Psoriasis: Horn EJ

Kimball AB, Gladman D, Gelfand JM, Gordon K, Horn EJ, Korman NJ, Korver G, Krueger GG, Strober BE, Lebwohl MG, Anonymous00020. · Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #18313171 No free full text.

Abstract: There have been several articles and reports in recent months about comorbidities and risks that affect psoriasis patients in addition to their underlying disease. This piece reviews the current literature and begins to address what should be done with this new information by updating the clinician about what health screening tests, preventative exams, and referrals should be considered in this population.

Pariser DM, Bagel J, Gelfand JM, Korman NJ, Ritchlin CT, Strober BE, Van Voorhees AS, Young M, Rittenberg S, Lebwohl MG, Horn EJ, Anonymous00184. · Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA. · Arch Dermatol. · Pubmed #17310004 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate the current severity criteria of mild, moderate, and severe psoriasis and to make recommendations concerning a 2-tiered categorization of severity based on current clinical practice and related to intent to treat. PARTICIPANTS: This volunteer task force, led by David M. Pariser, MD, included Jerry Bagel, MD, Joel M. Gelfand, MD, MSCE, Neil J. Korman, MD, PhD, Christopher T. Ritchlin, MD, Bruce E. Strober, MD, PhD, Abby S. Van Voorhees, MD, and Melodie Young, MSN, RN, ANP. Meetings were held by teleconference and were coordinated and funded by the National Psoriasis Foundation. EVIDENCE: This task force reviewed psoriasis severity criteria and other published psoriasis consensus statements. Current standards of care and expert opinion were used to inform the process. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Based on meetings of the task force and under the guidance of David M. Pariser, MD, a statement was drafted by Elizabeth J. Horn, PhD, presented to the task force, and reviewed and approved by the task force. This statement was then reviewed and approved by Robert E. Kalb, MD, Gerald G. Krueger, MD, and Alan Menter, MD. The National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board reviewed and endorsed this statement by a majority vote on March 2, 2006, at the medical board meeting. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical consensus statement proposes a 2-tiered system for plaque psoriasis therapy that reflects more accurately than the current system how patients are treated in clinical practice. This statement, focused on plaque psoriasis, is intended to assist medical professionals and insurance payers in understanding these 2 categories of patients with psoriasis and choosing appropriate therapies for these patients.

Feldman SR, Horn EJ, Balkrishnan R, Basra MK, Finlay AY, McCoy D, Menter A, van de Kerkhof PC, Anonymous00051. · Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #18835062 No free full text.

Abstract: Topical therapy has an important role in psoriasis treatment. It is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile as demonstrated in clinical trials. However, poor treatment outcomes from topical therapy regimens likely result from poor adherence and ineffective use of the medication. The International Psoriasis Council Topical Therapy Working Group has developed a new model to describe the complex interactions among patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, adherence behavior, and treatment outcomes. Recommendations are provided that may assist the health care provider in encouraging adherent behavior in their patients. By understanding and manipulating the factors that affect treatment adherence, improvement in adherence is possible and hence better control and outcomes in the topical treatment of psoriasis are likely.

Horn EJ, Chambers CD, Menter A, Kimball AB, Anonymous00039. · International Psoriasis Council, Dallas, Texas, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #19615534 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Strober B, Berger E, Cather J, Cohen D, Crowley JJ, Gordon KB, Gottlieb A, Horn EJ, Kavanaugh AF, Korman NJ, Krueger GG, Leonardi CL, Menter A, Schwartzman S, Sobell JM, Young M. · Department of Dermatology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #19527820 No free full text.

Abstract: Clinical trials for systemic psoriasis therapy typically enroll healthy patients and exclude patients with cardiovascular disease, latent tuberculosis, liver disease, histories of malignancies, viral infections, children, and pregnant or breast-feeding women. Physicians often require guidance for optimum management of severe psoriasis in patients that have a combination of underlying disease states. To provide treatment recommendations for complex psoriasis scenarios, a consensus panel comprising 15 experts in psoriatic disease convened to review and discuss available evidence-based data and to arrive at a consensus for treatment options of difficult cases. An application of the Delphi Method was used to select case scenarios, provide medical treatment options, present the case study with existing medical evidence, and anonymously vote on treatment options. The top 10 treatment options were ranked and statistically analyzed to compare the differences between treatments. The final rankings and analysis provide guidance for practical, safe, and efficacious treatment options in a number of complex psoriasis scenarios.

Callis Duffin K, Wong B, Horn EJ, Krueger GG. · Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #19167780 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine what clinical features of psoriasis predict sleep interference. METHODS: Data were obtained from 420 respondents to the 2005 National Psoriasis Foundation telephone and e-mail surveys. Logistic regression was used to determine whether disease severity, body mass index, age of onset, psoriatic arthritis, income, ethnicity, sex, current therapy, and quality-of-life measures predicted reported sleep interference within the last month. RESULTS: Psoriatic arthritis was the most significant predictor of sleep disturbance (odds ratio = 3.26). Itch, pain of lesions, and impact on emotional well-being were also significant predictors (odds ratio 1.26, 1.22, and 1.18, respectively). Body surface area covered with psoriasis, body mass index, and therapy were not significant predictors of sleep interference. LIMITATIONS: All data were self-reported and not physician-assessed. CONCLUSIONS: History of psoriatic arthritis, presence of itch and pain of psoriatic lesions, and impact of psoriasis on overall emotional well-being predict sleep interference.

Kalb RE, Bagel J, Korman NJ, Lebwohl MG, Young M, Horn EJ, Van Voorhees AS, Anonymous00091. · Department of Dermatology, State University of New York School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #19103363 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Involvement of areas of the skin fold is common in patients with psoriasis although the exact incidence is unknown. This report summarizes studies regarding the therapy of intertriginous psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to arrive at a consensus on therapy for intertriginous or inverse psoriasis. METHODS: Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding psoriasis affecting the skin-fold areas and its therapy. LIMITATIONS: There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of intertriginous psoriasis. RESULTS: The recommended short-term (2-4 weeks) therapy for inverse psoriasis is low- to mid-potency topical steroids. For long-term therapy, topical calcipotriene (calcipotriol) or one of the immunomodulating agents, pimecrolimus or tacrolimus, is favored. CONCLUSIONS: Low- to mid-potency topical steroids are recommended as first-line, short-term treatment. It is recommended that their use should either be of limited duration (less than 2-4 weeks) or that the lowest effective strength be used intermittently for long-term care to minimize the potential for risks. Calcipotriene (calcipotriol), pimecrolimus, and tacrolimus, while not as highly efficacious as topical steroids, are associated with fewer long-term risks and are therefore recommended for long-term therapy when feasible.

Patel V, Horn EJ, Lobosco SJ, Fox KM, Stevens SR, Lebwohl M. · Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #18378352 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated community physician prescribing patterns for patients with psoriasis. METHODS: US dermatologists actively practicing general dermatology and treating 10 or more patients with psoriasis/mo were interviewed (n = 90) in April and June 2006 and they recruited 8 to 10 consecutive patients for record review (n = 895, mean age = 46 years, 51% men). Proportion of patients treated with systemic, biologic, or topical therapy as reported by the dermatologist and recorded in the records was assessed by psoriasis severity. RESULTS: Among patients with severe psoriasis (body surface area affected > 10%), 56% to 63% received systemic therapy (including biologics) or phototherapy and 37% to 44% received topical therapy only. Dermatologists reported prescribing biologics to 41% of patients with severe disease compared with patient records where 27% to 34% of body surface area = 11% to 40% and 36% of body surface area greater than 40% patients received biologics. LIMITATIONS: Because of the small sample, eligibility criteria, and voluntary interview, selection bias may have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Some dermatologists are prescribing systemic therapy for the majority of their patients with severe psoriasis but a gap in treatment remains for about 40% who received topical therapy alone.

Ciocon DH, Horn EJ, Kimball AB. · Department of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. · Am J Clin Dermatol. · Pubmed #18284265 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Five to forty percent of patients with cutaneous psoriasis develop an inflammatory, oligoarticular spondyloarthropathy known as psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To compare health-related quality of life (QOL) between cutaneous psoriatic patients with and without psoriatic arthritis. METHOD: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the 2005 Spring US National Psoriasis Foundation Quality of Life Telephone/Internet Survey. 426 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis were included in the 2005 survey. Among these respondents, the self-reported disease histories of 140 patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were compared with those of 278 patients with cutaneous psoriasis only. Both groups were compared with respect to demographics, skin disease severity, treatment history and satisfaction, and QOL using previously validated assessment scales. RESULTS: Compared with those with skin psoriasis only, respondents with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were slightly older, more likely to be female and members of the National Psoriasis Foundation, and more likely to report a younger age of disease onset. They were also more likely to be unemployed, to report their job was affected by their condition, and to report a higher mean estimate of lost annual wages. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, however, no significant differences between groups were detected in skin disease severity, overall QOL, and satisfaction with current treatment options. At the same time, individuals with skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were more likely to be taking systemic agents. They also reported higher mean scores for pain, while those with cutaneous psoriasis reported higher mean scores for self-consciousness only. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous reports that did not control for skin disease severity, this study demonstrates that patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis do not report significantly worse health-related QOL compared with patients with cutaneous psoriasis only. Nor do they report significantly greater dissatisfaction with current treatment options. These findings may reflect the intrinsic inadequacy of the QOL instruments used in this study for capturing the additional burden of joint disease. Alternatively, these findings may reflect the existence of a threshold of joint disease in patients with skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis below which joint symptoms are perceived as negligible relative to cutaneous disease.

Horn EJ, Fox KM, Patel V, Chiou CF, Dann F, Lebwohl M. · National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, Oregon 97223-7195, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #17761358 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine whether psoriasis severity was associated with patient income and employment. METHODS: Respondents (> 30 years old) to National Psoriasis Foundation surveys (2003-2005) were classified by reported body surface area as having mild (< 3%), moderate (3%-10%), or severe (> 10%) psoriasis. The relationship between severity and household income (< $30,000 vs > or = $30,000) and employment was assessed by logistic regression, adjusting for age, age at onset, sex, race, and drug treatment. RESULTS: Probability of low income (< $30,000) was significantly greater among patients with severe disease than those with mild disease (P = .0002). Patients with severe disease had lower probability of working full time compared with patients with mild psoriasis but it was not statistically significant. Significantly more patients with severe psoriasis (17%) versus mild (6%) reported that psoriasis was the reason for not working (P = .01). LIMITATIONS: Household income was self-reported and may be influenced by household composition, which is unknown. Psoriasis severity was patient reported and not physician assessed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that income and employment were negatively impacted among patients with severe psoriasis compared with mild psoriasis.

Horn EJ, Fox KM, Patel V, Chiou CF, Dann F, Lebwohl M. · National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, Oregon 97223-7195, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #17706322 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether patients with psoriasis with moderate or severe disease are being treated with systemic therapy. METHODS: Participants were identified from a random sample of the National Psoriasis Foundation contact database who were 18 years and older, with severe psoriasis (>10% body surface area) and moderate psoriasis (3%-10% body surface area); respondents with psoriatic arthritis were excluded. RESULTS: In all, 1657 respondents with psoriasis completed the survey (28% severe, 41% moderate). A total of 39% of respondents with severe psoriasis and 37% with moderate psoriasis were not currently receiving any treatment. Among respondents currently receiving therapy, only 43% of respondents with severe psoriasis received either traditional systemic therapy, biologic therapy, or phototherapy. LIMITATIONS: Respondents were from the National Psoriasis Foundation contact database and reported their current severity, which may be affected by their treatment. Body surface area as a measure of patient-reported severity has not been validated but has been used in several published studies. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 40% of respondents with psoriasis were currently not receiving treatment. For respondents with severe psoriasis, 26% were treated with systemic therapy, phototherapy, or both; 39% were not in treatment; and 35% were treated with topical therapy alone.

Kaufman ED, Lebwohl MG, Krueger GG, Zimmerman G, Horn EJ, Feldman SR. · No affiliation provided · Cutis. · Pubmed #18856157 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.