Prostatic Neoplasms: Kantoff P

Mohler J, Babaian RJ, Bahnson RR, Boston B, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, Hauke RJ, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kawachi M, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Logothetis C, MacVicar G, Pollack A, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M, Sandler H, Shrieve D, Srinivas S, Twardowski P, Urban DA, Walsh PC, Anonymous00332. · No affiliation provided · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #17692170 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Scher HI, Eisenberger M, D'Amico AV, Halabi S, Small EJ, Morris M, Kattan MW, Roach M, Kantoff P, Pienta KJ, Carducci MA, Agus D, Slovin SF, Heller G, Kelly WK, Lange PH, Petrylak D, Berg W, Higano C, Wilding G, Moul JW, Partin AN, Logothetis C, Soule HR. · Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #14752077 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To define methodology to show clinical benefit for patients in the state of a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). RESULTS: Hypothesis: A clinical states framework was used to address the hypothesis that definitive phase III trials could not be conducted in this patient population. Patient Population: The Group focused on men with systemic (nonlocalized) recurrence and a defined risk of developing clinically detectable metastases. Models to define systemic versus local recurrence, and risk of metastatic progression were discussed. Intervention: Therapies that have shown favorable effects in more advanced clinical states; meaningful biologic surrogates of activity linked with efficacy in other tumor types; and/or effects on a target or pathway known to contribute to prostate cancer progression in this state can be considered for evaluation. Outcomes: An intervention-specific posttherapy PSA-based outcome definition that would justify further testing should be described at the outset. Reporting: Trial reports should include a table showing the number of patients who achieve a specific PSA-based outcome, the number who remain enrolled onto the trial, and the number who came off study at different time points. The term PSA response should be abandoned. Trial Design: The phases of drug development for this state are optimizing dose and schedule, demonstration of a treatment effect, and clinical benefit. To move a drug forward should require a high bar that includes no rise in PSA in a defined proportion of patients for a specified period of time at a minimum. Agents that do not produce this effect can only be tested in combination. The preferred end point of clinical benefit is prostate cancer-specific survival; the time to development of metastatic disease is an alternative. CONCLUSION: Methodology to show that an intervention alters the natural history of prostate cancer is described. At each stage of development, only agents with sufficient activity should be moved forward.

Bahnson RR, Hanks GE, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kozlowski JM, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Logothetis C, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M, Sandler H, Scardino PT, Taylor RJ, Urban DA, Walsh PC, Wilson TG, Anonymous00207. · James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. · Oncology (Williston Park). · Pubmed #11195405 No free full text.

Abstract: Systemic therapies for prostate cancer are likely to improve, and as they do, they will have enormous impact on the treatment of high-risk and locally advanced cancers. Further technical improvements in radiotherapy and alternative local modalities, such as cryoablation, are also likely, and will bring even more options for local control. It is certain these guidelines will continue to evolve.

Bradley DA, Hussain M, Dipaola RS, Kantoff P. · Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #17644119 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Bone is the most common site of metastatic disease in prostate cancer and the lead cause of significant morbidity. Preclinical and clinical studies have provided insight into the pathophysiology of bone metastases and the changes that occur in the bone microenvironment that result in a favorable site of growth for prostate cancer. We provide an overview of recent advances in understanding bone biology, and bone targeted therapy research and development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed recent research findings related to the biology of bone metastases, approaches to targeting osteoclast function, approaches to targeting osteoblasts and advances in assessing the treatment response to bone targeted therapies in the context of prostate cancer management. RESULTS: To date targeting some of the key players in the bone microenvironment has not been associated with a significant antitumor effect or with meaningful clinical benefit in phase III randomized trials. A significant limitation in the development of bone targeted therapy has been the inability to objectively assess treatment response. Investigation of improved imaging techniques are ongoing to provide better treatment assessment and, therefore, allow more rapid drug screening and development. CONCLUSIONS: It is our recommendation that future therapy development should be combination based, focusing on simultaneous targeting of multiple relevant pathways. Most important of all is the direct targeting of prostate cancer cells.

Pomerantz M, Kantoff P. · The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Annu Rev Med. · Pubmed #16987081 No free full text.

Abstract: Several recent advances have been made in the management of prostate cancer. Active surveillance is an increasingly attractive and reasonable approach for those with low-volume, low-risk disease. For locally advanced or localized high-risk disease, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are emerging as the standard of care. Innovative uses of traditional hormonal treatments can potentially limit common side effects. Recent data also support the utility of second-line hormonal therapy. For the first time, a survival advantage with the use of chemotherapy has been established. Much work is under way to augment its efficacy with novel agents such as targeted therapeutics and tumor vaccines. Recent scientific breakthroughs suggest additional strategies in treating prostate cancer.

Small EJ, Halabi S, Kantoff P, D'Amico A, Stadler W, Kelley WK, Mohler J, Bajorin D, Vogelzang NJ. · University of California/San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #16740791 links to  free full text

Abstract: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Genitourinary (GU) Committee has developed a multidisciplinary approach to treatment of GU cancer and has integrated correlative science research into the major research themes of the GU Committee. In localized prostate cancer, trials have evaluated novel approaches in radiation therapy. For patients with recurrence after local therapy, a trial evaluating local recurrence with salvage prostatectomy and a study of systemic therapy with "peripheral androgen blockade" were undertaken. Major contributions have been made in developing and testing therapeutics for advanced, androgen-independent prostate cancer (ketoconazole, suramin, estramustine/docetaxel, and docetaxel/bevacizumab), and in developing predictive markers and algorithms to assess prognosis in these patients. Contributions in kidney cancer have included the development of novel trial methodology, such as the randomized discontinuation trial design, and the testing of antiangiogenics. In addition to these areas, future work of the committee will include further development of therapy for earlier-stage prostate cancer patients and bladder cancer patients.

Kantoff P. · Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. · Oncology (Williston Park). · Pubmed #15945343 No free full text.

Abstract: Androgen-deprivation therapy, usually with combined androgen blockade, is standard initial treatment for advanced prostate cancer. With failure of initial treatment, as indicated by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, second-line hormonal therapy is usually instituted. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that systemic chemotherapy has an important role in hormone-refractory disease. Phase II trials have demonstrated high PSA and measurable disease response rates with taxane single-agent and combination treatments. One recent phase III trial showed that docetaxel (Taxotere)/ estramustine (Emcyt) significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and PSA response rate compared with mitoxantrone (Novantrone) plus prednisone. Another phase III trial demonstrated that docetaxel given every 3 weeks plus prednisone significantly improved overall survival, PSA response rate, pain relief response rate, and quality of life compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone. On the basis of these findings, every-3-week docetaxel plus prednisone is now considered standard first-line therapy for metastatic hormone-refractory disease. There is considerable optimism that treatment can be further improved. Studies of taxane combinations with bevacizumab (Avastin), thalidomide (Thalomid), bortezomib (Velcade), antisense Bcl-2 oligonucleotide, mTOR inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and KDR inhibitors are under way. Randomized phase III trials in progress or planned are examining docetaxel in combination with imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) or calcitriol and docetaxel/prednisone in combination with bevacizumab and an antisense clusterin compound. Other promising systemic agents include epothilones and atrasentan, and promising vaccines include Provenge, GVAX, and Prostvac.

Smith MR, Kantoff P. · Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA. · Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif. · Pubmed #10800495 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Reid P, Kantoff P, Oh W. · Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber-Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · Invest New Drugs. · Pubmed #10665479 No free full text.

Abstract: Antiandrogens competitively inhibit ligand binding to the androgen receptor (AR), and are used therapeutically in prostate cancer patients. The AR functions as a ligand dependent transcription factor that transduces androgen binding into increased transcription of androgen dependent genes. AR blockade induces programmed cell death in the vast majority of malignant and benign prostate cancer cells that have not previously been exposed to androgen ablation. The antiandrogens are divided structurally into the steroidal and non steroidal agents. The biological effects of the steroidal versus nonsteroidal agents are distinguished by differences in their effects on serum testosterone levels, and by their activity at receptors other than the androgen receptor. There is extensive clinical experience in the palliative and curative therapy of prostate cancer using antiandrogens as monotherapy or antiandrogens in combination with luteinizing hormone agonists or surgical castration. Prolonged therapy with antiandrogens selects for mutations in the AR that change the AR ligand specificity and permits stimulation by ligands that are usually inhibitory. These mutations give insight into one of the means by which prostate cancer progresses despite antiandrogen therapy, and also helps to explain the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. Areas of active research that may affect the future use of antiandrogens include the ongoing evaluation of antiandrogens in combination with 5 alpha reductase inhibitors to achieve AR blockade without inducing castrate testosterone levels. There is also interest in developing selective androgen receptor modulators (SARM) that can achieve AR blockade without causing the increased testosterone levels produced by the nonsteroidal antiandrogens currently in use.

Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA, Eisenberger MA, Higano C, Bubley GJ, Dreicer R, Petrylak D, Kantoff P, Basch E, Kelly WK, Figg WD, Small EJ, Beer TM, Wilding G, Martin A, Hussain M, Anonymous00048. · Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #18309951 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To update eligibility and outcome measures in trials that evaluate systemic treatment for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone. METHODS: A committee of investigators experienced in conducting trials for prostate cancer defined new consensus criteria by reviewing previous criteria, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and emerging trial data. RESULTS: The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) recommends a two-objective paradigm: (1) controlling, relieving, or eliminating disease manifestations that are present when treatment is initiated and (2) preventing or delaying disease manifestations expected to occur. Prostate cancers progressing despite castrate levels of testosterone are considered castration resistant and not hormone refractory. Eligibility is defined using standard disease assessments to authenticate disease progression, prior treatment, distinct clinical subtypes, and predictive models. Outcomes are reported independently for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), imaging, and clinical measures, avoiding grouped categorizations such as complete or partial response. In most trials, early changes in PSA and/or pain are not acted on without other evidence of disease progression, and treatment should be continued for at least 12 weeks to ensure adequate drug exposure. Bone scans are reported as "new lesions" or "no new lesions," changes in soft-tissue disease assessed by RECIST, and pain using validated scales. Defining eligibility for prevent/delay end points requires attention to estimated event frequency and/or random assignment to a control group. CONCLUSION: PCWG2 recommends increasing emphasis on time-to-event end points (ie, failure to progress) as decision aids in proceeding from phase II to phase III trials. Recommendations will evolve as data are generated on the utility of intermediate end points to predict clinical benefit.

Ryan CJ, Halabi S, Ou SS, Vogelzang NJ, Kantoff P, Small EJ. · Urologic Oncology Program, University of California,/San Francisco, California 94143, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #17404083 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Adrenal androgens activate the androgen receptor and stimulate prostate cancer growth. Ketoconazole is used as an inhibitor of adrenal androgen synthesis in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer. This study analyzes the relationship between pretreatment androgen levels and outcome following ketoconazole treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Baseline levels of three adrenal androgens (androstenedione, dehydroepiandrostenedione, and dehydroepiandrostenedione-sulfate) and testosterone were measured. Regression models (logistic and proportional hazard) were used to assess the prognostic significance of these levels in predicting overall survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined by Consensus Criteria. RESULTS: In 103 patients with available levels, PSA response rate was 28% and median response duration was 4.8 months. The median baseline androstenedione level was 0.64 ng/mL and was 0.88 ng/mL versus 0.53 ng/mL for those with and without a PSA response, respectively (P = 0.034). In univariate analysis, elevation of baseline androstenedione levels was predictive of PSA response [odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.03-4.96; P = 0.043]. In multivariate analysis, both the uppermost and the middle tertile of baseline androstenedione level were associated with an improved overall survival compared with those in the lower tertile (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98; P = 0.40; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90; P = 0.018, respectively). A linear correlation was observed among all androgen levels. CONCLUSIONS: Higher androstenedione levels predict likelihood of response to ketoconazole and improved survival compared with patients with lower levels. These data suggest that therapy with ketoconazole is less effective in patients with low levels of androgen at baseline.

Michaelson MD, Kaufman DS, Kantoff P, Oh WK, Smith MR. · Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #16804927 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer is characterized by the presence of osteoblastic bone metastases. Bone metastases account for most of the morbidity from this disease. Inhibition of osteoclast activity with the potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid reduces skeletal complications and decreases serum levels of biochemical bone turnover markers compared with placebo. Atrasentan is an investigational agent that inhibits endothelin-1 receptor, resulting in decreased osteoblast activity. METHODS: The effects of atrasentan alone versus combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid were investigated on bone turnover markers in men with bone metastases from prostate cancer. Forty-four men were randomized to receive either atrasentan alone or combination therapy, and 33 completed at least 12 weeks of treatment and were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: Treatment with the combination resulted in significantly lower serum levels of N-telopeptide, a marker of bone resorption, compared with treatment with atrasentan alone. There was no difference between groups in serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, a marker of bone formation, at 12 weeks. Commonly observed adverse effects were edema, rhinitis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, most of which were NCI CTC (version 3.0) Grade 1. No Grade 4 or 5 treatment-related toxicities were observed. There was minimal clinical efficacy, with no objective responses and only 1 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid on bone turnover markers in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

D'Amico AV, Kantoff P, Loffredo M, Renshaw AA, Loffredo B, Chen MH. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #16682147 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We identified factors associated with the length of survival after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study cohort comprised 81 of 206 men enrolled on a randomized trial evaluating external-beam radiation therapy (RT) with or without androgen suppression therapy (AST) and who experienced PSA failure. Salvage AST was administered at a PSA level of approximately 10 ng/mL as per protocol. Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with length of survival after PSA failure. RESULTS: A PSA DT (doubling time) <6 months (p = 0.04) and age at the time of PSA failure (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with length of survival. By 5 years, 35% and 65% of all-cause mortality was from prostate cancer in men whose age at PSA failure was 75 or higher vs. <75, respectively. Across all ages, 0%, 4%, as compared with 63% of men, were estimated to die of prostate cancer within 5 years after PSA failure if their PSA DT was >12, 6-12, or <6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age and a PSA DT <6 months at the time of PSA failure are associated with a significantly shorter survival.

Liu G, Gandara DR, Lara PN, Raghavan D, Doroshow JH, Twardowski P, Kantoff P, Oh W, Kim K, Wilding G. · Medical Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #14871968 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Flavopiridol is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against prostate cancer cell lines. A Phase II trial was conducted to determine the activity of flavopiridol in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 36 patients was enrolled from several institutions and treated with a 72-h continuous infusion of flavopiridol every 14 days at the eventual starting dose of 40 mg/m(2)/day. Dose escalation up to 60 mg/m(2)/day was permitted if no significant toxicity was observed. Responses were assessed every 12 weeks. Only those patients completing four courses of the 72-h infusion were considered evaluable for response because the primary objective was to determine progression-free survival at 6 months given the cytostatic nature of the agent. RESULTS: This study was conducted in a two-stage fashion. During the first stage, at least 20 evaluable patients needed to be enrolled to assess response. There were 22 of 36 patients evaluable for response. No objective responses were observed. Only 4 patients had stable disease for 16, 26, 29, and 48 weeks, respectively, stopping the trial by design as only 3 of 22 (14%) of the patients met the 6-month progression-free survival end point. The most common toxicities were diarrhea (grade 1 and 2) and nausea, although some grade 3 and 4 diarrhea (11 and 6%, respectively) were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Flavopiridol has disappointing single-agent activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer when administered at this dose and schedule. Its use in prostate cancer should be reserved for evaluation in combination therapies or alternative schedules.

Kelly WK, Curley T, Slovin S, Heller G, McCaffrey J, Bajorin D, Ciolino A, Regan K, Schwartz M, Kantoff P, George D, Oh W, Smith M, Kaufman D, Small EJ, Schwartz L, Larson S, Tong W, Scher H. · Genitourinary Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021-6007, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #11134194 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine the safety and activity of weekly paclitaxel in combination with estramustine and carboplatin (TEC) in patients with advanced prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a dose-escalation study, patients with advanced prostate cancer were administered paclitaxel (weekly 1-hour infusions of 60 to 100 mg/m(2)), oral estramustine (10 mg/kg), and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/mL-min every 4 weeks). Paclitaxel levels were determined 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 18 hours after infusion, and a concentration-time curve was estimated. Once a safe dose was established, a multi-institutional phase II trial was conducted in patients with progressive androgen-independent disease. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with progressive androgen-independent disease were treated for a median of four cycles. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 100 mg/m(2) without the occurrence of DLT. Posttherapy decreases in serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 50%, 80%, and 90% were seen in 67%, 48%, and 39% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 79%, 35% to 61%, 26% to 52%) of the patients, respectively. Of the 33 patients with measurable disease, two (6%) had a complete response and 13 (39%) had a partial response. The overall median time to progression was 21 weeks, and the median survival time for all patients was 19.9 months. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were thromboembolic disease (in 25% of patients), hyperglycemia (in 38%), and hypophosphatemia (in 42%). Significant leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy were not observed. CONCLUSION: TEC has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with progressive androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Sun T, Wang Q, Balk S, Brown M, Lee GS, Kantoff P. · Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · Cancer Res. · Pubmed #19351832 links to  free full text

Abstract: Androgen-dependent prostate cancer typically progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after the androgen deprivation therapy. MicroRNAs (miR) are noncoding small RNAs (19-25nt) that play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Recent studies have shown that miR expression patterns are significantly different in normal and neoplastic prostate epithelial cells. However, the importance of miRs in the development of CRPC has not yet been explored. By performing genome-wide expression profiling of miRs, we found that expression levels of several miRs, in particular miR-221 and miR-222, were significantly increased in CRPC cells (the LNCaP-derived cell line LNCaP-Abl), compared with those in the androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP). Overexpression of miR-221 or miR-222 in LNCaP or another androgen-dependent cell line, LAPC-4, significantly reduced the level of the dihydrotestosterone (DHT) induced up-regulation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression and increased androgen-independent growth of LNCaP cells. Knocking down the expression level of miR-221 and miR-222 with antagonist miRs in the LNCaP-Abl cell line restored the response to the DHT induction of PSA transcription and also increased the growth response of the LNCaP-Abl cells to the androgen treatment. Changing the expression level of p27/kip1, a known target of miR-221 and miR-222, alone in LNCaP cells affected the DHT-independent cell growth but did not significantly influence the response of PSA transcription to the DHT treatment. In conclusion, our data suggest the involvement of miR-221 and miR-222 in the development or maintenance of the CRPC phenotype.

Morris MJ, Basch EM, Wilding G, Hussain M, Carducci MA, Higano C, Kantoff P, Oh WK, Small EJ, George D, Mathew P, Beer TM, Slovin SF, Ryan C, Logothetis C, Scher HI. · Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. · Clin Genitourin Cancer. · Pubmed #19213669 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In 2005, the US Department of Defense, through the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Office of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, created a funding mechanism to form a clinical trials consortium to conduct phase I and II studies in prostate cancer. This is the first report of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Department of Defense award supports a consortium of 10 prostate cancer research centers. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was awarded the Coordinating Center grant for the consortium and charged with creating an infrastructure to conduct early-phase multicenter clinical trials. Each participating center was required to introduce >or=1 clinical trial per year and maintain accrual of a minimum of 35 patients per year. RESULTS: The PCCTC was launched in 2006 and now encompasses 10 leading prostate cancer research centers. Fifty-one trials have been opened, and 1386 patients have been accrued at member sites. Members share an online clinical trial management system for protocol tracking, electronic data capture, and data storage. A legal framework has been instituted, and standard operating procedures, an administrative structure, editorial support, centralized budgeting, and mechanisms for scientific review are established. CONCLUSION: The PCCTC fulfills a congressional directive to create a clinical trials instrument dedicated to early-phase prostate cancer studies. The member institutions have built an administrative, informatics, legal, financial, statistical, and scientific infrastructure to support this endeavor. Clinical trials are open and accruing in excess of federally mandated goals.

Jesser C, Mucci L, Farmer D, Moon C, Li H, Gaziano JM, Stampfer M, Ma J, Kantoff P. · Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #18827812 No free full text.

Abstract: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a protease produced in the prostate that cleaves insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and other proteins. Production is mediated by the androgen receptor (AR) binding to the androgen response elements (ARE) in the promoter region of the PSA gene. Studies of a single nucleotide polymorphism (PSA -158 G/A, rs266882) in ARE1 of the PSA gene have been conflicting for risk of prostate cancer and effect on plasma PSA levels. In this nested case-control analysis of 500 white cases and 676 age- and smoking-matched white controls in the Physicians' Health Study we evaluated the association of rs266882 with risk and survival of prostate cancer and prediagnostic total and free PSA plasma levels, alone or in combination with AR CAG repeats. We used conditional logistic regression, linear regression and Cox regression, and found no significant associations between rs266882 (GG allele vs AA allele) and overall prostate cancer risk (RR=1.21, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.88-1.67) or prostate cancer-specific survival (RR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.56-1.58). Similarly, no associations were found among high grade or advanced stage tumours, or by calendar year of diagnosis. There was no significant association between rs266882 and baseline total or free PSA levels or the AR CAG repeats, nor any interaction associated with prostate cancer risk. Meta-analysis of 12 studies of rs266882 and overall prostate cancer risk was null.

Fall K, Stark JR, Mucci LA, Chan J, Stampfer MJ, Kurth T, Febbo PG, Kantoff P, Ma J. · Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. · Prostate. · Pubmed #18615538 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) acts as a docking protein between the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor and intracellular signaling molecules in the IGF-1 signaling pathway. Accumulating data support a role of IGF-1 in prostate carcinogenesis. We assessed the influence of the most common IRS-1 gene polymorphism (Gly972Arg) on prostate cancer risk, alone and in combination with IGF-1 and other components in the IGF-1 signaling pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a nested case-control study within the Physicians' Health Study, the IRS-1 polymorphism was assayed from prospectively collected samples from 564 incident prostate cancer cases and 758 controls matched on age and smoking. We calculated relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the controls, 0.8% were homozygous (AA) and 12% were heterozygous (GA) for the polymorphic allele. There was no association between carriage of the A allele and total prostate cancer risk (RR = 1.1 95% CI = 0.8-1.5), advanced disease (stage C or D or lethal prostate cancer, RR = 1.3 95% CI = 0.8-2.3), or plasma IGF-1 levels. We explored possible interactions with body mass index and components in the IGF-1 pathway including IGFBP3, PI3k, and PTEN but none of these factors influenced the relation between IRS-1 genotype and prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support an association between carriage of the variant IRS-1 gene and prostate cancer risk.

Duque JL, Loughlin KR, Adam RM, Kantoff P, Mazzucchi E, Freeman MR. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. · Clinics (Sao Paulo). · Pubmed #17072437 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study focused on circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with prostate cancer compared to a normal population. METHODS: We analyzed 26 normal individuals and 80 patients with prostate cancer. Blood was drawn from all subjects, and plasma was extracted to determine the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor using a quantitative immunoassay technique (ELISA-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). RESULTS: The median plasma level of vascular endothelial growth factor was significantly elevated in patients with metastatic disease compared to patients with localized disease and with healthy controls. Patients with serum prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL had significantly higher levels of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor than patients with serum prostate-specific antigen < 20 ng/mL. There was a trend for patients with a Gleason score of 8 to 10 to have higher levels of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor when compared to patients with lower Gleason scores. No relationship was found between plasma vascular endothelial growth factor and clinical staging, or between plasma vascular endothelial growth factor and prostate volume, in patients with localized prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that patients with metastatic prostate cancer have higher plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels than patients with localized disease or in healthy controls.

Smith MR, Kantoff P, Talcott J. · Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. · Praxis (Bern 1994). · Pubmed #11675919 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Bok RA, Halabi S, Fei DT, Rodriquez CR, Hayes DF, Vogelzang NJ, Kantoff P, Shuman MA, Small EJ. · University of California at San Francisco, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94143-0324, USA. · Cancer Res. · Pubmed #11289126 links to  free full text

Abstract: Better prognostic markers are needed for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. No single biochemical or clinical parameter can reliably predict patient response to therapy or rapidity of disease progression. Peptide factors involved in major cancer growth pathways, such as tumor angiogenesis, are attractive candidates as markers of low- and high-risk HRPC patients. We analyzed prospectively collected urine specimens from 100 of 390 HRPC patients undergoing therapy with the growth factor antagonist suramin as part of CALGB 9480. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were assessed from day 1 of therapy (D1) and day 29 (D29) urine samples from this subset of 100 randomly selected patients. Growth factor levels were determined by standardized ELISA microtiter plate assays from a commercial (bFGF) or proprietary (VEGF) source. Pretreatment urine VEGF levels were predictive of survival. In univariate analysis, patients whose baseline urine VEGF level was < or =28 pg/ml (the median level) had an average survival of 17 months; those with baseline VEGF >28 pg/ml had a significantly shorter survival of 10 months (P = 0.024). This difference corresponded to a 60% increased risk of dying for the higher urine VEGF patients (hazard ratio, 1.62; P = 0.03) and remained significant in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.72, P = 0.02). No significant correlations between urine bFGF level or change in bFGF levels and survival were found. These results support the notion that certain peptide growth factor-mediated, mitogenic pathways are important in HRPC and that their levels can predict outcome.

Signoretti S, Montironi R, Manola J, Altimari A, Tam C, Bubley G, Balk S, Thomas G, Kaplan I, Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, Kantoff P, Loda M. · Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. · J Natl Cancer Inst. · Pubmed #11106683 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Human prostate cancers are initially androgen dependent but ultimately become androgen independent. Overexpression of the Her-2-neu receptor tyrosine kinase has been associated with the progression to androgen independence in prostate cancer cells. We examined the expression of Her-2-neu in normal and cancerous prostate tissues to assess its role in the progression to androgen independence. METHODS: Prostate cancer tissue sections were obtained from 67 patients treated by surgery alone (UNT tumors), 34 patients treated with total androgen ablation therapy before surgery (TAA tumors), and 18 patients in whom total androgen ablation therapy failed and who developed bone metastases (androgen-independent [AI] disease). The sections were immunostained for Her-2-neu, androgen receptor (AR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and Ki-67 (a marker of cell proliferation) protein expression. Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels and gene amplification of Her-2-neu were examined by RNA in situ hybridization and fluorescent in situ hybridization(FISH), respectively, in a subset of 27 tumors (nine UNT, 11 TAA, and seven AI). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Her-2-neu protein expression was statistically significantly higher in TAA tumors than in UNT tumors with the use of two different scoring methods (P =.008 and P =.002). The proportion of Her-2-neu-positive tumors increased from the UNT group (17 of 67) to the TAA group (20 of 34) to the AI group (14 of 18) (P<.001). When compared with UNT tumors, tumor cell proliferation was higher in AI tumors (P =.014) and lower in TAA tumors (P<.001). All tumors expressed AR and PSA proteins. Although Her-2-neu mRNA expression was high in TAA and AI tumors, no Her-2-neu gene amplification was detected by FISH in any of the tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Her-2-neu expression appears to increase with progression to androgen independence. Thus, therapeutic targeting of this tyrosine kinase in prostate cancer may be warranted.

Tindall D, Horne FM, Hruszkewycz A, Mohla S, Shuman M, Wang Z, Kantoff P. · Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. · Cancer Res. · Pubmed #15466216 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.