Osteoporosis: Khan AA

Khan AA, Sándor GK, Dore E, Morrison AD, Alsahli M, Amin F, Peters E, Hanley DA, Chaudry SR, Dempster DW, Glorieux FH, Neville AJ, Talwar RM, Clokie CM, Al Mardini M, Paul T, Khosla S, Josse RG, Sutherland S, Lam DK, Carmichael RP, Blanas N, Kendler D, Petak S, St-Marie LG, Brown J, Evans AW, Rios L, Compston JE, Anonymous00076. · Divisions of Endocrinology and Geriatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18528958 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Following publication of the first reports of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients receiving bisphosphonates in 2003, a call for national multidisciplinary guidelines based upon a systematic review of the current evidence was made by the Canadian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (CAOMS) in association with national and international societies concerned with ONJ. The purpose of the guidelines is to provide recommendations regarding diagnosis, identification of at-risk patients, and prevention and management strategies, based on current evidence and consensus. These guidelines were developed for medical and dental practitioners as well as for oral pathologists and related specialists. METHODS: The multidisciplinary task force established by the CAOMS reviewed all relevant areas of research relating to ONJ associated with bisphosphonate use and completed a systematic review of current literature. These evidence-based guidelines were developed utilizing a structured development methodology. A modified Delphi consensus process enabled consensus among the multidisciplinary task force members. These guidelines have since been reviewed by external experts and endorsed by national and international medical, dental, oral surgery, and oral pathology societies. RESULTS: Recommendations regarding diagnosis, prevention, and management of ONJ were made following analysis of all current data pertaining to this condition. ONJ has many etiologic factors including head and neck irradiation, trauma, periodontal disease, local malignancy, chemotherapy, and glucocorticoid therapy. High-dose intravenous bisphosphonates have been identified as a risk factor for ONJ in the oncology patient population. Low-dose bisphosphonate use in patients with osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease has not been causally linked to the development of ONJ. Prevention, staging, and treatment recommendations are based upon collective expert opinion and current data, which has been limited to case reports, case series, surveys, retrospective studies, and 2 prospective observational studies. Recommendations: In all oncology patients, a thorough dental examination including radiographs should be completed prior to the initiation of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy. In this population, any invasive dental procedure is ideally completed prior to the initiation of high-dose bisphosphonate therapy. Non-urgent procedures are preferably delayed for 3 to 6 months following interruption of bisphosphonate therapy. Osteoporosis patients receiving oral or intravenous bisphosphonates do not require a dental examination prior to initiating therapy in the presence of appropriate dental care and good oral hygiene. Stopping smoking, limiting alcohol intake, and maintaining good oral hygiene should be emphasized for all patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy. Individuals with established ONJ are most appropriately managed with supportive care including pain control, treatment of secondary infection, removal of necrotic debris, and mobile sequestrate. Aggressive debridement is contraindicated. CONCLUSION: Our multidisciplinary guidelines, which provide a rational evidence-based approach to the diagnosis, prevention, and management of bisphosphonate-associated ONJ in Canada, are based on the best available published data and the opinion of national and international experts involved in the prevention and management of ONJ.

Khan AA, Hanley DA, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, Brown JP, Hodsman AB, Josse RG, Kendler DL, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Olszynski WP, Petak SM, Syed ZA, Theriault D, Watts NB, Anonymous00369. · Division of Endocrinology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and Hanover General Hospital, PA, USA. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #16731431 No free full text.

Abstract: This document addresses skeletal health assessment in individuals with secondary causes of osteoporosis. Recommendations are based on consensus of the Canadian Panel of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and invited international experts. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing in these populations is performed in conjunction with careful evaluation of the disease state contributing to bone loss and increased fragility fracture risk, as well as assessment of other contributing risk factors for fracture. The presence of secondary causes of bone loss may further increase the risk of fracture independently of BMD and may necessitate earlier pharmacologic intervention. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is indicated in the initial workup of secondary causes of osteoporosis. The BMD fracture risk relationship is not known for individuals with chronic renal failure (CRF). The BMD testing in this population may be normal in the presence of skeletal fragility, and quantitative bone histomorphometry is better at evaluating skeletal status than BMD in CRF. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a valuable tool in assessing skeletal health in individuals with secondary causes of osteoporosis.

Khan AA, Bachrach L, Brown JP, Hanley DA, Josse RG, Kendler DL, Leib ES, Lentle BC, Leslie WD, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Nicholson RL, O'Brien C, Olszynski WP, Theriault MY, Watts NB, Anonymous00235. · Divisions of Endocrinology and Geriatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #14742888 No free full text.

Abstract: The Canadian Panel of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry has developed standards in order to establish the minimum level of acceptable performance for the practice of bone densitometry in Canada. Previously, this group addressed the performance of densitometry in postmenopausal women. This report addresses the use of densitometry in men, premenopausal women, and children with a focus on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Khan AA, Brown J, Faulkner K, Kendler D, Lentle B, Leslie W, Miller PD, Nicholson L, Olszynski WP, Watts NB, Anonymous00159. · McMaster University, Oakville, Ontario, Canada. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #12665644 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) is a multidisciplinary nonprofit global organization formed to ensure excellence in densitometry imaging, interpretation, and application. The Canadian panel of the ISCD represents ISCD in Canada and oversees Canadian bone densitometry certification programs. The standards of care from the Canadian panel of the ISCD have been developed in order to establish the minimum level of acceptable performance for the practice of bone densitometry in Canada. A variety of techniques are available for skeletal assessment of bone mineral density, which vary in accuracy, precision, and clinical utility as well as availability. This article focuses on central dual X-ray absorptiometry in adults and does not address densitometry in the pediatric population. Other technologies will be addressed in a subsequent article.

Khan AA, Sándor GK, Dore E, Morrison AD, Alsahli M, Amin F, Peters E, Hanley DA, Chaudry SR, Lentle B, Dempster DW, Glorieux FH, Neville AJ, Talwar RM, Clokie CM, Mardini MA, Paul T, Khosla S, Josse RG, Sutherland S, Lam DK, Carmichael RP, Blanas N, Kendler D, Petak S, Ste-Marie LG, Brown J, Evans AW, Rios L, Compston JE, Anonymous00115. · Divisions of Endocrinology and Geriatrics, McMaster University, Oakville, ON L6J 1X8, Canada. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19286860 No free full text.

Abstract: In 2003, the first reports describing osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients receiving bisphosphonates (BP) were published. These cases occurred in patients with cancer receiving high-dose intravenous BP; however, 5% of the cases were in patients with osteoporosis receiving low-dose bisphosphonate therapy. We present the results of a systematic review of the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of BP associated ONJ. We conducted a comprehensive literature search for relevant studies on BP associated ONJ in oncology and osteoporosis patients published before February 2008.All selected relevant articles were sorted by area of focus. Data for each area were abstracted by 2 independent reviewers. The results showed that the diagnosis is made clinically. Prospective data evaluating the incidence and etiologic factors are very limited. In oncology patients receiving high-dose intravenous BP, ONJ appears to be dependent on the dose and duration of therapy, with an estimated incidence of 1%-12% at 36 months of exposure. In osteoporosis patients, it is rare, with an estimated incidence < 1 case per 100,000 person-years of exposure. The incidence of ONJ in the general population is not known. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to confirm a causal link between low-dose BP use in the osteoporosis patient population and ONJ. We concluded BP associated ONJ is associated with high-dose BP therapy primarily in the oncology patient population. Prevention and treatment strategies are currently based on expert opinion and focus on maintaining good oral hygiene and conservative surgical intervention.

Khan AA, Colquhoun A, Hanley DA, Jankowski LG, Josse RG, Kendler DL, Lentle B, Leslie WD, Lewiecki EM, O'neill E, Robertson S, Syed ZA, Tanner SB, Webster D. · Division of Endocrinology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #17485038 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Khan AA, Hodsman AB, Papaioannou A, Kendler D, Brown JP, Olszynski WP. · Division of Endocrinology and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #17261833 links to  free full text

Abstract: In 2002, Osteoporosis Canada published clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The current paper supplements that guideline and provides a review and synthesis of the current literature on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in men.

Khan AA, Syed Z. · Department of Medicine, Divisions of Endocrinology and Geriatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #14742892 No free full text.

Abstract: Bone loss prior to menopause is being increasingly identified in women. Clearly, low bone mineral density (BMD) is a significant risk factor for fracture in the estrogen-deficient female postmenopause. The significance of low bone density prior to menopause needs to be addressed. Low bone density in the premenopausal female may reflect attainment of a lower peak bone mass. It may also be secondary to progressive bone loss following achievement of peak bone density. The etiology of low bone density in the premenopausal female needs to be clarified with meticulous exclusion of secondary causes of bone loss. Menstrual status is an important determinant of peak bone mass as well as the development of bone loss in women prior to the onset of menopause. Subclinical decreases in circulating gonadal steroids may be associated with a lower peak bone mass as well as progressive bone loss in otherwise reproductively normal women. Elevations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) of greater than 20 miu/L are associated with evidence of increased bone turnover marker activity and correlate with progressive bone loss in perimenopausal women. This transitional period requires further study with respect to the magnitude of bone loss experienced and the potential benefits of antiresorptive therapy. Detailed assessment of menstrual status is necessary in the evaluation of low bone density in premenopausal women. The majority of the cross-sectional and longitudinal studies completed evaluating BMD in the premenopausal years suggest that minimal bone loss does occur prior to menopause after attainment of peak bone mass. The magnitude of premenopausal bone loss, however, is controversial and may be site-dependent. More rapid rates of bone loss are seen in the transitional period beginning 2-3 yr prior to the onset of menopause. Prospective data are needed to understand further the relationship between BMD and fracture in the premenopausal period. Women with steroid-induced bone loss as well as other secondary causes of osteoporosis respond to antiresorptive therapy with documented improvements in BMD. Biomarkers can identify perimenopausal women with increased bone turnover. Lifestyle modification can improve BMD in the pre- and the perimenopausal period. Antiresorptive therapy has not been evaluated in pre- or perimenopausal women with low BMD in the absence of secondary causes of osteoporosis. As new treatment options are evaluated and become available, biomarker assessment may be of value in identifying women at risk of fracture.

Khan MN, Khan AA. · No affiliation provided · Curr Oncol. · Pubmed #18231646 links to  free full text

Abstract: Cancer therapy can result in significant bone loss and increased risk of fragility fracture. Chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitors, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues contribute to increases in the rate of bone remodelling and reduce bone mineral density. Patients with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy experience an increase in the risk of fracture. New research has demonstrated the key role played by bisphosphonates in preventing declines in bone density and increases in bone remodelling. Novel antiresorptive agents targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand have great potential in skeletal protection and prevention of bone loss related to cancer therapy. Early assessment of skeletal health, followed by initiation of calcium, vitamin D, and an exercise program are valuable in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In addition, individuals at increased risk for fracture should be offered antiresorptive therapy. Early data have demonstrated that bisphosphonates are able to prevent the bone loss and increased bone remodelling associated with cancer therapy, including aromatase inhibition and androgen deprivation therapy. The present paper reviews the new research and advances in the management of bone loss associated with both cancer therapy and estrogen deficiency in the postmenopausal female.

Murphy KJ, Lin DD, Khan AA, Gailloud P. · Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287. · Can Assoc Radiol J. · Pubmed #12500381 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Khan AA, Brown JP, Kendler DL, Leslie WD, Lentle BC, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Nicholson RL, Olszynski WP, Watts NB. · Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #12427706 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.