Prostatic Neoplasms: Vogelzang NJ

Loblaw DA, Virgo KS, Nam R, Somerfield MR, Ben-Josef E, Mendelson DS, Middleton R, Sharp SA, Smith TJ, Talcott J, Taplin M, Vogelzang NJ, Wade JL, Bennett CL, Scher HI, Anonymous00323. · American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #17404365 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To update the 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline on initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive, metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: The writing committee based its recommendations on an updated systematic literature review. Recommendations were approved by the Expert Panel, the ASCO Health Services Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials (four new), one systematic review, one meta-analysis (new), one Markov model, and one delta-method 95% CI procedure for active controlled trials (new) informed the guideline update. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bilateral orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists are recommended initial androgen-deprivation treatments (ADTs). Nonsteroidal antiandrogen monotherapy merits discussion as an alternative; steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy should not be offered. Combined androgen blockade should be considered. In metastatic or progressive PCa, immediate versus symptom-onset institution of ADT results in a moderate decrease (17%) in relative risk (RR) for PCa-specific mortality, a moderate increase (15%) in RR for non-PCa-specific mortality, and no overall survival advantage. Therefore, the Panel cannot make a strong recommendation for early ADT initiation. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics and other metrics allow identification of populations at high risk for PCa-specific and overall mortality. Further studies must be completed to assess whether patients with adverse prognostic factors gain a survival advantage from immediate ADT. For patients electing to wait until symptoms for ADT, regular monitoring visits are indicated. For patients with recurrence, clinical trials should be considered if available. Currently, data are insufficient to support use of intermittent androgen blockade outside clinical trials

Loblaw DA, Mendelson DS, Talcott JA, Virgo KS, Somerfield MR, Ben-Josef E, Middleton R, Porterfield H, Sharp SA, Smith TJ, Taplin ME, Vogelzang NJ, Wade JL, Bennett CL, Scher HI, Anonymous00081. · Cancer Policy and Clinical Affairs, 1900 Duke St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #15184404 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To develop a clinical practice guideline for the management of men with metastatic, recurrent, or progressive carcinoma of the prostate. The focus of this document is on the use, combinations, and timing of various forms of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for the palliation of men with androgen-sensitive disease. METHODS: An expert panel and writing committee were formed. The questions to be addressed by the guideline were determined, and a systematic review of the literature was performed, which included a search of online databases, bibliographic review, and consultation with content experts. A priori criteria were used to select studies for analysis and study authors were contacted when necessary. RESULTS: There were 10 randomized controlled trials, six systematic reviews, and one Markov model available to inform the guidelines. CONCLUSION: A full discussion between practitioner and patient should occur to determine which therapy is best for the patient. Bilateral orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists are the recommended initial treatments. Nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy may be discussed as an alternative, but steroidal antiandrogens should not be offered as monotherapy. Patients willing to accept the increased toxicity of combined androgen blockage for a small benefit in survival should be offered nonsteroidal antiandrogen in addition to castrate therapy. Until data from studies using modern medical diagnostic/biochemical tests and standardized follow-up schedules become available, no specific recommendations can be issued regarding the question of early versus deferred ADT. A discussion about the pros and cons of early versus deferred ADT should occur.

D'Amico AV, Vogelzang NJ. · No affiliation provided · Cancer. · Pubmed #10547533 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Garmey EG, Sartor O, Halabi S, Vogelzang NJ. · Arqule Inc., Woburn, MA 01801-5140, USA. · Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. · Pubmed #18347563 No free full text.

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer occurring among men in the United States. In spite of the disease's favorable prognosis, approximately 30,000 U.S. men develop incurable metastatic disease each year, making prostate cancer the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the United States. Although hormone-based therapies generally result in rapid responses, virtually all patients ultimately develop androgen-independent progressive disease. It is among these men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) that the role of chemotherapy continues to be investigated. To date, three drugs (estramustine, mitoxantrone, and docetaxel) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for first-line chemotherapy in HRPC, with other agents and combinations now under evaluation in ongoing clinical trials. Patients whose tumors progress through first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options available to them and less than half of all men with HRPC will receive any second-line chemotherapy. To date, only one phase III randomized clinical trial has been completed in this setting and no therapies are FDA-approved. We review here the entirety of phase II and III data evaluating chemotherapy agents in second-line HRPC.

Small EJ, Halabi S, Kantoff P, D'Amico A, Stadler W, Kelley WK, Mohler J, Bajorin D, Vogelzang NJ. · University of California/San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #16740791 links to  free full text

Abstract: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Genitourinary (GU) Committee has developed a multidisciplinary approach to treatment of GU cancer and has integrated correlative science research into the major research themes of the GU Committee. In localized prostate cancer, trials have evaluated novel approaches in radiation therapy. For patients with recurrence after local therapy, a trial evaluating local recurrence with salvage prostatectomy and a study of systemic therapy with "peripheral androgen blockade" were undertaken. Major contributions have been made in developing and testing therapeutics for advanced, androgen-independent prostate cancer (ketoconazole, suramin, estramustine/docetaxel, and docetaxel/bevacizumab), and in developing predictive markers and algorithms to assess prognosis in these patients. Contributions in kidney cancer have included the development of novel trial methodology, such as the randomized discontinuation trial design, and the testing of antiangiogenics. In addition to these areas, future work of the committee will include further development of therapy for earlier-stage prostate cancer patients and bladder cancer patients.

Davis NB, Jani AB, Vogelzang NJ. · Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. · Urol Clin North Am. · Pubmed #12735514 No free full text.

Abstract: There is compelling evidence that early hormonal therapy prolongs life in many stages of prostate cancer. Large-scale trials to answer this question have not yet been conducted in surgically treated patients or in patients with PSA-only relapse. Thus, many physicians and patients use early hormone therapy in PSA-only relapse. Many unique new agents are being tested in this population and may offer benefits. Patients and physicians are encouraged to participate in such trials, with hormone therapy reserved for subsequent use. Following failure of primary hormone therapy, a standard algorithm of care exists: antiandrogen withdrawal, use of alternative or first-line anti-androgens. ketoconazole. and chemotherapy. At each interval, clinical trials should be offered since none of these maneuvers are proven to prolong life.

Vogelzang NJ. · Department of Medicine and Surgery (Urology), University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, Chicago, IL 60637-1470, USA. · Semin Oncol. · Pubmed #11894007 No free full text.

Abstract: Because of an annual morbidity of 225,000 patients and mortality of over 56,000 patients per year in the United States from metastatic genitourinary malignancies, there is a great need for new systemic agents. With its activity and low toxicity, gemcitabine has begun to play a growing role in genitourinary cancer treatment and clinical trials. Substantial activity has been reported for gemcitabine combinations in the treatment of bladder cancer (median survival in one study of nearly 20 months) and for gemcitabine alone or in combinations in testicular cancer patients. Lower (but real) levels of activity have also been observed for gemcitabine combinations in renal carcinoma (17% response rate) and for monotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (7%). These data suggest the need for further trials of gemcitabine alone or in combinations in genitourinary cancer patients.

Small EJ, Reese DM, Vogelzang NJ. · University of California, San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94115, USA. · Semin Oncol. · Pubmed #10604272 No free full text.

Abstract: The treatment of advanced prostate cancer has evolved rapidly in the last several years. Therapeutic options for patients with advanced disease, once limited to the use of androgen deprivation, have expanded to include a number of interventions, including secondary hormonal manipulations, chemotherapy, and a variety of investigational approaches.

D'Amico AV, Halabi S, Vollmer R, Loffredo M, McMahon E, Sanford B, Archer L, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ, Kantoff PW, Anonymous00198. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. · Urology. · Pubmed #18291508 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: It has been hypothesized that abnormal p53 protein expression is associated with a worse prognosis after radiation (RT) and androgen suppression therapy (AST). This hypothesis was prospectively tested. METHODS: Between May 1997 and April 2001, 180 men with clinical stage T1c-T3cN0M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were registered on a study evaluating whether the endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI)-defined change in tumor volume (TV) during neoadjuvant (n) AST was associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome. Of these, 141 had sufficient tissue to perform immunohistochemical detection of the p53 protein expression status and 113 had complete eMRI information. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether p53 protein expression status predicted time to PSA failure adjusting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.9 years and adjusting for PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, and eMRI-defined TV change during nAST, men with abnormal compared with normal p53 expression were at increased risk of PSA failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-5.9; P = 0.008 for the 141; HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.4; P = 0.03 for the 113). Adjusted estimates of PSA failure were significantly higher (P = 0.03) in men with abnormal compared with normal p53 expression. At 5 years, these respective estimates were 33% and 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing local control and randomized trials evaluating the impact on survival of adding novel agents to maximal local therapy are warranted in men whose prostate cancer demonstrates abnormal p53 expression.

D'Amico AV, Halabi S, Tempany C, Titelbaum D, Philips GK, Loffredo M, McMahon E, Sanford B, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ, Anonymous00001. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #18037582 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We prospectively determined whether the change in tumor volume (TV) during 2 months of neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy (nAST) measured using conventional 1.5 Tesla endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI) was associated with the risk of recurrence after radiation (RT) and 6 months of AST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2001, 180 men with clinical stage T1c-T3cN0M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were registered. Fifteen were found to be ineligible and the institutional MR radiologist could not assess the TV in 32, leaving 133 for analysis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether a significant association existed between eMRI-defined TV progression during nAST and time to recurrence adjusting for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (8 to 10 or 7 vs. 6 or less) and stage (T3 vs. T1-2). RESULTS: After a median follow up of 6.7 years and adjusting for known prognostic factors, there was a significant increase in the risk of PSA failure (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.1-4.5; p = 0.025) in men with eMRI-defined TV progression during nAST. Specifically, adjusted estimates of PSA failure were significantly higher (p = 0.032) in men with, compared with men without, eMRI-defined TV progression reaching 38% vs. 19%, respectively, by 5 years. CONCLUSION: Eradicating intraprostatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) by maximizing local control and randomized trials assessing whether survival is improved when agents active against HRPC are combined with maximal local therapy are needed in men who progress based on eMRI during nAST.

Ryan CJ, Halabi S, Ou SS, Vogelzang NJ, Kantoff P, Small EJ. · Urologic Oncology Program, University of California,/San Francisco, California 94143, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #17404083 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Adrenal androgens activate the androgen receptor and stimulate prostate cancer growth. Ketoconazole is used as an inhibitor of adrenal androgen synthesis in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer. This study analyzes the relationship between pretreatment androgen levels and outcome following ketoconazole treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Baseline levels of three adrenal androgens (androstenedione, dehydroepiandrostenedione, and dehydroepiandrostenedione-sulfate) and testosterone were measured. Regression models (logistic and proportional hazard) were used to assess the prognostic significance of these levels in predicting overall survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined by Consensus Criteria. RESULTS: In 103 patients with available levels, PSA response rate was 28% and median response duration was 4.8 months. The median baseline androstenedione level was 0.64 ng/mL and was 0.88 ng/mL versus 0.53 ng/mL for those with and without a PSA response, respectively (P = 0.034). In univariate analysis, elevation of baseline androstenedione levels was predictive of PSA response [odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.03-4.96; P = 0.043]. In multivariate analysis, both the uppermost and the middle tertile of baseline androstenedione level were associated with an improved overall survival compared with those in the lower tertile (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98; P = 0.40; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90; P = 0.018, respectively). A linear correlation was observed among all androgen levels. CONCLUSIONS: Higher androstenedione levels predict likelihood of response to ketoconazole and improved survival compared with patients with lower levels. These data suggest that therapy with ketoconazole is less effective in patients with low levels of androgen at baseline.

Lara PN, Stadler WM, Longmate J, Quinn DI, Wexler J, Van Loan M, Twardowski P, Gumerlock PH, Vogelzang NJ, Vokes EE, Lenz HJ, Doroshow JH, Gandara DR. · University of California Davis Cancer Center and the University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #16533781 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: BMS-275291 is a selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI) that does not inhibit sheddases implicated in the dose-limiting arthritis of older MMPIs. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of two doses of BMS-275291 (1,200 versus 2,400 mg) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients with bone metastases to probe for a dose-response relationship and to assess differential toxicities. Serial serum and urine specimens were collected to assess for markers of bone metabolism. METHODS: The primary end point was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS). Eligibility criteria included documentation of androgen-independent disease (including anti-androgen withdrawal), skeletal metastasis, adequate end-organ function and performance status, and no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomized to 1,200 mg orally once daily (arm A) or 1,200 mg orally twice daily (arm B). Response was assessed every 56 days. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled: 39 in arm A and 41 in arm B. There were no responders by prostate-specific antigen or measurable disease to treatment. Stable disease was noted at 8 weeks in 39% of patients in arm A and in 17% of patients in arm B. Progression of disease at 8 weeks was seen in 61% of patients in arm A versus 83% of patients in arm B. Median survival time was 21.6 months (95% confidence interval, 17.5; not reached), whereas median PFS time was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval 1.74; 2) for all patients. Patients in arm A had a median survival time that was not reached, whereas patients on arm B has a median survival time of 21 months (P = 0.2). PFS at 4 months favored arm A: 22% versus 10% (log-rank, P = 0.008). Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 5 (13%) patients in arm A and in 9 (22%) patients in arm B. Grade 4 toxicities were uncommon (only 4% of patients): one each of thrombosis, fatigue, and motor neuropathy was seen in the arm B. Bone marker studies showed that baseline serum levels of N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, procollagen I NH2-terminal propeptide, and PICP had prognostic significance for PFS and/or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of dose schedule, BMS-275291 was well tolerated in HRPC patients and had no dose-limiting arthritis. Toxicities differed modestly according to the dose schedule employed. As overall survival and PFS favored the once daily schedule, this dose schedule is recommended for future studies. Baseline markers of bone metabolism may have prognostic value in HRPC patients with bone metastases.

Davis NB, Ryan CW, Stadler WM, Vogelzang NJ. · Division of Neoplastic Diseases and Related Disorders, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #16153201 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and time to PSA or radiographic progression in men with prostate cancer refractory to bicalutamide and/or flutamide therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with histologically confirmed prostate cancer not amenable to curative surgery or radiation therapy were eligible for the study if they had radiographic or PSA progression on at least one antiandrogen (not nilutamide) despite continued androgen suppression and standard antiandrogen withdrawal periods. All men received nilutamide 150 mg/day orally for > or = 8 weeks unless there was unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. All men were evaluated for response, safety and toxicity. Baseline PSA levels, chest X-ray, bone scan and abdominopelvic computed tomography studies were obtained; the re-evaluation included PSA levels every 4 weeks and repeated imaging every 8 weeks in those with baseline abnormalities. The chest X-ray was repeated if there were pulmonary symptoms. Nineteen men were consented and 16 were evaluable for response. RESULTS: The median (range) Gleason score was 7 (6-9) and the median number of previous second-line therapies was 2 (1-4). Bicalutamide therapy had failed in all patients. At baseline, 13 (of 16 men) had radiographically evident disease, nine with diffuse osseous and four with radiographically measurable metastases. There was no grade 3/4 toxicity; the commonest grade 1/2 toxicities were constipation (three), sensory neuropathy (four), fatigue (six), and visual changes (two) involving transiently altered colour vision and sensitivity to light, respectively. Responses included three partial and 13 with progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The study was discontinued after a planned interim analysis because nilutamide had no apparent activity. Although well tolerated, nilutamide offers benefit to few men with prostate cancer in whom bicalutamide has failed.

Ryan CW, Stadler WM, Vogelzang NJ. · Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #15839914 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy, in a dose-escalation study, of exisulind (an oral sulphone metabolite of sulindac thought to induce apoptosis in malignant cells by inhibiting cGMP-phosphodiesterase) combined with docetaxel in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), as pre-clinical studies suggested activity against prostate cancer and synergy with cytotoxic agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with HRPC were treated with oral exisulind twice daily for 21-day cycles and intravenous docetaxel given for 1 h on the first day of each cycle. Three dose levels were assessed, combining exisulind 150 and 250 mg twice daily with docetaxel at 60 or 75 mg/m2. Toxicity was then evaluated using standard criteria. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose was determined to be exisulind 250 mg and docetaxel 60 mg/m2, with escalation to 75 mg/m2 after cycle 1, as tolerated. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities among all patients were neutropenia (56%), infection (24%) and hyperglycaemia (18%). Twelve of 32 evaluable patients (38%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 23-55%) had a decline in PSA by at least half. Only four of 17 evaluable patients (95% CI, 1-47%) treated at the phase II dose level had such a decline in PSA. The median (95% CI) overall survival of all patients was 16 (12.9-19.7) months and median progression-free survival 4.7 (2.7-5.2) months. CONCLUSION: The combination of exisulind and docetaxel was tolerable in patients with HRPC. The PSA response rates do not suggest an improvement over historical data with single-agent docetaxel in this population.

Ahles TA, Herndon JE, Small EJ, Vogelzang NJ, Kornblith AB, Ratain MJ, Stadler W, Palchak D, Marshall ME, Wilding G, Petrylak D, Holland JC, Anonymous00172. · Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #15484217 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Research has suggested that men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma have a lower quality of life (QOL) compared with men who have hormone-sensitive prostate carcinoma and that quality of life (QOL) steadily declines over the last year of life for men with prostate carcinoma. The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether there was evidence of palliative effects associated with suramin at any of the three doses administered in the original clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate were randomized to receive suramin at a low dose (n = 129; median age, 69 years), an intermediate dose (n = 129; median age, 71 years), or a high dose (n = 127; median age, 70 years) as part of the Intergroup 0159/Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480 trial. Patients completed a battery of assessment tools, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Prostate, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), the Brief Pain Inventory, and an opioid medication log, at baseline, on Day 1 of the sixth week of active therapy, during the second week after treatment termination, and 3 months after administration of the final suramin dose. RESULTS: Patients who received low-dose suramin reported improvement in QOL (FACT-General: P < 0.01; FACT-Treatment Outcome Index: P < 0.01) and decreased levels of depression (CES-D: P < 0.0006) during treatment compared with patients in the intermediate- and high-dose arms. After treatment, all groups experienced equal decreases in FACT and CES-D scores. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of results suggests that the lowest dose of suramin administered had a palliative effect in terms of improvement in QOL and decreased levels of depression and that this effect was lost once suramin was discontinued.

Ryan CW, Vogelzang NJ, Vokes EE, Kindler HL, Undevia SD, Humerickhouse R, André AK, Wang Q, Carr RA, Ratain MJ. · Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cancer Research Center, and Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, University of Chicago, Chicago, and Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #15240529 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Atrasentan is an orally bioavailable selective antagonist of the endothelin receptor ET(A). Due to the potential activity of this agent against prostate cancer, the majority of subjects enrolled in prior studies had been male. This Phase I study sought to determine the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of daily atrasentan in a population of both female and male subjects with advanced malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with refractory malignancies received atrasentan once daily at doses ranging from 5 mg to 75 mg. At least 3 subjects were treated at each dose level before enrollment began at the next higher dose level. Enrollment for specific dose levels was expanded if any subject experienced serious drug-related toxicity. Plasma concentration profiles for atrasentan were determined after dosing on days 1 and 28. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received atrasentan at doses from 5 mg to 75 mg. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were headache (60%), rhinitis (49%), and peripheral edema (31%). These toxicities were mild to moderate in severity and reversible on cessation of treatment. Dose escalation was stopped at the 75-mg dose level due to the occurrence of three severe adverse events (2 hyponatremia and 1 hypotension). Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed after oral administration; mean time to maximum observed concentration ranged from 0.3 to 1.7 h. Terminal elimination half-life averaged 26 h. No significant difference between sexes was found in any atrasentan pharmacokinetic parameter tested, including maximum observed plasma concentration, time to maximum observed concentration, minimum observed plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and elimination rate constant. CONCLUSIONS: Atrasentan is well tolerated in both female and male cancer patients at doses of up to 60 mg/day with dose-limiting toxicity observed at 75 mg/day. The most frequently observed toxicities were headache, rhinitis, and edema. There was no statistically significant difference in atrasentan pharmacokinetics between sexes.

Stadler WM, Cao D, Vogelzang NJ, Ryan CW, Hoving K, Wright R, Karrison T, Vokes EE. · University of Chicago Phase II Consortium, University of Chicago, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #15161690 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the activity of the antiangiogenic agent and VEGFR2 inhibitor SU5416 in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: Thirty-six chemotherapy naïve patients were randomized to treatment with SU5416 (145 mg/m(2)) and dexamethasone premedication or dexamethasone alone. Patients in the control arm could cross over to experimental therapy after progression. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was measured every 2 weeks, and radiological evaluation was performed every 8 weeks. In vitro assessment of SU5416 on PSA secretion was assessed in the LNCaP cell line. Baseline serum basic fibroblast growth factor and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were explored as prognostic factors. RESULTS: VEGF receptor-2 expression is detectable in prostate cancer cell lines, and SU5416 inhibited in vitro PSA secretion. No effect of SU5416 on PSA secretion or time to progression is detectable in patients. VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor were not prognostic. Headache and fatigue were the most common SU5416 toxicities, but hyperglycemia, hyponatremia, lymphopenia, infection, and adrenal suppression, all attributable to steroids and the required central line, were common. CONCLUSION: No disease modifying effects of SU5416 were detectable in this small study. Modest toxicity, an inconvenient administration schedule, and availability of other VEGFR-targeted agents support the decision to halt further evaluation of SU5416 in prostate cancer.

Small EJ, Halabi S, Dawson NA, Stadler WM, Rini BI, Picus J, Gable P, Torti FM, Kaplan E, Vogelzang NJ. · UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St, Room A-718, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #15020604 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Antiandrogen withdrawal (AAWD) results in a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decline in PSA level of > or =50%) in 15% to 30% of androgen-independent prostate cancer (AiPCa) patients. Thereafter, adrenal androgen ablation with agents such as ketoconazole (K) is commonly utilized. The therapeutic effect of AAWD alone was compared with simultaneous AAWD and K therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: AiPCa patients were randomized to undergo AAWD alone (n=132), or together with K (400 mg orally [p.o.] tid) and hydrocortisone (30 mg p.o. each morning, 10 mg p.o. each evening; n=128). Patients who developed progressive disease after AAWD alone were eligible for deferred treatment with K. RESULTS: Eleven percent of patients undergoing AAWD alone had a PSA response, compared to 27% of patients who underwent AAWD and simultaneous K (P=.0002). Objective responses were observed in 2% of patients treated with AAWD alone compared to 20% in patients treated with AAWD/K (P=.02). There was no difference in survival. PSA and objective responses were observed in 32% and 7%, respectively, of patients receiving deferred K, and were more common in patients with prior AAWD response. Treatment with K was well tolerated, and resulted in a decline in adrenal androgen levels, which rose at the time of disease progression. CONCLUSION: K has modest activity in AiPCa patients, while AAWD alone has minimal activity. Adrenal androgen levels fall with treatment with K and then climb at the time of progression, suggesting that progressive disease while on K may be due to tachyphylaxis to the adrenolytic properties of K.

Higano CS, Vogelzang NJ, Sosman JA, Feng A, Caron D, Small EJ. · University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #14977818 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, biological activity, and feasibility of repeated doses of the dendritic cell (DC)-stimulating agent Flt3 ligand (FL) in patients with bone scan-negative hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Experimental Design: Thirty-one patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer who had elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and negative bone scans were enrolled. Six cycles (28 days each) were planned. In the first cycle, patients were randomized to FL or placebo. All patients received open-label FL during the next five courses. DC, anti-FL antibody, and PSA levels were measured every 15 days to assess biological activity. RESULTS: DCs increased markedly in FL-treated patients from precycle to day 15, and the increase was consistent in each cycle. Mean percentages of DCs in peripheral blood ranged from 1.4% to 1.9% precycle and from 10.1% to 13.9% on day 15, and after the first cycle, absolute counts on day 15 were approximately 29-fold higher than precycle levels. Natural killer cell counts (CD56(+)) were found to be elevated after cycle 1 (154% increase versus 2.8% decrease in placebo group at day 22). Twenty-two of 27 patients tested developed nonneutralizing anti-FL antibody. The most frequently experienced toxicity was injection site reaction, followed by asthenia, rash, and diarrhea. Although median PSA levels did not vary during any cycle, a significant slowing in velocity of PSA was observed while patients were on-study (relative velocity = 0.002) compared with prestudy PSA velocity (relative velocity = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: FL was well tolerated. FL consistently produced an increase in DC count without any evidence of decreasing response with continued exposure. The expansion of DCs and the slowing of PSA velocity after administration of FL suggest potential clinical applications in the immunotherapy of prostate cancer.

Eisenberger MA, Laufer M, Vogelzang NJ, Sartor O, Thornton D, Neubauer BL, Sinibaldi V, Lieskovsky G, Carducci MA, Zahurak M, Raghavan D. · Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231-1000, USA. · Urology. · Pubmed #14751361 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To study the safety, pharmacokinetics, biologic activity, and preliminary efficacy of the bispecific 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor (LY320236) in prostate cancer. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer were sequentially (nonrandomly) assigned in cohorts to receive one of five single daily oral doses of LY320236 (10, 50, 150, 250, and 500 mg). Serial evaluations included serum testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenediol glucuronide, estradiol, and pharmacokinetics on days 1, 29, and 57. Toxicity assessments, x-rays/scans, and blood tests, including serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination, were done at regular intervals. RESULTS: Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with 3 of 51 patients developing reversible grade 3-4 toxicity (one diarrhea, two elevated liver enzymes). Peak blood levels (2 to 3 hours after drug administration) were greater for doses of 150 mg or greater compared with less than 150-mg doses with slow accumulation. Serum levels of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and androstenediol glucuronide did not change significantly during treatment; however, a statistically significant increase occurred in serum estradiol levels in both the castration and noncastration groups. One of 26 in the noncastration group and 4 (27%) of 15 in the castration group with baseline PSA levels of 5 ng/mL or greater had a 50% or greater PSA decline for 4 weeks or longer. CONCLUSIONS: LY320236 treatment is associated with modest reversible toxicity. An elevation of estradiol levels was seen in both castration and noncastration groups, although PSA declines were primarily seen in the castration group. The absence of cardiovascular toxicity suggests that this agent may be a promising alternative to exogenous estrogens in patients with prostate cancer who demonstrate evidence of disease progression after initial androgen deprivation treatment.

Vogelzang NJ, Karrison T, Stadler WM, Garcia J, Cohn H, Kugler J, Troeger T, Giannone L, Arrieta R, Ratain MJ, Vokes EE. · Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #14692025 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The goal of the current study was to determine the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and objective response rates and the pharmacokinetics associated with a monthly x 3 one-hour infusion of suramin in 58 patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. METHODS: A PSA response was defined as a > 50% reduction in the PSA level from baseline for at least 3 consecutive evaluations over a minimum of 6 weeks. The suramin dose was 2400 mg/m(2) taken intravenously on Day 1, 1620 mg/m(2) on Day 29, and 1292 mg/m(2) on Day 57. All patients received 0.5 mg dexamethasone twice daily. RESULTS: Among 56 evaluable patients (median entry PSA level, 229.5 ng/mL), there were 21 PSA responders (37.5%). Among 27 patients with measurable disease, there were 5 responders (4 partial and 1 complete). The median overall survival time was 15.3 months. Grade III fatigue (14.1%) was the predominant toxicity observed. Suramin plasma levels remained high even 3 months after treatment was discontinued. Among the 12 evaluable patients who previously had received chemotherapy, the PSA response rate was 42%; one response was observed among 4 patients with measurable disease, and the median survival was 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly bolus suramin was well tolerated, reduced PSA levels, and induced objective responses, even in patients who previously had received chemotherapy.

Oh WK, Halabi S, Kelly WK, Werner C, Godley PA, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ, Anonymous00009. · Lank Center for Geritourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #14669278 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The authors determined the safety and efficacy of estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. METHODS: In the current multicenter, cooperative group study, patients with advanced prostate carcinoma whose disease progressed despite androgen deprivation therapy were treated with a combination of oral estramustine(240 mg three times per day for 5 days), 70 mg/m2 of docetaxel, and carboplatin at a dose of (area under the curve) 5. G-CSF was used to minimize the neutropenia associated with this regimen. Each cycle was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated with a median of 7 cycles of therapy. Of the 34 evaluable patients with elevated pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, 23 (68%) had a > or = 50% decline in PSA and 20 (59%) had a > or = 75% decline. Twenty-one patients had measurable disease, with 1 complete response (5%) and 10 partial responses (47%), for an overall measurable response rate of 52% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 30-74%). The most common Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicities (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) included neutropenia in 23% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 13%, and fatigue in 13%. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 1 patient (3%). The overall median time to disease progression was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6-10 months) and the overall survival period was 19 months (95% CI, 13-26 months). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin with G-CSF support was found to have significant clinical activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with progressive hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma.

Taplin ME, Rajeshkumar B, Halabi S, Werner CP, Woda BA, Picus J, Stadler W, Hayes DF, Kantoff PW, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ, Anonymous00340. · University of Massachusetts Memorial Health Center, Department of Oncology, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12860943 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The mechanisms responsible for prostate cancer androgen independence are diverse. Mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) gene that broaden ligand specificity have been implicated. Bone marrow specimens containing prostate tumor were obtained from men undergoing antiandrogen withdrawal for AR sequence analysis and clinical correlation. Materials and METHODS: Eligible men enrolled on a trial of antiandrogen withdrawal had a minimum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 5 ng/dL that was increasing on castration therapy including an antiandrogen. With informed consent, marrow biopsies were obtained to collect prostate tumor. Additional samples were obtained from men enrolled on chemotherapy trials. AR cDNA or DNA was polymerase chain reaction-amplified, cloned, and sequenced. The AR CAG repeat length was recorded. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four bone marrow biopsies were obtained, and 48 had prostate tumor detected by light microscopy. The ARs from these 48 samples were sequenced. Overall, five (10%) of 48 tumors had mutated ARs. AR point mutations were detected in the hormone-binding domain involved in transcription factor binding. Three mutations were novel in prostate cancer. One tumor sample had a CAG repeat length of 21, compared with germline length of 22 repeats. There was no association between detectability of AR mutations and antiandrogen withdrawal response or survival. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that AR mutations are present in approximately 10% of patients with prostate cancer who experience treatment failure with hormone therapy that included an antiandrogen. Mutations in the AR likely confer a growth advantage for a subset of progressive prostate cancers. Correlation of AR mutation with antiandrogen withdrawal response or survival could not be made.

Carducci MA, Padley RJ, Breul J, Vogelzang NJ, Zonnenberg BA, Daliani DD, Schulman CC, Nabulsi AA, Humerickhouse RA, Weinberg MA, Schmitt JL, Nelson JB. · Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12586806 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atrasentan (ABT-627), an endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in the treatment of asymptomatic, hormone-refractory prostatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPCa) patients was conducted in the United States and Europe. Two hundred eighty-eight asymptomatic patients with HRPCa and evidence of metastatic disease were randomly assigned to one of three study groups receiving a once-daily oral dose of placebo, 2.5 mg atrasentan, or 10 mg atrasentan, respectively. Primary end point was time to progression; secondary end points included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, bone scan changes, and changes in bone and tumor markers. RESULTS: The three treatment groups were similar in all baseline characteristics. Median time to progression in intent-to-treat (ITT) patients (n = 288) was longer in the 10-mg atrasentan group compared with the placebo group: 183 v 137 days, respectively; (P =.13). Median time to progression in evaluable patients (n = 244) was significantly prolonged, from 129 days (placebo group) to 196 days (10-mg atrasentan group; P =.021). For both ITT and evaluable populations in the 10-mg atrasentan group, median time to PSA progression was twice that of the placebo group (155 v 71 days; P =.002). Patients who received placebo continued to have significant increases from baseline in serum (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), a marker of disease burden; elevations in LDH were uniformly attenuated by atrasentan in the ITT population. Headache, peripheral edema, and rhinitis were primary side effects, typically of mild to moderate severity. Quality of life was not adversely affected by atrasentan. CONCLUSION: Atrasentan is an oral, targeted therapy with favorable tolerability and the potential to delay progression of HRPCa.

Nelson JB, Nabulsi AA, Vogelzang NJ, Breul J, Zonnenberg BA, Daliani DD, Schulman CC, Carducci MA. · Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #12576870 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We examined the effects of atrasentan (endothelin-A receptor antagonist) on bone deposition and resorption markers and on bone scan index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial of hormone refractory prostate cancer patients was done at 74 medical centers in the United States and Europe. A total of 288 asymptomatic patients with hormone refractory prostate adenocarcinoma and evidence of metastatic disease were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups, namely 2.5 mg. atrasentan, 10 mg. atrasentan or placebo administered orally daily until disease progression. The main outcomes measures were changes in bone deposition markers (total alkaline phosphatase and bone alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (N-telopeptides, C-telopeptides and deoxypyridinoline), and in the bone scan index. RESULTS: At baseline markers of bone deposition and resorption were elevated 1.4 to 2.7-fold above respective upper limits of normal. Subjects receiving placebo experienced a 58% elevation in mean total alkaline phosphatase and a 99% elevation in mean bone alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.001), whereas subjects receiving 10 mg. atrasentan maintained stable mean total alkaline phosphatase and bone alkaline phosphatase values compared with baseline. N-telopeptides, C-telopeptides and deoxypyridinoline elevation from baseline were consistently less in patients receiving 10 mg. atrasentan compared with placebo. Similar trends were observed in subjects who received 2.5 mg. atrasentan. Changes in clinical bone scan studies paralleled bone marker changes. CONCLUSIONS: Atrasentan suppressed markers of biochemical and clinical prostate cancer progression in bone and demonstrates clinical activity for hormone refractory prostate cancer.