Parkinson Disease: Friedenberg FK

Dadabhai A, Friedenberg FK. · Temple University Hospital, Temple University School of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, Parkinson Pavilion, 8th Floor, 3401 North Broad Street, PA 19140, Philadelphia, USA. · Expert Opin Drug Saf. · Pubmed #19236223 No free full text.

Abstract: Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that can be used in the treatment of acid-peptic-related disorders (gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, gastric acid hypersecretory syndromes) and Helicobacter pylori. Pharmacodynamic data has demonstrated that rabeprazole, with a high pKa of approximately 5.0, can be activated at a higher pH than other proton pump inhibitors. This possibly results in faster onset of action. Owing to its non-enzymatic pathway of metabolism, rabeprazole is also less influenced by genetic polymorphisms of the CYP2C19, which others proton pump inhibitors are dependent on. In a 2-week, placebo-controlled trial, rabeprazole was both rapid and effective in relieving heartburn on day 1 of therapy and improved other GERD-related symptoms including regurgitation, belching, bloating, early satiety and nausea. For oesophageal reflux disease without erosions both 10 and 20 mg of rabeprazole are equivalent and better than placebo at 2 and 4 weeks. An on-demand approach to non-erosive reflux disease with 10 mg of rabeprazole has also been documented as superior to placebo. Some success in the treatment of extra-oesophageal manifestations of GERD, such as asthma and chronic laryngitis, has also been achieved with rabeprazole. Overall, rabeprazole with very few side effects is a safe and efficacious medication for acid suppression therapy.

Modena S, Bearelly D, Swartz K, Friedenberg FK. · Gastroenterology Section, Temple University Hospital, 8 Parkinson Pavilion, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. · Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. · Pubmed #16156324 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of infectious nosocomial diarrhea and can be found in up to 30% of asymptomatic hospitalized patients. Our primary aim was to compare the clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients who received antibiotics and developed C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) with those of hospitalized patients who received antibiotics and did not develop the disease. DESIGN: Case-control study comprising inpatients at a single institution. PATIENTS: Case-patients were defined as patients who had diarrhea and tested positive for C. difficile. Control-patients (matched 4:1 to case-patients) were defined as patients who received antibiotics for at least 5 days and did not develop CDAD. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, nine variables were associated with CDAD. Only three of the variables, need for intensive care, length of stay, and macrolide antibiotic use, were found to be significant (P < .05) on logistic regression analysis. The odds ratios for status as a CDAD case were 3.68 (CI95, 1.44 to 9.40) for stay in the intensive care unit and 1.03 (CI95, 1.02 to 1.05) for each day of hospital stay. Receipt of macrolide antibiotics reduced risk significantly; the odds ratio was 0.23 (CI95, 0.19 to 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: We identified need for intensive care and length of stay as important risk factors for the development of CDAD. We also identified macrolide antibiotic use as protective against its development. Patients receiving intensive care may represent a population to study for targeted prophylaxis.