Prostatic Neoplasms: Arlen PM

Arlen PM, Bianco F, Dahut WL, D'Amico A, Figg WD, Freedland SJ, Gulley JL, Kantoff PW, Kattan MW, Lee A, Regan MM, Sartor O, Anonymous00032. · Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #18423743 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen is a glycoprotein found almost exclusively in normal and neoplastic prostate cells. Prostate specific antigen doubling time, or the change in prostate specific antigen over time, has emerged as a useful predictive marker for assessing disease outcome in patients with prostate cancer. It is important to agree on definitions and values for the calculation of prostate specific antigen doubling time, and to develop a common approach to outcome analysis and reporting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In September 2006 a conference was held at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland to define these parameters and develop guidelines for their use. RESULTS: The Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group defined criteria regarding prostate specific antigen doubling time including the calculation of prostate specific antigen doubling time, evidence to support prostate specific antigen doubling time as a predictive factor in the setting of biochemical recurrence and the use of prostate specific antigen doubling time as a stratification factor in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that investigators calculate prostate specific antigen doubling time before enrolling patients in clinical studies and calculate it as an additional measurement of therapeutic activity. We believe we have developed practical guidelines for the calculation of prostate specific antigen doubling time and its use as a measurement of prognosis and outcome. Furthermore, the use of common standards for prostate specific antigen doubling time in clinical trials is important as we determine which treatments should progress to randomized trials in which "hard" end points such as survival will be used.

Arlen PM, Mohebtash M, Madan RA, Gulley JL. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Future Oncol. · Pubmed #19284377 No free full text.

Abstract: The field of therapeutic cancer vaccines is currently in a state of active preclinical and clinical investigation, and certain novel therapies involving tumor immunotherapy have recently come to the forefront of prostate cancer research. While no therapeutic cancer vaccine has yet been approved by the US FDA, recent findings have demonstrated that new paradigms of combination therapies involving vaccines, employed in clinical trials with appropriate design and end points, may ultimately lead to cancer vaccines being used to treat various malignancies. Several characteristics of prostate cancer make it an ideal target for immunotherapy. Its relative indolence allows sufficient time to generate immune responses, which usually take weeks or months to mount. In addition, prostate cancer-associated antigens direct the immune response to prostate cancer cells, thus sparing normal tissue. This review focuses on the future of promising new vaccines and novel perspectives in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Mohebtash M, Gulley JL, Madan RA, Ferrara T, Arlen PM. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Curr Opin Mol Ther. · Pubmed #19169957 No free full text.

Abstract: Numerous research groups are investigating the use of cancer vaccines as a potential therapeutic modality for various tumor types. The efficacy of cancer vaccines has improved because of advances in the characterization of tumor-associated antigens, the development of improved vaccine delivery systems, and the combination of vaccines with cytokines and other immunostimulants to enhance immune responses. Although cancer vaccines are under investigation for the treatment of various different tumor types, several characteristics of prostate cancer make it an ideal target for immunotherapy. The relative indolence of prostrate cancer allows sufficient time to generate immune responses, which usually take weeks or months to mount. In addition, prostate cancer-associated antigens direct the immune response to prostate cancer cells, thus sparing normal tissue. This review focuses on promising new strategies for combining vaccines with other therapeutic approaches, as well as novel perspectives in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Mohebtash M, Madan RA, Gulley JL, Arlen PM. · National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 8B09, MSC 1750, Bethesda, MD 20892-1750, USA. · Curr Opin Investig Drugs. · Pubmed #19037836 No free full text.

Abstract: Therapeutic cancer vaccines are well-tolerated immunotherapy modalities designed to activate the immune system to kill cancer cells without a significant effect on healthy cells. An improved understanding of tumor immunology has led to improved strategies in vaccine development, which in turn have resulted in improved outcomes. This review discusses different types of cancer vaccines, with a focus on prostate cancer vaccines because of the high prevalence of prostate cancer and the wide variety of approaches used in prostate cancer immunotherapy.

Arlen PM, Dahut WL, Gulley JL. · Clinical Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, MSC 1750, Bethesda, MD 20892-1750, USA. · Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. · Pubmed #16861126 No free full text.

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer and second leading cause of cancer death among US men. A greater understanding of basic immunologic principles has led to a variety of new techniques,which has led to advancements in prostate cancer vaccines. This article discusses the rationale for the development of antibody-based therapy and vaccines therapy, including whole tumor cells, dendritic cells, and pox viral vectors. A summary of selected clinical studies incorporating these strategies and new approaches incorporating a combination of immunotherapy with traditional treatments for prostate cancer is presented.

Tarassoff CP, Arlen PM, Gulley JL. · F.A.C.P., National Cancer Institute, Clinical Immunotherapy Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1750, Building 10, Room 5B52, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Oncologist. · Pubmed #16720845 links to  free full text

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common, noncutaneous cancer for men in the U.S., leading to more than 30,000 deaths a year. Vaccines for prostate cancer, which for several years have been shown to generate immunologic responses, are beginning to show significant clinical promise. At present, numerous therapeutic options are being investigated, including autologous and allogeneic whole-tumor cell vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, and poxvirus-based vaccines. Advances in basic immunology have translated into new, more complex therapeutic strategies. The findings from current trials and the demonstrated potential to combine vaccines with conventional therapies herald a promising future for the treatment of prostate cancer. This review highlights recent advances and clinical trials in immunotherapy for prostate cancer, along with current thoughts on immunologic and clinical monitoring of these trials.

Madan RA, Gulley JL, Arlen PM. · National Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology Branch, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 8B09, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Expert Rev Vaccines. · Pubmed #16608420 No free full text.

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the USA. Vaccine strategies represent a novel therapeutic approach. One potential target for a prostate cancer vaccine is prostate-specific antigen, owing to its restricted expression in prostate cancer and normal prostatic epithelial cells. A number of prostate-specific antigen-specific epitopes have been identified that can activate cytotoxic T lymphocytes and, in turn, result in the killing of tumor targets by the peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Strategies employed in clinical trials consist of dendritic cell vaccines, recombinant protein and recombinant DNA vaccines, as well as viral vector delivery of vaccines. New approaches incorporating a combination of a vaccine with traditional treatments for prostate cancer are also being investigated.

Arlen PM, Kaufman HL, DiPaola RS. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. · Semin Oncol. · Pubmed #16338420 No free full text.

Abstract: Recent advances in understanding tumor-specific immunity have introduced new excitement in the clinical development of vaccines for the treatment of cancer. A better understanding of basic immunologic principles has led to a variety of techniques for enhancing tumor-specific immunity through vaccination. Approaches to antigen-specific immunotherapy have included: (1) peptides, usually in combination with various immunological adjuvants; (2) soluble proteins; (3) dendritic cells pulsed with specific antigens; (4) monoclonal antibodies; (5) recombinant plasmid DNA; (6) autologous and allogeneic tumor cells; and (7) recombinant viral vectors. This review will focus on the use of viral vectors, which offer unique advantages as both gene delivery vectors and as agents supplying additional adjuvant activity for vaccination. Viral vectors are particularly attractive for immunotherapy since they mimic natural infection and can induce potent immune responses. Replicating and nonreplicating members of the poxvirus family have been widely studied for expression of tumor antigens and other immunomodulatory genes, such as cytokines and costimulatory molecules. Although a large number of TAAs are available for insertion into viral vectors, this review will discuss the preclinical and clinical development of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) poxviral vaccines, as models of the pox viral vaccine approach.

Arlen PM, Gulley JL. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-1750, USA. · Curr Opin Investig Drugs. · Pubmed #15988910 No free full text.

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common, non-cutaneous cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the US. A greater understanding of basic immunological principles has led to the development of a variety of new techniques, which in turn has led to advances in the field of prostate cancer vaccines. This review will discuss the rationale for the development of vaccines involving whole tumor cells and dendritic cells, as well as pox viral vectors, and will summarize selected clinical studies that have incorporated these strategies.

Arlen PM, Gulley JL, Tsang KY, Schlom J. · Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Expert Rev Vaccines. · Pubmed #14711334 No free full text.

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in males in the USA. Vaccine strategies represent a novel therapeutic approach. One potential target for a prostate cancer vaccine is prostate-specific antigen (PSA), due to its restricted expression in prostate cancer and normal prostatic epithelial cells. A number of PSAspecific epitopes have been identified that can activate cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and in turn lead to the killing of tumor targets by the peptide-specific CTLs. Strategies have now been employed in clinical trials using RNA-pulsed dendritic cell vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines, and recombinant viral vector delivery of vaccines. Newer approaches incorporating costimulatory molecules that enhance Tcell activation are also being investigated.

Aragon-Ching JB, Ning YM, Chen CC, Latham L, Guadagnini JP, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Wright JJ, Parnes H, Figg WD, Dahut WL. · Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Cancer Invest. · Pubmed #19235596 links to  free full text

Abstract: ONJ is an important toxicity in cancer patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy. Here we report a higher than usual incidence of ONJ, 11 of 60 (18.3%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 9%-28%) patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial combining bevacizumab, docetaxel, thalidomide, and prednisone (ATTP) in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The use of bisphosphonates was allowed at study entry. Our study suggests that anti-angiogenic and chemotherapy agents can predispose to the development of ONJ in men with mCRPC on zoledronic acid. Imaging modalities, such as bone scans, may be useful in following the clinical course of patients who develop ONJ.

Aragon-Ching JB, Jain L, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Wright JJ, Steinberg SM, Draper D, Venitz J, Jones E, Chen CC, Figg WD, Dahut WL. · Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #19154507 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine if sorafenib is associated with an improved 4-month probability of progression-free survival, using radiographic and clinical criteria alone, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, toxicity analysis and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was an open-label, phase II, two-stage design, focusing on the results from the second stage, as criteria for progression were modified after completing the first stage. Sorafenib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Clinical and laboratory assessments were done every 4 weeks, and radiographic scans were obtained every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were accrued in the second stage; the median (range) age was 66 (49-85) years, the on-study prostate-specific antigen level was 68.45 (5.8-995) ng/mL, the Gleason score 8 (6-9) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 1 (in 17 patients). Of the 24 patients, 21 had previous chemotherapy with docetaxel. All patients had bony metastases, either alone (in 11) or with soft-tissue disease (in 13). One patient had a partial response; 10 patients had stable disease (median duration 18 weeks, range 15-48). At a median potential follow-up of 27.2 months, the median progression-free survival was 3.7 months and the median overall survival was 18.0 months. For the whole trial of 46 patients the median survival was 18.3 months. Most frequent toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (grade 2 in nine patients, grade 3 in three), rash, abnormalities in liver function tests, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib has moderate activity as a second-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Gulley JL, Aragon-Ching JB, Steinberg SM, Hussain MH, Sartor O, Higano CS, Petrylak DP, Chatta GS, Arlen PM, Figg WD, Dahut WL. · Center for Cancer Research, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #18710748 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Groups have investigated time to testosterone recovery in patients who have undergone androgen deprivation therapy, usually by measuring androgen every 3 months, with varying results. To our knowledge this represents the largest study using monthly testosterone and dihydroxytestosterone measurement to evaluate the kinetics of androgen recovery following limited androgen deprivation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monthly serum androgen levels were analyzed following 2, 6-month cycles of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy as part of a randomized, placebo controlled study of the role of thalidomide in delaying time to prostate specific androgen progression. RESULTS: By the Kaplan-Meier method the median time to testosterone normalization in cycles 1 vs 2 was 15.4 vs 18.3 weeks with similar dihydroxytestosterone recovery times. Neither on-study prostate specific antigen, Gleason score nor thalidomide treatment had a significant impact on time to testosterone normalization. However, in cycle 1 men with low baseline dihydroxytestosterone and those who were more than 67 years old had significantly longer time to T normalization on Cox model analysis. Additionally, in cycle 2 patients with prior local radiation therapy had longer time to testosterone normalization, although this was no longer significant on Cox model analysis. Cox model analysis in cycle 2 showed that low baseline dihydroxytestosterone and testosterone, low testosterone nadir and white race were associated with longer time to testosterone normalization. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of delayed testosterone recovery may be useful for designing and analyzing clinical trials of limited androgen deprivation therapy and for estimating the duration of treatment associated side effects in patients undergoing limited androgen deprivation therapy.

Lechleider RJ, Arlen PM, Tsang KY, Steinberg SM, Yokokawa J, Cereda V, Camphausen K, Schlom J, Dahut WL, Gulley JL. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #18698048 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We have previously reported on the safety and immunologic response of a poxvirus-based vaccine encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) used in combination with radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. We hypothesized that a "metronomic" dose of interleukin 2 (IL-2) as a biological adjuvant would cause less toxicity while maintaining immunologic response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eighteen patients with localized prostate cancer were treated in a single-arm trial using previously established doses of vaccine and radiation therapy. The vaccine used was a recombinant vaccinia virus engineered to encode PSA admixed with a recombinant vaccinia encoding the costimulatory molecule B7.1, followed by booster vaccinations with a recombinant fowlpox vector expressing PSA. Patients received a total of eight planned vaccination cycles, once every 4 weeks, with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given on days 1 to 4 and interleukin 2 (IL-2) at a dose of 0.6 MIU/M2 given from days 8 to 21 after each vaccination. Definitive external beam radiation therapy was initiated after the third vaccination cycle. Patients were evaluated for safety and immunologic response. Toxicity and immunologic activity were compared with the previously reported regimen containing a higher dose of IL-2. RESULTS: Seventeen of 18 patients received all eight cycles of vaccine with IL-2. Five of eight HLA-A2+ patients evaluated had an increase in PSA-specific T cells of > or =3-fold. Toxicities were generally mild, with only seven vaccination cycles of 140 given resulting in grade 3 toxicities possibly attributable to IL-2. CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic-dose IL-2 in combination with vaccine and radiation therapy is safe, can induce prostate-specific immune responses, and has immunologic activity similar to low-dose IL-2, with markedly reduced toxicities.

Madan RA, Gulley JL, Schlom J, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Dahut WL, Arlen PM. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Office of the Clinical Director, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #18628467 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: We reported previously the first randomized study of any kind in patients with nonmetastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer. The study employed vaccine, the hormone nilutamide, and the combined therapy (crossover for each arm) with an endpoint of time to progression. We now report survival analyses at 6.5 years from the initiation of therapy with a median potential follow-up of 4.4 years. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-two patients were randomized to receive either a poxvirus-based prostate-specific antigen (PSA) vaccine or nilutamide. Patients in either arm who developed increasing PSA without radiographic evidence of metastasis could cross over to receive the combined therapies. RESULTS: Median survival among all patients was 4.4 years from date of enrollment. Median survival exhibited a trend toward improvement for patients initially randomized to the vaccine arm (median, 5.1 versus 3.4 years; P = 0.13). Starting from the on-study date, the retrospectively determined subset of 12 patients who initially received vaccine and then later received nilutamide suggested improved survival compared with the 8 patients who began with nilutamide and subsequently were treated with vaccine (median, 6.2 versus 3.7 years; P = 0.045). A subgroup analysis of patients randomized to the vaccine arm versus the nilutamide arm showed substantial improvements in survival if at baseline patients had a Gleason score <7 (P = 0.033) and PSA <20 ng/dL (P = 0.013) or who had prior radiation therapy (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (D0.5) who receive vaccine before second-line hormone therapy may potentially result in improved survival compared with patients who received hormone therapy and then vaccine. These data also suggest that patients with more indolent disease may derive greater clinical benefit from vaccine alone or vaccine before second-line hormone therapy compared with hormone therapy alone or hormone therapy followed by vaccine. These findings have potential implications for both the design and endpoint analysis of larger vaccine combination therapy trials.

Dahut WL, Scripture C, Posadas E, Jain L, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Wright JJ, Yu Y, Cao L, Steinberg SM, Aragon-Ching JB, Venitz J, Jones E, Chen CC, Figg WD. · Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #18172272 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine if sorafenib is associated with a 4-month probability of progression-free survival, which is consistent with 50%, as determined by clinical, radiographic, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with progressive metastatic AIPC were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm phase II study. Sorafenib was given continuously at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Clinical assessment and PSA measurement were done every cycle whereas radiographic measurements were carried out every two cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study to date, completing a planned first stage of the trial. Baseline patient characteristics included a median age of 63.9 years (range, 50-77 years), Gleason score of 9 (range, 4-9.5), and PSA concentration of 53.3 ng/mL (range, 2-1,905 ng/mL). Fifty-nine percent of patients had received one prior chemotherapy regimen. Of the 21 patients with progressive disease, 13 progressed only by PSA criteria in the absence of evidence of clinical and radiographic progression. Two patients were found to have dramatic reduction of bone metastatic lesions as shown by bone scan, although they met PSA progression criteria at the time when scans were obtained. Toxicities likely related to treatment included one grade 3 hypertension; one grade 3 hand-foot syndrome; and grade 1/2 toxicities: fatigue, anorexia, hypertension, skin rash, nausea, and diarrhea. Results from in vitro studies suggested that PSA is not a good marker of sorafenib activity. The geometric mean exposure (AUC(0-12)) and maximum concentration (C(max)) were 9.76 h mg/L and 1.28 mg/L, respectively. The time to maximum concentration (t(max)) and accumulation ratio (after second dose) ranged from 2 to 12 h and 0.68 to 6.43, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib is relatively well tolerated in AIPC with two patients showing evidence of improved bony metastatic lesions. Interpretation of this study is complicated by discordant radiographic and PSA responses. PSA may not be an adequate biomarker for monitoring sorafenib activity. Based on these observations, further investigation using only clinical and radiographic end points as progression criteria is warranted. Accrual to the second stage of trial is ongoing.

Arlen PM, Skarupa L, Pazdur M, Seetharam M, Tsang KY, Grosenbach DW, Feldman J, Poole DJ, Litzinger M, Steinberg SM, Jones E, Chen C, Marte J, Parnes H, Wright J, Dahut W, Schlom J, Gulley JL. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #17707059 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I study was to evaluate the clinical safety of a vaccine using recombinant vaccinia virus (prime) and recombinant fowlpox virus (boost) in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with prostate cancer. The vaccines contained transgenes for prostate specific antigen, a triad of co-stimulatory molecules and a tumor antigen whose amino acid sequence had been modified to enhance its immunogenicity. Secondary end points were immunological and clinical responses, changes in prostate specific antigen velocity, and the kinetics of vaccinia virus clearance from the vaccination site, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, urine and saliva. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 15 patients enrolled in this study had metastatic prostate cancer. Patients were given recombinant fowlpox-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules alone or recombinant vaccinia-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules followed by recombinant fowlpox-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules on a prime and boost schedule with or without recombinant-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor protein or recombinant fowlpox-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor vector. Prostate specific antigen specific immune responses were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay for interferon-gamma production. Polymerase chain reaction for vaccinia DNA and a plaque assay for live virus were also used. RESULTS: Some grade 2 toxicity was seen in patients who received a higher dose of recombinant fowlpox-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor but no toxicity exceeded grade 2. Viable vaccinia was detected after vaccination at the site swab of 1 of 4 patients analyzed. Prostate specific antigen specific immune responses were seen in 4 of 6 patients who were HLA-A2+ and decreases in serum prostate specific antigen velocity were observed in 9 of 15. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the safety and preliminary immunogenicity results of this trial we recommend initiating a randomized, phase II study of prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules vaccines in patients with less advanced prostate cancer.

Theoret MR, Arlen PM, Pazdur M, Dahut WL, Schlom J, Gulley JL. · Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Clin Genitourin Cancer. · Pubmed #17645835 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Wu SL, Jones E, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Chen CC, Figg WD, Dahut WL. · Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute/NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · BJU Int. · Pubmed #17155971 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) with bone metastasis and no soft-tissue metastases at the time of protocol enrollment, and analyse their disease progression by computed tomography (CT), bone scan, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to determine the utility of routine interval CT in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bone is the most common metastatic site in patients with AIPC and the only site of metastatic disease for many; because some with initial bone metastasis eventually develop soft-tissue disease, many clinical trials use routine CT to monitor for the latter as a sign of disease progression, but the actual incidence of new soft-tissue metastases is unknown and the role of routine interval CT in monitoring for disease progression, especially for asymptomatic patients, is unclear. Thus we reviewed 175 cases of metastatic AIPC from three randomized phase II clinical trials (docetaxel/thalidomide, docetaxel/vaccine, and ketoconazole/alendronate) at the National Cancer Institute between 1995 and 2004. The patients' PSA levels were assessed every 4 weeks, and CT and bone scans were done every 2-3 months. We retrospectively identified patients with bone metastasis only and examined subsequent CT for the occurrence of soft-tissue disease. For patients with progressive disease, we also examined bone scan and PSA progression. RESULTS: Of 175 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 105 (60%) had bone metastasis only, 12 (6.9%) had soft-tissue metastases only, and 58 (33.1%) had both bone and soft-tissue metastases. The median (range) follow-up was 8 (1-44) months for the 105 patients with bone metastasis only. During that time, two patients (1.9%) developed new soft-tissue disease; one developed right iliac fossa lymphadenopathy after 8 months and the other developed a perirectal mass after 12 months. The patient with new lymphadenopathy also had multiple new bone lesions identified by bone scan and PSA progression. The patient with the perirectal mass had PSA progression and a palpable abnormality. CONCLUSION: This review of patients with AIPC and bone metastasis only, followed for a median of 8 months on clinical trials, shows that the incidence of asymptomatic new soft-tissue disease as the only sign of disease progression is quite low. Therefore, routine CT to exclude new soft-tissue disease in this population appears to be unwarranted. We recommend that for these patients CT is done only at the time of disease progression, as shown by bone scan, PSA level, or clinical presentation. We do not exclude the possibility that patients who remain on trial for significantly longer periods might benefit from routine interval CT.

Arlen PM, Gulley JL, Parker C, Skarupa L, Pazdur M, Panicali D, Beetham P, Tsang KY, Grosenbach DW, Feldman J, Steinberg SM, Jones E, Chen C, Marte J, Schlom J, Dahut W. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1750, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #16489082 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Docetaxel has activity against androgen-independent prostate cancer and preclinical studies have shown that taxane-based chemotherapy can enhance antitumor response of vaccines. The primary objective of this study was to determine if concurrent docetaxel (with dexamethasone) had any effect on generating an immune response to the vaccine. Secondary end points were whether vaccine could be given safely with docetaxel and the clinical outcome of the treatment regimen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The vaccination regimen was composed of (a) recombinant vaccinia virus (rV) that expresses the prostate-specific antigen gene (rV-PSA) admixed with (b) rV that expresses the B7.1 costimulatory gene (rV-B7.1), and (c) sequential booster vaccinations with recombinant fowlpox virus (rF-) containing the PSA gene (rF-PSA). Patients received granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor with each vaccination. Twenty-eight patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomized to receive either vaccine and weekly docetaxel or vaccine alone. Patients on the vaccine alone arm were allowed to cross over to receive docetaxel alone at time of disease progression. The ELISPOT assay was used to monitor immune responses for PSA-specific T cells. RESULTS: The median increase in these T-cell precursors to PSA was 3.33-fold in both arms following 3 months of therapy. In addition, immune responses to other prostate cancer-associated tumor antigens were also detected postvaccination. Eleven patients who progressed on vaccine alone crossed over to receive docetaxel at time of progression. Median progression-free survival on docetaxel was 6.1 months after receiving vaccine compared with 3.7 months with the same regimen in a historical control. CONCLUSION: This is the first clinical trial to show that docetaxel can be administered safely with immunotherapy without inhibiting vaccine specific T-cell responses. Furthermore, patients previously vaccinated with an anticancer vaccine may respond longer to docetaxel compared with a historical control of patients receiving docetaxel alone. Larger prospective clinical studies will be required to validate these findings.

Posadas EM, Gulley J, Arlen PM, Trout A, Parnes HL, Wright J, Lee MJ, Chung EJ, Trepel JB, Sparreboom A, Chen C, Jones E, Steinberg SM, Daniels A, Figg WD, Dahut WL. · Medical Oncology Clinical Research Unit, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. · Cancer Biol Ther. · Pubmed #16138006 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Perifosine is an alkylphospholipid that has exhibited broad antineoplastic activity in preclinical studies. The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of this agent in the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) using PSA and clinical criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with progressive, metastatic AIPC were treated with oral perifosine. Cycles were 28 days in length. A loading dose of 900 mg was given on day 1 of cycle 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 150 mg daily for the next 20 days. A loading dose of 600 mg was administered on the first day of subsequent cycles by the maintenance dose of 150 mg daily for the next 20 days. Pharmacokinetic measurements were made throughout the course of the study. Circulating epithelial cells were collected via leukapheresis on day 0, 3, and 28. RESULTS: Median patient age was 67 years and median PSA was 180 ng/mL (range: 19-904 ng/ml). Grade 1-2 fatigue and gastrointestinal toxicities were common. Pharmacokinetic studies showed an average minimum concentration at steady-state of approximately 4059 ng/ml which correlated well with previous studies. Median time to progression was four weeks. There were no radiographic responses or PSA declines of 50% or greater related to perifosine. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with perifosine was complicated by fatigue and gastrointestinal toxicity. No significant clinical activity against prostate cancer was observed. This agent does not merit further study in the setting of monotherapy in this population.

Arlen PM, Gulley JL, Todd N, Lieberman R, Steinberg SM, Morin S, Bastian A, Marte J, Tsang KY, Beetham P, Grosenbach DW, Schlom J, Dahut W. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · J Urol. · Pubmed #16006888 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: There is no current standard treatment for patients with prostate cancer who have received hormonal therapy but have an increasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) without radiographic evidence of metastasis. This trial was designed to analyze toxicity, immunogenicity and time to treatment failure using vaccine, antiandrogen therapy or their sequential use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients were randomized to receive vaccine vs antiandrogen therapy with nilutamide. The vaccine consisted of recombinant vaccinia viruses containing the PSA and B7.1 costimulatory genes as prime vaccinations, and avipox-PSA as boosters. After 6 months patients with an increasing PSA and no metastasis may receive a combination of both treatments. RESULTS: Three patients on nilutamide were removed from study secondary to grade 3 toxicities but no grade 3 toxicities were attributed to vaccine. In the vaccine arm median time to treatment failure was 9.9 months with 13 of 21 decreases in PSA velocity vs 7.6 months with 16 of 21 decreases in PSA velocity in the nilutamide arm (p =0.28). Of the patients in the nilutamide arm 8 had vaccine added at the time of PSA progression. Median time to treatment failure with combined therapy was 5.2 months, with a median duration from study entry of 15.9 months. Of the patients in the vaccine arm 12 had nilutamide added at the time of PSA progression. Median time to treatment failure with combined therapy was 13.9 months and a median of 25.9 months from initiation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are merited to investigate the role of combining vaccine with antiandrogen therapy or vaccine followed by vaccine plus antiandrogen therapy in this patient population.

Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Bastian A, Morin S, Marte J, Beetham P, Tsang KY, Yokokawa J, Hodge JW, Ménard C, Camphausen K, Coleman CN, Sullivan F, Steinberg SM, Schlom J, Dahut W. · Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Medical Oncology Clinical Research Unit, Radiation Oncology Branch, and Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #15867235 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Many patients with clinically localized prostate cancer develop biochemical failure despite excellent local therapy perhaps due to occult metastatic disease. One potential solution is the utilization of a well-tolerated systemic therapy (e.g., vaccine) in concert with local therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We present a randomized phase II clinical trial designed to determine if a poxviral vaccine encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can induce a PSA-specific T-cell response when combined with radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Thirty patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio into vaccine plus radiotherapy or radiotherapy-only arms. Those patients in the combination arm received a "priming" vaccine with recombinant vaccinia (rV) PSA plus r V containing the T-cell costimulatory molecule B7.1 (rV-B7.1) followed by monthly booster vaccines with recombinant fowlpox PSA. The vaccines were given with local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and low-dose systemic interleukin-2. Standard external beam radiation therapy was given between the fourth and the sixth vaccinations. RESULTS: Seventeen of 19 patients in the combination arm completed all eight vaccinations and 13 of these 17 patients had increases in PSA-specific T cells of at least 3-fold versus no detectable increases in the radiotherapy-only arm (P < 0.0005). There was also evidence of de novo generation of T cells to well-described prostate-associated antigens not found in the vaccine, providing indirect evidence of immune-mediated tumor killing. The vaccine was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This vaccine regimen can be safely given in patients undergoing radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer, with the majority of patients generating a PSA-specific cellular immune response to vaccine.

Dahut WL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Liu Y, Fedenko KM, Steinberg SM, Wright JJ, Parnes H, Chen CC, Jones E, Parker CE, Linehan WM, Figg WD. · Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #15226321 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Both docetaxel and thalidomide have demonstrated activity in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). We compared the efficacy of docetaxel to docetaxel plus thalidomide in patients with AIPC. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic AIPC were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) intravenously every week for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period (n = 25); or docetaxel at the same dose and schedule, plus thalidomide 200 mg orally each day (n = 50). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) consensus criteria and radiographic scans were used to determine the proportion of patients with a PSA decline, and time to progression. RESULTS: After a median potential follow-up time of 26.4 months, the proportion of patients with a greater than 50% decline in PSA was higher in the docetaxel/thalidomide group (53% in the combined group, 37% in docetaxel-alone arm). The median progression-free survival in the docetaxel group was 3.7 months and 5.9 months in the combined group (P =.32). At 18 months, overall survival in the docetaxel group was 42.9% and 68.2% in the combined group. Toxicities in both groups were manageable after administration of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin in the combination group. CONCLUSION: In this randomized phase II trial, the addition of thalidomide to docetaxel resulted in an encouraging PSA decline rate and overall median survival rate in patients with metastatic AIPC. After the prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin was instituted to prevent venous thromboses, the combination regimen was well tolerated. Larger randomized trials are warranted to assess the impact of this combination.

Tohnya TM, Ng SS, Dahut WL, Wright JJ, Arlen PM, Gulley JL, Parker C, Zeldis J, Figg WD. · Clinical Pharmacology Research Core, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. · Clin Prostate Cancer. · Pubmed #15072608 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.