| 1 |
Guideline Prostate cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. free! 2008
Horwich A, Parker C, Kataja V, Anonymous00130. · Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #18456765 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 2 |
Guideline Prostate cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. free! 2007
Anonymous00083, Horwich A, Parker C. · No affiliation provided · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #17491038 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 3 |
Review Systemic treatment for prostate cancer. free! 2006
Horwich A. · Institute of Cancer Research & Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #17018726 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 4 |
Review Technological advances in radiotherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. 2005
Mangar SA, Huddart RA, Parker CC, Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Horwich A. · Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK. · Eur J Cancer. · Pubmed #15808957 No free full text.
Abstract: There is good evidence that radiation dose escalation in localised prostate cancer is associated with increased cell kill. The traditional two-dimensional (2D) technique of treatment planning and delivery is limited by normal tissue toxicity, such that the dose that can be safely delivered to the prostate by external beam radiotherapy is 65-70 Gy. Several technological advances over the last 20 years have enhanced the precision of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and have resulted in improved outcomes. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) approach reduces the dose-limiting late side-effect of proctitis and has allowed for dose escalation to the whole prostate to 78 Gy. More recently, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced form of conformal therapy, has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity when using doses greater than 80 Gy. In addition, IMRT can potentially escalate the dose to specific parts of the prostate where there are resistant subpopulations of tumour clonogens, or can be used to extend the high-dose region to pelvic lymph nodes. The addition of androgen deprivation to conventional radiotherapy has an impact on survival and local control. Initial hormone therapy causes cytoreduction of the prostate cancer allowing for a reduction in radiotherapy volume as well as an additive effect on cell kill. Long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation has been shown to improve overall survival in more advanced tumours. Prostate brachytherapy is now a recognised treatment for those with low-risk disease. It achieves similar long-term outcome to other treatment modalities. Brachytherapy can be used as monotherapy for localised disease, or as boost treatment following conventional EBRT for locally advanced disease. New techniques are available to improve the precision of both target definition and treatment verification. This so-called image-guided radiotherapy will help to enhance the accuracy of dose delivery by correcting both for inter-fraction positional variation and for intra-fraction movement of the prostate in real-time and will allow for tighter tumour margins and avoidance of normal tissues, thereby enhancing the safety of treatment.
|
| 5 |
Review Prostate cancer management. free! 2004
Horwich A. · Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #15477327 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 6 |
Review Management of early prostate cancer. free! 2002
Horwich A, Parker CC, Huddart RA, Dearnaley DP. · Department of Clinical Oncology Academic Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #12401671 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 7 |
Clinical Conference A phase 2 study of high-activity 186Re-HEDP with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant in progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. 2006
O'Sullivan JM, Norman AR, McCready VR, Flux G, Buffa FM, Johnson B, Coffey J, Cook G, Treleaven J, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Parker CC, Dearnaley DP. · Department of Oncology, Queen's University Belfast/Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK. · Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. · Pubmed #16572306 No free full text.
Abstract: PURPOSE: We investigated the potential for improvement in disease control by use of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) to permit administration of high activities of (186)Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) in patients with progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive HRPC metastatic to bone, good performance status and minimal soft tissue disease. Patients received 5,000 MBq of (186)Re-HEDP i.v., followed 14 days later by PBSCT. Response was assessed using PSA, survival, pain scores and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years (range 50-77) and a median PSA of 57 ng/ml (range 4-3,628) received a median activity of 4,978 MBq (186)Re-HEDP (range 4,770-5,100 MBq). The most serious toxicity was short-lived grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 8 (21%) patients. The median survival of the group is 21 months (95%CI 18-24 months) with Kaplan-Meier estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates of 83% and 40% respectively. Thirty-one patients (81%, 95% CI 66-90%) had stable or reduced PSA levels 3 months post therapy while 11 (29%, 95% CI 15-49%) had PSA reductions of >50% lasting >4 weeks. Quality of life measures were stable or improved in 27 (66%) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: We have shown that it is feasible and safe to deliver high-activity radioisotope therapy with PBSCT to men with metastatic HRPC. Response rates and survival data are encouraging; however, further research is needed to define optimal role of this treatment approach.
|
| 8 |
Clinical Conference Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects. free! 2005
Dearnaley DP, Hall E, Lawrence D, Huddart RA, Eeles R, Nutting CM, Gadd J, Warrington A, Bidmead M, Horwich A. · Academic Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #15685244 links to free full text
Abstract: Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating radiotherapy dose and investigated the appropriate target volume margin. After an initial 3-6 month period of androgen suppression, 126 men were randomised and treated with radiotherapy using a 2 by 2 factorial trial design. The initial radiotherapy tumour target volume included the prostate and base of seminal vesicles (SV) or complete SV depending on SV involvement risk. Treatments were randomised to deliver a dose of 64 Gy with either a 1.0 or 1.5 cm margin around the tumour volume (1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups) and also to treat either with or without a 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone with no additional margin (64 and 74 Gy groups). Tumour control was monitored by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and clinical examination with additional tests as appropriate. Acute and late side effects of treatment were measured using the Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) and LENT SOM systems. The results showed that freedom from PSA failure was higher in the 74 Gy group compared to the 64 Gy group, but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance with 5-year actuarial control rates of 71% (95% CI 58-81%) in the 74 Gy group vs 59% (95% CI 45-70%) in the 64 Gy group. There were 23 failures in the 74 Gy group and 33 in the 64 Gy group (Hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.38-1.10, P=0.10). No difference in disease control was seen between the 1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups (5-year actuarial control rates 67%, 95% CI 53-77% vs 63%, 95% CI 50-74%) with 28 events in each group (Hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.50-1.86, P=0.94). Acute side effects were generally mild and 18 weeks after treatment, only four and five of the 126 men had persistent > or =Grade 1 bowel or bladder side effects, respectively. Statistically significant increases in acute bladder side effects were seen after treatment in the men receiving 74 Gy (P=0.006), and increases in both acute bowel side effects during treatment (P=0.05) and acute bladder sequelae (P=0.002) were recorded for men in the 1.5 cm margin group. While statistically significant, these differences were of short duration and of doubtful clinical importance. Late bowel side effects (RTOG> or =2) were seen more commonly in the 74 Gy and 1.5 cm margin groups (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively) in the first 2 years after randomisation. Similar results were found using the LENT SOM assessments. No significant differences in late bladder side effects were seen between the randomised groups using the RTOG scoring system. Using the LENT SOM instrument, a higher proportion of men treated in the 74 Gy group had Grade > or =3 urinary frequency at 6 and 12 months. Compared to baseline scores, bladder symptoms improved after 6 months or more follow-up in all groups. Sexual function deteriorated after treatment with the number of men reporting some sexual dysfunction (Grade> or =1) increasing from 38% at baseline to 66% at 6 months and 1 year and 81% by year 5. However, no consistent differences were seen between the randomised groups. In conclusion, dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy using conformal radiotherapy may improve long-term PSA control, but a treatment margin of 1.5 cm is unnecessary and is associated with increased acute bowel and bladder reactions and more late rectal side effects. Data from this randomised pilot study informed the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medical Research Council RT 01 Trial and the two studies will be combined in subsequent meta-analysis.
|
| 9 |
Clinical Conference Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer. free! 2004
Albrecht W, Van Poppel H, Horenblas S, Mickisch G, Horwich A, Serretta V, Casetta G, MarĂ©chal JM, Jones WG, Kalman S, Sylvester R. · Department of Urology, Rudolfstiftung, Juchgasse 25, Vienna A 1030, Austria. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #14710214 links to free full text
Abstract: Based on the results of combined data from three North American Phase II studies, a randomised Phase II study in the same patient population was performed, using combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine (VBL) in hormone refractory prostate cancer patients. In all, 92 patients were randomised into a Phase II study of oral EMP (10 mg kg day continuously) or oral EMP in combination with intravenous VBL (4 mg m(2) week for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks rest). The end points were toxicity and PSA response in both groups, with the option to continue the trial as a Phase III study with time to progression and survival as end points, if sufficient responses were observed. Toxicity was unexpectedly high in both treatment arms and led to treatment withdrawal or refusal in 49% of all patients, predominantly already during the first treatment cycle. The mean treatment duration was 10 and 14 weeks, median time to PSA progression was 27.2 and 30.8 weeks, median survival time was 44 and 50.9 weeks, and PSA response rate was only 24.6 and 28.9% in the EMP/VBL and EMP arms, respectively. There was no correlation between PSA response and survival. While the PSA response in the patients tested was less than half that recorded in the North American studies, the toxicity of EMP monotherapy or in combination with VBL was much higher than expected. Further research on more effective and less toxic treatment strategies for hormone refractory prostate cancer is mandatory.
|
| 10 |
Clinical Conference High activity Rhenium-186 HEDP with autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue: a phase I study in progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. free! 2002
O'Sullivan JM, McCready VR, Flux G, Norman AR, Buffa FM, Chittenden S, Guy M, Pomeroy K, Cook G, Gadd J, Treleaven J, Al-Deen A, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Dearnaley DP. · Unit of Academic Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #12087455 links to free full text
Abstract: We tested the feasibility and toxicity of high activities Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate, with peripheral blood stem cell rescue in patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Twenty-five patients received between 2500 and 5000 MBq of Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate followed 14 days later by the return of peripheral blood peripheral blood stem cells. Activity limiting toxicity was defined as grade III haematological toxicity, lasting at least 7 days, or grade IV haematological toxicity of any duration or any serious unexpected toxicity. Activity limiting toxicity occurred in two of six who received activities of 5000 MBq and maximum tolerated activity was defined at this activity level. Prostate specific antigen reductions of 50% or more lasting at least 4 weeks were seen in five of the 25 patients (20%) all of whom received more than 3500 MBq of Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate. The actuarial survival at 1 year is 54%. Administered activities of 5000 MBq of Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate are feasible using autologous peripheral blood peripheral blood stem cell rescue in patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. The main toxicity is thrombocytopaenia, which is short lasting. A statistically significant activity/prostate specific antigen response was seen. We have now commenced a Phase II trial to further evaluate response rates.
|
| 11 |
Clinical Conference Pre-treatment nomogram for biochemical control after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer. free! 2002
Parker CC, Norman AR, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP. · Academic Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #11875726 links to free full text
Abstract: Phase III studies have demonstrated the clinical benefit of adding neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation to radical radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer. We have developed a nomogram to describe the probability of PSA control for patients treated in this way. Five hundred and seventeen men with clinically localised prostate cancer were treated with 3-6 months of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy (64Gy in 32#) between 1988 and 1998. Median presenting PSA was 20 ng x ml(-1), and 56% of patients had T3/4 disease. Multivariate analysis of pre-treatment factors was performed, and a nomogram developed to describe PSA-failure-free survival probability. At a median follow-up of 44 months, 233 men had developed PSA failure. Presenting PSA, histological grade and clinical T stage were all highly predictive of PSA failure on multivariate analysis. The nomogram score for an individual patient is given by the summation of PSA (<10=0, 10-19=16, 20-49=44, > or =50=100), grade (Gleason 2-4=0, 5-7=44, 8-10=81) and T stage (T1/2=0, T3/4=35). For a nomogram score of 0, 50, 100 and 150 points the 2 year PSA control rate was 93, 87, 75 and 54%, and the 5 year PSA control rate was 82, 67, 44 and 18%. These results are comparable to those using surgery or higher doses of radical radiotherapy alone. The nomogram illustrates the results of multivariate analysis in a visually-striking way, and facilitates comparisons with other treatment methods.
|
| 12 |
Clinical Conference Preliminary results of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using focused ultrasound in the treatment of localised tumours. 1999
Visioli AG, Rivens IH, ter Haar GR, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Moskovic E, Padhani A, Glees J. · Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. · Eur J Ultrasound. · Pubmed #10099162 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this phase I trial was to assess the tolerance of cancer patients to focused ultrasound (FUS) treatment in a variety of different sites and to document any associated acute or delayed toxicity. This would appear to be the first time that treatment has been given without sedation or anaesthesia. METHODS: Patients with advanced and/or metastatic disease were eligible for entry into this study. Previous work has established that an in situ ablative intensity (AI) of 1500 W/cm2 Isp for 1 s achieves coagulative necrosis at the focal spot. Ultrasonic exposures of 25-100% of AI for 1 s were delivered to preselected tissue volumes. Pain questionnaires recording any side effects were completed by the patient and the investigator separately. Ultrasound images of the target volume were taken before, immediately after, and 1 week after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients have been entered into this study to date. Seven patients were treated at their primary site and seven received treatment to one of their metastases. No treatment needed to be stopped because of pain. Eight of the 14 patients did not complain of any side effect during or after the treatment. One patient complained of mild, and two of moderate pain during the week following treatment. One patient developed an asymptomatic blister on the skin. CONCLUSION: Focused ultrasound is a safe, well-tolerated and non-invasive method of delivering ablative thermal energy to selected tumours. More clinical trials are needed to assess the role of this modality in the treatment of cancer.
|
| 13 |
Clinical Conference Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. 1999
Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Norman AR, Meyer L, Nahum A, Tait D, Yarnold J, Horwich A. · Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · Lancet. · Pubmed #9929018 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Radical radiotherapy is commonly used to treat localised prostate cancer. Late chronic side-effects limit the dose that can be given, and may be linked to the volume of normal tissues irradiated. Conformal radiotherapy allows a smaller amount of rectum and bladder to be treated, by shaping the high-dose volume to the prostate. We assessed the ability of this new technology to lessen the risk of radiation-related effects in a randomised controlled trial of conformal versus conventional radiotherapy. METHODS: We recruited men with prostate cancer for treatment with a standard dose of 64 Gy in daily 2 Gy fractions. The men were randomly assigned conformal or conventional radiotherapy treatment. The primary endpoint was the development of late radiation complications (> 3 months after treatment) measured with the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) score. Indicators of disease (cancer) control were also recorded. FINDINGS: In the 225 men treated, significantly fewer men developed radiation-induced proctitis and bleeding in the conformal group than in the conventional group (37 vs 56% > or = RTOG grade 1, p=0.004; 5 vs 15% > or = RTOG grade 2, p=0.01). There were no differences between groups in bladder function after treatment (53 vs 59% > or = grade 1, p=0.34; 20 vs 23% > or = grade 2, p=0.61). After median follow-up of 3.6 years there was no significant difference between groups in local tumour control (conformal 78% [95% CI 66-86], conventional 83% [69-90]). INTERPRETATION: Conformal techniques significantly lowered the risk of late radiation-induced proctitis after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Widespread introduction of these radiotherapy treatment methods is appropriate. Our results are the basis for dose-escalation studies to improve local tumour control.
|
| 14 |
Article Does magnetic resonance imaging of the spine have a role in the staging of prostate cancer? 2009
Venkitaraman R, Cook GJ, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC, Huddart RA, Khoo V, Eeles R, Horwich A, Sohaib SA. · Academic Uro-oncology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). · Pubmed #18993040 No free full text.
Abstract: AIMS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an effective method for evaluating the spine in patients with a high risk of metastatic disease. The aim of this study was to compare MRI spine with radionuclide bone scan in detecting spinal metastases for staging prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 99 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer at high risk of skeletal metastasis (prostate-specific antigen>10 ng/ml, composite Gleason score>or=8) or equivocal findings on bone scan were included in the retrospective study, and their MRI spine and bone scans were analysed. RESULTS: Ten patients were detected to have definite spinal metastasis by bone scan, whereas 12 patients had definite skeletal metastasis by MRI spine. Compared with the 'gold standard', derived from clinical and radiological follow-up, the sensitivities for radionuclide bone scan and that for MRI spine for detecting skeletal metastasis were 71.4 and 85.7%, respectively (P=0.023), whereas the specificities were 96.5 and 97.7%, respectively (P=0.95). Of the 34 individual metastatic lesions in the spine, 15 were concordantly positive on both scans, whereas five lesions were positive only by bone scan and 11 positive only by MRI. The addition of MRI spine in the staging for prostate cancer resulted in a change of stage and management plan in seven (7%) patients. CONCLUSION: MRI spine has comparable specificity and slightly better sensitivity than bone scan to detect spinal metastasis from prostate cancer.
|
| 15 |
Article Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in untreated, localized prostate cancer: PSA velocity vs PSA doubling time. 2009
Ng MK, Van As N, Thomas K, Woode-Amissah R, Horwich A, Huddart R, Khoo V, Thompson A, Dearnaley D, Parker C. · Academic Unit Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #18990146 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV) vs PSA doubling time (DT) for predicting the repeat biopsy results in men with localized prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS), as the utility of PSAV vs PSADT in untreated prostate cancer has not been well studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had favourable-risk localized prostate cancer (T1/2a, PSA level <or=15 ng/mL, Gleason score <or=3 + 4, and percentage positive biopsy cores <or=50%), and consented to AS between 2002 and 2005. Repeat biopsies were taken after 18-24 months, with adverse histology defined as any of: primary Gleason grade >or=4, >50% cores positive, or initial Gleason score 3 + 3 upgraded to >or=3 + 4. Using all PSA values for the 2 years preceding repeat biopsy, the PSAV and PSADT were calculated using linear regression and the log-slope method (DT = ln2/slope), respectively. RESULTS: In all, 199 patients were assessable; the median PSAV and PSADT were 0.71 ng/mL/year and 5.29 years, respectively. Fifty-three patients (27%) had adverse histology on repeat biopsy. On univariate analyses, PSAV (P < 0.001) and PSADT (P = 0.019) were associated with adverse histology. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting adverse histology was 0.70 and 0.63 for PSAV and PSADT, respectively. The mean difference was 0.07 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.12; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PSAV is more accurate than PSADT for predicting adverse histology on repeat biopsies. These data suggest that PSAV should be used in preference to PSADT to describe PSA kinetics in untreated, localized prostate cancer.
|
| 16 |
Article Baseline urinary phytoestrogen levels and the natural history of untreated, localised prostate cancer in a British population. 2008
Venkitaraman R, Thomas K, Grace P, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R, Parker CC. · Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · Int J Biol Markers. · Pubmed #18949747 No free full text.
Abstract: AIM: To determine whether urinary concentrations of phytoestrogens are associated with the rate of disease progression in men with untreated, localised prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated, localised prostatic adenocarcinoma on a prospective clinical study of active surveillance had urine samples collected at baseline. Patients underwent monitoring with serial PSA levels and repeat octant prostate biopsies. Disease progression was defined as either adverse histology on repeat biopsy (primary Gleason grade >or= 4, or >50% positive cores) or radical treatment for PSA velocity >1 ng/mL/year. Time to disease progression was analysed with respect to baseline urinary levels of genistein, enterolactone, daidzein and equol, assayed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: 191 patients were evaluable, with a median follow-up of 2.5 years. 71 patients experienced disease progression. No significant association was seen between time to disease progression and baseline urinary levels of daidzein (p=0.85), genistein (p=0.81), enterolactone (p=0.085) or equol (p=0.33). No significant association was seen between adverse histology on repeat biopsy and urinary levels of either daidzein (p=0.85), genistein (p=0.58), enterolactone (p=0.88) or equol (p=0.71). There was no significant correlation between PSA velocity and urinary levels of daidzein (p=0.90), genistein (p=0.98), enterolactone (p=0.10) or equol (p=0.60). CONCLUSION: These data do not support the hypothesis that phytoestrogens prevent disease progression in men with localised prostate cancer.
|
| 17 |
Article Biopsy tissue microarray study of Ki-67 expression in untreated, localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. 2009
Jhavar S, Bartlett J, Kovacs G, Corbishley C, Dearnaley D, Eeles R, Khoo V, Huddart R, Horwich A, Thompson A, Norman A, Brewer D, Cooper CS, Parker C. · Institute of Cancer Research, Male Urological Cancer Research Centre, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. · Pubmed #18762814 No free full text.
Abstract: Active surveillance provides a unique opportunity to study biomarkers of prostate cancer behaviour, although only small volumes of tumor tissue are typically available. We have evaluated a technique for constructing tissue microarrays (TMAs) from needle biopsies for assessing immunohistochemical markers in localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. TMAs were constructed from diagnostic prostate biopsies for 60 patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma in a prospective cohort study of active surveillance. Radical treatment was recommended for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity greater than 1 ng ml(-1) per year or adverse histology in repeat biopsies, defined as Gleason score > or =4+3 or >50% of cores involved. Sections from the TMAs were stained with H&E, P63/AMACR and Ki-67. Time to radical treatment was analysed with respect to clinical characteristics and Ki-67 LI. At a median follow up of 36 months, 25/60 (42%) patients had received radical treatment. On univariate analysis, PSA density (P=0.001), Gleason score (P=0.001), clinical T stage (P=0.01), Ki-67 LI (P=0.02) and initial PSA (P=0.04) were associated with time to radical treatment. On multivariate analysis, PSA density (P=0.01), Ki-67 LI (P=0.03) and Gleason score (P=0.04) were independent determinants of progression to radical treatment. TMAs constructed from prostate needle biopsies can be used to assess immunohistochemical markers in localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Ki-67 LI merits further study as a possible biomarker of early prostate cancer behaviour.
|
| 18 |
Article Intrinsic markers of tumour hypoxia and angiogenesis in localised prostate cancer and outcome of radical treatment: a retrospective analysis of two randomised radiotherapy trials and one surgical cohort study. 2008
Vergis R, Corbishley CM, Norman AR, Bartlett J, Jhavar S, Borre M, Heeboll S, Horwich A, Huddart R, Khoo V, Eeles R, Cooper C, Sydes M, Dearnaley D, Parker C. · Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. · Lancet Oncol. · Pubmed #18343725 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Expression of intrinsic markers of tumour hypoxia and angiogenesis are important predictors of radiotherapeutic, and possibly surgical, outcome in several cancers. Extent of tumour hypoxia in localised prostate cancer is comparable to that in other cancers, but few data exist on the association of extent of tumour hypoxia with treatment outcome. We aimed to study the predictive value of intrinsic markers of tumour hypoxia and angiogenesis in localised prostate cancer, both in patients treated with radiotherapy and in those treated surgically. METHODS: We applied a new, needle biopsy tissue microarray (TMA) technique to study diagnostic samples from men with localised, previously untreated prostate cancer treated in two randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy-dose escalation. Multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards was done to assess the association between clinical outcome, in terms of biochemical control, and immunohistochemical staining of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and osteopontin expression. The analysis was repeated on an independent series of men with localised, previously untreated prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. The main outcome was time to biochemical (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) failure. FINDINGS: Between Oct 12, 1995, and Feb 5, 2002, 308 patients were identified from two prospective, randomised trials at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Sutton, UK, for the radiotherapy cohort and diagnostic biopsies were available for 201 of these patients. Between June 6, 1995, and Nov 4, 2005, 329 patients were identified from the Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark, for the prostatectomy cohort; of these, 40 patients were excluded because the tumour was too small to sample (19 patients), because the paraffin block was too thin (19 patients), or because the blocks were missing (two patients), leaving 289 patients for analysis. For patients treated with radiotherapy, increased staining for VEGF (p=0.008) and HIF-1 alpha (p=0.02) expression, but not increased osteopontin expression (p=0.978), were significant predictors of a shorter time to biochemical failure on multivariate analysis, independent of clinical tumour stage, Gleason score, serum PSA concentration, and dose of radiotherapy. For patients treated with surgery, increased staining for VEGF (p<0.0001) and HIF-1 alpha (p<0.0001) expression, and increased osteopontin expression (p=0.0005) were each significantly associated with a shorter time to biochemical failure on multivariate analysis, independent of pathological tumour stage, Gleason score, serum PSA concentration, and margin status. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study of intrinsic markers of hypoxia and angiogenesis in relation to the outcome of radical treatment of localised prostate cancer. Increased expression of VEGF, HIF-1 alpha, and, for patients treated with surgery, osteopontin, identifies patients at high risk of biochemical failure who would be suitable for enrolment into trials of treatment intensification.
|
| 19 |
Article Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. 2008
van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K, Khoo VS, Thompson A, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC. · Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom. · Eur Urol. · Pubmed #18342430 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Outcome data from a prospective study of active surveillance of localised prostate cancer were analysed to identify factors, present at the time of diagnosis, that predict subsequent radical treatment. METHODS: Eligible patients had clinical stage T1-T2a, N0-Nx, M0-Mx adenocarcinoma of the prostate with serum PSA<15 ng/ml, Gleason score <or= 7, primary Gleason grade <or= 3, and % positive biopsy cores (pbc) <or= 50%. Monitoring included serial PSA measurement and repeat prostate biopsies. Radical treatment was initiated in the event of biochemical progression (PSA velocity > 1 ng/ml/yr) or histological progression (primary Gleason grade >or= 4, or %pbc > 50%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of baseline variables was performed with respect to time to radical treatment. RESULTS: The 326 men recruited from 2002 to 2006 have been followed for a median of 22 mo. Median age was 67 yr, and median initial PSA (iPSA) 6.4 ng/ml. Sixty-five patients (20%) had deferred radical treatment, 16 (5%) changed to watchful waiting because of increasing comorbidity, 7 (2%) died of other causes, and 238 (73%) remain on surveillance. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the free/total PSA ratio (p<0.001) and clinical T stage (p=0.006) were independent determinants of time to radical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to established prognostic factors, the free/total PSA ratio may predict time to radical treatment in patients with untreated, localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. This possibility warrants further study.
|
| 20 |
Article Multiple newly identified loci associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. 2008
Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Giles GG, Olama AA, Guy M, Jugurnauth SK, Mulholland S, Leongamornlert DA, Edwards SM, Morrison J, Field HI, Southey MC, Severi G, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Dearnaley DP, Muir KR, Smith C, Bagnato M, Ardern-Jones AT, Hall AL, O'Brien LT, Gehr-Swain BN, Wilkinson RA, Cox A, Lewis S, Brown PM, Jhavar SG, Tymrakiewicz M, Lophatananon A, Bryant SL, Anonymous00010, Anonymous00011, Anonymous00012, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Khoo VS, Parker CC, Woodhouse CJ, Thompson A, Christmas T, Ogden C, Fisher C, Jamieson C, Cooper CS, English DR, Hopper JL, Neal DE, Easton DF. · The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK. · Nat Genet. · Pubmed #18264097 No free full text.
Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting males in developed countries. It shows consistent evidence of familial aggregation, but the causes of this aggregation are mostly unknown. To identify common alleles associated with prostate cancer risk, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using blood DNA samples from 1,854 individuals with clinically detected prostate cancer diagnosed at </=60 years or with a family history of disease, and 1,894 population-screened controls with a low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration (<0.5 ng/ml). We analyzed these samples for 541,129 SNPs using the Illumina Infinium platform. Initial putative associations were confirmed using a further 3,268 cases and 3,366 controls. We identified seven loci associated with prostate cancer on chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 19 and X (P = 2.7 x 10(-8) to P = 8.7 x 10(-29)). We confirmed previous reports of common loci associated with prostate cancer at 8q24 and 17q. Moreover, we found that three of the newly identified loci contain candidate susceptibility genes: MSMB, LMTK2 and KLK3.
|
| 21 |
Article Clinical implications of introducing a new PSA assay. 2008
Venkitaraman R, Norman AR, Iqbal J, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Parker CC. · Academic Unit of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. · Int Urol Nephrol. · Pubmed #18253858 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: A number of different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays are in common use. There has been little consideration of the possible clinical implications of interassay variation. The availability of two assays in the same laboratory provided an opportunity to audit the clinical implications of the interassay variation in PSA levels. METHODS: The same serum samples from patients with prostate cancer on follow-up were analyzed for PSA by the Abbott AxSYM assay and by the Abbott ARCHITECT assays. To assess within-patient reproducibility of the interassay variation, repeat analysis of PSA by both assays was conducted in a second sample obtained at least 1 month after the first. RESULTS: Samples from 156 cases were analyzed. The mean ratio of serum PSA values by the two assays (AxSYM assay/ARCHITECT assay) was 0.89 (range 0.5-2.27). The interassay coefficient of variation was 20%. In a subgroup of 50 cases with repeat samples available, the correlation coefficient, r, of the interassay variation in PSA between the first and second samples was 0.441. CONCLUSIONS: Interassay variation in serum PSA is clinically significant, both between patients and on repeated measurement within the same patient. Clinicians should be aware that simple correction factors may not accurately control for variation between PSA assays. Ideally, patients on follow-up for prostate cancer should be monitored using a single PSA assay.
|
| 22 |
Article Outcome of early detection and radiotherapy for occult spinal cord compression. 2007
Venkitaraman R, Barbachano Y, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC, Khoo V, Huddart RA, Eeles R, Horwich A, Sohaib SA. · Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · Radiother Oncol. · Pubmed #18036691 No free full text.
Abstract: Retrospective analysis in 150 patients with metastatic prostate cancer was conducted to determine whether early detection with MRI spine and treatment of clinically occult spinal cord compromise (SCC) facilitate preservation of neurologic function. Our results suggest that prophylactic radiotherapy for patients with back pain or radiological SCC without neurologic deficit may facilitate preservation of neurologic function. Thus MRI surveillance for SCC may be important for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
|
| 23 |
Article Efficacy of low-dose dexamethasone in castration-refractory prostate cancer. 2008
Venkitaraman R, Thomas K, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC. · Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #17941935 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate and duration of PSA response to dexamethasone in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC), as corticosteroids are frequently used as second-line hormonal treatment of CRPC and there is little published evidence concerning the efficacy of low-dose dexamethasone in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 102 patients with progressive CRPC received oral dexamethasone (0.5 mg daily) between January 2003 and October 2006. The median pretreatment PSA level was 83 ng/mL. The main endpoint was the PSA response rate according to the PSA Working Group criteria. RESULTS: In all, 50 patients (49%) had a confirmed PSA response. The median (range) time to PSA progression for the entire cohort was 7.4 (1-28) months. In responders, the median duration of the PSA response was 11.6 (1-24) months. CONCLUSION: Low-dose dexamethasone has significant activity in CRPC. Subject to validation with more clinically meaningful endpoints, dexamethasone could become the corticosteroid of choice in the management of CRPC, and its potential for use in combination with novel agents should be explored.
|
| 24 |
Article Prostate-specific antigen velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer. 2008
Venkitaraman R, Norman A, Woode-Amissah R, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R, Parker C. · Academic Unit of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #17850368 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a prospective study of active surveillance of untreated prostate cancer, with a focus on baseline predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, as PSA velocity before treatment is an important predictor of prostate cancer mortality, and patients on active surveillance are monitored for several years to estimate the PSA velocity and thus select patients for radical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer opened at the Royal Marsden Hospital in 2002. Eligible patients had clinical stage T1/T2a, N0/Nx, M0/Mx adenocarcinoma of the prostate with a serum PSA level of < 15 ng/mL, a Gleason score of < or = 7 with primary grade < or = 3, and less than half the biopsy cores positive. The PSA velocity before treatment was analysed in relation to baseline clinical characteristics. RESULTS: In all, 237 patients on surveillance were followed for a median of 24 months (median age 67 years; median initial PSA level 6.5 ng/mL; median pretreatment PSA velocity 0.44 ng/mL per year). On multivariate analysis, PSA density (i.e. serum PSA level/prostate volume) was the only significant determinant of PSA velocity (P < 0.001). Patients with a PSA density above or below the median (0.185 ng/mL/mL) had a median (interquartile range) PSA velocity of 0.92 (0.34-1.77) ng/mL per year and 0.35 (-0.06, 0.80) ng/mL per year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSA density, which is readily available at the time of diagnosis, is an independent determinant of PSA velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer. If this is confirmed, PSA density could be used to inform the often difficult choice between active surveillance and immediate radical treatment.
|
| 25 |
Article Predictors of histological disease progression in untreated, localized prostate cancer. 2007
Venkitaraman R, Norman A, Woode-Amissah R, Fisher C, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R, Khoo V, Thompson A, Parker C. · Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom. · J Urol. · Pubmed #17631355 No free full text.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Active surveillance for early prostate cancer is a policy of close monitoring with radical treatment targeted at cases with evidence of disease progression. There is no consensus on the need for or optimum timing of repeat biopsies as part of active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of active surveillance 119 patients with untreated localized prostate cancer (T1/2a), prostate specific antigen less than 15 ng/ml, Gleason score 3 + 4 or less and 50% or less positive cores underwent repeat biopsy after 18 to 24 months. Histological disease progression was defined as primary Gleason grade 4 or greater, greater than 50% positive cores or a Gleason score increase from 6 or less to 7 or greater. The risk of histological disease progression was analyzed with respect to baseline clinical factors. RESULTS: Median patient age was 66 years and median initial prostate specific antigen was 6.6 ng/ml. Histological disease progression was seen in 33 of 119 cases (28%). On multivariate analysis prostate specific antigen density (p = 0.002) and maximum percent involvement of any core (p = 0.04) were significant independent determinants of histological disease progression. Progression was seen in 22 of 40 cases (55%) with prostate specific antigen density 0.2 ng/ml/ml or greater and greater than 15% maximum involvement of any core. Progression was seen in 2 of 33 cases (6%) with prostate specific antigen density less than 0.2 ng/ml/ml and 15% or less maximum involvement of any core. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat biopsy should be an integral part of active surveillance for untreated localized prostate cancer. Immediate repeat biopsy should be considered in patients who elect active surveillance but who have prostate specific antigen density greater than 0.2 ng/ml/ml. These findings must be validated in a cohort of patients with extended biopsies at diagnosis and followup.
|
Next |
|
|