| 1 |
Guideline Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group. 2002
Morton CA, Brown SB, Collins S, Ibbotson S, Jenkinson H, Kurwa H, Langmack K, McKenna K, Moseley H, Pearse AD, Stringer M, Taylor DK, Wong G, Rhodes LE. · Department of Dermatology, Falkirk Royal Infirmary, Falkirk FK1 5QE, U.K. · Br J Dermatol. · Pubmed #11966684 No free full text.
Abstract: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective in the treatment of certain non-melanoma skin cancers and is under evaluation in other dermatoses. Its development has been enhanced by a low rate of adverse events and good cosmesis. 5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is the main agent used, converted within cells into the photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX, with surface illumination then triggering the photodynamic reaction. Despite the relative simplicity of the technique, accurate dosimetry in PDT is complicated by multiple variables in drug formulation, delivery and duration of application, in addition to light-specific parameters. Several non-coherent and coherent light sources are effective in PDT. Optimal disease-specific irradiance, wavelength and total dose characteristics have yet to be established, and are compounded by difficulties comparing light sources. The carcinogenic risk of ALA-PDT appears to be low. Current evidence indicates topical PDT to be effective in actinic keratoses on the face and scalp, Bowen's disease and superficial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). PDT may prove advantageous where size, site or number of lesions limits the efficacy and/or acceptability of conventional therapies. Topical ALA-PDT alone is a relatively poor option for both nodular BCCs and squamous cell carcinomas. Experience of the modality in other skin diseases remains limited; areas where there is potential benefit include viral warts, acne, psoriasis and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. A recent British Photodermatology Group workshop considered published evidence on topical PDT in order to establish guidelines to promote the efficacy and safety of this increasingly practised treatment modality.
|
| 2 |
Clinical Conference Improved response of plaque psoriasis after multiple treatments with topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy. 1999
Robinson DJ, Collins P, Stringer MR, Vernon DI, Stables GI, Brown SB, Sheehan-Dare RA. · Centre for Photobiology and Photodynamic Therapy, Research School of Medicine, Medical Physics, University of Leeds, UK. · Acta Derm Venereol. · Pubmed #10598759 No free full text.
Abstract: We investigated the clinical response of 10 patients with plaque psoriasis to multiple treatments with photodynamic therapy, using topical application of 5-aminolaevulinic acid followed by exposure to broad-band visible radiation. Treatment was performed up to 3 times per week, with a maximum of 12 treatments, using a light dose of 8 Jcm(-2) delivered at a dose-rate of 15 mW cm(-2). Eight patients showed a clinical response. Out of 19 treated sites, 4 cleared, 10 responded but did not clear and 5 showed no improvement. Of the 4 sites that cleared only 1 did so fully, after 7 treatments, 45 days after the start of therapy. Of the 10 sites that responded partially, the greatest reduction in scale, erythema and induration index occurred after a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 8 treatments. The intensity of 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence, recorded prior to the first treatment, varied between sites on the same patient as well as between patients. There was also a variation in fluorescence intensity recorded from the same site immediately prior to subsequent treatments, although the pretreatment levels generally decreased as the study progressed and then increased as psoriasis relapsed. Biopsies confirmed that fluorescence was localized throughout the epidermis and stratum corneum, but the level was not consistent between sections taken within the same biopsy. We also observed fluorescence at sites distant from the ones that received 5-aminolaevulinic acid, which was not present prior to the start of the treatment programme, but found no evidence of elevated levels of plasma porphyrins. The level of discomfort associated with this therapy increased with increasing values of the calculated photodynamic dose, defined as the product of the initial photosensitizer concentration and the percentage reduction in fluorescence following irradiation. Therefore, although clinical efficacy improved with multiple treatments, unpredictable response and patient discomfort make ALA-PDT unsuitable for the treatment of psoriasis.
|
|
|