Prostatic Neoplasms: Forman JD

Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, Eton DT, Forman JD, Goldenberg SL, Hernandez J, Higano CS, Kraus SR, Moul JW, Tangen CM, Anonymous00324. · American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. · J Urol. · Pubmed #17509297 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Burnett AL, Aus G, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, Eton DT, Forman JD, Goldenberg SL, Hernandez J, Higano CS, Kraus S, Liebert M, Moul JW, Tangen C, Thrasher JB, Thompson I, Anonymous00008. · The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe St., Marburg 407, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-2411, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #17570435 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: In conjunction with the assignment to update the Guidelines for Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer, the American Urological Association Prostate Cancer Guideline Update Panel performed a side analysis of the reporting of erectile function outcomes in this clinical context as published in the medical literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four National Library of Medicine PubMed(R) Services literature searches targeting articles published from 1991 through early 2004 were done to derive outcome reporting (efficacy or side effects) for the treatment of clinical stage T1 or T2 N0M0 prostate cancer. A database was constructed containing descriptions relating to erectile function as well as numerical frequency rates of complete erectile dysfunction, and partial and intact erectile function for various treatments. A literature review was also done, consisting of a PubMed Services search of current measures and protocols used for assessing erectile function outcomes and a survey of consensus opinion sources on the management of male sexual dysfunctions. RESULTS: Based on inclusion criteria 436 articles were selected. Of these articles database extraction from 100 pertaining to radical prostatectomy garnered various characterizations of erectile function, including qualitative descriptions, generic terminology and rating systems. Database extraction from 31 articles, in which results for at least 50 patients were reported, yielded ranges of rates for complete erectile dysfunction, partial erectile function and intact erectile function that were 26% to 100%, 16% to 48% and 9% to 86% for radical prostatectomy, 8% to 85%, 21% to 47% and 36% to 63% for external beam radiation, and 14% to 61%, 21% and 18% for interstitial radiation, respectively. The literature review showed an evolution in standards for studying and reporting erectile function outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical studies reporting erectile function outcomes after localized prostate cancer treatment often demonstrate poorly interpretable and inconsistent manners of assessment as well as widely disparate rates of erectile dysfunction and erectile function. Future studies must apply scientifically rigorous methodology and standard outcomes measures to advance this field of study.

Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, Eton DT, Forman JD, Goldenberg SL, Hernandez J, Higano CS, Kraus SR, Moul JW, Tangen C, Thrasher JB, Thompson I. · Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #17222629 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The American Urological Association Prostate Guideline Update Panel was charged with updating the Guidelines for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. In assessing outcomes with treatment, it became apparent that a highly variable number of definitions exist with respect to biochemical recurrence. Herein, we review the variability in published definitions of biochemical recurrence and make recommendations directed toward improving this terminology by recommending a standard definition in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four PubMed literature searches were performed between May 2001 and April, 2004 and covered articles published from 1991 through early 2004. The search terms included the MeSH major headings of prostate cancer and prostatic neoplasm. All potentially relevant articles were retrieved and a more detailed screen for relevance was performed. An article was considered relevant if it reported treatment outcomes of patients with clinical T1 or T2N0M0 prostate cancer. Data extractors recorded the definition of biochemical recurrence and definitions were then collapsed into categories representing the same criteria. The results of biochemical failure were subcategorized by initial treatment. RESULTS: Of 13,800 citations, a total of 436 articles were selected. Among these, a total of 145 articles contained 53 different definitions of biochemical recurrence for those treated with radical prostatectomy. Of these, the most common definition (35) was a prostate specific antigen of >0.2 ng/mL or a slight variation thereof. In addition, a total of 208 articles reported 99 different definitions of biochemical failure among those treated with radiation therapy. Of these, the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition (70) and/or a variation thereof was the most commonly reported. In total, 166 different definitions of biochemical failure were identified. Following radical prostatectomy, the Panel recommends defining biochemical recurrence as an initial serum prostate specific antigen of > or =0.2 ng/mL, with a second confirmatory level of prostate specific antigen of >0.2 ng/mL. The Panel recommends the use of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria for patients treated with radiation therapy and acknowledges that these criteria will soon be updated although not yet published. CONCLUSIONS: A high degree of variability in the definition of biochemical recurrence exists following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Strict definitions for biochemical recurrence are necessary to identify men at risk for disease progression and to allow meaningful comparisons among patients treated similarly. The Panel acknowledges the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria and future modifications thereof for those receiving radiation therapy and recommends the newly developed American Urological Association criteria for those treated with radical prostatectomy. The purpose for the establishment of this standard is for data reporting purposes and for comparison of similarly treated patients. It is not intended to represent a threshold value for which to initiate treatment. The Panel acknowledges that the clinical decision to initiate treatment will be dependent on multiple factors including patient and physician interaction rather than a specific prostate specific antigen threshold value.

Forman JD, Yudelev M, Bolton S, Tekyi-Mensah S, Maughan R. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. · Cancer Metastasis Rev. · Pubmed #12465752 No free full text.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to summarize the progress made using fast neutron irradiation in the treatment of prostate cancer at Wayne State University between 1991 and the year 2001. The results of three Phase II studies and one Phase III st udy involving nearly 700 patients is summarized in this paper. The Phase II studies weredose finding studies looking at doses of 15, 9, 10, and 11 nGy, respectively. The randomized protocol was a study of sequence looking at the results of treating patients with neutron first versus neutron radiation last. The results demonstrated that the best combination of tumor control probabilities and normal tissue complications was found in a mix of approximately 50% neutrons and 50% photons. Thus, the standard doses become 10 nGy and 40 Gy of photons. The randomized trial demonstrated that the sequence has significant importance and the disease-free survival was 93% for patients treated with neutrons first versus 73% for patients treated with neutrons last. There was no difference in the rate of acute or chronic complications. Finally, an analysis was performed demonstrating which patients may best benefit from the use of neutron irradiation. It was shown that patients with one, two, or three adverse risk factors had a significant improvement in disease-free survival when part of the treatment included neutron radiation versus standard photon radiation alone. Neutron radiation can be delivered safely with effort to see that it is superior to that which can be achieved by conformal photon irradiation by itself. Future work will be done to expand the role of neutron radiation in other clinical disease sites.

Tiguert R, Forman JD, Hussain M, Wood DP. · Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, and the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Semin Urol Oncol. · Pubmed #10462317 No free full text.

Abstract: With the advent of routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in asymptomatic young men, the number of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy is increasing. Effective therapy for the 30% to 40% of men who recur following radical prostatectomy is essential. Salvage radiation therapy for a rising serum PSA level is an effective therapy for controlling local recurrence. The impact of salvage radiotherapy on disease-free survival is promising, but the guidelines of therapy are not well established. The best candidates for salvage radiotherapy are those with a serum PSA level < 2 ng/mL with no palpable recurrence and complete urinary continence.

Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, Hussain M, Pienta KJ, Smith DC, Kershaw T. · School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5482, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #17999405 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Few intervention studies have been conducted to help couples manage the effects of prostate cancer and maintain their quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine whether a family-based intervention could improve appraisal variables (appraisal of illness or caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness), coping resources (coping strategies, self-efficacy, communication), symptom distress, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer and their spouses. METHODS: For this clinical trial, 263 patient-spouse dyads were stratified by research site, phase of illness, and treatment; then, they were randomized to the control group (standard care) or the experimental group (standard care plus a 5-session family intervention). The intervention targeted couples' communication, hope, coping, uncertainty, and symptom management. The final sample consisted of 235 couples: 123 couples in the control group and 112 couples in the experimental group. Data collection occurred at baseline before randomization and at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: At 4-month follow-up, intervention patients reported less uncertainty and better communication with spouses than control patients, but they reported no other effects. Intervention spouses reported higher quality of life, more self-efficacy, better communication, and less negative appraisal of caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness, and symptom distress at 4 months compared with controls, and some effects were sustained to 8 months and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer and their spouses reported positive outcomes from a family intervention that offered them information and support. Programs of care need to be extended to spouses who likely will experience multiple benefits from intervention.

Vaishampayan U, Hussain M, Banerjee M, Seren S, Sarkar FH, Fontana J, Forman JD, Cher ML, Powell I, Pontes JE, Kucuk O. · Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Nutr Cancer. · Pubmed #17927495 No free full text.

Abstract: Dietary intake of lycopene and soy has been associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer. In vitro studies with lycopene and genistein, a soy isoflavone, have shown induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell growth in androgen-sensitive (LNCaP) and androgen-independent (PC3 and VeCaP) prostate cancer cell lines. In a previous Phase II clinical trial in prostate cancer patients, we observed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) stabilization with soy isoflavone intake. In this Phase II clinical trial, we investigated the efficacy of lycopene alone or in combination with soy isoflavones on serum PSA levels in men with prostate cancer. To be eligible for the study, men with prostate cancer had to have rising serum PSA following local therapy or while on hormone therapy. Study population included 71 eligible patients who had 3 successive rising PSA levels or a minimum PSA of 10 ng/ml at 2 successive evaluations prior to starting therapy. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a tomato extract capsule containing 15 mg of lycopene alone (n = 38) or together with a capsule containing 40 mg of a soy isoflavone mixture (n = 33) twice daily orally for a maximum of 6 mo. One patient on the lycopene arm did not receive therapy due to his inability to ingest the study pill. There was no decline in serum PSA in either group qualifying for a partial or complete response. However, 35 of 37 (95%) evaluable patients in the lycopene group and 22 of 33 (67%) evaluable patients in the lycopene plus soy isoflavone group achieved stable disease described as stabilization in serum PSA level. The data suggest that lycopene and soy isoflavones have activity in prostate cancer patients with PSA relapse disease and may delay progression of both hormone-refractory and hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. However, there may not be an additive effect between the 2 compounds when taken together. Future studies are warranted to further investigate the efficacy of lycopene and soy isoflavones in prostate cancer as well as the mechanism of potential negative interaction between them.

Van den Heuvel F, Powell T, Seppi E, Littrupp P, Khan M, Wang Y, Forman JD. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. · Med Phys. · Pubmed #14655934 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to study the correction of prostate motion and position during external beam therapy. The correction was performed using a commercially available ultrasound-based repositioning tool. Electronic portal imaging with the use of fiducial markers was used to assess efficacy and accuracy. Patients undergoing radiation treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate were enrolled in a positioning study. Fifteen patients had five to six gold fiducial markers implanted in their prostate. These patients were positioned daily in a standard manner and then were repositioned every other day using an ultrasound-based correction system. Every fraction of a patients' treatment was imaged. This yielded 156 image pairs with and 119 pairs without repositioning available for analysis. This group of patients with markers had the following residual positions measured after the use of ultrasound repositioning. A mean error of -0.4 mm (LL), -2.6 mm (CC), and +2.5 mm (AP) with a standard deviation of 4.3, 5.4, and 5.7 mm. In two directions the improvements of treatment using the ultrasound correction were smaller than the precision of this experiment. They were no larger than 0.81 mm (LAT), and 0.95 mm (CC). In the AP direction a significant improvement was found of 1.6 mm. A highly significant correlation (p < 0.001) was found between the residual errors in the cranio-caudal direction and the shifts performed on the basis of the ultrasound measurements (Spearman ranking R = 0.53). We presented a method to objectively estimate improvements by a correction scheme. This method applied to ultrasound-based adjustment showed significant improvement in one direction and no measurable improvement in two other directions.

Maughan RL, Brambs B, Porter AT, Forman JD. · Gershenson Radiation Oncology Center, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Harper Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA. · Strahlenther Onkol. · Pubmed #10394414 No free full text.

Abstract: The results of clinical trials in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate using, mixed beam neutron/photon therapy, neutrons alone and photon therapy in combination with hormone treatment are compared. These trials indicate that neutron therapy is superior to photon/hormone therapy in achieving local control. The costs of delivering these two different therapies in a large US academic radiation oncology center at Wayne State University (WSU) are compared. The cost of a full course of mixed beam therapy is $20,142 compared to $18,871 for the photon/hormone treatment. Although the WSU neutron facility is a state-of-the-art installation, it is also a prototype device; it is estimated that a modern neutron facility based on this design would operate more cost effectively reducing the cost of a course of mixed beam therapy to $18,532.

Chuba PJ, Maughan R, Forman JD. · Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA. · Strahlenther Onkol. · Pubmed #10394405 No free full text.

Abstract: The conditions for safe and effective conformal neutron radiotherapy have been established at Wayne State University.

Swanson GP, Goldman B, Tangen CM, Chin J, Messing E, Canby-Hagino E, Forman JD, Thompson IM, Crawford ED, Anonymous00045. · University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #18930488 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: From the randomized study Southwest Oncology Group 8794 we evaluated the effect of seminal vesicle involvement on outcomes and whether those patients benefited from post-prostatectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Southwest Oncology Group study 8794 randomized high risk patients (with seminal vesicle positive disease and/or capsular penetration and/or positive margins) to radiation vs observation after prostatectomy. A total of 431 subjects with pathologically advanced prostate cancer were randomized. RESULTS: Median followup was 12.2 years. Of the patients 139 had seminal vesicle involvement with or without capsular penetration and/or positive margins. Compared to the 286 patients with seminal vesicle negative disease there was poorer 10-year biochemical failure-free survival (33% for seminal vesicle negative and 22% for seminal vesicle positive, p = 0.04), metastasis-free survival (70% and 56%, respectively, p = 0.005) and overall survival (10-year overall survival 74% and 61%, respectively, p = 0.02) for those with seminal vesicle positive disease. Patients with seminal vesicle positive disease who received adjuvant radiation compared to observation realized an improvement in 10-year biochemical failure-free survival from 12% to 36% (p = 0.001), in 10-year overall survival from 51% to 71% (p = 0.08) and in metastasis-free survival from 47% to 66% (p = 0.09), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although seminal vesicle involvement is a negative prognostic factor, long-term control is possible especially if patients are given adjuvant radiation therapy. This therapy appears to be effective in patients with seminal vesicle involvement.

Trabulsi EJ, Valicenti RK, Hanlon AL, Pisansky TM, Sandler HM, Kuban DA, Catton CN, Michalski JM, Zelefsky MJ, Kupelian PA, Lin DW, Anscher MS, Slawin KM, Roehrborn CG, Forman JD, Liauw SL, Kestin LL, DeWeese TL, Scardino PT, Stephenson AJ, Pollack A. · Department of Urology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA. · Urology. · Pubmed #18672274 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether postoperative salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and early adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after radical prostatectomy lead to equivalent long-term tumor control. We studied a group of patients undergoing ART by comparing them with a matched control group undergoing SRT after biochemical failure. METHODS: Using a multi-institutional database of 2299 patients, 449 patients with pT3-4N0 disease were eligible for inclusion, including 211 patients receiving ART and 238 patients receiving SRT. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio according to preoperative prostate-specific antigen Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, surgical margin status, and follow-up from date of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were matched (96:96). The median follow-up was 94 months from surgery and 73 months from RT completion. There was a significant reduction in biochemical failure with ART compared with SRT. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) from surgery was 75% after ART, compared with 66% for SRT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6, P = .049). The 5-year FFBF from the end of RT was 73% after ART, compared with 50% after SRT (HR = 2.3, log rank [LR] P = .0007). From the end of RT, SRT and Gleason score >or=8 were independent predictors of diminished FFBF. From the date of surgery, Gleason score >or=8 was a significant predictor of FFBF. CONCLUSIONS: Early ART for pT3-4N0 prostate cancer significantly reduces the risk of long-term biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy compared with SRT. Gleason score >or=8 was the only factor on multivariate analysis associated with metastasic progression.

Santanam L, He T, Yudelev M, Forman JD, Orton CG, Heuvel FV, Maughan RL, Burmeister J. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #17674984 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study investigates the enhanced conformality of neutron dose distributions obtainable through the application of intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy (IMNRT) to the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An in-house algorithm was used to optimize individual segments for IMNRT generated using an organ-at-risk (OAR) avoidance approach. A number of beam orientation schemes were investigated in an attempt to approach an optimum solution. The IMNRT plans were created retrospectively for 5 patients previously treated for prostate adenocarcinoma using fast neutron therapy (FNT), and a comparison of these plans is presented. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and plans were evaluated based on percentage volumes of rectum and bladder receiving 95%, 80%, and 50% (V(95), V(80), V(50)) of the prescription dose, and on V(60) for both the femoral heads and GM(muscle) group. RESULTS: Plans were normalized such that the IMNRT DVHs for prostate and seminal vesicles were nearly identical to those for conventional FNT plans. Use of IMNRT provided reductions in rectum V(95) and V(80) of 10% (2-27%) and 13% (5-28%), respectively, and reductions in bladder V(95) and V(80) of 12% (3-26%) and 4% (7-10%), respectively. The average decrease in V(60) for the femoral heads was 4.5% (1-18%), with no significant change in V(60) for the GM(muscle) group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first analysis of the application of intensity modulation to neutron radiotherapy. The IMNRT technique provides a substantial reduction in normal tissue dose in the treatment of prostate cancer. This reduction should result in a significant clinical advantage for this and other treatment sites.

Northouse LL, Mood DW, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, Hussain M, Pienta KJ, Smith DC, Sanda MG, Kershaw T. · School of Nursing and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0482, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #17635953 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Despite the high prevalence of prostate cancer, little information is available on the quality of life of men and their spouses during the phases of illness. This study assessed patients' and spouses' quality of life, appraisal of illness, resources, symptoms, and risk for distress across three phases of prostate cancer: newly diagnosed, biochemical recurrence, and advanced. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 263 patient/spouse dyads. A stress-appraisal conceptual model guided the selection of variables which were then assessed with established instruments. Study variables were examined for phase effects (differences in dyads across three phases), role effects (patients v spouses), and phase-by-role interactions (differences within dyads across phases) using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: More phase effects than role effects were found, indicating that the psychosocial experiences of patients and their spouses were similar, but differed from dyads in other phases. Dyads in the advanced phase were at highest risk for distress. These patients had the lowest physical quality of life, and their spouses had the lowest emotional quality of life of all participants. Dyads in the biochemical recurrence and advanced phases had more negative appraisals of illness and caregiving, greater uncertainty, and more hopelessness compared with dyads in the newly diagnosed phase. Spouses, in contrast to patients, had less confidence in their ability to manage the illness and perceived less support across all phases of illness. CONCLUSION: Phase-specific programs of care are needed to assist both men with prostate cancer and their spouses to manage the effects of illness.

Swanson GP, Hussey MA, Tangen CM, Chin J, Messing E, Canby-Hagino E, Forman JD, Thompson IM, Crawford ED, Anonymous00243. · Department of Radiation Oncology and Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #17538167 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial 8794 demonstrated that adjuvant radiation reduces the risk of biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) treatment failure by 50% over radical prostatectomy alone. In this analysis, we stratified patients as to their preradiation PSA levels and correlated it with outcomes such as PSA treatment failure, local recurrence, and distant failure, to serve as guidelines for future research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-one subjects with pathologically advanced prostate cancer (extraprostatic extension, positive surgical margins, or seminal vesicle invasion) were randomly assigned to adjuvant radiotherapy or observation. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four eligible patients had immediate postprostatectomy and follow-up PSA data. Median follow-up was 10.2 years. For patients with a postsurgical PSA of 0.2 ng/mL, radiation was associated with reductions in the 10-year risk of biochemical treatment failure (72% to 42%), local failures (20% to 7%), and distant failures (12% to 4%). For patients with a postsurgical PSA between higher than 0.2 and <or = 1.0 ng/mL, reductions in the 10-year risk of biochemical failure (80% to 73%), local failures (25% to 9%), and distant failures (16% to 12%) were realized. In patients with postsurgical PSA higher than 1.0, the respective findings were 94% versus 100%, 28% versus 9%, and 44% versus 18%. CONCLUSION: The pattern of treatment failure in high-risk patients is predominantly local with a surprisingly low incidence of metastatic failure. Adjuvant radiation to the prostate bed reduces the risk of metastatic disease and biochemical failure at all postsurgical PSA levels. Further improvement in reducing local treatment failure is likely to have the greatest impact on outcome in high-risk patients after prostatectomy.

Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, Pisansky TM, Slawin KM, Klein EA, Anscher MS, Michalski JM, Sandler HM, Lin DW, Forman JD, Zelefsky MJ, Kestin LL, Roehrborn CG, Catton CN, DeWeese TL, Liauw SL, Valicenti RK, Kuban DA, Pollack A. · Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195-0001, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #17513807 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: An increasing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is the initial sign of recurrent prostate cancer among patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) may eradicate locally recurrent cancer, but studies to distinguish local from systemic recurrence lack adequate sensitivity and specificity. We developed a nomogram to predict the probability of cancer control at 6 years after SRT for PSA-defined recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we constructed a model to predict the probability of disease progression after SRT in a multi-institutional cohort of 1,540 patients. RESULTS: The 6-year progression-free probability was 32% (95% CI, 28% to 35%) overall. Forty-eight percent (95% CI, 40% to 56%) of patients treated with SRT alone at PSA levels of 0.50 ng/mL or lower were disease free at 6 years, including 41% (95% CI, 31% to 51%) who also had a PSA doubling time of 10 months or less or poorly differentiated (Gleason grade 8 to 10) cancer. Significant variables in the model were PSA level before SRT (P < .001), prostatectomy Gleason grade (P < .001), PSA doubling time (P < .001), surgical margins (P < .001), androgen-deprivation therapy before or during SRT (P < .001), and lymph node metastasis (P = .019). The resultant nomogram was internally validated and had a concordance index of 0.69. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy have a long-term PSA response to SRT when treatment is administered at the earliest sign of recurrence. The nomogram we developed predicts the outcome of SRT and should prove valuable for medical decision making for patients with a rising PSA level.

Opfermann KJ, Lai Z, Essenmacher L, Bolton S, Ager J, Forman JD. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine/Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Clin Genitourin Cancer. · Pubmed #17026802 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The object of this study was to evaluate the duration of response to intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) in patients with nonmetastatic recurrent or localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ten patients received IAD from February 1992 to February 2005. One hundred three patients were treated after failure of primary radiation therapy and/or prostatectomy, with the remaining 7 patients treated primarily with IAD. The median duration of treatment cycle was 6 months. Patients were considered resistant to hormone therapy if the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level increased, with castrate levels of testosterone. At the time of initial diagnosis, the median Gleason score was 7 (range, 4-9), and tumor stages were as follows: T1/T2 (n = 73), T3 and T4 N1 (n = 34), and other (n = 3). The median PSA at the initiation of IAD was 8.25 ng/mL. RESULTS: The median follow-up after beginning IAD was 45.5 months. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-9 cycles). Ninety-four of 110 patients (85.5%) remained responsive to IAD. Sixteen patients (14.5%) progressed to become refractory to primary hormone treatment. Patients with a higher tumor stage (T3 and T4) were significantly more likely to develop resistance. The median time to become refractory to hormone therapy was 47.9 months (range, 9.4-93.4 months). Five patients were put on secondary continuous hormone treatment, and 3 of them developed resistance at a median of 9 months. One patient was put on a secondary IAD and was still responding at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: With 85.5% of the original patient population still responding to the primary hormone therapy at 45.5 months of follow-up, IAD appears to be a viable option for patients with biochemical failure after local radiation therapy. A pattern of shortening time between cycles and an increasing nadir PSA level with each successive cycle is consistent with the gradual development of hormone resistance.

Raffoul JJ, Wang Y, Kucuk O, Forman JD, Sarkar FH, Hillman GG. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · BMC Cancer. · Pubmed #16640785 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: New cancer therapeutic strategies must be investigated that enhance prostate cancer treatment while minimizing associated toxicities. We have previously shown that genistein, the major isoflavone found in soy, enhanced prostate cancer radiotherapy in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we investigated the cellular and molecular interaction between genistein and radiation using PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. METHODS: Tumor cell survival and progression was determined by clonogenic analysis, flow cytometry, EMSA analysis of NF-kappaB, and western blot analysis of cyclin B1, p21WAF1/Cip1, and cleaved PARP protein. RESULTS: Genistein combined with radiation caused greater inhibition in PC-3 colony formation compared to genistein or radiation alone. Treatment sequence of genistein followed by radiation and continuous exposure to genistein showed optimal effect. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated a significant dose- and time-dependent G2/M arrest induced by genistein and radiation that correlated with increased p21WAF1/Cip1 and decreased cyclin B1 expression. NF-kappaB activity was significantly decreased by genistein, yet increased by radiation. Radiation-induced activation of NF-kappaB activity was strongly inhibited by genistein pre-treatment. A significant and striking increase in cleaved PARP protein was measured following combined genistein and radiation treatment, indicating increased apoptosis. CONCLUSION: A mechanism of increased cell death by genistein and radiation is proposed to occur via inhibition of NF-kappaB, leading to altered expression of regulatory cell cycle proteins such as cyclin B and/or p21WAF1/Cip1, thus promoting G2/M arrest and increased radiosensitivity. These findings support the important and novel strategy of combining genistein with radiation for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Van den Heuvel F, Fugazzi J, Seppi E, Forman JD. · Department of Oncology and Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Leuven, Belgium. · Radiother Oncol. · Pubmed #16581149 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To implement an on-line correction scheme based on implanted markers to reduce treatment margins in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of carcinoma of the prostate. In turn reduction in treatment margins reduces irradiated volumes and offers the possibility of reduced normal tissue complications or escalated target dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five or six gold markers were implanted in 10 patients treated for prostate carcinoma using EBRT. All patients were enlisted in an IRB-approved protocol. Before each fraction two portal images were obtained using a low dose (2MU). Positions of the markers were calculated from these images using an in-house developed program. Corrections were applied with a threshold of 2mm displacement. After correction the procedure was repeated. RESULTS: Overall systematic errors were reduced from 7.45, 1.29, and 5.12 mm to 0.65, 0.11, and 0.46 mm in, respectively, the antero-posterior, lateral, and cranio-caudal directions. Likewise, the overall SD were reduced from 5.99, 5.34, and 4.44 mm to 2.82, 2.64, and 2.22 mm, respectively. All reductions were highly significant (P < 0.01) using a t-test for systematic and an F-test for random errors. On an individual level all but three patients showed significant improvements in all directions for the random errors. All patients improved in at least one direction. Systematic errors were significantly lower in all patients. Simulated correction schemes using this data suggest that margin reduction using off-line reduction does not benefit substantially from on-line corrections in the first few fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Use of marker-based correction improves the patient position. Factors influencing the accuracy were: (1) number of seeds usable for correction, (2) distribution of markers throughout the volume of interest, and (3) objective instructions for patient realignment.

Wang Y, Xu M, Che M, Von Hofe E, Abbas A, Kallinteris NL, Lu X, Liss ZJ, Forman JD, Hillman GG. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Harper Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Hum Gene Ther. · Pubmed #15761259 No free full text.

Abstract: Transfecting genes into tumors, to upregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II molecules and inhibit MHC class II associated invariant chain (Ii), induces a potent anti-tumor immune response when preceded by tumor irradiation, in murine RM-9 prostate carcinoma. The transfected genes are cDNA plasmids for interferon-gamma (pIFN-gamma), MHC class II transactivator (pCIITA), an Ii reverse gene construct (pIi-RGC), and a subtherapeutic dose of adjuvant IL-2 (pIL-2). Responding mice rejected challenge with parental tumor and demonstrated tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). We have extended our investigation to determine the relative roles of each one of the four plasmids pIFN-gamma, pCIITA, pIi-RGC, and pIL-2 in conjunction with radiation for the induction of a curative immune response. Upregulation of MHC class I with pIFN-gamma or class II with pCIITA, separately, does not lead to a complete response even if supplemented with pIL-2 or pIi-RGC. An optimal and specific antitumor response is achieved in more than 50% of the mice when, after tumor irradiation, tumor cells are converted in situ to a MHC class I+/class II+/Ii- phenotype with pIFN-gamma, pCIITA, pIi-RGC, and pIL-2. We demonstrate further that both CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are essential for induction of an antitumor response because in vivo depletion of either subset abrogates the response. The radiation contributes to the gene therapy by causing tumor debulking and increasing the permeability of tumors to infiltration of inflammatory cells.

Hillman GG, Wang Y, Kucuk O, Che M, Doerge DR, Yudelev M, Joiner MC, Marples B, Forman JD, Sarkar FH. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University School of Medicine and Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Mol Cancer Ther. · Pubmed #15486194 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We have shown previously that pretreatment with genistein potentiated cell killing induced by radiation in human PC-3 prostate carcinoma cell line in vitro. We tested this approach in vivo using an orthotopic prostate carcinoma model of PC-3 cells in nude mice. METHODS: Established prostate tumors were pretreated with p.o. genistein at a dose of 5 mg/d for 2 days followed by tumor irradiation with 5 Gy photons. One day after radiation, genistein was resumed and given every other day for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Genistein combined with radiation caused a significantly greater inhibition of primary tumor growth (87%) compared with genistein (30%) or radiation (73%) alone. The number of metastatic lymph nodes was also significantly decreased following genistein and radiation. Paradoxically, genistein alone increased the size of lymph nodes associated with heavy tumor infiltration. Genistein-treated prostate tumors were large with necrosis, apoptotic cells, and giant cells and have a lower proliferation index than in control tumors. Following radiation, areas of tumor destruction replaced by fibrotic tissue and inflammatory cells as well as giant cells were observed, which are typical of radiation effect. After radiation and genistein treatment, an increase in giant cells, apoptosis, inflammatory cells, and fibrosis was observed with decreased tumor cell proliferation consistent with increased tumor cell destruction. Long-term therapy with genistein after prostate tumor irradiation significantly increased survival. CONCLUSIONS: Genistein combined with prostate tumor irradiation led to a greater control of the growth of the primary tumor and metastasis to lymph nodes than genistein or radiation alone, resulting in greater survival.

Youssef E, Forman JD, Tekyi-Mensah S, Bolton S, Hart K. · Gershenson Radiation Oncology Center, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Clin Prostate Cancer. · Pubmed #15046710 No free full text.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients receiving external beam radiation for an elevated postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Between December 1991 and September 1998, 108 patients received definitive radiation therapy for elevated postprostatectomy PSA levels. The median dose of irradiation was 68 Gy (range, 48-74 Gy). During treatment, the PSA levels were checked an average of 5 times (range, 3-7 times). Prostate-specific antigen values were judged to decline or increase during treatment if they changed by more than 0.2 ng/mL. After treatment, biochemical failure was defined as a measurable or rising PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 51 months (range, 3-112 months). Fifty-eight patients (54%) had evidence of biochemical failure. The 3- and 5-year actuarial biochemical relapse-free (bNED) survivals for all patients were 55% and 39%, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, intratreatment PSA and preradiation PSA were significant predictors of bNED survival. Patients with a PSA level that decreased during treatment had a 5-year bNED survival of 43% compared to 10% in patients with an increasing PSA level (P = 0.0002). Using the preradiation therapy PSA value as a continuous variable, higher preradiation therapy PSA levels were associated with an increased risk of failure (P = 0.004). Cut points of pretreatment PSA were derived at 0.9 ng/mL and 4.2 ng/mL using the Michael Leblanc recursive partitioning algorithm. The 5-year bNED rate for patients with a preradiation therapy PSA < 0.9 ng/mL was 45% versus 42% for patients with preradiation therapy PSA between 0.9 and 4.2 ng/mL and 21% for patients > or = 4.2 ng/mL (P = 0.0003). Patients with a Gleason score of < or = 7 had a 5-year bNED rate of 38% compared to 37% for patients with a Gleason score > 7 (P = 0.27). Other factors examined individually that did not reach statistical significance included time from surgery to radiation therapy, race, seminal vesicle involvement, pathological stage, surgical margin, and perineural invasion. Upon multivariate analysis, only preradiation therapy PSA (P < 0.001) and the PSA trend during radiation therapy (P < 0.001) were significant factors. The results of therapeutic radiation for patients with elevated postprostatectomy PSA levels are sufficiently poor; other strategies should be explored as alternatives, including early adjuvant postprostatectomy irradiation or the use of combined hormonal and radiation therapy in the salvage situation.

Forman JD. · No affiliation provided · Urol Oncol. · Pubmed #14969804 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Hillman GG, Maughan RL, Grignon DJ, Yudelev M, Che M, Abrams J, Wang Y, Layer A, Wright JL, Rubio J, Forman JD. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Harper Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #12873689 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To improve the outcome of radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma bone tumors, we investigated bone tumor irradiation with photons or neutrons followed by interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy in a tumor model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Implantation of PC-3 cells in nude mouse femur cavity induced a bone tumor that progressed to the formation of a palpable tumor, at the hip joint, by Day 20. Established bone tumors were irradiated with photons or neutrons, and a day later, mice were treated with IL-2 therapy for 3 weekly cycles. RESULTS: PC-3 bone tumors responded to radiation with photons or neutrons in a dose-dependent manner. Combination of photon or neutron radiation with IL-2 therapy increased tumor growth delay, compared to that with photons or neutrons alone. Radiation alone or combined with IL-2 significantly increased mouse survival compared to that with IL-2 or no treatment. After combined therapy, a complete inhibition of bone tumor growth was observed in 45% to 50% of the mice. Histologically, the combined therapy resulted in greater tumor destruction associated with fibrosis, new bone formation, and inflammatory infiltrates than that observed with each modality alone. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of tumor irradiation with neutrons or photons was enhanced by IL-2 therapy for the treatment of prostate carcinoma bone tumors.

Hillman GG, Xu M, Wang Y, Wright JL, Lu X, Kallinteris NL, Tekyi-Mensah S, Thompson TC, Mitchell MS, Forman JD. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Harper Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. · Hum Gene Ther. · Pubmed #12804139 No free full text.

Abstract: Our goal was to convert murine RM-9 prostate carcinoma cells in vivo into antigen-presenting cells capable of presenting endogenous tumor antigens and triggering a potent T-helper cell-mediated immune response essential for the generation of a specific antitumor response. We showed that generating the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I+/class II+/Ii- phenotype, within an established subcutaneous RM-9 tumor nodule, led to an effective immune response limiting tumor growth. This phenotype was created by intratumoral injection of plasmid cDNAs coding for interferon gamma, MHC class II transactivator, and an antisense reverse gene construct (RGC) for a segment of the gene for Ii protein (-92,97). While this protocol led to significant suppression of tumor growth, there were no disease-free survivors. Nevertheless, irradiation of the tumor nodule on the day preceding initiation of gene therapy yielded 7 of 16 mice that were disease-free in a long-term follow up of 57 days compared to 1 of 7 mice receiving radiotherapy alone. Mice receiving radiotherapy and gene therapy rejected challenge with parental RM-9 cells and demonstrated specific cytotoxic T-cell activity in their splenocytes but not the mouse cured by radiation alone. These data were reproduced in additional experiments and confirmed that tumor irradiation prior to gene therapy resulted in complete tumor regression and specific tumor immunity in more than 50% of the mice. Increasing the number of plasmid injections after tumor irradiation induced tumor regression in 70% of the mice. Administering radiation before this novel gene therapy approach, that creates an in situ tumor vaccine, holds promise for the treatment of human prostate carcinoma.