Osteoporosis: Kaufman JM

Bergmann P, Body JJ, Boonen S, Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM, Reginster JY, Gangji V, Anonymous00023. · Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium. · Int J Clin Pract. · Pubmed #19125989 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To review the clinical value of bone turnover markers (BTM), to initiate and/or monitor anti-resorptive treatment for osteoporosis compared with bone mineral density (BMD) and to evaluate suitable BTM and changes in BTM levels for significance of treatment efficiency. METHODOLOGY: Consensus meeting generating guidelines for clinical practice after review and discussion of the randomised controlled trials or meta-analyses on the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. RESULTS: Although the correlation between BMD and BTM is statistically significant, BTM cannot be used as predictive markers of BMD in an individual patient. Both are independent predictors of fracture risk, but BTM can only be used as an additional risk factor in the decision to treat. Current data do not support the use of BTM to select the optimal treatment. However, they can be used to monitor treatment efficiency before BMD changes can be evaluated. Early changes in BTM can be used to measure the clinical efficacy of an anti-resorptive treatment and to reinforce patient compliance. DISCUSSION: Determining a threshold of BTM reflecting an optimal long-term effect is not obvious. The objective should be the return to the premenopausal range and/or a decrease at least equal to the least significant change (30%). Preanalytical and analytical variability of BTM is an important limitation to their use. Serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), procollagen 1 N terminal extension peptide and bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSALP) appear to be the most suitable. Conclusion: Consensus regarding the use of BTM resulted in guidelines for clinical practice. BMD determines the indication to treat osteoporosis. BTM reflect treatment efficiency and can be used to motivate patients to persist with their medication.

Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Boonen S, Body JJ, Kaufman JM, Reginster JY, Rozenberg S, Boutsen Y. · Rheumatology Unit, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #16217586 No free full text.

Abstract: Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently prescribed for various inflammatory and/or life-threatening conditions concerning many systems in the body. However, they can provoke many aftereffects, of which osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most crippling complications, with its host of fractures. The dramatic increase in bone fragility is mainly attributable to the GC-induced rapid bone loss in all skeletal compartments. We have reviewed the meta-analyses and randomized controlled studies reporting medical therapeutic interventions currently registered in Belgium for the management of GC-OP comparatively with a placebo. Based on this research, an expert meeting developed a consensus on the prevention and therapy of GC-OP. The pathophysiology of GC-OP is complex. Several factors, acting separately or synergistically, have been described. Their great number could help to understand the rapidity of bone loss and of bone fragility occurrence, indicating that a rapid therapeutic intervention should be implemented to avoid complications. All patients on GCs are threatened with OP, so the prevention and/or therapy of GC-OP should be considered not only for postmenopausal females, but also for osteopenic premenopausal females and for males put on a daily dose of at least 7.5 mg equivalent prednisolone that is expected to last at least 3 months. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as exercise and avoidance of tobacco and alcohol, should be recommended, even if their role is not definitely settled in GC-OP prevention. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D should be considered as the first-line therapy because of the decrease in intestinal calcium absorption provoked by GCs. They also could be considered either as isolated therapy in patients taking less than 7.5 mg prednisolone daily and/or for a predicted period shorter than 3 months or as adjuvant therapy to other more potent drugs. Hormone replacement therapy could be considered in young postmenopausal females on GC, such as in postmenopausal OP, or in men with low androgen levels. Calcitonin appears to have a protective effect on trabecular bone in GC-OP, just as in postmenopausal OP. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the antifracture efficacy of bisphosphonates, notably alendronate and risedronate. Preventative and curative therapy of GC-OP should be maintained as long as the patient is on GC treatment and could be stopped after weaning from GC, because there is more than circumstantial evidence of some recovery of BMD when GCs are stopped. There is no indication in GC-OP for any combination of two antiresorptive agents (except for calcium and vitamin D) or for an antiresorptive and an anabolic agent. There is indeed no proof that the increased costs of combined treatments will translate into increased therapeutic efficacy.

Boonen S, Body JJ, Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM, Rozenberg S, Reginster JY. · Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases, Katholieke University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #15726235 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Lekkerkerker F, Kanis JA, Alsayed N, Bouvenot G, Burlet N, Cahall D, Chines A, Delmas P, Dreiser RL, Ethgen D, Hughes N, Kaufman JM, Korte S, Kreutz G, Laslop A, Mitlak B, Rabenda V, Rizzoli R, Santora A, Schimmer R, Tsouderos Y, Viethel P, Reginster JY, Anonymous00251. · No affiliation provided · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #17585359 No free full text.

Abstract: SUMMARY: Adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications is currently low and is associated with poor anti-fracture efficacy. This manuscript reviews the potential design of clinical studies that aim to demonstrate improved adherence, with new chemical entities to be used in the management of osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: Several medications have been unequivocally shown to decrease fracture rates in clinical trials. However, in real life settings, long-term persistence and compliance to anti-osteoporosis medication is poor, hence decreasing the clinical benefits for patients. METHODS: An extensive search of Medline from 1985 to 2006 retrieved all trials including the keywords osteoporosis, compliance, persistence or adherence followed by a critical appraisal of the data obtained through a consensus expert meeting. RESULTS: The impact of non-adherence on the clinical development of interventions is reviewed, so that clinicians, regulatory agencies and reimbursement agencies might be better informed of the problem, in order to stimulate the necessary research to document adherence. CONCLUSION: Adherence to therapy is a major problem in the treatment of osteoporosis. Both patients and medication factors are involved. Adherence studies are an important aspect of outcomes studies, but study methodologies are not well developed at the moment and should be improved. Performing adherence studies will be stimulated when registration authorities accept the result of these studies and include the relevant information in Sect. 5.1 of the summary of product characteristics. Reimbursement authorities might also consider such studies as important information for decisions on reimbursement.

Reginster JY, Abadie E, Delmas P, Rizzoli R, Dere W, der Auwera P, Avouac B, Brandi ML, Daifotis A, Diez-Perez A, Calvo G, Johnell O, Kaufman JM, Kreutz G, Laslop A, Lekkerkerker F, Mitlak B, Nilsson P, Orloff J, Smillie M, Taylor A, Tsouderos Y, Ethgen D, Flamion B. · No affiliation provided · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #16091835 No free full text.

Abstract: Recent advances in the understanding of the epidemiology of osteoporosis suggest that certain parts of the current European guidelines for the registration of drugs in osteoporosis might be no longer substantiated. The object of this review is to provide the European regulatory authorities with an evidence-based working document providing suggestions for the revision of the "Note for guidance for the approval of drugs to be used in postmenopausal osteoporosis" (CPMP/EWP/552/95). Following an extensive review of the literature (1990-2004), the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) organized a workshop including European regulators, academic scientists and representatives of the pharmaceutical industry. The outcomes of this meeting reflect the personal views of those who attended and should not, in any case, be seen as an official position paper of any regulatory agency. The group identified a certain number of points that deserve discussion. They mainly relate to the nature of the indication being granted to new chemical entities (treatment of osteoporosis in women at high risk of fracture instead of prevention and treatment of osteoporosis), the requirements of showing an anti-fracture efficacy on all or on major nonvertebral fractures (instead of the hip), the duration of pivotal trials (2 years instead of 3) and the possibility of considering bridging studies for new routes of administration, new doses or new regimens of previously approved drugs. The group also recommends that an indication could be granted for the treatment of osteoporosis in males on the basis of a placebo-controlled study, with bone mineral density changes after 1 year as the primary endpoint, for medications approved in the treatment of osteoporosis in women at high risk of fractures.

Delmas PD, Calvo G, Boers M, Abadie E, Avouac B, Kahan A, Kaufman JM, Laslop A, Lekkerkerker JF, Nilsson P, Van Zwieten-Boot B, Kreutz G, Reginster JY, Anonymous00178. · INSERM Research Unit 403 and Claude Bernard University of Lyon, France. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #11878450 No free full text.

Abstract: Registration of new agents for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has been based over the past few years on placebo-controlled phase III trials with the incidence of patients with new vertebral/nonvertebral fractures as the most usual primary endpoint. The use of a placebo in diseases where an active treatment is available has been a matter of debate following the update of the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association which questioned this trial design. Current regulatory recommendations within the European Union suggest that placebo-controlled trials are still the best option when assessing the efficacy and safety of new drugs intended for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This suggestion seems to be in apparent contradiction with the current content of the Declaration of Helsinki. This paper addresses the ethics and feasibility of placebo-controlled trials in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, in the light of available therapeutic options, and discusses possible alternative approaches in those patients where placebo treatment could be deemed to be unethical. It is concluded that placebo-controlled trials remain the most efficient design to establish the efficacy and safety of a new agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Such trials are feasible and ethically acceptable in patients with osteoporosis but without prevalent vertebral fractures. Conversely, in patients with prevalent vertebral fractures, placebo-controlled trials are ethically questionable and non-inferiority trials are more appropriate. A relative margin of non-inferiority of 20-30% is suggested, to be discussed on a case by case basis.

Kaufman JM, Goemaere S. · Ghent University Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Gent, Belgium. · Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. · Pubmed #19028357 No free full text.

Abstract: About one in three osteoporotic fractures occur in men, and the consequences of fractures are more severe in men. However, only too few men at high risk of fracture are detected and treated. There is no consensus definition of osteoporosis in men based on bone mineral density (BMD), and therapeutic decisions should be based on absolute fracture risk as estimated from age, BMD, fracture history, and additional clinical risk factors. In men, secondary osteoporosis deserves particular attention. Genetically determined alterations of bone mass acquisition during growth are involved in idiopathic osteoporosis in the young, whereas senile osteoporosis involves progressive bone loss throughout adult life. Estradiol appears to be the predominant sex steroid involved in regulation of bone maturation and metabolism. The evidence base for the long-term efficacy and safety of therapies for osteoporosis in men, including the bone-active agents (i.e. bisphosphonates and teriparatide), is limited, so that they should be applied with discernment based on clinical judgement and careful estimation of fracture risk.

Body JJ, Bergmann P, Boonen S, Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Reginster JY, Rozenberg S, Kaufman JM. · Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann and Institute J Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 4 place van Gehuchten, Brussels 1020, Belgium. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #17690930 No free full text.

Abstract: Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is one of the most important side effects of adjuvant antineoplastic treatment in hormone-dependent neoplasms. Chemotherapy, GnRH analogs and tamoxifen can induce marked bone loss in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are replacing tamoxifen as the preferred treatment for postmenopausal women. As a class effect, steroidal (exemestane) and non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) AIs increase bone turnover and cause bone loss (4%-5% over 2 years). When compared to tamoxifen, the risk of getting a clinical fracture under AI treatment is increased by 35%-50%. In patients with prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases bone turnover, reduces bone mass (4%-5% per year) and increases the fracture rate depending on the duration of therapy. Zoledronic acid can prevent accelerated bone loss induced by goserelin in premenopausal women, by letrozole in postmenopausal women and by ADT in men. More limited data indicate that weekly alendronate or risedronate could also be effective for preventing CTIBL. Initiation of therapy early, prior to the occurrence of severe osteoporosis, rather than after, may be more effective. Bisphosphonate treatment should be considered in osteoporotic but also in osteopenic patients if other risk factor(s) for fractures are present.

Szulc P, Kaufman JM, Delmas PD. · INSERM Research Unit 831, University of Lyon, Lyon, France. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #17566813 No free full text.

Abstract: SUMMARY: Osteoporosis in men is less studied than in women. Few data concern biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM) in men and their potential use. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated papers concerning BTM in men cited on Medline. Selection of studies were based on the number of subjects, age range, group homogeneity, follow-up duration, number of BTM. RESULTS: BTM levels are high in young men, then decrease with age.In elderly men, bone resorption increases with age more than bone formation. Variability of individual values is high and their significance is unclear. In elderly men, BTM levels correlate negatively with bone mineral density suggesting that accelerated bone turnover underlies age-related bone loss. Data on the prediction of accelerated bone loss and fractures by BTM in men are scant. Testosterone treatment induces a decrease in bone resorption followed by a decrease in bone formation. Bisphosphonates and calcitonin decrease BTM levels in osteoporotic men. Parathyroid hormone 1-34 and growth hormone induce a rapid increase in bone turnover followed by a progressive slowdown. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies concern BTM in men. Currently available data are not sufficient to suggest guidelines for the practical use of BTM in the clinical management of the osteoporosis in elderly men.

Kaufman JM. · Département d'Endocrinologie et Unité d'Ostéoporose et Métabolisme Osseux, Hôpital Universitaire de Gand, De Pintelaan 185 B-9000 Gand, Belgique. · Ann Endocrinol (Paris). · Pubmed #12773951 No free full text.

Abstract: Elderly men are at substantial risk for fracture. Morbidity after osteoporotic fractures appears to be more serious and mortality more common in men than in women. Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in men appear to be qualitatively similar to those in women. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is an important risk factor for fracture in men; however, further clarification of the relationship between BMD, bone geometry and fracture risk is needed. Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying senile bone loss and the pathogenesis of senile osteoporosis in men remains fragmentary with, in particular, the need for further clarification regarding the precise impact of hormonal status in elderly men on skeletal homeostasis. Nevertheless, the available evidence indicates a role for both testosterone and estrogens in the regulation of bone metabolism in elderly men. Recommendations concerning prevention and treatment of senile osteoporosis in men should focus on the minimization of known risk factors for bone loss and falls. Testosterone treatment may be useful only in those men with initially low serum testosterone. As to other pharmacological treatment modalities, prospective trials specifically in elderly men, and preferably with fracture incidence as the primary clinical endpoint, are required.

Kaufman JM, Johnell O, Abadie E, Adami S, Audran M, Avouac B, Sedrine WB, Calvo G, Devogelaer JP, Fuchs V, Kreutz G, Nilsson P, Pols H, Ringe J, Van Haelst L, Reginster JY. · Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11005775 links to  free full text

Abstract: Male osteoporosis represents an important, although long underestimated, public health problem. Both in men and in women aging is accompanied by continuous bone loss and by an exponential increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fracture, with a female to male incidence ratio of about 2 to 3 to 1 in the elderly for hip and vertebral fractures. Morbidity after osteoporotic fractures appears to be more serious and mortality more common in men than in women. To date, no single treatment has been proved to be effective and safe in published prospective studies. The present report, based on a systematic search of the literature on male osteoporosis, summarises the state of the art on the clinical consequences of male osteoporosis and its risk factors, in relation to the present state of knowledge about female osteoporosis. This constitutes the background for the design of rational clinical development strategies for therapeutic interventions in male osteoporosis. From this review of the literature it is apparent that notwithstanding the existing sex differences in pathophysiology of osteoporosis and the difference in age-specific incidence of osteoporotic fractures, there are also important similarities between osteoporosis in women and men. The higher incidence of fracture in women than in men results from quantitative differences in risk factors rather than from different risk factors. Even though there are sex differences in bone geometry, incidence of fracture seems to be similar in men and women for a same absolute areal bone mineral density. However, the lack of data on the changes in fracture rates in men resulting from pharmacological intervention, leading to changes in bone mineral density or bone turnover, remains the main limitation for extrapolation of established treatment outcomes from women to men.

Reginster JY, Bruyere O, Audran M, Avouac B, Body JJ, Bouvenot G, Brandi ML, Gennari C, Kaufman JM, Lemmel EM, Vanhaelst L, Weryha G, Devogelaer JP. · No affiliation provided · Calcif Tissue Int. · Pubmed #10954771 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Kaufman JM, Compston J, Audran MA, Avouac B, Devogelaer JP, Lemmel EM, Vanhaelst L, Reginster JY. · Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium. · Calcif Tissue Int. · Pubmed #10369725 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Seeman E, Vellas B, Benhamou C, Aquino JP, Semler J, Kaufman JM, Hoszowski K, Varela AR, Fiore C, Brixen K, Reginster JY, Boonen S. · Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Australia. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #16813532 No free full text.

Abstract: Strontium ranelate produces an early and sustained reduction of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in patients > or = 80 years of age. INTRODUCTION: About 25-30% of the population burden of all fragility fractures in the community arise from women > or = 80 years of age, because this population is at high risk for all types of fracture, particularly nonvertebral fractures. Despite this, evidence that therapies reduce the risk of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in this group is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine whether strontium ranelate, an agent that reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women >50 years of age, also reduces fractures in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis based on preplanned pooling of data from two international, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies (the Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention [SOTI] and TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis [TROPOS]) included 1488 women between 80 and 100 years of age followed for 3 years. Yearly spinal X-rays were performed in 895 patients. Only radiographically confirmed nonvertebral fractures were included. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ in placebo and treatment arms. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical (symptomatic vertebral and nonvertebral) fractures was reduced within 1 year by 59% (p = 0.002), 41% (p = 0.027), and 37% (p = 0.012), respectively. At the end of 3 years, vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical fracture risks were reduced by 32% (p = 0.013), 31% (p = 0.011), and 22% (p = 0.040), respectively. The medication was well tolerated, and the safety profile was similar to that in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with strontium ranelate safely reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis > or = 80 years of age. Even in the oldest old, it is not too late to reduce fracture risk.

Kaufman JM, Orwoll E, Goemaere S, San Martin J, Hossain A, Dalsky GP, Lindsay R, Mitlak BH. · Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, 9K121E, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #15322742 No free full text.

Abstract: Teriparatide (rhPTH[1-34]), a bone-forming agent for the treatment of osteoporosis, increases bone mineral density in men and women, and reduces the risk of fractures in women with osteoporosis. However, fracture efficacy has not yet been confirmed in men. Further, there is limited information on the effect of withdrawal of teriparatide. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on bone mineral density and vertebral fracture incidence during a 42-month observation period, from the baseline of the previously reported treatment study in men [1] through 30 months of posttreatment follow-up. Three hundred fifty-five men who were treated with once-daily self-injections of either placebo or 20 or 40 microg of teriparatide participated in the follow-up study. Bone mineral density gradually decreased following discontinuation of teriparatide therapy. However, the lumbar spine and total hip values remained significantly higher than baseline after 30 months of follow-up (p< or =0.001). Antiresorptive treatment prevented the decline and tended to further increase bone mineral density. Lateral thoracic lumbar radiographs obtained at baseline and 18 months after discontinuation of teriparatide were available for 279 men. Of these men, 11.7% assigned to placebo, 5.4% treated with teriparatide 20 microg, and 6.0% treated with teriparatide 40 microg had an incident vertebral fracture. In the combined teriparatide treated groups vs placebo, the risk of vertebral fracture was reduced 51% (nonsignificant, p=0.07). The incidence of moderate or severe fractures was significantly reduced by 83% (p=0.01). In conclusion, men who received teriparatide and who may have received follow-up antiresorptive therapy had a decreased risk of moderate and severe vertebral fractures.

T'Sjoen G, Goemaere S, De Meyere M, Kaufman JM. · Unit of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease, Department of Endocrinology and Primary Health Care, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent 9000, Belgium. · Psychoneuroendocrinology. · Pubmed #14604601 No free full text.

Abstract: Aging in men is associated with a progressive but variable decline in androgen production. In aging men there is also an increased occurrence of symptoms such as lack of concentration, nervousness, impaired memory, depressive mood, insomnia, lack of energy and general sense of well-being, decreased libido and erectile dysfunction, periodic sweating, bone and joint complaints, reduction of strength and increased adiposity. This ill-defined male climacterium syndrome is often referred to as "andropause", with the underlying implication that it is at least in part related to (relative) androgen deficiency. Recently an "aging males" symptoms' (AMS) rating scale was developed aimed at a more systematic description of severity of symptoms related to a clinically defined "male climacteric". We studied the relationship of male climacteric symptoms as assessed by the AMS with androgen levels and other questionnaires assessing the perception of health and well-being. Serum levels of sex steroids, sex hormone binding globulin and gonadotropins were measured in blood samples of 161 healthy, ambulatory, elderly men, aged 74-89 years who also completed the AMS scale. Mean value of total, free and bioavailable testosterone in this group was 401.6, 6.8 and 151.4 ng/dl, respectively, with 24.7, 32.4 and 52.2% of the values under the normal range for young men. The results of the AMS scores mostly suggested mild psychological and mild to moderate somatovegetative symptoms. However, clear sexual symptoms were reported in 88% of cases. None of the three AMS domain scale scores significantly correlated with testosterone, free testosterone or bioavailable testosterone. Significant correlations were observed between results for the AMS scores and those for other health questionnaires, but none of the subscores for the latter questionnaires correlated with androgen serum levels. In conclusion, the results of this study have shown that, as assessed by the AMS, healthy ambulatory elderly males over 70 had a high perception of sexual symptoms with mild psychological and mild to moderate somatovegetative symptoms. These data failed to support the view that in healthy elderly men, "climacteric symptoms" can predict androgen levels.

Orwoll ES, Scheele WH, Paul S, Adami S, Syversen U, Diez-Perez A, Kaufman JM, Clancy AD, Gaich GA. · Bone and Mineral Research Unit, Oregon Health and Sciences University and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #12510800 No free full text.

Abstract: Teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] increases bone mineral density and reduces the risk of vertebral fracture in women. We randomized 437 men with spine or hip bone mineral density more than 2 SD below the young adult male mean to daily injections of placebo, teriparatide 20 microg, or teriparatide 40 microg. All subjects also received supplemental calcium and vitamin D. The study was stopped after a median duration of 11 months because of a finding of osteosarcomas in rats in routine toxicology studies. Biochemical markers of bone formation increased early in the course of therapy and were followed by increases in indices of osteoclastic activity. Spine bone mineral density was greater than in placebo subjects after 3 months of teriparatide therapy, and by the end of therapy it was increased by 5.9% (20 microg) and 9.0% (40 microg) above baseline (p < 0.001 vs. placebo for both comparisons). Femoral neck bone mineral density increased 1.5% (20 microg; p = 0.029) and 2.9% (40 microg; p < 0.001), and whole body bone mineral content increased 0.6% (20 microg; p = 0.021) and 0.9% (40 microg;p = 0.005) above baseline in the teriparatide subjects. There was no change in radial bone mineral density in the teriparatide groups. Bone mineral density responses to teriparatide were similar regardless of gonadal status, age, baseline bone mineral density, body mass index, smoking, or alcohol intake. Subjects experienced expected changes in mineral metabolism. Adverse events were similar in the placebo and 20-microg groups, but more frequent in the 40-microg group. This study shows that teriparatide treatment results in an increase in bone mineral density and is a potentially useful therapy for osteoporosis in men.

Reid IR, Brown JP, Burckhardt P, Horowitz Z, Richardson P, Trechsel U, Widmer A, Devogelaer JP, Kaufman JM, Jaeger P, Body JJ, Brandi ML, Broell J, Di Micco R, Genazzani AR, Felsenberg D, Happ J, Hooper MJ, Ittner J, Leb G, Mallmin H, Murray T, Ortolani S, Rubinacci A, Saaf M, Samsioe G, Verbruggen L, Meunier PJ. · Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #11870242 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are effective agents for the management of osteoporosis. Their low bioavailability and low potency necessitate frequent administration on an empty stomach, which may reduce compliance. Gastrointestinal intolerance limits maximal dosing. Although intermittent intravenous treatments have been used, the optimal doses and dosing interval have not been systematically explored. METHODS: We studied the effects of five regimens of zoledronic acid, the most potent bisphosphonate, on bone turnover and density in 351 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density in a one-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Women received placebo or intravenous zoledronic acid in doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, or 1 mg at three-month intervals. In addition, one group received a total annual dose of 4 mg as a single dose, and another received two doses of 2 mg each, six months apart. Lumbar-spine bone mineral density was the primary end point. RESULTS: There were similar increases in bone mineral density in all the zoledronic acid groups to values for the spine that were 4.3 to 5.1 percent higher than those in the placebo group (P<0.001) and values for the femoral neck that were 3.1 to 3.5 percent higher than those in the placebo group (P<0.001). Biochemical markers of bone resorption were significantly suppressed throughout the study in all zoledronic acid groups. Myalgia and pyrexia occurred more commonly in the zoledronic acid groups, but treatment-related dropout rates were similar to that in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid infusions given at intervals of up to one year produce effects on bone turnover and bone density as great as those achieved with daily oral dosing with bisphosphonates with proven efficacy against fractures, suggesting that an annual infusion of zoledronic acid might be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Adachi JD, Saag KG, Delmas PD, Liberman UA, Emkey RD, Seeman E, Lane NE, Kaufman JM, Poubelle PE, Hawkins F, Correa-Rotter R, Menkes CJ, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Schnitzer TJ, Block JA, Wing J, McIlwain HH, Westhovens R, Brown J, Melo-Gomes JA, Gruber BL, Yanover MJ, Leite MO, Siminoski KG, Nevitt MC, Sharp JT, Malice MP, Dumortier T, Czachur M, Carofano W, Daifotis A. · Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11212161 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the continued efficacy and safety of alendronate (ALN) for up to 2 years in patients receiving glucocorticoids. METHODS: This is a 12-month extension of a previously completed 1-year trial of daily ALN, performed to evaluate the effects of ALN over a total of 2 years in 66 men and 142 women continuing to receive at least 7.5 mg of prednisone or equivalent daily. All patients received supplemental calcium and vitamin D. The primary end point was the mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 24 months. Other outcomes included changes in hip and total body BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, radiographic joint damage of the hands, and vertebral fracture incidence. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SEM) lumbar spine BMD increased by 2.8 +/- 0.6%, 3.9 +/- 0.7%, and 3.7 +/- 0.6%, respectively, in the groups that received 5 mg, 10 mg, and 2.5/10 mg of ALN daily (P < or = 0.001) and decreased by -0.8 +/- 0.6% in the placebo group (P not significant) over 24 months. In patients receiving any dose of ALN, BMD was increased at the trochanter (P < or = 0.05) and maintained at the femoral neck. Total body BMD was increased in patients receiving 5 or 10 mg ALN (P < or = 0.01). These 2 dose levels of ALN were more effective than placebo at all sites (P < or = 0.05). Bone turnover markers (N-telopeptides of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) decreased 60% and 25%, respectively, during treatment with ALN (P < or = 0.05). There were fewer patients with new vertebral fractures in the ALN group versus the placebo group (0.7% versus 6.8%; P = 0.026). The safety profile was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Alendronate is an effective, well-tolerated therapy for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, with sustained treatment advantages for up to 2 years.

Taes YE, Lapauw B, Vanbillemont G, Bogaert V, De Bacquer D, Zmierczak H, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM. · Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. · J Clin Endocrinol Metab. · Pubmed #19401374 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: Body weight has been associated with bone mass and bone size through shared genetic determination and environmental influences. Whereas lean mass exerts a positive influence on bone size, the relationship between fat and bone remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to investigate the individual influence of fat mass and lean mass on volumetric bone density and size in young healthy male siblings at age of peak bone mass. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional, population-based sibling pair study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 677 men (25-45 yr) were included in this study with 296 independent pairs of brothers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Areal and volumetric bone parameters were determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Body composition was determined by DXA. Sex steroids, leptin, and adiponectin were determined by immunoassay. RESULTS: Total and regional fat mass were found to be inversely associated with areal bone mass and bone size, independent from lean mass (radius periosteal circumference beta: -0.29 +/- 0.04; P < 0.001). Lean mass was positively associated with bone size but inversely with cortical density at both tibia and radius (P < 0.01). The negative association between total fat mass and bone size was independent from sex steroid concentrations. Leptin but not adiponectin was inversely associated with bone size, but this was no longer significant after adjustment for body fat. CONCLUSIONS: Increased fat mass is associated with smaller bone size, challenging the view of a high bone mass index as a protective factor for osteoporosis, whereas lean mass was a consistent positive determinant of bone size.

Kaufman JM, Ostertag A, Saint-Pierre A, Cohen-Solal M, Boland A, Van Pottelbergh I, Toye K, de Vernejoul MC, Martinez M. · Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 563, Hôpital Purpan, BP 31024 Toulouse, France. · J Clin Endocrinol Metab. · Pubmed #18664539 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: Bone mass is under strong genetic control, with heritability estimates greater than 50% and is likely determined by complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to localize genes contributing to bone mineral density (BMD) variation. DESIGN: An autosomal genome-wide scan for BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck was conducted with variance components linkage methods. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 103 pedigrees (Network in Europe on Male Osteoporosis Family Study) ascertained through a male relative with low (Z-score < or = -2) BMD values at either lumbar spine or femoral neck. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nonparametric multipoint logarithm of the odds ratio scores for lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD values adjusted for age, gender, and body mass index. RESULTS: We identified a total of eight chromosomal regions with logarithm of the odds ratio score of 1.5 or greater (P < or = 5 x 10(-3)): on 1q42-43, 11q12-13, 12q23-24, 17q21-23, 21q22, and 22q11 for lumbar spine and on 5q31-33 and 13q12-14 for femoral neck BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Four of our detected quantitative trait loci (QTL) reached the genome-wide criteria for significant (17q,21-23, P < or = 2 x 10(-5)) or suggestive (11q12-13, 22q11, and 13q12-14, P < or = 7 x 10(-4)) linkage. Apart from 22q11, which is a novel QTL, all other loci provide consistent replication for previously reported QTLs for BMD and other bone-related traits. Finally, several of our specific-linkage areas encompass prominent candidate genes: type 1 collagen (COL1A1) and the sclerosteosis/van Buchem disease (SOST) genes on 17q21-23; the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene on 11q12-13; and the rank ligand gene on 13q12-14. Further analysis of these positive regions by fine linkage disequilibrium mapping is thus warranted.

Kaptoge S, da Silva JA, Brixen K, Reid DM, Kröger H, Nielsen TL, Andersen M, Hagen C, Lorenc R, Boonen S, de Vernejoul MC, Stepan JJ, Adams J, Kaufman JM, Reeve J. · Department of Medicine and Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Wort's Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK. · Bone. · Pubmed #18519175 No free full text.

Abstract: We collected population-based young normal hip and spine BMD data from 17 centres across Europe to assess between centre differences and to compare reference values with the US NHANES-III data. There was strong evidence of between country heterogeneity, but not between centres within countries. Hip BMD mean values were lower in European women, but SD's differed little from the NHANES-III USA results in both sexes. It may be necessary to adjust NHANES-III based T-scores by adding/subtracting a country-specific adjustment factor. INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear whether young normal BMD reference values specific to an American population can be validly used for T-score calculation in Europeans. METHODS: We collected population based BMD data from 1163 men and 329 women aged 19-29 years from 17 centres across Europe to compare mean and SD values with the NHANES-III study USA results. BMD(g/cm2) was measured at the hip and spine using DXA densitometers cross-calibrated with the European Spine Phantom (ESP). The only exclusions were for technically inadequate scans. A linear regression model was used to derive reference values. To allow for direct comparison with published NHANES III study data, the cross-calibrated BMD values were converted using the ESP equations to Hologic QDR 1000 units. RESULTS: In men, the overall mean(SD) BMD values expressed in Hologic-QDR1000 units of measurement, were: femoral neck 0.912(0.132); trochanter 0.793(0.124); and L2-L4 spine 1.027(0.123). The respective estimates in women were: 0.826(0.115); 0.670(0.093); and 0.983(0.107). However the I2 statistic for heterogeneity indicated moderate to strong evidence of between-centre heterogeneity. There was, however, no significant heterogeneity observed between centres within countries, suggesting that this variation arose from national differences. Compared to the NHANES III population-based US data, the mean values in women were significantly lower at both sites due to some lower national European means. However, at all sites and in both sexes the SD's were very similar between the US and Europe. There was some evidence that recruiting volunteers resulted in biased values in women. CONCLUSION: Our T-score normal values for the lumbar spine (L2-L4) should be more reliable for spine-specific risk assessment than some non-representative normal ranges, and should be evaluated for that purpose in Europe. If T-scores are to be used to compare individual data with ranges seen in normal young subjects of the same nationality, it may be necessary to adjust femoral NHANES III-based T-scores by adding (or subtracting) a country-specific adjustment factor. In risk assessment it is probably sufficient to use NHANES III-based hip T-scores, as supplied for the hip by densitometer manufacturers, interpreting them in light of recent international meta-analysis data on the relationship between BMD and fracture risk.

Willaert A, Van Pottelbergh I, Zmierczak H, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM, De Paepe A, Coucke P. · Department of Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. · Eur J Hum Genet. · Pubmed #18285824 links to  free full text

Abstract: Osteoporotic fractures are an increasing cause of mortality and morbidity in ageing populations. A major risk determinant for these fractures is bone mineral density (BMD). Variation on BMD is thought, on the basis of twin and family studies, to be subject to a large amount of genetic variation and it has been hypothesised that this may be due to the influence of multiple genes. However, in families showing segregation of low or high BMD, single major genes have been shown to play a crucial role. We performed a genome-wide screen using 380 microsatellite markers in a single extended family (n=34) in which early-onset low spinal areal BMD segregates in an autosomal dominant-like fashion. A two-point linkage analysis was performed, revealing a maximum LOD score of 3.07 on 1p36.3 (D1S468), confirming results of previous linkage studies of BMD, while no other suggestive linkage peaks (LOD>2.2) were detected elsewhere in the genome. Microsatellite markers were subsequently genotyped for a +/-6.9 Mb region surrounding D1S468. This revealed critical recombination events restricting the candidate region to 1.2 Mb and 19 genes. Sequencing analysis of the coding region of candidate genes WDR8 and EGFL3 revealed no mutations or disease-associated polymorphisms. Our results provide some evidence supporting the hypothesis that there are genetic determinants for spinal BMD on 1p36.3. Although no specific disease causing mutation has yet been found, the delineation of a relatively small candidate region in a single extended family opens perspectives to identify a major gene for spinal BMD.

Bruyere O, Roux C, Detilleux J, Slosman DO, Spector TD, Fardellone P, Brixen K, Devogelaer JP, Diaz-Curiel M, Albanese C, Kaufman JM, Pors-Nielsen S, Reginster JY. · World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspect of Osteoarticular Disorders, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium. · J Clin Endocrinol Metab. · Pubmed #17566094 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyze the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) changes and fracture incidence during 3-yr treatment with strontium ranelate. PATIENTS: Women from the strontium ranelate arm of the Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study and the TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis study were evaluated. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures included BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total proximal femur assessed at baseline and after a follow-up of 1 and 3 yr; semiquantitative visual assessment of vertebral fractures; and nonvertebral fractures based on written documentation. RESULTS: After 3 yr of strontium ranelate treatment, each percentage point increase in femoral neck and total proximal femur BMD was associated with a 3% (95% adjusted confidence interval, 1-5%) and 2% (1-4%) reduction in risk of a new vertebral fracture, respectively. The 3-yr changes in femoral neck and total proximal femur BMD explained 76% and 74%, respectively, of the reduction in vertebral fractures observed during the treatment. Three-year changes in spine BMD were not statistically associated with the incidence of new vertebral fracture (P = 0.10). No significant associations were found between 3-yr changes in BMD and incidence of new nonvertebral fractures, but a trend was found for femoral neck BMD (P = 0.09) and for total proximal femur BMD (P = 0.07). An increase in femoral neck BMD after 1 yr was significantly associated with the reduction in incidence of new vertebral fractures observed after 3 yr (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: During 3-yr strontium ranelate treatment, an increase in femoral neck BMD was associated with a proportional reduction in vertebral fracture incidence.

Goemaere S, Vanderschueren D, Kaufman JM, Reginster JY, Boutsen Y, Poriau S, Callens J, Raeman F, Depresseux G, Borghs H, Devogelaer JP, Boonen S, Anonymous00357, Anonymous00358. · Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #17289523 No free full text.

Abstract: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements from different manufacturers provide different bone mineral density (BMD) values and derived T-scores and Z-scores. These differences result partly from technical differences in the algorithms for the determination of bone mineral content and bone area and partly from the use of different manufacturer-derived reference databases. The present study was to implement a uniform expression of BMD in all male patients by using standardized BMD (sBMD) values and referring to a newly established national male reference sample. In 8 bone densitometry centers throughout Belgium 229 young healthy men were measured on Hologic (Bedford, MA) or GE-Lunar (Madison, WI) bone densitometers. Quality control procedures were implemented and site cross-calibration performed using the European Spine Phantom. Absolute BMD values were converted to standardized values by validated formulas (sBMD). Clinically acceptable between-center differences were noted. No discrepancy was observed in terms of mean sBMD and standard deviations at the lumbar spine and proximal femur between the Belgian and the US reference populations. Region-specific sBMD thresholds for the diagnosis of male osteoporosis were calculated. The current data provide a basis to implement a nation-wide, uniform expression of BMD in male patients and allow harmonization of the BMD-based diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men.