Prostatic Neoplasms: Bahnson RR

Kawachi MH, Bahnson RR, Barry M, Carroll PR, Carter HB, Catalona WJ, Epstein JI, Etzioni RB, Hemstreet GP, Howe RJ, Kopin JD, Lange PH, Lilja H, Mohler J, Moul J, Nadler RB, Patterson S, Pollack A, Presti JC, Stroup AM, Urban DA, Wake R, Wei JT, Anonymous00333. · No affiliation provided · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #17692177 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Mohler J, Babaian RJ, Bahnson RR, Boston B, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, Hauke RJ, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kawachi M, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Logothetis C, MacVicar G, Pollack A, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M, Sandler H, Shrieve D, Srinivas S, Twardowski P, Urban DA, Walsh PC, Anonymous00332. · No affiliation provided · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #17692170 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Montie JE, Abrahams NA, Bahnson RR, Eisenberger MA, El-Galley R, Herr HW, Hudes GR, Kuzel TM, Lange PH, Patterson A, Pollack A, Richie JP, Sexton WJ, Shipley WU, Small EJ, Trump DL, Walther PJ, Wilson TG, Anonymous00097. · No affiliation provided · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #17112448 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Bahnson RR, Hanks GE, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kozlowski JM, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Logothetis C, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M, Sandler H, Scardino PT, Taylor RJ, Urban DA, Walsh PC, Wilson TG, Anonymous00207. · James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. · Oncology (Williston Park). · Pubmed #11195405 No free full text.

Abstract: Systemic therapies for prostate cancer are likely to improve, and as they do, they will have enormous impact on the treatment of high-risk and locally advanced cancers. Further technical improvements in radiotherapy and alternative local modalities, such as cryoablation, are also likely, and will bring even more options for local control. It is certain these guidelines will continue to evolve.

Bahnson RR. · No affiliation provided · J Urol. · Pubmed #10991699 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Grainger EM, Schwartz SJ, Wang S, Unlu NZ, Boileau TW, Ferketich AK, Monk JP, Gong MC, Bahnson RR, DeGroff VL, Clinton SK. · The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. · Nutr Cancer. · Pubmed #18444145 No free full text.

Abstract: Tomato and soy products are hypothesized to reduce the risk of prostate cancer or enhance efficacy of therapy. A study was completed to determine if men with active prostate cancer will adhere to a dietary intervention rich in tomato products and a soy protein supplement men (n = 41) with recurrent, asymptomatic prostate cancer were randomized among 2 groups: Group A (n = 20) consumed tomato products (no soy) for Weeks 0 through 4, targeting a minimum of 25 mg of lycopene/day. Group B (n = 21) consumed soy (no tomatoes) for Weeks 0 through 4, providing 40 g of soy protein/day. For Weeks 4 through 8, all men consumed a combined tomato-rich diet and soy supplements. No grade II through IV toxicities were observed. During Weeks 0 through 4, mean daily lycopene intake for Group A was 43 mg (+/- 15 mg) and mean soy intake for Group B was 39 g (+/- 1 g), remaining similar during Weeks 4 through 8. Serum lycopene increased from 0.72 +/- 0.09 micromol/l to 1.21 +/- 0.10 micromol/l (P < 0.0001) and urinary isoflavone excretion increased from not detectable to 54.1 +/- 5.7 micromol/l (P < 0.05) with 8 wk of diet intervention. Serum prostate-specific antigen decreased between Weeks 0 and 8 for 14 / 41 men (34%). Mean serum vascular endothelial growth factor for the entire group was reduced from 87 to 51 ng/ml (P < 0.05) over 8 wk. In conclusion, prostate cancer patients will consume diets rich in tomato products and soy with excellent compliance and bioavailability of phytochemicals. Further studies combining tomato and soy foods to determine efficacy for prostate cancer prevention or management are encouraged.

Cegala DJ, Bahnson RR, Clinton SK, David P, Gong MC, Monk JP, Nag S, Pohar KS. · School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. · Health Commun. · Pubmed #18443993 No free full text.

Abstract: Relatively little is known about prostate cancer patients' information seeking after diagnosis, how they use such information in making a treatment decision, or what role information plays in adjusting to quality-of-life issues posttreatment. This research sought to explore some of these issues by examining prostate cancer patients' information seeking and its relationship to assessments of feeling informed and satisfied with physician-patient communication about prostate cancer. Respondents felt reasonably informed about prostate cancer, although over one third of them reported being less then informed. Similarly, many respondents were generally satisfied with their communication with physicians, but nearly 40% of them reported being less than satisfied. However, there was no relationship between respondents' information seeking about prostate cancer and their assessments of being informed or satisfied with physician-patient communication. These and other results are discussed with respect to future research on prostate cancer patients' information needs and uses of such information.

Grainger EM, Kim HS, Monk JP, Lemeshow SA, Gong M, Bahnson RR, Clinton SK. · Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. · Urol Oncol. · Pubmed #18312929 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesized that dietary patterns, individual nutrients, and specific prescription and over-the-counter medications may influence prostate carcinogenesis. Little information is available regarding the use of these products among men who are participating in prevention trials targeting prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 92 men (mean age 69 years) participating in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) at an academic center were asked to bring all nutritional supplements and medications to regularly scheduled study visits. RESULTS: Data were collected on 86 of 92 men. We found that 85% of men in the PCPT regularly consumed at least 1 nutritional supplement. The mean (+/-standard deviation) number of dietary supplements consumed per man was 3.3 +/- 3.5 (range 0-21). A multivitamin and multimineral (73%) supplement was the most common product consumed. Single-nutrient supplements regularly consumed included: vitamin E (48%), vitamin C (31%), calcium (24%), and selenium (7%). Of men, 36% reported consumption of herbal products. Medications frequently consumed during the study period that may influence prostate carcinogenesis included nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (57%), antihypertensives (49%), lipid lowering agents (27%), and aspirin (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Participants in the PCPT at an academic center have a high propensity for dietary supplement use. Many, such as vitamin E and selenium, are hypothesized to influence the risk of prostate cancer. Several of the medications commonly consumed, including aspirin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and statins, are being investigated as chemopreventive agents. Investigators designing prostate cancer chemoprevention trials should consider including detailed documentation of exposure to these products that may influence study outcomes.

Nag S, Shi P, Liu B, Gupta N, Bahnson RR, Wang JZ. · Department of Radiation Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #17996395 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate whether real-time intraoperative ultrasound (US)-based dosimetry can replace conventional postoperative computed tomography (CT)-based dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2001 and November 2002, 82 patients underwent (103)Pd prostate brachytherapy. An interplant treatment planning system was used for real-time intraoperative transrectal US-guided treatment planning. The dose distribution was updated according to the estimated seed position to obtain the dose-volume histograms. Postoperative CT-based dosimetry was performed a few hours later using the Theraplan-Plus treatment planning system. The dosimetric parameters obtained from the two imaging modalities were compared. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed correlations between the US- and CT-based dosimetry. However, large variations were found in the implant-quality parameters of the two modalities, including the doses covering 100%, 90%, and 80% of the prostate volume and prostate volumes covered by 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescription dose. The mean relative difference was 38% and 16% for doses covering 100% and 90% of the prostate volume and 10% and 21% for prostate volumes covered by 100% and 150% of the prescription dose, respectively. The CT-based volume covered by 200% of the prescription dose was about 30% greater than the US-based one. Compared with CT-based dosimetry, US-based dosimetry significantly underestimated the dose to normal organs, especially for the rectum. The average US-based maximal dose and volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose for the rectum was 72 Gy and 0.01 cm(3), respectively, much lower than the 159 Gy and 0.65 cm(3) obtained using CT-based dosimetry. CONCLUSION: Although dosimetry using intraoperative US-based planning provides preliminary real-time information, it does not accurately reflect the postoperative CT-based dosimetry. Until studies have determined whether US-based dosimetry or postoperative CT-based dosimetry can better predict patient outcomes, the American Brachytherapy Society recommendation of CT-based postimplant dosimetry should remain the standard of care.

Zhang H, Melamed J, Wei P, Cox K, Frankel W, Bahnson RR, Robinson N, Pyka R, Liu Y, Zheng P. · Department of Pathology, Division of Cancer Immunology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. · Cancer Immun. · Pubmed #12747744 links to  free full text

Abstract: Recognition of tumor cells by cytolytic T lymphocytes depends on cell surface MHC class I expression. As a mechanism to evade T cell recognition, many malignant cancer cells, including those of prostate cancer, down-regulate MHC class I. For the majority of human cancers, the molecular mechanism of MHC class I down regulation is unclear, although it is well established that MHC class I down-regulation is often associated with the down-regulation of multiple genes devoted to antigen presentation. Since the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) proto-oncogene controls multiple antigen-presentation genes in some murine cancer cells, we analyzed the expression of proto-oncogene PML and MHC class I in high-grade prostate cancer. We found that 30 of 37 (81%) prostate adenocarcinoma cases with a Gleason grade of 7-8 had more than 50% down-regulation of HLA class I expression. Among these, 22 cases (73.3%) had no detectable PML protein, while 4 cases (13.3%) showed partial PML down-regulation. In contrast, all 7 cases of prostate cancer with high expression of cell surface HLA class I had high levels of PML expression. Concordant down-regulation of HLA and PML was observed in different histological patterns of prostate adenocarcinoma. These results suggest that in high-grade prostate cancer, malfunction of proto-oncogene PML is a major factor in the down-regulation of cell surface HLA class I molecules, the target molecules essential for the direct recognition of cancer cells by cytolytic T lymphocytes.

LeRoy BE, Bahnson RR, Rosol TJ. · Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. · Prostate. · Pubmed #11816018 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Osteoblastic metastases are common in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The pathophysiology of the new bone formation at metastatic sites is not currently known, but it is hypothesized that growth factors secreted by the prostate may be involved. Unfortunately, most rodent models of prostate cancer with metastasis to bone are osteolytic and not osteoblastic. Significant osteolysis by tumor cells at metastatic sites may also lead to fractures or bone instability. Misinterpretation of new periosteal bone due to bone instability as tumor-cell osteoinduction is another disadvantage of the osteolytic models. To circumvent these problems, we have developed a model system of new bone formation in the calvaria of nude mice stimulated by normal canine prostate tissue. METHODS: Collagenase-digested normal prostate tissue was implanted adjacent to the calvaria of nude mice. Calvaria were examined at 2 weeks post-implantation for changes in the bone microenvironment by histology, calcein uptake at sites of bone mineralization, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining for osteoclasts. RESULTS: The prostate tissue remained viable and induced abundant new woven bone formation on the adjacent periosteal surface. In some cases new bone formation also was induced on the distant or concave calvarial periosteum. The new bone stained intensely with calcein, which demonstrated mineralization of the bone matrix. The new bone formation on prostate-implanted calvaria significantly increased (1.7-fold) the thickness of the calvaria compared with control calvaria. New bone formation was not induced in calvaria of mice implanted with normal canine kidney, urinary bladder, spleen, or skeletal muscle tissue, or mice with surgically-induced disruption of the periosteum. Osteoclast numbers in the medullary spaces and periosteum of calvaria were mildly increased (61%) in mice with implanted prostate tissue. CONCLUSIONS: This animal model will be useful for investigating the roles of prostate-derived growth factors on new bone formation in vivo.

Wagner TT, Young D, Bahnson RR. · Division of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #10081872 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: For the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer radical retropubic prostatectomy with its attendant hospital stay should be associated with higher charges than transperineal prostate brachytherapy. We report a comparative case series to determine patient charges and length of hospitalization of 2 modalities of monotherapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (16) or transperineal prostate brachytherapy (19) at the Arthur James Cancer Hospital and Research Institute. Complete charge and length of hospital stay data were collected for each patient. Total charges were calculated and the 2 modalities were compared. RESULTS: Charge data were available in 33 cases. Average total charges in the prostatectomy and brachytherapy groups were $15,097 and $21,025, respectively ($5,928 difference, p <0.0001). The difference increased further when outliers were excluded from study. Average length of hospital stay and average charge in the prostatectomy group were 3.8 days and $1,897. The higher charges for transperineal prostatic brachytherapy were due to dosimetry calculations, radioactive seeds and seed implantation. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution the average total charges for transperineal prostate brachytherapy are significantly higher than those for radical retropubic prostatectomy.