Psoriasis: Kreiselmaier I

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 4 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Psoriasis," originating from Planet Earth —» Kreiselmaier I.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. 2007

Nast A, Kopp IB, Augustin M, Banditt KB, Boehncke WH, Follmann M, Friedrich M, Huber M, Kahl C, Klaus J, Koza J, Kreiselmaier I, Mohr J, Mrowietz U, Ockenfels HM, Orzechowski HD, Prinz J, Reich K, Rosenbach T, Rosumeck S, Schlaeger M, Schmid-Ott G, Sebastian M, Streit V, Weberschock T, Rzany B, Anonymous00272, Anonymous00273. · Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. · Pubmed #17615051 No free full text.

Abstract: Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1 to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed lack of satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. These resulting Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaquetype psoriasis in adults. The Guidelines include evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy of all currently available therapeutic options in Germany. In addition, they offer detailed information on how best to administer the various treatments and give information on contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions as well as estimates of practicability and cost. The Guidelines were developed following the recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft wissenschaftlicher medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). The therapeutic recommendations were developed by an expert group and finalized during interdisciplinary consensus conferences.

2 Guideline German evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris (short version). free! 2007

Nast A, Kopp I, Augustin M, Banditt KB, Boehncke WH, Follmann M, Friedrich M, Huber M, Kahl C, Klaus J, Koza J, Kreiselmaier I, Mohr J, Mrowietz U, Ockenfels HM, Orzechowski HD, Prinz J, Reich K, Rosenbach T, Rosumeck S, Schlaeger M, Schmid-Ott G, Sebastian M, Streit V, Weberschock T, Rzany B. · Division of Evidence Based Medicine, Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie, Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, Berlin, Germany. · Arch Dermatol Res. · Pubmed #17497162 links to  free full text

Abstract: Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and chronic inflammatory skin disease which has the potential to significantly reduce the quality of life in severely affected patients. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1.5 to 2%. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed insufficient satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of medication non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) have initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. The guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults. The short version of the guidelines reported here consist of a series of therapeutic recommendations that are based on a systematic literature search and subsequent discussion with experts in the field; they have been approved by a team of dermatology experts. In addition to the therapeutic recommendations provided in this short version, the full version of the guidelines includes information on contraindications, adverse events, drug interactions, practicality, and costs as well as detailed information on how best to apply the treatments described (for full version, please see Nast et al., JDDG, Suppl 2:S1-S126, 2006; or http://www.psoriasis-leitlinie.de ).

3 Guideline [S3-Guidelines for the therapy of psoriasis vulgaris] 2006

Nast A, Kopp IB, Augustin M, Banditt KB, Boehncke WH, Follmann M, Friedrich M, Huber M, Kahl C, Klaus J, Koza J, Kreiselmaier I, Mohr J, Mrowietz U, Ockenfels HM, Orzechowski HD, Prinz J, Reich K, Rosenbach T, Rosumeck S, Schlaeger M, Schmid-Ott G, Sebastian M, Streit V, Weberschock T, Rzany B, Anonymous00487. · Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. · Pubmed #17187649 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

4 Clinical Conference [Psychosocial consequences of psoriasis--an empirical study of disease burden in 3753 affected people] 2005

Schmid-Ott G, Malewski P, Kreiselmaier I, Mrowietz U. · Abteilung Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover. · Hautarzt. · Pubmed #15711815 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the psychosocial consequences of psoriasis in a large sample in Germany.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire including the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) circulated by the German Psoriasis Alliance was answered by 3753 members representing a return rate of 42.3%. Psoriasis was graded-at the time of the examination-with less than 3% of the body surface affected as "mild", between 3 and 10% as "moderate," and more than 10% as "severe."RESULTS: The general impact of the illness on everyday life was "mild" in about 27%, "problematic" in about 45%, and "severe" in about 25% of the respondents. About 50% of the participants in the study had, concerning the skin, "mild" (PDI=9), about 35% "moderate" (PDI=14), and about 15% "severe" psoriasis (PDI=19). The differences of the PDI values are significant (ANOVA: p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: This investigation confirms the enormous burden caused by the skin disease in the form of impairment and stigmatization, depending on the somatic severity, even when the current affection is rather mild. In connection with psychosocial consequences, future study should also focus on the disease burden of psoriasis.