Parkinson Disease: Krack P

Krack P. · Unité des troubles du mouvement, Pôle de psychiatrie et de neurologie, CHU, Grenoble. · Rev Neurol (Paris). · Pubmed #18680824 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Benabid AL, Chabardès S, Seigneuret E, Fraix V, Krack P, Pollak P, Xia R, Wallace B, Sauter F. · University Joseph Fourier, INSERM U318, Grenoble, France. · J Neural Transm Suppl. · Pubmed #17017557 No free full text.

Abstract: High frequency stimulation (HFS) has become the main alternative to medical treatment, due to its reversibility, adaptability, and low morbidity. Initiated in the thalamus (Vim) for the control of tremor, HFS has been applied to the Pallidum (GPi), and then to the subthalamic nucleus (STN), suggested by experiments in MPTP monkeys. STN-HFS is highly efficient on tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia and is now widely applied. Criteria for success are correct patient selection and precise electrode placement. The best outcome predictor is the response to Levodopa. The mechanisms of action might associate inhibition of cell firing, jamming of neuronal message and exhaustion of synaptic neurotransmitter release. The inhibition of glutamate STN release could be neuroprotective on nigral cells. Animal experiments support this hypothesis, not contradicted by the long-term follow up of patients. Neuroprotection might have considerable impact on the management of PD patient and warrants clinical trials.

Gross RE, Krack P, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Rezai AR, Benabid AL. · Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #16810720 No free full text.

Abstract: The vast majority of centers use electrophysiological mapping techniques to finalize target selection during the implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and tremor. This review discusses the techniques used for physiological mapping and addresses the questions of how various mapping strategies modify target selection and outcome following subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus internus (GPi), and ventralis intermedius (Vim) deep brain stimulation. Mapping strategies vary greatly across centers, but can be broadly categorized into those that use microelectrode or semimicroelectrode techniques to optimize position prior to implantation and macrostimulation through a macroelectrode or the DBS lead, and those that rely solely on macrostimulation and its threshold for clinical effects (benefits and side effects). Microelectrode criteria for implantation into the STN or GPi include length of the nucleus recorded, presence of movement-responsive neurons, and/or distance from the borders with adjacent structures. However, the threshold for the production of clinical benefits relative to side effects is, in most centers, the final, and sometimes only, determinant of DBS electrode position. Macrostimulation techniques for mapping, the utility of microelectrode mapping is reflected in its modification of electrode position in 17% to 87% of patients undergoing STN DBS, with average target adjustments of 1 to 4 mm. Nevertheless, with the absence of class I data, and in consideration of the large number of variables that impact clinical outcome, it is not possible to conclude that one technique is superior to the other in so far as motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale outcome is concerned. Moreover, mapping technique is only one out of many variables that determine the outcome. The increase in surgical risk of intracranial hemorrhage correlated to the number of microelectrode trajectories must be considered against the risk of suboptimal benefits related to omission of this technique.

Voon V, Kubu C, Krack P, Houeto JL, Tröster AI. · Department of Psychiatry, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #16810676 No free full text.

Abstract: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor, cognitive, neuropsychiatric, autonomic, and other nonmotor symptoms. The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the motor symptoms of advanced PD is well established. However, the effects of DBS on the cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms are less clear. The neuropsychiatric aspects of DBS for PD have recently been of considerable clinical and pathophysiological interest. As a companion to the preoperative and postoperative sections of the DBS consensus articles, this article reviews the published literature on the cognitive and neuropsychiatric aspects of DBS for PD. The majority of the observed neuropsychiatric symptoms are transient, treatable, and potentially preventable. Outcome studies, methodological issues, pathophysiology, and preoperative and postoperative management of the cognitive and neuropsychiatric aspects and complications of DBS for PD are discussed.

Benabid AL, Wallace B, Mitrofanis J, Xia C, Piallat B, Fraix V, Batir A, Krack P, Pollak P, Berger F. · INSERM U318, Université Joseph-Fourier, CHU Albert-Michallon, pavilion B, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble, France. · C R Biol. · Pubmed #15771004 No free full text.

Abstract: The electrical effects on the nervous system have been known for long. The excitatory effect has been used for diagnostic purposes or even for therapeutic applications, like in pain using low-frequency stimulation of the spinal cord or of the thalamus. The discovery that High-Frequency Stimulation (HFS) mimics the effect of lesioning has opened a new field of therapeutic application of electrical stimulation in all places where lesion of neuronal structures, such as nuclei of the basal ganglia, had proven some therapeutic efficiency. This was first applied to the thalamus to mimic thalamotomy for the treatment of tremor, then to the subthalamic nucleus and the pallidum to treat some advanced forms of Parkinson's disease and control not only the tremor but also akinesia, rigidity and dyskinesias. The field of application is increasingly growing, currently encompassing dystonias, epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disease, cluster headaches, and experimental approaches are being made in the field of obesity and food intake control. Although the effects of stimulation are clear-cut and the therapeutic benefit is clearly recognized, the mechanism of action of HFS is not yet understood. The similarity between HFS and the effect of lesions in several places of the brain suggests that this might induce an inhibition-like process, which is difficult to explain with the classical concept of physiology where electrical stimulation means excitation of neural elements. The current data coming from either clinical or experimental observations are providing elements to shape a beginning of an understanding. Intra-cerebral recordings in human patients with artefact suppression tend to show the arrest of electrical firing in the recorded places. Animal experiments, either in vitro or in vivo, show complex patterns mixing inhibitory effects and frequency stimulation induced bursting activity, which would suggest that the mechanism is based upon the jamming of the neuronal message, which is by this way functionally suppressed. More recent data from in vitro biological studies show that HFS profoundly affects the cellular functioning and particularly the protein synthesis, suggesting that it could alter the synaptic transmission by reducing the production of neurotransmitters. It is now clear that this method has a larger field of application than currently known and that its therapeutical applications will benefit to several diseases of the nervous system. The understanding of the mechanism has opened a new field of research, which will call for reappraisal of the basic effects of electricity on the living tissues.

Fraix V, Pollak P, Chabardes S, Ardouin C, Koudsie A, Benazzouz A, Krack P, Batir A, Le Bas JF, Benabid AL. · Département de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble. · Rev Neurol (Paris). · Pubmed #15269668 No free full text.

Abstract: The present renewal of the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease, almost abandoned for twenty Years, arises from two main reasons. The first is the better understanding of the functional organization of the basal ganglia. It was demonstrated in animal models of Parkinson's disease that the loss of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra, at the origin of the striatal dopaminergic defect, induces an overactivity of the excitatory glutamatergic subthalamo-internal pallidum pathway. The decrease in this hyperactivity might lead to an improvement in the pakinsonian symptoms. The second reason is the improvement in stereotactic neurosurgery in relation with the progress in neuroimaging techniques and with intraoperative electrophysiological microrecordings and stimulations, which help determine the location of the deep brain targets. In the 1970s chronic deep brain stimulation in humans was applied to the sensory nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of intractable pain. In 1987, Benabid and colleagues suggested high frequency stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in order to treat drug-resistant tremors and to avoid the adverse effects of thalamotomies. How deep brain stimulation works is not well known but it has been hypothetized that it could change the neuronal activities and thus avoid disease-related abnormal neuronal discharges. Potential candidates for deep brain stimulation are selected according to exclusion and inclusion criteria. Surgery can be applied to patients in good general and mental health, neither depressive nor demented and who are severely disabled despite all available drug therapies but still responsive to levodopa. The first session of surgery consists in the location of the target by ventriculography and/or brain MRI. The electrodes are implanted during the second session. The last session consists in the implantation of the neurostimulator. The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus was the first target in which chronic deep brain stimulation electrodes were implanted in order to alleviate tremor. This technique can be applied bilaterally without the adverse effects of bilateral thalamotomies. Like pallidotomy, internal globus pallidum stimulation has a dramatic beneficial effect on levodopa-induced dyskinesia but its effects on the parkinsonian triad are less constant and opposite motor effects are sometimes observed in relation with the stimulated contact. The inconstant results, perhaps related to the complexity of the structure led to the development of subthalamic nucleus stimulation. The alleviation of motor fluctuations and the improvement in all motor symptoms allows a significant decrease in levodopa daily dose and in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Presently, deep brain stimulation is a fashionable neurosurgical technique to treat Parkinson's disease. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation seems to be the most suitable target to control the parkinsonian triad and the motor fluctuations. Because of the possible adverse effects it must be reserved for disabled parkinsonian patients. No large randomized study comparing different targets and different neurosurgical techniques has been performed yet. Such studies, including cost benefit studies would be useful to assess the respective value of these different techniques.

Krack P. · Département des Neurosciences Cliniques et Biologiques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, INSERM U 318, Université Joseph-Fourier, Grenoble, France. · Rev Neurol (Paris). · Pubmed #12690673 No free full text.

Abstract: The effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal pallidum (GPi) on the parkinsonian triad and on levodopa-induced dyskinesias are very similar. The antiakinetic effect of STN DBS seems to be slightly better. On the contrary to pallidal DBS, stimulation of the STN allows to reduce dopaminergic treatment by more than 50 p. 100 on average. Moreover, the current drain is smaller in STN. Thus, the STN is a low budget target compared to the GPi. STN DBS seems to be as effective on PD tremor as stimulation of the classic thalamic target, the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim), whereas Vim stimulation has no effect on akinesia and very little on levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Thus, the STN has become the main target nucleus for DBS in PD, which is most often performed bilaterally in one surgical procedure. There is a good correlation of the preoperative response to levodopa and postoperative effects of bilateral STN DBS and this defines the patient population. Given the large patient population, simple guidelines for patient selection are developed. The referring physician can preselect patients based mainly on age (less than 70), absence of dementia and presence of severe disability related to motor fluctuations or dyskinesias. It is the responsibility of the operating centre to determine the levodopa response, to confirm the diagnosis, to rule out contraindications and to make sure that the medical treatment cannot be further optimised. Severe surgical complications with permanent sequels are relatively rare, about 1 p. 100 per implanted side. The patient selection, the precision of the surgery and the quality of the postoperative follow-up are the three main determinants of success.

Benabid AL, Vercucil L, Benazzouz A, Koudsie A, Chabardes S, Minotti L, Kahane P, Gentil M, Lenartz D, Andressen C, Krack P, Pollak P. · Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France. · Adv Neurol. · Pubmed #12442687 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Krack P, Fraix V, Mendes A, Benabid AL, Pollak P. · Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #11948776 No free full text.

Abstract: The postoperative neurologic management of patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson' s disease is a complex dynamic process that involves a progressive increase in stimulation intensity and a parallel decrease in antiparkinsonian medication while assessing the interactions of both treatments. Neurologists responsible for postoperative management of patients receiving STN DBS must have expert knowledge of the electroanatomy of the subthalamic area and be familiar with the medical treatment of motor and nonmotor symptoms, including the management of long-term complications of levodopa treatment. Neurosurgeons who perform DBS need to understand the principles that guide the postoperative adaptation of treatment. This article defines guidelines for setting stimulation parameters, adapting drugs and managing adverse effects.

Pollak P, Krack P, Fraix V, Mendes A, Moro E, Chabardes S, Benabid AL. · Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #11948771 No free full text.

Abstract: Studying the clinical effects induced by electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) area in a parkinsonian patient under local anesthesia is a mandatory step to determine the precise location of the final chronic electrode. Using multiple microelectrodes, preferably in a concentric parallel array allows a precise mapping of the STN region. The most reliable features to determine the suitable target are stimulation-induced dyskinesias and rigidity decrease at a low intensity without adverse effects or only at far higher intensities. New skills are needed to assess all stimulation-induced effects and interpret them in anatomo-functional terms.

Pollak P, Fraix V, Krack P, Moro E, Mendes A, Chabardes S, Koudsie A, Benabid AL. · Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, France. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #11948759 No free full text.

Abstract: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical treatment of Parkinson's disease that is applied to three targets: the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), the globus pallidus internas (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Vim DBS mainly improves contralateral tremor and, therefore, is being supplanted by DBS of the two other targets, even in patients with tremor dominant disease. STN and GPi DBS improve off-motor phases and dyskinesias. There is little comparative data between these procedures. The magnitude of the motor improvement seems more constant with STN than GPi DBS. STN DBS allows a decrease in antiparkinsonian drug doses and consumes moderate current. These advantages of STN over GPi DBS are offset by the need for more intensive postoperative management. The DBS procedure has the unique advantage of reversibility and adjustability over time. Patients with young-onset Parkinson's disease suffering from levodopa-induced motor complications but still responding well to levodopa and who exhibit no behavioral, mood, or cognitive impairment benefit the most from STN DBS. Adverse effects more specific of the DBS procedure are infection, cutaneous erosion, and lead breaking or disconnection. Intracranial electrode implantation can induce a hematoma or contusion. Most authors agree that the benefit to risk ratio of DBS is favorable.

Benabid AL, Koudsie A, Benazzouz A, Piallat B, Krack P, Limousin-Dowsey P, Lebas JF, Pollak P. · Department of Neurosurgery, Université Joseph Fourier-INSERM, 38043 Grenoble, France. · Adv Neurol. · Pubmed #11554003 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Krack P, Poepping M, Weinert D, Schrader B, Deuschl G. · Neurology Department, University of Kiel, Germany. · J Neurol. · Pubmed #10991659 No free full text.

Abstract: Levodopa is a highly effective treatment of all motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, long-term treatment with levodopa can lead to motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Motor side effects can become so disabling as to warrant surgical treatment. Both ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) can be performed in different target areas. Thalamic surgery mainly improves tremor, and to a lesser extent also rigidity and dyskinesias, whereas pallidal and subthalamic nucleus surgery improves all motor symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. The efficacy and safety of unilateral pallidotomy is well established. DBS has a lower morbidity and is safe enough to be performed bilaterally. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) presently seems to be the most promising target for DBS in advanced stage PD.

Benabid AL, Benazzouz A, Limousin P, Koudsie A, Krack P, Piallat B, Pollak P. · Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, INSERM Preclinical Neurobiology U-318, Joseph Fourier University of Grenoble, Hôpital A. Michallon, France. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #10762147 No free full text.

Abstract: Severe dyskinesias or ballism can occur following hemorrhagic events in the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and it has recently been established that the STN plays a major role in the pathophysiology of the motor dysfunction of Parkinson's disease (PD) and that STN inhibition improves parkinsonian dysfunction. Deep brain stimulation of the STN in PD patients is therefore currently being evaluated as a therapy. High-frequency stimulation of the STN in PD patients can induce intense dyskinesias that are similar to those induced by levodopa. These may occur with a variable latency and resemble all types of levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs). They can be decreased by reducing the levodopa dosage, which is permitted by the antiparkinsonian effect of stimulating the STN. STN stimulation has been shown to improve all types of LIDs, with the most dramatic effect being that on off-period dystonia. The improvement in LIDs may relate to the decrease in drug dosage, while the off-period dystonia is likely improved by the simultaneous administration of levodopa and STN stimulation. It is thought that the STN is an important node in a network, which can produce dyskinesias when disturbed by a lesion, and is particularly sensitive for the induction of these abnormal movements.

Krack P, Hamel W, Mehdorn HM, Deuschl G. · Neurology Department, University of Kiel, Germany. · Curr Opin Neurol. · Pubmed #10555830 No free full text.

Abstract: Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease can be performed in the thalamus, the pallidum and the subthalamic nucleus. The efficacy and safety of unilateral pallidotomy is well established. Deep brain stimulation has a lower morbidity and is preferred for bilateral surgery. The subthalamic nucleus presently seems to be the most promising target in advanced stage Parkinson's disease.

Limousin-Dowsey P, Pollak P, Van Blercom N, Krack P, Benazzouz A, Benabid A. · MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, 23 Queen Square, London WC1N3BG, email: · J Neurol. · Pubmed #10526001 No free full text.

Abstract: The limits of drug therapy in severe forms of Parkinson's disease have lead to a renewal of functional neurosurgery of the basal ganglia and the thalamus. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of these structures was developed with the aims of reducing the morbidity of surgery and of offering an adaptative treatment. DBS was first applied to the thalamus in patients with severe tremor. Tremor of the hemibody is greatly reduced by stimulation of the contralateral electrode in 85% of the cases. There is little change in other symptoms. However, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias are a more frequent problem than severe tremor; in attempt to treat these symptoms, DBS has recently been applied to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the internal pallidum (GPi). STN stimulation greatly decreases off motor symptoms and motor fluctuations, which allows a reduction of drug dosage and consequently of dyskinesias. GPi stimulation decreases dyskinesias in most patients, but the effect on off motor symptoms is more variable from one series to another, from very good to nil. The severe morbidity of DBS applied to these 3 targets is low. Comparative studies of the cost and the efficacy of DBS and lesions applied to these different targets are now required.

Witt K, Daniels C, Reiff J, Krack P, Volkmann J, Pinsker MO, Krause M, Tronnier V, Kloss M, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L, Bötzel K, Danek A, Hilker R, Sturm V, Kupsch A, Karner E, Deuschl G. · Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany. · Lancet Neurol. · Pubmed #18538636 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) reduces motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and improves their quality of life; however, the effect of DBS on cognitive functions and its psychiatric side-effects are still controversial. To assess the neuropsychiatric consequences of DBS in patients with PD we did an ancillary protocol as part of a randomised study that compared DBS with the best medical treatment. METHODS: 156 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations were randomly assigned to have DBS of the STN or the best medical treatment for PD according to the German Society of Neurology guidelines. 123 patients had neuropsychological and psychiatric examinations to assess the changes between baseline and after 6 months. The primary outcome was the comparison of the effect of DBS with the best medical treatment on overall cognitive functioning (Mattis dementia rating scale). Secondary outcomes were the effects on executive function, depression, anxiety, psychiatric status, manic symptoms, and quality of life. Analysis was per protocol. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00196911. FINDINGS: 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive STN-DBS and 63 patients to have best medical treatment. After 6 months, impairments were seen in executive function (difference of changes [DBS-best medical treatment] in verbal fluency [semantic] -4.50 points, 95% CI -8.07 to -0.93, Cohen's d=-;0.4; verbal fluency [phonemic] -3.06 points, -5.50 to -0.62, -0.5; Stroop 2 naming colour error rate -0.37 points, -0.73 to 0.00, -0.4; Stroop 3 word reading time -5.17 s, -8.82 to -1.52, -0.5; Stroop 4 colour naming time -13.00 s, -25.12 to -0.89, -0.4), irrespective of the improvement in quality of life (difference of changes in PDQ-39 10.16 points, 5.45 to 14.87, 0.6; SF-36 physical 16.55 points, 10.89 to 22.21, 0.9; SF-36 psychological 9.74 points, 2.18 to 17.29, 0.5). Anxiety was reduced in the DBS group compared with the medication group (difference of changes in Beck anxiety inventory 10.43 points, 6.08 to 14.78, 0.8). Ten patients in the DBS group and eight patients in the best medical treatment group had severe psychiatric adverse events. INTERPRETATION: DBS of the STN does not reduce overall cognition or affectivity, although there is a selective decrease in frontal cognitive functions and an improvement in anxiety in patients after the treatment. These changes do not affect improvements in quality of life. DBS of the STN is safe with respect to neuropsychological and psychiatric effects in carefully selected patients during a 6-month follow-up period. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01GI0201).

Tommasi G, Krack P, Fraix V, Le Bas JF, Chabardes S, Benabid AL, Pollak P. · Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France. · J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. · Pubmed #17928327 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To study the pyramidal tract side effects (PTSEs) induced by the spread of current from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) to the pyramidal tract (PT), in patients with parkinsonism undergoing STN stimulation. METHODS: 14 patients bilaterally implanted with tetrapolar electrodes were assessed. For each side separately, the threshold of adverse effects induced by monopolar stimulation delivered by the chronically used contact was detected. The voltage was progressively increased until the patient experienced discomfort. All the PTSEs induced at 130 Hz (high-frequency stimulation (HFS)) and 2 or 3 Hz (low-frequency stimulation (LFS)) were videotaped. By superimposing the preoperative and postoperative MR images, the minimum distance (R) from the centre of the used contact to the medial border of the PT were measured. RESULTS: The progressive increase in voltage at HFS induced tonic motor contractions, mainly located in the face, in 27/28 electrodes. LFS induced synchronous rhythmic myoclonus in the same territory. PTSEs induced at threshold voltage by HFS were observed in the upper face at 13/28 electrodes (bilaterally in six cases) and in the contralateral lower face at five electrodes. A positive correlation was found between the stimulus intensity capable of eliciting motor contractions at HFS and R. CONCLUSIONS: HFS of the STN preferentially activates the corticobulbar tract over the corticospinal tract. Therefore, cranial motor contractions need to be looked for during electrical parameter setting. The positive correlation between the electrical intensity threshold for PTSEs and R reflects the need for millimetre accuracy in electrode positioning.

Ardouin C, Voon V, Worbe Y, Abouazar N, Czernecki V, Hosseini H, Pelissolo A, Moro E, Lhommée E, Lang AE, Agid Y, Benabid AL, Pollak P, Mallet L, Krack P. · Département de Neurologie, CHU Grenoble, INSERM U318, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #16972268 No free full text.

Abstract: Pathological gambling (PG) related to dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) is part of a spectrum of behavioral disorders called the dopamine dysregulation syndrome (DDS). We describe a series of PD patients with preoperative active PG due to dopaminergic treatment from a total of 598 patients who have undergone surgery for subthalamic nucleus stimulation for disabling motor fluctuations. The patients had systematic open assessment of behavioral symptoms and standardized assessments of motor symptoms, mood, and apathy. Seven patients (6 men, 1 woman; age, 54 +/- 9 years; levodopa equivalent dose, 1,390 +/- 350 mg/day) had preoperative PG over a mean of 7 years, intolerant to reduction in medication. Six had nonmotor fluctuations and four had other behavioral symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of the DDS. After surgery, motor symptoms improved, allowing for 74% reduction of dopaminergic treatment, below the dosage of gambling onset. In all patients, PG resolved postoperatively after 18 months on average (range, 0-48), although transient worsening occurred in two. Improvement paralleled the time course and degree of reduction in dopaminergic treatment. Nonmotor fluctuations, off period dysphoria, and other symptoms of the DDS improved. Two patients developed persistent apathy. In conclusion, PG and other symptoms of the DDS-associated dopaminergic treatment improved in our patients following surgery. Dopaminergic dysregulation commonly attributed to pulsatile overstimulation of the limbic dopaminergic system may be subject to desensitization on chronic subthalamic stimulation, which has a relative motor selectivity and allows for decrease in dopaminergic treatment.

Witt K, Pulkowski U, Herzog J, Lorenz D, Hamel W, Deuschl G, Krack P. · Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #15148146 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves motor symptoms of Parkinson disease. Although several studies have assessed cognitive functions before surgery and after long-term STN stimulation, only a few have assessed patients while stimulation is on and off to more specifically address the short-term cognitive effects of STN deep brain stimulation. OBJECTIVE: To examine the short-term effects of STN stimulation on several tests sensitive to executive function and the long-term effects of STN stimulation on a global cognitive scale. DESIGN: Twenty-three patients with Parkinson disease were tested 6 to 12 months after surgery with STN stimulation switched on and off in a random order while taking their regular medication. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score was also rated in the on and off stimulation condition. The neuropsychological battery included digit span, verbal fluency, Stroop color test, and random number generation in a single- and dual-task condition. RESULTS: Short-term stimulation improved the results on the Random Number Generation Task, requiring suppression of habitual responses, but induced more errors in the interference task of the Stroop color test. Digit span, verbal fluency, and dual-task performance results did not change. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.47, P =.02) between improved performance on the Random Number Generation Task and impaired response inhibition in the Stroop interference condition. A preoperative to postoperative comparison showed no changes in global cognitive function with long-term STN deep brain stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term STN stimulation improves cognitive flexibility (giving up habitual responses) but impairs response inhibition. Long-term STN stimulation does not change global cognitive function.

Hariz MI, Krack P, Melvill R, Jorgensen JV, Hamel W, Hirabayashi H, Lenders M, Wesslen N, Tengvar M, Yousry TA. · Department of Neurosurgery, Umeå, Sweden. · Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. · Pubmed #14745216 No free full text.

Abstract: For deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), it would be an advantage if the STN could be visualized with fast acquisition of MR images, allowing direct and individual targeting. We present a protocol for T2-weighted, nonvolumetric fast-acquisition MRI, implemented at 8 centers in 6 countries. Acquisition time varied between 3 min 5 s and 7 min 48 s according to the center, and imaging often provided visualization of the STN on axial and coronal scans. Postoperatively, the same imaging protocol permitted visualization of the target area and DBS electrodes with minimum artifacts. This imaging technique may contribute to a decrease in the number of electrode passes at surgery.

Wenzelburger R, Kopper F, Zhang BR, Witt K, Hamel W, Weinert D, Kuhtz-Buschbeck J, Gölge M, Illert M, Deuschl G, Krack P. · Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany. · Mov Disord. · Pubmed #14534921 No free full text.

Abstract: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) reduces akinesia in Parkinson's disease but its impact on fine motor functions was unknown. We assessed the effects of DBS and a levodopa (L-dopa) test on the timing of the precision grip in 18 patients. Improvement on UPDRS-items reflecting hand functions and the shortening of the first phases of the precision grip were more distinct in the L-dopa test than in the pure STN-DBS condition. Other akinesia items and the time for build-up of lifting force were equally improved in both conditions. This suggests that routine STN-DBS might not be equally effective on all aspects of fine motor functions.

Lagrange E, Krack P, Moro E, Ardouin C, Van Blercom N, Chabardes S, Benabid AL, Pollak P. · Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France. · Neurology. · Pubmed #12499496 No free full text.

Abstract: In order to assess the impact of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in PD on quality of life, the PD Quality of Life questionnaire was assessed in 60 consecutive patients with PD before surgery and 12 months after surgery. All aspects of quality of life, including motor (+48%), systemic (+34%), emotional (+29%), and social (+63%) dimensions, significantly improved with long-term STN stimulation.

Xie J, Krack P, Benabid AL, Pollak P. · Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, France. · J Neurol. · Pubmed #12013584 No free full text.

Abstract: Clinical reports show that bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation is effective in improving parkinsonian gait. Quantitative analysis of the efficacy of STN stimulation on gait is of interest and can be carried out using a commercially available stride analyser. Ten parkinsonian patients (5 men, 5 women) with a mean age of 55.8, SD 9.6 years were included in our study. They had a mean duration of Parkinson's disease (PD) of 13.3, SD 4.5 years and a motor examination score (part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) (UPDRS) of 43, SD 13 in off-stimulation off-drug condition. All the patients had bilateral chronic STN stimulation which had started from 3 to 36 months before the study. Patients were evaluated in off-drug and on-drug conditions both with and without stimulation. We analysed the principal gait measures: velocity, cadence, stride length, gait cycle, duration of single and double limb support. The clinical parkinsonian signs were evaluated with the part III of the UPDRS. In the off-drug condition, STN stimulation significantly (p < 0.05) improved velocity and stride length. The effect was similar to that of levodopa. When STN stimulation was switched on at the best of the levodopa induced effect, no further improvement was observed. The UPDRS motor score was significantly (p < 0.001) decreased after both stimulation and levodopa. In conclusion, STN stimulation is effective on parkinsonian gait.

Pillon B, Ardouin C, Damier P, Krack P, Houeto JL, Klinger H, Bonnet AM, Pollak P, Benabid AL, Agid Y. · INSERM EPI 007 and U 289, Fédération de Neurologie and Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Neurology. · Pubmed #10932277 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In a previous study on a consecutive series of 62 patients with PD, the authors showed that bilateral subthalamic or pallidal continuous high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) affects neither memory nor executive functions 3 to 6 months after surgery. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the specific effects of DBS by comparing the performance of patients with the stimulator turned "on" and "off." METHODS: The performance of 56 patients on clinical tests of executive function was compared after 3 and 12 months of DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN; n = 48) or the internal globus pallidus (GPi; n = 8) with the stimulator "on" or "off." Global intellectual efficiency, verbal learning, and mood were also evaluated with the stimulator "on." The performance of another group of 20 patients was compared after 6 months of DBS of the STN (n = 15) or the GPi (n = 5) with the stimulator "on" or "off" on more experimental tests recently shown to be more sensitive to l-dopa therapy. RESULTS: When the stimulator was "on," STN patients showed a mild but significant improvement in psychomotor speed and working memory. In comparison with the presurgical state, STN patients had no cognitive deficit at 12 months, except for lexical fluency. There was no differential effect of STN or GPi stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: 1) The specific effect of DBS seems to mimic the action of l-dopa treatment in the cognitive as in the motor domain; 2) the surgery associated with DBS does not appear to affect the cognitive performance of patients with PD 12 months later, except for a mild deficit in lexical fluency.