Parkinson Disease: Shannon K

Miyasaki JM, Shannon K, Voon V, Ravina B, Kleiner-Fisman G, Anderson K, Shulman LM, Gronseth G, Weiner WJ, Anonymous00046. · University of Toronto, Canada. · Neurology. · Pubmed #16606910 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To make evidence-based treatment recommendations for patients with Parkinson disease (PD) with dementia, depression, and psychosis based on these questions: 1) What tools are effective to screen for depression, psychosis, and dementia in PD? 2) What are effective treatments for depression and psychosis in PD? 3) What are effective treatments for PD dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)? METHODS: A nine-member multispecialty committee evaluated available evidence from a structured literature review using MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Health and Psychosocial Instruments from 1966 to 2004. Additional articles were identified by panel members. RESULTS: The Beck Depression Inventory-I, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale should be considered to screen for depression in PD (Level B). The Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination should be considered to screen for dementia in PD (Level B). Amitriptyline may be considered to treat depression in PD without dementia (Level C). For psychosis in PD, clozapine should be considered (Level B), quetiapine may be considered (Level C), but olanzapine should not be considered (Level B). Donepezil or rivastigmine should be considered for dementia in PD (Level B) and rivastigmine should be considered for DLB (Level B). CONCLUSIONS: Screening tools are available for depression and dementia in patients with PD, but more specific validated tools are needed. There are no widely used, validated tools for psychosis screening in Parkinson disease (PD). Clozapine successfully treats psychosis in PD. Cholinesterase inhibitors are effective treatments for dementia in PD, but improvement is modest and motor side effects may occur.

Tilley BC, Palesch YY, Kieburtz K, Ravina B, Huang P, Elm JJ, Shannon K, Wooten GF, Tanner CM, Goetz GC, Anonymous00248. · Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, P.O. Box 250835, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #16534099 No free full text.

Abstract: Many agents are being considered for treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). Given the large number of agents and the limited resources to evaluate new agents, it is essential to reduce the likelihood of advancing ineffective agents into large, long-term Phase III trials. Futility design methodology addresses this goal. The authors describe how a single-arm Phase II futility study uses a short-term outcome to compare a treatment group response to a predetermined hypothesized or historically based control response. The authors present advantages and limitations of futility designs along with examples derived from the data archive of a large Phase III efficacy study of treatments to delay PD progression, the Deprenyl And Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy Of Parkinsonism (DATATOP) trial. Using the same control progression rate and treatment effect assumptions used to power the original DATATOP trial, the authors calculated the number of subjects needed to conduct two 12-month futility studies. DATATOP was designed to enroll 800 patients. Using data on 124 consecutive subjects randomized into each of the DATATOP treatment groups, the authors identified tocopherol as futile and deprenyl as worthy of further study. Using Phase II information, DATATOP could have been simplified from a 2 x 2 factorial design to a comparison of deprenyl vs placebo. While not testing efficacy, futility designs provide a strategy for discarding treatments unlikely to be effective in Phase III. A limitation is the dependence on historical data or hypothesized outcomes for untreated controls. Futility studies may decrease the time to identify treatments unworthy of further pursuit and reduce subjects' exposure to futile treatments.

Fink JS, Schumacher JM, Ellias SL, Palmer EP, Saint-Hilaire M, Shannon K, Penn R, Starr P, VanHorne C, Kott HS, Dempsey PK, Fischman AJ, Raineri R, Manhart C, Dinsmore J, Isacson O. · Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. · Cell Transplant. · Pubmed #10811399 No free full text.

Abstract: The observation that fetal neurons are able to survive and function when transplanted into the adult brain fostered the development of cellular therapy as a promising approach to achieve neuronal replacement for treatment of diseases of the adult central nervous system. This approach has been demonstrated to be efficacious in patients with Parkinson's disease after transplantation of human fetal neurons. The use of human fetal tissue is limited by ethical, infectious, regulatory, and practical concerns. Other mammalian fetal neural tissue could serve as an alternative cell source. Pigs are a reasonable source of fetal neuronal tissue because of their brain size, large litters, and the extensive experience in rearing them in captivity under controlled conditions. In Phase I studies porcine fetal neural cells grafted unilaterally into Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington's disease (HD) patients are being evaluated for safety and efficacy. Clinical improvement of 19% has been observed in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale "off" state scores in 10 PD patients assessed 12 months after unilateral striatal transplantation of 12 million fetal porcine ventral mesencephalic (VM) cells. Several patients have improved more than 30%. In a single autopsied PD patient some porcine fetal VM cells were observed to survive 7 months after transplantation. Twelve HD patients have shown a favorable safety profile and no change in total functional capacity score 1 year after unilateral striatal placement of up to 24 million fetal porcine striatal cells. Xenotransplantation of fetal porcine neurons is a promising approach to delivery of healthy neurons to the CNS. The major challenges to the successful use of xenogeneic fetal neuronal cells in neurodegenerative diseases appear to be minimizing immune-mediated rejection, management of the risk of xenotic (cross-species) infections, and the accurate assessment of clinical outcome of diseases that are slowly progressive.

Maries E, Kordower JH, Chu Y, Collier TJ, Sortwell CE, Olaru E, Shannon K, Steece-Collier K. · Department of Neuroscience, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Road, N. Chicago, IL 60064, USA. · Neurobiol Dis. · Pubmed #16095907 No free full text.

Abstract: Dyskinesias are a common consequence of dopaminergic therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Little is known about the influence of cellular replacement strategies upon drug-induced dyskinesias. In the current study, we employed parkinsonian rats to test whether the distribution of dopamine neuron grafts could differentially alter striatal circuitry and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Specifically, we compared behavioral and neurochemical consequences of dopamine reinnervation restricted to a focal region of the striatum to innervation encompassing the majority of the striatum by distributing the same number of cells into single locus or multiple locations. Both the single-site and widespread grafts reduced pregraft dyskinesias and normalized FosB/DeltaFosB in the dorsal two-thirds of the lateral striatum. However, single-site DA graft recipients developed a robust, novel forelimb-facial stereotypy and upregulated FosB/DeltaFosB expression in the ventrolateral striatum, an area associated with movements of tongue and forelimbs. The onset of forelimb-facial stereotypy correlated with measures of increased graft function.

Elm JJ, Goetz CG, Ravina B, Shannon K, Wooten GF, Tanner CM, Palesch YY, Huang P, Guimaraes P, Kamp C, Tilley BC, Kieburtz K, Anonymous00019. · Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #15668964 No free full text.

Abstract: Futility studies are designed to test new treatments over a short period in a small number of subjects to determine if those treatments are worthy of larger and longer term studies, or if they should be abandoned. An appropriate outcome measure for a neuroprotection futility study in Parkinson's disease (sensitive to tracking disease progression in the short-term) has not been determined. Data sets from three clinical trials were used to compare Parkinson's disease outcome measures. Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS; Mentation + Activities of Daily Living + Motor) change and Motor plus Activities of Daily Living UPDRS change, measured in untreated patients, required the smallest sample sizes of all the outcome measures explored. Other outcomes (UPDRS Motor, UPDRS Activities of Daily Living, and time to need levodopa) required somewhat larger sample sizes. Futility designs in Parkinson's disease are feasible in terms of short duration and small sample size requirements, and this design is being applied in two ongoing Parkinson's disease studies to select agents for future larger and longer term neuroprotection studies.

Flament D, Vaillancourt DE, Kempf T, Shannon K, Corcos DM. · Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. · Clin Neurophysiol. · Pubmed #14652099 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We studied the ability of patients with Parkinson's disease to improve their performance in a motor task requiring both speed and accuracy in the execution of elbow flexion movements. Our goal was to investigate the changes in electromyographic activity associated with the changes in movement performance. METHODS: Eleven patients on anti-Parkinsonian medication were tested. The patients were selected for being bradykinetic, having little or no resting tremor or dyskinesias, and being in stages II or III of the Hoehn and Yahr rating scale. RESULTS: The untrained patients displayed multiple bursts of agonist activity, characteristic of Parkinsonian EMG recordings. All patients improved their performance by increasing peak velocity while maintaining movement accuracy within strict boundaries. With practice, the patients' performance changed in a manner similar to that which has been previously observed for performance curves in neurologically normal subjects. As movement duration decreased (i.e. peak velocity increased), we observed a slight decrease in the number of agonist bursts and an increase in the average burst duration. However, the patients continued to generate a fractionated, multi-burst agonist pattern. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Parkinsonian patients benefit from practice by improving their performance but remain fundamentally impaired in the generation of muscle activation patterns. This study has shown that the generation of fractionated, multiple short bursts of EMG activity that is characteristic of movements made by Parkinsonian patients is not normalized by practice.