| 1 |
Guideline Bladder cancer. 2009
Montie JE, Clark PE, Eisenberger MA, El-Galley R, Greenberg RE, Herr HW, Hudes GR, Kuban DA, Kuzel TM, Lange PH, Lele SM, Michalski J, Patterson A, Pohar KS, Richie JP, Sexton WJ, Shipley WU, Small EJ, Trump DL, Walther PJ, Wilson TG, Anonymous00046. · University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #19176203 No free full text.
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 2 |
Guideline Bladder cancer. Clinical guidelines in oncology. 2006
Montie JE, Abrahams NA, Bahnson RR, Eisenberger MA, El-Galley R, Herr HW, Hudes GR, Kuzel TM, Lange PH, Patterson A, Pollack A, Richie JP, Sexton WJ, Shipley WU, Small EJ, Trump DL, Walther PJ, Wilson TG, Anonymous00097. · No affiliation provided · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #17112448 No free full text.
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 3 |
Review Delayed metastatic renal carcinoma to prostate. 2006
Rodriguez A, Kang L, Politis C, Wade M, Sexton WJ, Miranda-Sousa A, Pow-Sang JM. · Genitourinary Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612-9497, USA. · Urology. · Pubmed #16527593 No free full text.
Abstract: Renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the prostate is a rare entity. We report a delayed (9 years) metachronous solitary metastasis presentation of renal cell carcinoma to the prostate. Including our patient, only 5 cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the prostate have been reported. Four patients presented with hematuria and two with bladder outlet obstruction; one had an incidental finding after prostate biopsy. Radical prostatectomy could be considered for patients with the prostate as the only site of disease.
|
| 4 |
Article Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens. 2008
Whittemore DE, Hick EJ, Carter MR, Moul JW, Miranda-Sousa AJ, Sexton WJ. · Department of Pathology, Mike O'Callaghan Federal Hospital, Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #18076949 No free full text.
Abstract: PURPOSE: The Gleason grading system in reporting prostate cancer accounts for the primary and secondary Gleason pattern. The clinical significance of a higher tertiary (third most prevalent) grade is largely unrecognized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radical prostatectomy specimens from 300 patients with Gleason score 7 (3 + 4 or 4 + 3) prostate cancer were pathologically reexamined for the presence of a tertiary grade 5 pattern as well as the association with pathological stage and biochemical recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients met study inclusion criteria. Patients with Gleason score 7 and tertiary grade 5 cancer had significantly higher pathological stage disease than patients with Gleason score 7 without tertiary grade 5 cancer (p <0.001). Gleason score 7 + tertiary pattern 5 tumors were significantly associated with adverse pathological features such as seminal vesicle invasion, extraprostatic extension and lymphovascular invasion compared to Gleason score 7 tumors (p <0.05). The relative effects of a tertiary grade 5 component on all pathological parameters analyzed was greater for Gleason score 7 tumors with a lower primary Gleason pattern 3 vs a higher primary Gleason pattern 4. Patients with Gleason score 7 + tertiary pattern 5 tumors had significantly decreased biochemical recurrence-free survival (54 months) compared to patients with Gleason score 7 tumors (121 months) (p = 0.0005). Preoperative prostate specific antigen, lymphovascular invasion and positive surgical margin status were shown to be independent predictors of prostate specific antigen recurrence on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Small percentages of tertiary grade 5 patterns in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens are associated with aggressive pathological features predictive of advanced pathological stage and biochemical recurrence-free survival.
|
| 5 |
Article Pathologic variables and recurrence rates as related to obesity and race in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. 2004
Amling CL, Riffenburgh RH, Sun L, Moul JW, Lance RS, Kusuda L, Sexton WJ, Soderdahl DW, Donahue TF, Foley JP, Chung AK, McLeod DG. · Department of Urology, Naval Medical Center, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134-5000, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #14691120 No free full text.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine if obesity is associated with higher prostate specific antigen recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to explore racial differences in body mass index (BMI) as a potential explanation for the disparity in outcome between black and white men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional pooled analysis of 3,162 men undergoing RP was conducted at nine US military medical centers between 1987 and 2002. Patients were initially categorized as obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25 to 30 kg/m(2)), or normal (BMI < or = 25 kg/m(2)). For analysis, normal and overweight groups were combined (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)) and compared with the obese group (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)) with regard to biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen > or = 0.2 ng/mL) after RP. RESULTS: Of 3,162 patients, 600 (19.0%) were obese and 2,562 (81%) were not obese. BMI was an independent predictor of higher Gleason grade cancer (P <.001) and was associated with a higher risk of biochemical recurrence (P =.027). Blacks had higher BMI (P <.001) and higher recurrence rates (P =.003) than whites. Both BMI (P =.028) and black race (P =.002) predicted higher prostate specific antigen recurrence rates. In multivariate analysis of race, BMI, and pathologic factors, black race (P =.021) remained a significant independent predictor of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with higher grade cancer and higher recurrence rates after RP. Black men have higher recurrence rates and greater BMI than white men. These findings support the hypothesis that obesity is associated with progression of latent to clinically significant prostate cancer (PC) and suggest that BMI may account, in part, for the racial variability in PC risk.
|
| 6 |
Article Adult prostate sarcoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience. 2001
Sexton WJ, Lance RE, Reyes AO, Pisters PW, Tu SM, Pisters LL. · Department of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #11458058 No free full text.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Sarcoma of prostate origin is rare. Historically, long-term survival rates for adult patients with prostate sarcoma are poor. We analyzed the experience of 1 institution with prostate sarcoma during the last 3 decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 21 patients with prostate sarcoma were reviewed to identify symptoms at presentation, diagnostic procedures, presence and development of metastases, staging evaluation, histological subtype, grade and size of the primary tumor, and treatment sequence, including surgery, and preoperative and postoperative therapies. Several clinicopathological variables were assessed for prognostic importance. RESULTS: Most patients presented with urinary obstruction. The diagnosis of prostate sarcoma was usually established with ultrasound guided biopsy or transurethral resection. Histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma in 12, rhabdomyosarcoma in 4, malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 and unclassified sarcoma in 4 patients. At last followup, 8 patients had no evidence of disease after a median of 81.5 months (range 10 to 197). The remaining 13 patients died of sarcoma (median survival 18 months, range 3 to 94). The 1, 3 and 5-year actuarial survival rates for all 21 patients were 81%, 43% and 38%, respectively. Factors predictive of long-term survival were negative surgical margins (p = 0.0005) and absence of metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.0004). Tumor size and grade, and the histological subtype of prostate sarcoma had no significant influence on actuarial survival. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term disease specific survival rate for adults with prostate sarcoma is poor. Early diagnosis and complete surgical resection offer patients the best chance for cure.
|
|
|