Psoriasis: Gordon K

Kimball AB, Gladman D, Gelfand JM, Gordon K, Horn EJ, Korman NJ, Korver G, Krueger GG, Strober BE, Lebwohl MG, Anonymous00020. · Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #18313171 No free full text.

Abstract: There have been several articles and reports in recent months about comorbidities and risks that affect psoriasis patients in addition to their underlying disease. This piece reviews the current literature and begins to address what should be done with this new information by updating the clinician about what health screening tests, preventative exams, and referrals should be considered in this population.

Winterfield LS, Menter A, Gordon K, Gottlieb A. · Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas 75230, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15708946 links to  free full text

Abstract: Quality of life studies in patients with cutaneous psoriasis attest to its significant impact on day to day activities and personal social interactions. Up to 40% of patients with psoriasis may develop psoriatic arthritis, usually within 5-10 years after onset of the cutaneous disease, heightening quality of life issues. These data have prompted an increased awareness and interest in more aggressive management of psoriasis; coupled with a better understanding of immunopathogenesis, this has led to the development of new agents targeting specific cells and molecules involved in the development and maintenance of psoriatic plaques. Although non-biological therapies, including methotrexate and ciclosporin, show significant efficacy their side effect profiles have precluded their long term use for moderate to severe psoriasis. This review concentrates on new biological agents, focusing on the three agents approved for psoriasis within the past 18 months (alefacept, efalizumab, and etanercept). Phase II and III trial data on other agents in development (adalimumab and infliximab) are also presented. Surveys show many patients want to be treated more aggressively. It is hoped that the introduction of new agents that are more targeted and that hold the promise of fewer side effects will cause patients and their physicians to reconsider systemic treatment and, as a consequence, stimulate other patients to reconsider treatment for psoriasis. Close cooperation between dermatologists and rheumatologists, particularly in the area of psoriatic joint disease, will enhance these considerations.

Menter A, Tyring SK, Gordon K, Kimball AB, Leonardi CL, Langley RG, Strober BE, Kaul M, Gu Y, Okun M, Papp K. · Division of Dermatology, Baylor Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 3900 Junius St, 125, Dallas, TX 75246-1613, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #17936411 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds tumor necrosis factor, a key proinflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of adalimumab for moderate to severe psoriasis and investigate continuous versus interrupted therapy. METHODS: We conducted a 52-week, multicenter study of 1212 patients randomized to receive adalimumab (40 mg) or placebo every other week for the first 15 weeks. At least 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was the criterion for advancement through this multiphase study. RESULTS: At week 16, 71% (578 of 814) of adalimumab- and 7% (26 of 398) of placebo-treated patients achieved greater than or equal to 75% improvement in the PASI score. During weeks 33 to 52, the percentage of patients rerandomized to placebo who lost adequate response (defined as <50% improvement in the PASI response relative to baseline and at least a 6-point increase in PASI score from week 33) was 28% compared with 5% of patients treated continuously with adalimumab. LIMITATIONS: Lack of an active comparator and evaluation of maintenance of response beyond week 52 are limitations. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab is efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov. NCT00237887.

Menter A, Gordon K, Carey W, Hamilton T, Glazer S, Caro I, Li N, Gulliver W. · Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. · Arch Dermatol. · Pubmed #15655139 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of efalizumab. DESIGN: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled 12-week study followed by a 12-week open-label study. SETTING: Outpatient dermatology clinics.Patients A total of 556 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis who were seeing an outpatient dermatologist were included in the study.Intervention For weeks 1 to 12, the 556 patients were randomized to receive 1 mg/kg of efalizumab weekly or placebo subcutaneously. For weeks 13 to 24, 516 of these patients received 1 mg/kg of efalizumab weekly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients with a 75% or greater improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75), a 50% or greater improvement in PASI (PASI-50), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) rating of minimal or clear, and improvements in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), itching scale, and Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA) frequency and severity scores at weeks 12 and 24. Safety was evaluated by reviewing adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and anti-efalizumab antibodies. RESULTS: At week 12, 26.6% of efalizumab-treated patients achieved PASI-75 and 58.5% achieved PASI-50. After 24 weeks of continuous efalizumab therapy, PASI responses increased: 43.8% of patients achieved PASI-75 and 66.6% achieved PASI-50. The percentage of patients who achieved an sPGA rating of minimal or clear increased from 25.7% to 35.9%. The mean percentage of improvement in all patient-reported outcomes (DLQI, itching scale, and PSA frequency and severity scores) at week 12 was maintained at week 24 (DLQI, 49.2%; itching scale, 42.2%; PSA frequency, 47.6%; PSA severity, 47.3%). There was a decline in overall reported adverse events from weeks 1 to 12 (80.4%) to weeks 13 to 24 (63.2%) without evidence of cumulative toxic effects.Conclusion Extending efalizumab treatment from 12 to 24 weeks leads to improved efficacy and maintenance of quality of life with no evidence of cumulative toxic effects noted in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Gordon K, Korman N, Frankel E, Wang H, Jahreis A, Zitnik R, Chang T. · Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA. · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #16488320 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor etanercept has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for treating chronic plaque psoriasis in 3 clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To refine efficacy results for etanercept on the basis of a larger population size through the integration of the 3 studies, and to determine if the efficacy profile across all 3 studies is consistent with efficacy profiles observed for individual trials. METHODS: In these integrated analyses, data for 1187 patients from 3 blinded treatment groups were pooled to compare efficacy at 12 weeks: etanercept 50 mg weekly (equivalent to 25 mg twice weekly) subcutaneously, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly subcutaneously, and placebo. The primary efficacy end point in all 3 studies was at least a 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75). Other measurements included PASI 50, PASI 90, patient's and dermatologist's global assessments, and Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: In the integrated analyses, statistically significant, dose-dependent improvements in PASI 75 at 12 weeks were observed in patients treated with etanercept 50 mg weekly (33%) and 50 mg twice weekly (49%), compared with the placebo group (3%; P < .05). Significant improvements also were seen in all secondary end points (PASI 50 and PASI 90 responses, patient's and dermatologist's global assessments, and Dermatology Life Quality Index) at 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses of baseline patient characteristics demonstrated that there were no statistically significant treatment-by-covariate interactions. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of these integrated analyses is the relatively short (12-week) time frame. CONCLUSION: The efficacy profile of etanercept in patients with psoriasis was consistent across multiple studies as shown in the integrated analyses of the primary and secondary end points. Etanercept demonstrated rapid, dose-dependent improvements in disease severity and quality of life consistently over all studies.

Tyring S, Gottlieb A, Papp K, Gordon K, Leonardi C, Wang A, Lalla D, Woolley M, Jahreis A, Zitnik R, Cella D, Krishnan R. · Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. · Lancet. · Pubmed #16399150 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Psoriasis has substantial psychological and emotional effects. We assessed the effect of etanercept, an effective treatment for the clinical symptoms of psoriasis, on fatigue and symptoms of depression associated with the condition. METHODS: 618 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis received double-blind treatment with placebo or 50 mg twice-weekly etanercept. The primary efficacy endpoint was a 75% or greater improvement from baseline in psoriasis area and severity index score (PASI 75) at week 12. Secondary and other endpoints included the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue (FACIT-F) scale, the Hamilton rating scale for depression (Ham-D), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), and adverse events. Efficacy analyses were based on the allocated treatment. Analyses and summaries of safety data were based on the actual treatment received. This study is registered with with the identifier NCT00111449. FINDINGS: 47% (147 of 311) of patients achieved PASI 75 at week 12, compared with 5% (15 of 306) of those receiving placebo (p<0.0001; difference 42%, 95% CI 36-48). Greater proportions of patients receiving etanercept had at least a 50% improvement in Ham-D or BDI at week 12 compared with the placebo group; patients treated with etanercept also had significant and clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue (mean FACIT-F improvement 5.0 vs 1.9; p<0.0001, difference 3.0, 95% CI 1.6-4.5). Improvements in fatigue were correlated with decreasing joint pain, whereas improvements in symptoms of depression were less correlated with objective measures of skin clearance or joint pain. INTERPRETATION: Etanercept treatment might relieve fatigue and symptoms of depression associated with this chronic disease.

Kazanis M, Leonardi C, Gordon K, Strober B, Menter A, Kimball AB. · No affiliation provided · J Am Acad Dermatol. · Pubmed #18571602 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Horn E, Gordon K, Mease P. · National Psoriasis Foundation, Portland, Oregon 97223, USA. · J Invest Dermatol. · Pubmed #17568796 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.