clinician about what health screening tests, preventative exams, and referrals should be considered in this population.

Duffin KC, Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132-2409, USA. · J Invest Dermatol. · Pubmed #18830267 No free full text.

Abstract: Genetic variants have long been suspected to be important in psoriasis. Recent work has suggested that HLA-Cw6 on chromosome 6 is the risk variant in the PSORS1 [MIM 177900] susceptibility locus that confers the greatest risk for early onset of psoriasis. Although numerous minor susceptibility loci have been identified by linkage analysis, few biologically relevant candidates have been discovered within these intervals. Recent large-scale genome-wide association studies have yielded new candidates in genes encoding cytokines with functional relevance to psoriasis. Polymorphisms within the genes encoding the IL-12 p40 subunit, IL12B, and one of the IL-23 receptor subunits, IL23R, have been replicated in US and European populations and overlap with risk of Crohn's disease. Polymorphisms within the gene encoding IL-13, a Th2 cytokine, also confer risk for psoriasis. Variants of the gene IL15 encoding IL-15 have been identified that associate with psoriasis in a Chinese population. These discoveries pose the challenge of elucidating the role of common genetic variants in susceptibility to and manifestations of psoriasis.

Duffin KC, Chandran V, Gladman DD, Krueger GG, Elder JT, Rahman P. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18609743 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) both have substantive genetic determinants. Numerous candidate regions and genes have now been replicated in disease susceptibility, and to a lesser extent in disease expression, in both disease entities. Intensive efforts are now under way or are being planned to perform genome-wide association scans (GWAS) in psoriasis and PsA. A major determinant of success for GWAS is likely to be accumulation of multiple large well-phenotyped cohorts, sophisticated data management, and verification of the findings. At the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), members of the GRAPPA genetics committee presented a discussion of the genetics of psoriasis and PsA, including future trends. This article is a summary of that presentation and a review of the literature.

Feldman SR, Krueger GG. · Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1071, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15708941 links to  free full text

Abstract: In clinical practice, broad global assessments of psoriasis disease activity and its effect on patients' quality of life are used to assess the severity of patients' disease and their response to treatment. In clinical trials, more objective, validated instruments are required. Several such instruments have been developed and continue to be developed to provide an assessment of the severity of the skin lesions. Because a lesion's impact on patients' lives varies widely among patients, there has been growing recognition of the need to measure the quality of life impact of the disease along with the severity of the lesions.

Langley RG, Krueger GG, Griffiths CE. · Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 1V6. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15708928 links to  free full text

Abstract: Psoriasis is a common chronic, recurrent, immune mediated disease of the skin and joints. It can have a significant negative impact on the physical, emotional, and, psychosocial wellbeing of affected patients. Psoriasis is found worldwide but the prevalence varies among different ethnic groups. It has a strong genetic component but environmental factors such as infections can play an important role in the presentation of disease. There are several clinical cutaneous manifestations of psoriasis but most commonly the disease presents as chronic, symmetrical, erythematous, scaling papules and plaques. The epidemiology, clinical features, and impact on quality of life of psoriasis are reviewed.

Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. · J Cutan Med Surg. · Pubmed #15668750 No free full text.

Abstract: The duration of response to treatment with alefacept has been assessed in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis who responded to alefacept therapy in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies. In a phase 2 trial, duration of response was based on time to retreatment with alefacept. In two phase 3 studies, the more objective measure of maintenance of a > or =50% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) was used. Two patient subsets were analyzed: (1) those who achieved a PASI 75 at any time during the trials and (2) those who achieved a Physician Global Assessment of "clear" or "almost clear" at any time during the trials. Regardless of the criterion used or the route of alefacept administration (intravenous or intramuscular), the median duration of response to alefacept therapy ranged from 7 to 10 months across the three studies. Alefacept is a remittive therapy for psoriasis.

Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, 4B454 School Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2409, USA. · Dermatol Clin. · Pubmed #15450337 No free full text.

Abstract: Alefacept is a novel biologic agent that selectively targets the memory T-cell population involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Alefacept, administered by intramuscular (IM)or intravenous (IV) bolus injection, is safe and efficacious and improves quality of life ina broad spectrum of psoriasis patients. Disease remissions last approximately 7 months in responders following either IM or IV administration without further treatment.In clinical studies, treatment of patients with psoriasis with up to six courses of alefacept demonstrates the following: no evidence of an increased risk for infection or malignancy;no correlation between rates of infection, malignancy, and circulating CD4+ /CD8+ T-cell counts; and low immunogenicity. A preliminary study evaluating the use of alefacept for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis parallels the psoriasis experience and supports the premise of targeting T cells as an intervention for this disease. Research continues to examine the use of alefacept in combination with other systemic psoriasis therapies and phototherapy and its potential as a treatment for other T-cell-mediated diseases, such as psoriatic arthritis, alopecia areata, and rheumatoid arthritis.

Callen JP, Krueger GG, Lebwohl M, McBurney EI, Mease P, Menter A, Paller AS, Pariser DM, Weinblatt M, Zimmerman G, Anonymous00189. · No affiliation provided · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #14576671 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Krueger GG, Callis KP. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 4B454 School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2409, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #12894131 No free full text.

Abstract: Activated memory T cells, expressing CD2, are key components in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Alefacept binds to CD2, blocks co-stimulatory signaling, and selectively induces apoptosis of pathogenic T cells. Our objective is to present safety and efficacy results which lead to the new drug application (NDA) of alefacept for the treatment of psoriasis. We reviewed the key phase II and III trials in over 1300 patients and found that during treatment and follow-up of patients receiving 12 weekly intramuscular or intravenous injections of alefacept, about 1/3 will achieve a reduction in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) of > or =75% and nearly 2/3 a reduction in PASI of > or =50%. Patients who achieved a > or =75% reduction from baseline PASI during or after a single course maintained a > or =50% reduction in PASI for a median duration of >7 months. Among patients who received 2 courses of alefacept, 40% and 71% of patients achieved a > or =75% and > or =50% reduction in PASI, respectively and duration of effect was prolonged. Adverse events in the placebo and active treatment arms did not differ. We conclude that alefacept significantly improves psoriasis and produces durable clinical improvement with a very favorable safety profile.

Krueger GG. · No affiliation provided · Am J Manag Care. · Pubmed #11990861 links to  free full text

Abstract: The past 5 years have seen major advances in understanding the immunology and molecular biology of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), especially the impact of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), which has produced striking, long-term benefits in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because PsA is not the same disease as RA, the ability to distinguish between them is important to physicians in managing patients who have clinical features consistent with an arthropathy. The development of TNF inhibitors directed specifically at the mechanisms of skin and joint inflammation offers hope to patients who suffer from the debilitating effects of PsA.

Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 50 N. Medical Drive, Suite 4B 454, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. · Expert Opin Biol Ther. · Pubmed #11955280 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease in which memory-effector (CD45RO+), skin-homing T cells play a key role in driving the disease process. Available therapies are often poorly tolerated, none are curative and most only suppress disease symptoms without attacking the underlying cause of the illness. Alefacept (Ameviv, Biogen, Inc.) is a fully human lymphocyte function associated antigen-3/immunoglobulin G1 fusion protein that targets memory-effector T cells by binding CD2 on the T cell and Fc phi receptor III IgG receptors on accessory cells, thereby preventing T cell activation and proliferation and causing selective T cell apoptosis. To date, alefacept has been studied in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis and in a pilot study of psoriatic arthritis. In chronic plaque psoriasis, alefacept produced significant and sustained improvements in psoriasis symptoms. There was no evidence of disease rebound or worsening of psoriasis following treatment cessation. Multiple courses provided consistent efficacy, with a trend for more rapid and greater clinical improvement in subsequent courses. Alefacept reduced circulating CD4+ and CD8+ memory-effector T cells, with relatively no change in naive (CD45RA+) T cells or B cells. Alefacept also reduced IFN-phi-secreting Tcells in lesional biopsies of psoriatic skin. These reductions all correlated with the observed clinical effect. Alefacept was well-tolerated throughout these studies, with a side effect profile similar to placebo. There was no evidence of generalised immunosuppression or increased risk of infection or malignancy. Alefacept did not alter the primary or acquired immune response in psoriatic patients. Clinical data obtained to date support the use of alefacept as a safe and remittive therapy for psoriasis.

Kavanaugh A, McInnes I, Mease P, Krueger GG, Gladman D, Gomez-Reino J, Papp K, Zrubek J, Mudivarthy S, Mack M, Visvanathan S, Beutler A. · University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0943, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19333944 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Adult patients with PsA who had at least 3 swollen and 3 tender joints and active psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 113), golimumab 50 mg (n = 146), or golimumab 100 mg (n = 146) every 4 weeks through week 20. Efficacy assessments through week 24 included the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in patients in whom at least 3% of the body surface area was affected by psoriasis at baseline, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), the physician's global assessment of psoriatic nail disease, and enthesitis (using the PsA-modified Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score [MASES] index). RESULTS: At week 14, 48% of all patients receiving golimumab, 51% of patients receiving golimumab 50 mg, and 45% of patients receiving golimumab 100 mg achieved an ACR20 response (the primary end point), compared with 9% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Among the 74% of patients in whom at least 3% of the body surface area was affected by psoriasis at baseline, 40% of those in the golimumab 50 mg group and 58% of those in the golimumab 100 mg group had at least 75% improvement in the PASI at week 14 (major secondary end point), compared with 3% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001 for both doses). Significant improvement was observed for other major secondary end points (the HAQ and the SF-36), the NAPSI, the physician's global assessment of psoriatric nail disease, and the PsA-modified MASES index in each golimumab group compared with placebo. This efficacy was maintained through week 24. Golimumab was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment with golimumab at doses of 50 mg and 100 mg significantly improved active PsA and associated skin and nail psoriasis through week 24.

Krueger GG, Gottlieb AB, Sterry W, Korman N, Van De Kerkhof P. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2409, USA. · J Dermatolog Treat. · Pubmed #18569270 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiple courses of alefacept in combination with traditional psoriasis therapy for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis (CPP). METHODS: Patients with CPP requiring systemic therapy were eligible for this study. Patients received up to three courses of intramuscular alefacept 15 mg once weekly for 12 weeks. One concomitant psoriasis therapy (topical agents, methotrexate, cyclosporine, systemic retinoids, or ultraviolet B [UVB]) per course was allowed. The extent of disease was determined using the 7-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA; scale ranging from 0 = clear to 6 = severe). RESULTS: More than 73% of patients improved by > or = one PGA category and > or = 44% of patients improved by > or = two PGA categories across all concomitant treatments. Clinical responses tended to be greatest in patients who received alefacept plus UVB. The incidences of serious infections (< or =1%) and malignancies (< or =2%) were low across all courses and all combinations. CONCLUSION: Multiple courses of alefacept appear to be well tolerated and demonstrate efficacy in patients with CPP when administered with other psoriasis therapies.

Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG, Szapary P, Yeilding N, Guzzo C, Hsu MC, Wang Y, Li S, Dooley LT, Reich K, Anonymous00035. · Probity Medical Research, Waterloo and University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. · Lancet. · Pubmed #18486740 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab, a human monoclonal antibody against interleukins 12 and 23, has shown therapeutic potential for psoriasis. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in psoriasis patients and assessed dosing intensification in partial responders. METHODS: In this multicentre, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1230 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (defined by a psoriasis area and severity index [PASI] score > or =12, and at least 10% total body surface area involvement) were randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab 45 mg (n=409) or 90 mg (n=411) at weeks 0 and 4, then every 12 weeks, or placebo (n=410). Partial responders (ie, patients achieving > or =50% but <75% improvement from baseline in PASI) were re-randomised at week 28 to continue dosing every 12 weeks or escalate to dosing every 8 weeks. Both randomisations were done with a minimisation method via a centralised interactive voice response. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least 75% improvement in PASI (PASI 75) at week 12. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00307437. FINDINGS: All randomised patients were included in the efficacy analysis. 273 (66.7%) patients receiving ustekinumab 45 mg, 311 (75.7%) receiving ustekinumab 90 mg, and 15 (3.7%) receiving placebo achieved the primary endpoint (difference in response rate 63.1%, 95% CI 58.2-68.0, p<0.0001 for the 45 mg group vs placebo and 72.0%, 67.5-76.5, p<0.0001 for the 90 mg group vs placebo). More partial responders at week 28 who received ustekinumab 90 mg every 8 weeks achieved PASI 75 at week 52 than did those who continued to receive the same dose every 12 weeks (22 [68.8%] vs 11 [33.3%]; difference in response rate 35.4%, 95% CI 12.7-58.1, p=0.004). There was no such response to changes in dosing intensity in partial responders treated with ustekinumab 45 mg. During the placebo-controlled phase, 217 (53.1%) patients in the 45 mg group, 197 (47.9%) in the 90 mg group, and 204 (49.8%) in the placebo group experienced adverse events; serious adverse events were seen in eight (2.0%) patients in the 45 mg group, five (1.2%) in the 90 mg group, and eight (2.0%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Although treatment with ustekinumab every 12 weeks is effective for most patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, intensification of dosing to once every 8 weeks with ustekinumab 90 mg might be necessary to elicit a full response in patients who only partially respond to the initial regimen.

van der Heijde D, Kavanaugh A, Gladman DD, Antoni C, Krueger GG, Guzzo C, Zhou B, Dooley LT, de Vlam K, Geusens P, Birbara C, Halter D, Beutler A. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17665424 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on progression of structural damage over 1 year in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the Induction and Maintenance Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Trial 2. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 54. At week 24, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab (5 mg/kg). Based on predefined criteria, patients randomized to receive placebo could enter early escape by receiving infliximab (5 mg/kg) starting at week 16, and patients randomized to receive infliximab could have the dose increased to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were randomized to receive. Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline and at weeks 24 and 54. Two readers blinded to treatment assignment and radiograph sequence independently evaluated erosions and joint space narrowing using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method modified for PsA. RESULTS: At week 24, patients randomized to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg had significantly less radiographic progression compared with patients randomized to receive placebo, with mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score of -0.70 +/- 2.53 and 0.82 +/- 2.62, respectively (P < 0.001). At week 54, mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score were -0.94 +/- 3.40 in patients randomized to receive infliximab and 0.53 +/- 2.60 in those receiving placebo/infliximab (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Infliximab significantly inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA as early as 6 months after starting treatment, and the beneficial effect continues through 1 year of infliximab therapy.

Krueger GG, Langley RG, Leonardi C, Yeilding N, Guzzo C, Wang Y, Dooley LT, Lebwohl M, Anonymous00348. · University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #17287478 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Skin-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing type 1 cytokines have been linked to the pathophysiology of psoriasis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody in treating psoriasis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 320 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis underwent randomization to treatment with the interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody (one 45-mg dose, one 90-mg dose, four weekly 45-mg doses, or four weekly 90-mg doses) or placebo; 64 patients were randomly assigned to each group. Patients assigned to the interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody received one additional dose at week 16 if needed. Patients assigned to placebo crossed over to receive one 90-mg dose of interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody at week 20. RESULTS: There was at least 75% improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index at week 12 (the primary end point) in 52% of patients who received 45 mg of the interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in 59% of those who received 90 mg, in 67% of those who received four weekly 45-mg doses, and in 81% of those who received four weekly 90-mg doses, as compared with 2% of those who received placebo (P<0.001 for each comparison), and there was at least 90% improvement in 23%, 30%, 44%, and 52%, respectively, of patients who received the monoclonal antibody as compared with 2% of patients who received placebo (P<0.001 for each comparison). Adverse events occurred in 79% of patients treated with the interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody as compared with 72% of patients in the placebo group (P=0.19). Serious adverse events occurred in 4% of patients who received the monoclonal antibody and in 1% of those who received placebo (P=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the therapeutic efficacy of an interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody in psoriasis and provides further evidence of a role of the interleukin-12/23 p40 cytokines in the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Larger studies are needed to determine whether serious adverse events might limit the clinical usefulness of this new therapeutic target. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00320216 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Kavanaugh A, Krueger GG, Beutler A, Guzzo C, Zhou B, Dooley LT, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, de Vlam K, Geusens PP, Birbara C, Halter DG, Antoni C, Anonymous00101. · Center for Innovative Therapy, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0943, USA, and University Hospital Leuven, Belgium. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17114188 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab through 1 year in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the IMPACT 2 trial. METHODS: In this double blind, placebo controlled, phase III study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through 1 year. Patients with persistent disease activity could enter early escape at week 16, and all remaining placebo patients crossed over to infliximab at week 24. Patients randomised to infliximab who had no response or who lost response could escalate their dose to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Clinical efficacy was assessed based on the proportion of patients achieving ACR 20 and PASI 75 responses. Major clinical response (that is, maintenance of ACR 70 response for 24 continuous weeks) was assessed for the first time in PsA. RESULTS: Through 1 year of treatment, 58.9% and 61.4% of patients in the randomised infliximab and placebo/infliximab groups, respectively, achieved ACR 20; corresponding figures for PASI 75 were 50.0% and 60.3%. At week 54, major clinical response was achieved by 12.1% of patients in the infliximab group. The safety profile of infliximab through week 54 was consistent with that seen through week 24. Two malignancies occurred: basal cell skin cancer (placebo) and stage I Hodgkin's lymphoma (infliximab). CONCLUSION: Infliximab maintains a high degree of clinical efficacy and continues to be well tolerated in patients with PsA through 1 year of treatment.

Krueger GG, Langley RG, Finlay AY, Griffiths CE, Woolley JM, Lalla D, Jahreis A. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 30 N. 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-0001, USA. · Br J Dermatol. · Pubmed #16307657 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Etanercept, a soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor, lessens the severity of psoriasis as measured by physician-reported clinical outcomes. Equally important is the patient perspective on the effect of etanercept therapy on daily life. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with psoriasis receiving etanercept therapy. METHODS: In this multinational, randomized, phase III trial, patients with psoriasis received placebo (n = 193), etanercept 50 mg per week (n = 196) or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (n = 194) during the initial 12-week, double-blind period. Thereafter, all patients received open-label etanercept (50 mg per week). The following PROs were assessed: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), patient rating of pruritus, and patient global assessment of psoriasis. RESULTS: At week 12, DLQI total score improved by 65-70% in patients receiving etanercept compared with 6% in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.0001), and improvement in DLQI was clinically meaningful (> or = 5-point improvement or 0 score) for 72-77% of patients receiving etanercept therapy. All DLQI and SF-36 subscales and the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores demonstrated significantly greater improvement with etanercept therapy than with placebo, illustrating that etanercept benefits patients with psoriasis across multiple domains that contribute to health-related quality of life. With etanercept therapy, distributions of patient ratings of pruritus and global assessment of disease shifted from moderate to severe (baseline) to minimal to good (week 12). Etanercept-induced benefits of PROs were maintained for patients who reduced their dose after 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept therapy improves PROs in patients with psoriasis and makes a meaningful difference to their lives. These results support the efficacy profile of physician-reported clinical measures while providing a more complete understanding of the benefits experienced by patients with psoriasis treated with etanercept.

Feldman SR, Kimball AB, Krueger GG, Woolley JM, Lalla D, Jahreis A. · Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina 27157-1071, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #16243150 No free full text.

Abstract: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, patients with psoriasis received etanercept for 24 weeks or placebo for 12 weeks followed by etanercept for 12 weeks. At week 12, improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index was 47% to 61% with etanercept compared with 11% with placebo (P < .0001). Etanercept rapidly and substantially improved patients' health-related quality of life.

van de Kerkhof P, Griffiths CE, Christophers E, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, UMC St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Dermatology. · Pubmed #16205071 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Many patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis fail to respond to or are not appropriate candidates for conventional systemic therapies and/or phototherapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, quality of life and safety of alefacept among the proportion of patients who participated in the phase III studies and who were not suitable candidates for conventional systemic psoriasis therapies or phototherapy. METHODS: The patient's historical responses at the baseline visit during the phase III studies of alefacept were used to identify a subpopulation in whom the use of methotrexate, ciclosporin, retinoids, ultraviolet B or psoralen plus ultraviolet A was ineffective or inappropriate. Endpoints included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and adverse events. RESULTS: Most patients (69%) who were treated with alefacept in the phase III programme were not candidates for > or =1 of the above-mentioned therapies, and 41 and 21% were not candidates for > or =2 and > or =3, respectively. A reduction in PASI of > or =75% was achieved by 27, 23 and 26% of alefacept-treated patients who were not candidates for > or =1, > or =2 and > or =3 conventional systemic psoriasis therapies or phototherapy, respectively (all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). The corresponding results for PASI 50 were 53, 52 and 50% (all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). At 2 weeks after the last dose of alefacept, mean DLQI overall scores were reduced by -4.2, -3.9 and -5.2, respectively (all p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the alefacept and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy, quality of life effects and safety of alefacept in patients who were not candidates for conventional systemic psoriasis therapies or phototherapy were similar to those reported previously for the overall alefacept-treated population in the phase III studies.

Kavanaugh A, Antoni C, Krueger GG, Yan S, Bala M, Dooley LT, Beutler A, Guzzo C, Gladman D. · Center for Innovative Therapy, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0943, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16096330 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the IMPACT 2 trial. METHODS: 200 patients with PsA unresponsive to conventional treatment were randomised to intravenous infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22; patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. HRQoL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at weeks 0, 14, and 24. Functional disability was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at every visit through week 24. Associations between changes in quality of life (SF-36) and articular (American College of Rheumatology (ACR)) and dermatological (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)) responses were examined. RESULTS: Mean percentage improvement from baseline in HAQ was 48.6% in the infliximab group compared with worsening of 18.4% in the placebo group at week 14 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 58.6% and 19.4% of infliximab and placebo treated patients, respectively, achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ (that is, > or = 0.3 unit decrease) at week 14 (p < 0.001). Increases in physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores and all eight scales of the SF-36 in the infliximab group were greater than those in the placebo group at week 14 (p < or = 0.001). These benefits were sustained through week 24. Patients achieving ACR20 and PASI75 responses had the greatest improvements in PCS and MCS scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PsA, infliximab 5 mg/kg significantly improved HRQoL and physical function compared with placebo through 24 weeks.

Antoni C, Krueger GG, de Vlam K, Birbara C, Beutler A, Guzzo C, Zhou B, Dooley LT, Kavanaugh A, Anonymous00352. · Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15677701 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate further in a phase III, double blind trial the efficacy of infliximab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as observed in the smaller IMPACT trial. METHODS: 200 patients with active PsA unresponsive to previous treatment were randomised to infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22. Patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. The primary measure of clinical response was ACR20. Other measures included Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and dactylitis and enthesopathy assessments. RESULTS: At week 14, 58% of patients receiving infliximab and 11% of those receiving placebo achieved an ACR20 response and 77% of infliximab patients and 27% of placebo patients achieved PsARC (both p<0.001). Among the 85% of patients with at least 3% body surface area psoriasis involvement at baseline, 53/83 (64%) patients receiving infliximab had at least 75% improvement in PASI compared with 2/87 (2%) patients receiving placebo at week 14 (p<0.001). These therapeutic effects were maintained through the last evaluation (week 24). Fewer infliximab patients than placebo patients had dactylitis at week 14 (18% v 30%; p = 0.025) and week 24 (12% v 34%; p<0.001). Fewer infliximab patients (22%) than placebo patients (34%) had active enthesopathy at week 14 (p = 0.016); corresponding figures at week 24 were 20% and 37% (p = 0.002). Infliximab was generally well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab 5 mg/kg through 24 weeks significantly improved active PsA, including dactylitis and enthesopathy, and associated psoriasis.

Liu CM, McKenna JK, Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East #4B454, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. · Drugs Today (Barc). · Pubmed #15645008 No free full text.

Abstract: Recognition of psoriasis as a T-cell-mediated immune disease has led to the development of various therapeutic approaches directed against the T cell and T-cell processes such as activation, trafficking and cytokine release. The novel and selective biologic agent alefacept, with an effect of selective apoptotic reduction in memory-effector T cells, has been given FDA approval for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. The clinical profile of this novel biologic agent is presented here. Two pivotal multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies enrolling 1060 patients were designed to support the efficacy and safety of alefacept in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. With either intramuscular or intravenous administration, well over half of patients treated with a single course of alefacept achieved a 50% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index), and a second course of therapy provided further benefit by increasing response rates and providing long-lasting off-treatment responses regardless of the route of administration. In all studies, alefacept was well tolerated. There was no evidence of an increased risk of infections or malignancies and no opportunistic infections were reported. Consistent with its composition as a fully human fusion protein, alefacept had a low incidence of immunogenicity and no evidence of an increased rate of antibody development over time. There was no evidence that primary or secondary responses to a new antigen or memory response to a recall antigen were blunted in patients treated with alefacept. In conclusion, alefacept is the first biologic therapy to demonstrate positive effects in an immune-mediated disease while maintaining immune responses to novel and recall antigens. This selective effect on the immune system distinguishes alefacept from immunosuppressive therapies that are nonselective.

Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Lowe N, Krueger GG, Kang S, Goffe BS, Gaspari AA, Ling M, Weinstein GD, Nayak A, Gordon KB, Zitnik R. · Clinical Research Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, 08901-0019, USA. · Arch Dermatol. · Pubmed #14676082 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine safety and efficacy of monotherapy with etanercept. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Outpatient, ambulatory; private practice and university dermatology research centers. PATIENTS: Patients aged at least 18 years, with plaque psoriasis involving 10% or more of body surface area; 148 were screened and 112 were randomly assigned to treatment groups and received study drug. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received placebo or etanercept, 25 mg, subcutaneously twice a week for 24 weeks. Other psoriasis therapies were limited during the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety measurements included tracking of adverse events and laboratory values. Efficacy was evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI); the primary end point was a 75% improvement in PASI. Other efficacy measurements included patient and physician global assessments and quality-of-life measures. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, 17 (30%) of the 57 etanercept-treated patients and 1 (2%) of the 55 placebo-treated patients had achieved PASI 75%, and after 24 weeks, 32 (56%) of etanercept-treated patients and 3 (5%) of placebo-treated patients had reached this level (P<.001 for both time points). By 24 weeks, psoriasis was clear or minimal by physician's global assessment in more than 50% of patients who received etanercept. Treatment failure (PASI response <50) occurred in 23% of patients at week 24. All other measures confirmed the efficacy of etanercept. Adverse events were similar among etanercept and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Etanercept monotherapy provided significant benefit to patients with psoriasis and had a favorable safety profile.

Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. · J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. · Pubmed #12795771 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is a current lack of safe and effective psoriasis therapies that provide patients with lasting remissions after treatment is discontinued. Alefacept, a novel and selective biological agent, has demonstrated durable efficacy in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, and its efficacy has been correlated with reductions in memory-effector T cells. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of both one and two 12-week courses of alefacept 7.5 mg given once weekly as an intravenous (IV) bolus injection in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Multicentre (51 centres in the USA and Canada), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing once-weekly alefacept 7.5 mg IV or placebo for two 12-week treatment courses. Each course had a 12-week follow-up phase. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were > or =16 years of age, had chronic plaque psoriasis for > or =12 months involving > or =10% body surface area, and had CD4+ T-cell counts at or above the lower limit of normal. RESULTS: 553 patients received treatment in Course 1, and 449 were treated in Course 2. The cohorts were well balanced for demographic and baseline disease characteristics. During the treatment and follow-up period of Course 1, 28% of patients treated with alefacept achieved > or =75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), compared with 8% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001). Patients achieving > or =75% reduction in PASI following a single 12-week course of alefacept maintained > or =50% reduction in PASI for a median of over 7 months. Among patients who received a second course of alefacept therapy, 71% achieved > or =50% reduction in PASI, and 40% achieved > or =75% reduction in PASI over two treatment courses. One or two 12-week courses of alefacept were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with alefacept 7.5 mg IV provided highly significant improvements in all measures of psoriasis disease activity compared with placebo. A second course of alefacept provided additional benefit.