Osteoporosis: Selby P

Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Francis R, Kanis JA, Marsh D, McCloskey EV, Reid DM, Selby P, Wilkins M, Anonymous00031. · University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom. · Maturitas. · Pubmed #19135323 No free full text.

Abstract: In 1999 and 2000 the Royal College of Physicians published guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [Royal College of Physicians. Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment. London: Royal College of Physicians; 1999; Royal College of Physicians and Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain. Update on pharmacological interventions and an algorithm for management. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2000.; Royal College of Physicians. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Guidelines on prevention and treatment; Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain, National Osteoporosis Society and Royal College of Physicians. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2002]. Since then, there have been significant advances in the field of osteoporosis including the development of new techniques for measuring bone mineral density, improved methods of assessing fracture risk and new treatments that have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of fractures. Against this background, the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), in collaboration with many Societies in the UK, have updated the original guidelines [Royal College of Physicians, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group on behalf of the Bone Research Society, British Geriatrics Society, British Orthopaedic Association, British Society of Rheumatology, National Osteoporosis Society, Osteoporosis 2000, Osteoporosis Dorset, Primary Care Rheumatology Society, Society for Endocrinology. Osteoporosis. Clinical guideline for prevention and treatment, Executive Summary. University of Sheffield Press; 2008], a practical summary of which is detailed below. The management algorithms are underpinned by a health economic analysis applied to the epidemiology of fracture in the UK.

Reid DM, Doughty J, Eastell R, Heys SD, Howell A, McCloskey EV, Powles T, Selby P, Coleman RE. · Department of Rheumatology, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom. · Cancer Treat Rev. · Pubmed #18515009 No free full text.

Abstract: In postmenopausal women, the use of aromatase inhibitors increases bone turnover and induces bone loss at sites rich in trabecular bone at an average rate of 1-3% per year leading to an increase in fracture incidence compared to that seen during tamoxifen use. The bone loss is much more marked in young women with treatment-induced ovarian suppression followed by aromatase inhibitor therapy (average 7-8% per annum). Pre-treatment with tamoxifen for 2-5 years may reduce the clinical significance of the adverse bone effects associated with aromatase inhibitors, particularly if this leads to a shortening in the duration of exposure to an aromatase inhibitor. However, skeletal status should still be assessed at the commencement of aromatase inhibitor therapy. The rate of bone loss in women who experience a premature menopause before the age of 45 or are receiving ovarian suppression therapy is accelerated by the concomitant use of aromatase inhibitors. These patients are considered to be at high risk of clinically important bone loss and should have a baseline dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Randomised clinical trials in postmenopausal women indicate that bisphosphonates prevent the bone loss and accelerated bone turnover associated with aromatase inhibitor therapy and are a promising strategy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in this setting. Treatment initiation recommendations are based on a combination of risk factors for osteoporotic fracture and BMD levels. Bisphosphonates, along with a healthy lifestyle and adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D are the treatments of choice to prevent bone loss. Due to the rate of bone loss associated with breast cancer treatments, and uncertainties about the interaction between aromatase inhibitor use and BMD for fracture risk, the threshold for intervention has been set at a higher level than that generally recommended for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Management recommendations have been summarised in two algorithms, one for women experiencing a premature menopause and the other for postmenopausal women requiring adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgström F, Cooper C, Jönsson B, Preedy D, Selby P, Compston J. · No affiliation provided · Bone. · Pubmed #18156107 No free full text.

Abstract: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK has recently issued health economic appraisals for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fracture that are more restrictive than previous guidelines for the management of osteoporosis despite a marked reduction of the cost of intervention. The aim of the present study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of the bisphosphonate, alendronate for the prevention and treatment of fractures associated with osteoporosis. A second aim was to investigate reasons for any disparities in cost-effectiveness between our findings and the NICE appraisals. We compared the effects of alendronate 70 mg weekly by mouth for 5 years with no treatment in postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture and computed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using a lifetime simulation model based on Markov cohort methodology. A sensitivity analysis examined other common interventions. Using a threshold of pound sterling 30,000 and pound sterling 20,000 per quality of life-year (QALY) gained to determine cost-effectiveness, alendronate was cost-effective for the primary prevention of fracture in women with osteoporosis irrespective of age as was treatment of women with a prior fragility fracture irrespective of BMD. Cost-effective scenarios were also found in women with strong risk factors for fracture with a bone mineral density value above the threshold for osteoporosis. The results were robust over reasonable assumptions in sensitivity analysis. We conclude that alendronate is a cost-effective agent for the prevention and treatment of fractures associated with osteoporosis. These findings, suitable for informing practice guidance, contrast with recent appraisals from NICE.

Selby P. · University Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. · Curr Osteoporos Rep. · Pubmed #16036090 No free full text.

Abstract: The postmenopausal state is the most common underlying cause for osteoporosis and most of our understanding of the condition relates to this group. Recent evidence has suggested that hormone therapy may no longer have the pre-eminent place it once held but the same studies have also confirmed its antifracture efficacy. However, an increasing variety of alternative therapies are available for the postmenopausal woman. Furthermore, recent understanding of the mechanisms of bone loss after estrogen withdrawal, suggest that newer even better targeted therapies might be developed in the future.

McCloskey E, Selby P, Davies M, Robinson J, Francis RM, Adams J, Kayan K, Beneton M, Jalava T, Pylkkänen L, Kenraali J, Aropuu S, Kanis JA. · Division of Genomic Medicine, The World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #15068495 No free full text.

Abstract: The efficacy of oral clodronate 800 mg daily to reduce vertebral fractures was studied in 593 women with postmenopausal or secondary osteoporosis. The incidence of vertebral fractures was significantly reduced by 46%. The effect was not modified by the underlying cause of osteoporosis or other baseline factors including bone mineral density, QUS, weight, and smoking. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine if the bisphosphonate, clodronate (Bonefos), reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures in osteoporotic women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women fulfilling the WHO criteria for osteoporosis at the lumbar spine (T-score </= -2.5) and/or with at least one prevalent vertebral fracture were recruited to a 3-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 593 patients were randomized to two strata comprised of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (I, n = 483) and secondary osteoporosis (II, n = 110). They received either clodronate 800 mg daily orally (n = 292) or an identical placebo (n = 301). All patients received a calcium supplement of 500 mg daily. BMD was measured at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, and lateral spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and annually thereafter for vertebral morphometry. RESULTS: Treatment with clodronate was associated with a significant increase in mean spine BMD over 3 years (percent change from baseline, 4.35 +/- 6.34% versus 0.64 +/- 6.02% in the placebo group, p < 0.0001). At the hip, clodronate maintained total BMD, whereas a significant decrease was observed in the placebo group (percent change from baseline 0.70 +/- 5.67% versus -3.03 +/- 6.32% in the placebo group, p < 0.0001). The changes at the spine and hip were similar in both strata. Incident vertebral fractures at 3 years were observed in 63 women in the placebo group and 33 patients receiving clodronate (relative risk, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80; p = 0.001). Clodronate significantly reduced vertebral fracture risk in both strata and in women with or without prior vertebral fracture at baseline. Nonvertebral osteoporosis-associated fractures occurred in 21 women in the placebo group and in 14 women treated with clodronate. Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant difference in adverse event rates, including esophagitis, during clodronate treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that clodronate 800 mg daily is a safe and effective treatment to reduce fracture risk in women with osteoporosis, regardless of causation.

McCloskey E, Selby P, de Takats D, Bernard J, Davies M, Robinson J, Francis R, Adams J, Pande K, Beneton M, Jalava T, Löyttyniemi E, Kanis JA. · The WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK. · Bone. · Pubmed #11248662 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine whether clodronate reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis. We report here the interim analysis after 1 year of a 3-year double-blind placebo-controlled study. The objectives of the interim analysis were to determine whether there was a trend in fracture frequency and to examine the effects of clodronate on bone mineral density (BMD). Patients with densitometrically proven osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5 and <-3 for women and men, respectively) or with at least one prevalent vertebral fracture were recruited to a 3-year double-blind, controlled study. Patients were randomized to three strata, namely women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (stratum I, n = 483), women with secondary osteoporosis (II, n = 110), and men with osteoporosis of any causation (III, n = 84). They received either clodronate 800 mg daily by mouth or an identical placebo, and all patients received a calcium supplement of 500 mg daily. BMD was measured at six monthly intervals, and lateral spine radiographs for vertebral morphometry were obtained at baseline and 1 year. Treatment with clodronate was associated with a significant increase in BMD at the spine of 3.2 +/- 0.3% (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline) compared with a nonsignificant change of 0.5 +/- 0.3% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001 between treatments). At the hip, clodronate was associated with a significant increase in total hip BMD of 1.3 +/- 0.3% (p = 0.018 vs. baseline) compared with a small decrease of 0.4 +/- 0.3% in the placebo group (p = 0.027 for the difference between treatment groups). The mean changes at the spine and hip were similar in all three strata. Incident vertebral fractures were observed in 27 patients at 1 year in the placebo group (9.0%) and in 14 patients receiving clodronate (4.9%) (relative risk 0.54; 95% CI 0.29-1.02; p = 0.07). A trend was observed in all treatment strata. Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant adverse events attributable to clodronate treatment. We conclude that clodronate 800 mg daily is effective in preventing bone loss, and at 1 year, there is a trend consistent with antifracture efficacy in patients with established osteoporosis regardless of causation.

Cox H, Puffer S, Morton V, Cooper C, Hodson J, Masud T, Oliver D, Preedy D, Selby P, Stone M, Sutcliffe A, Torgerson D. · University of York, Department of Health Sciences, SRB Area 4, York YO10 5DD, UK. · Age Ageing. · Pubmed #18083724 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: to assess whether specialist osteoporosis nurses delivering training to care home staff can reduce fractures and improve the prescription of treatments to reduce fractures versus usual care. DESIGN: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with randomisation at the Primary Care Organisation (PCO) level. SETTING: care homes (residential, nursing and EMI) across England and Wales within PCOs. PARTICIPANTS: all 300 PCOs in England and Wales were invited to take part. Of these, 58 agreed to participate and gained ethical approval in time to start the study: 29 clusters were randomised to the intervention group and 29 to the control. INTERVENTION: specialist osteoporosis nurses undertaking short training sessions with care home staff emphase the importance of fracture and fall prevention and train staff on how to identify those residents at high risk of fracture. Residents' risk of fracture and falls was reported to general practitioners (GPs) of patients along with treatment recommendations. OUTCOME MEASURES: primary outcome measures were total fractures over the past 12 months and total hip fractures over past the 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were total home falls, number of residents sustaining a fall, number of residents prescribed bisphosphonates, number of residents prescribed calcium and vitamin D and number of residents wearing hip protectors. All outcomes were measured at the care home level. RESULTS: of the 230 care homes randomised data were collected from 209 of these containing 5,637 residents. There were no differences between the groups in the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for total fractures (IRR = 0.94 [0.71, 1.26] P = 0.70) or total hip fractures (IRR = 0.86 [0.63, 1.18] P = 0.36). No differences were found between groups for home falls or hip protector use. A significant increase in bisphosphonate prescription was seen in the intervention group over the control group (IRR = 1.50 [1.00, 2.24] P = 0.05). Calcium and vitamin D prescription was significantly increased in the intervention group over the control group (IRR = 1.64 [1.23, 2.18] P<0.01). CONCLUSION: the intervention significantly increased the prescription of bisphosphonates and calcium/vitamin D, but was not associated with a significant effect on the rate of falls or fractures.

Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkänen L, Mawer B, Kanis JA, Selby P, Davies M, Adams J, Francis RM, Robinson J, McCloskey E. · Leiras, Helsinki, Finland. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #12854835 No free full text.

Abstract: Determinants of mortality were studied in a prospective study of 677 women and men with primary or secondary osteoporosis. Prevalent vertebral fractures were associated with increased mortality, but other known predictors of mortality explain a significant proportion of the excess risk. INTRODUCTION: In population studies, prevalent vertebral fractures are associated with increased mortality. It is unknown whether this excess mortality is related to low bone mineral density or its determinants or whether there is an additional component associated with fracture itself. METHODS: We studied 677 women and men with osteoporosis, 28-88 years old, of whom 352 had morphometrically determined vertebral fracture, to examine the risk and causes of mortality in patients with osteoporosis (defined densitometrically as a spine bone mineral density T-score < -2.5 and -3.0 for women and men, respectively, and/or one or more prevalent vertebral fractures without a history of significant trauma). The participants had enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in osteoporosis and were comprised of 483 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, 110 women with secondary osteoporosis, and 84 men with osteoporosis of any cause. Demographics, medical history, and other measures of skeletal and nonskeletal health status were assessed at entry. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 37 (5.5%) participants died, with 31 of these deaths occurring in those with prevalent vertebral fractures. Compared with participants who did not have a prevalent vertebral fracture, those with one or more fractures had a 4.4-fold higher (95% CI, 1.85, 10.6) mortality rate. After adjustment for predictors for poor health--including number of medications, number of diseases, use of oral corticosteroids, alcohol intake, serum albumin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), renal function, height, weight, gender, and age--the point estimate of risk remained elevated but was no longer statistically significant (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.93, 6.23). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients are associated with increased mortality. Other known predictors of mortality can explain a significant proportion of the excess risk.

Braidman I, Baris C, Wood L, Selby P, Adams J, Freemont A, Hoyland J. · Musculoskeletal Research Group, University of Manchester Medical School, Manchester, UK. · Bone. · Pubmed #10773580 No free full text.

Abstract: Although osteoporosis is usually associated with women, 1 in 12 men in the UK have the disease, and a third of these cases are idiopathic. Estrogen is now known to be associated with bone loss in older men, but we found, previously, that levels of this hormone were normal in younger cases of male idiopathic osteoporosis (MIO) in the age range 33-61 years. We therefore hypothesized that their estrogen responses in bone might be defective, through impaired estrogen receptor-alpha (ER)-alpha expression. Consequently, in the present study, we compared expression of ER-alpha by indirect immunofluorescence, semiquantitative image analysis, and in situ reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in bone sections from MIO patients (33-56 years) (N = 7); age-matched control men (N = 7); and, for reference, ovarian steroid (OS)-replete (N = 7) and OS-deficient women (N = 6). In the control men, 23 +/- 6% (mean +/- SEM) of osteoblasts and 14 +/- 2% of osteocytes expressed ER-alpha protein, similar to OS-replete women. Although receptor expression decreased in OS-deficient women, the loss of ER-alpha protein in MIO patients was more severe (1 +/- 0.5% osteocytes, 2 +/- 1% osteoblasts expressed receptor); however, ER-alpha messenger RNA (mRNA) was still expressed in controls and MIO patients. Bone loss in these patients may be due to deficient ER-alpha protein expression.