Osteoporosis: Hans D

Krieg MA, Barkmann R, Gonnelli S, Stewart A, Bauer DC, Del Rio Barquero L, Kaufman JJ, Lorenc R, Miller PD, Olszynski WP, Poiana C, Schott AM, Lewiecki EM, Hans D. · Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. <> · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18442758 No free full text.

Abstract: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used in the care of patients for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis, low bone mass (osteopenia), or normal bone density; assessment of fracture risk; and monitoring changes in bone density over time. The development of other technologies for the evaluation of skeletal health has been associated with uncertainties regarding their applications in clinical practice. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), a technology for measuring properties of bone at peripheral skeletal sites, is more portable and less expensive than DXA, without the use of ionizing radiation. The proliferation of QUS devices that are technologically diverse, measuring and reporting variable bone parameters in different ways, examining different skeletal sites, and having differing levels of validating data for association with DXA-measured bone density and fracture risk, has created many challenges in applying QUS for use in clinical practice. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) 2007 Position Development Conference (PDC) addressed clinical applications of QUS for fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment initiation, monitoring of treatment, and quality assurance/quality control. The ISCD Official Positions on QUS resulting from this PDC, the rationale for their establishment, and recommendations for further study are presented here.

Zemel B, Bass S, Binkley T, Ducher G, Macdonald H, McKay H, Moyer-Mileur L, Shepherd J, Specker B, Ward K, Hans D. · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18442753 No free full text.

Abstract: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) has mainly been used as a research tool in children. To evaluate the clinical utility of pQCT and formulate recommendations for its use in children, the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convened a task force to review the literature and propose areas of consensus and future research. The types of pQCT technology available, the clinical application of pQCT for bone health assessment in children, the important elements to be included in a pQCT report, and quality control monitoring techniques were evaluated. The review revealed a lack of standardization of pQCT techniques, and a paucity of data regarding differences between pQCT manufacturers, models and software versions and their impact in pediatric assessment. Measurement sites varied across studies. Adequate reference data, a critical element for interpretation of pQCT results, were entirely lacking, although some comparative data on healthy children were available. The elements of the pQCT clinical report and quality control procedures are similar to those recommended for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Future research is needed to establish evidence-based criteria for the selection of the measurement site, scan acquisition and analysis parameters, and outcome measures. Reference data that sufficiently characterize the normal range of variability in the population also need to be established.

Hans D, Downs RW, Duboeuf F, Greenspan S, Jankowski LG, Kiebzak GM, Petak SM, Anonymous00365. · Nuaclear Medicine Division, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #16731427 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions to assist healthcare providers in addressing some of the issues inherent with the use of bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to diagnose osteoporosis, apply World Health Organization (WHO) T-score classifications, and monitor BMD changes over time. Differences exist, however, between the ISCD Official Position statement and that of the International Osteoporosis Foundation with respect to WHO criteria for skeletal sites. Consequently, a subcommittee of the ISCD was directed to address the application of the WHO classifications to specific skeletal sites and regions of interest. In 2005, the ISCD Position Development Conference reviewed the findings and prepared Official Positions, which address whether or not: (1) the lowest T-score of the total proximal femur, femoral neck, trochanter, and spine should continue to be used for diagnosis; (2) the WHO classification may be applied to a single vertebral body T-score; and (3) the ISCD should endorse the use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database for proximal femur T-score derivation. The resulting ISCD Official Positions, with their corresponding rationales and evidence are provided here, as well as questions that will need to be addressed in the future.

Glüer CC, Hans D. · No affiliation provided · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #10450405 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Hans D, Krieg MA. · Orthopedic Department , Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. · Salud Publica Mex. · Pubmed #19287890 links to  free full text

Abstract: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) appears to be developing into an acceptable, low-cost and readily-accessible alternative to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the detection and management of osteoporosis. Perhaps the major difficulty with their widespread use is that many different QUS devices exist that differ substantially from each other, in terms of the parameters they measure and the strength of empirical evidence supporting their use. But another problem is that virtually no data exist outside of Caucasian or Asian populations. In general, heel QUS appears to be most tested and most effective. Some, but not all heel QUS devices are effective assessing fracture risk in some, but not all populations, the evidence being strongest for Caucasian females > 55 years old, though some evidence exists for Asian females > 55 and for Caucasian and Asian males > 70. Certain devices may allow to estimate the likelihood of osteoporosis, but very limited evidence exists supporting QUS use during the initiation or monitoring of osteoporosis treatment. Likely, QUS is most effective when combined with an assessment of clinical risk factors (CRF); with DXA reserved for individuals who are not identified as either high or low risk using QUS and CRF. However, monitoring and maintenance of test and instrument accuracy, precision and reproducibility are essential if QUS devices are to be used in clinical practice; and further scientific research in non-Caucasian, non-Asian populations clearly is compulsory to validate this tool for more widespread use.

Hans D, Krieg MA. · Dept. of Bone & Joint, Lausanne Univ. Hosp., Lausanne, Switzerland. · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. · Pubmed #18986943 No free full text.

Abstract: For the detection and management of osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is emerging as a relatively low-cost and readily accessible alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in certain circumstances. The following is a brief, but thorough review of the existing literature with respect to the use of QUS in 6 settings: 1) assessing fragility fracture risk; 2) diagnosing osteoporosis; 3) initiating osteoporosis treatment; 4) monitoring osteoporosis treatment; 5) osteoporosis case finding; and 6) quality assurance and control. Many QUS devices exist that are quite different with respect to the parameters they measure and the strength of empirical evidence supporting their use. In general, heel QUS appears to be most tested and most effective. Overall, some, but not all, heel QUS devices are effective assessing fracture risk in some, but not all, populations, the evidence being strongest for Caucasian females over 55 years old. Otherwise, the evidence is fair with respect to certain devices allowing for the accurate diagnosis of likelihood of osteoporosis, and generally fair to poor in terms of QUS use when initiating or monitoring osteoporosis treatment. A reasonable protocol is proposed herein for case-finding purposes, which relies on a combined assessment of clinical risk factors (CR.F) and heel QUS. Finally, several recommendations are made for quality assurance and control.

Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Glüer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg MA, La Croix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott AM, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts NB, Yoshimura N. · WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #17323110 No free full text.

Abstract: SUMMARY: BMD and clinical risk factors predict hip and other osteoporotic fractures. The combination of clinical risk factors and BMD provide higher specificity and sensitivity than either alone. INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESES: To develop a risk assessment tool based on clinical risk factors (CRFs) with and without BMD. METHODS: Nine population-based studies were studied in which BMD and CRFs were documented at baseline. Poisson regression models were developed for hip fracture and other osteoporotic fractures, with and without hip BMD. Fracture risk was expressed as gradient of risk (GR, risk ratio/SD change in risk score). RESULTS: CRFs alone predicted hip fracture with a GR of 2.1/SD at the age of 50 years and decreased with age. The use of BMD alone provided a higher GR (3.7/SD), and was improved further with the combined use of CRFs and BMD (4.2/SD). For other osteoporotic fractures, the GRs were lower than for hip fracture. The GR with CRFs alone was 1.4/SD at the age of 50 years, similar to that provided by BMD (GR = 1.4/SD) and was not markedly increased by the combination (GR = 1.4/SD). The performance characteristics of clinical risk factors with and without BMD were validated in eleven independent population-based cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The models developed provide the basis for the integrated use of validated clinical risk factors in men and women to aid in fracture risk prediction.

Durosier C, Hans D, Krieg MA, Schott AM. · Nuclear Medicine Division, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Medical Information Department, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #17097535 No free full text.

Abstract: Osteoporotic hip fractures increase dramatically with age and are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Several treatments to prevent the occurrence of hip fracture have been validated in large randomized trials and the current challenge is to improve the identification of individuals at high risk of fracture who would benefit from therapeutic or preventive intervention. We have performed an exhaustive literature review on hip fracture predictors, focusing primarily on clinical risk factors, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative ultrasound, and bone markers. This review is based on original articles and meta-analyses. We have selected studies that aim both to predict the risk of hip fracture and to discriminate individuals with or without fracture. We have included only postmenopausal women in our review. For studies involving both men and women, only results concerning women have been considered. Regarding clinical factors, only prospective studies have been taken into account. Predictive factors have been used as stand-alone tools to predict hip fracture or sequentially through successive selection processes or by combination into risk scores. There is still much debate as to whether or not the combination of these various parameters, as risk scores or as sequential or concurrent combinations, could help to better predict hip fracture. There are conflicting results on whether or not such combinations provide improvement over each method alone. Sequential combination of bone mineral density and ultrasound parameters might be cost-effective compared with DXA alone, because of fewer bone mineral density measurements. However, use of multiple techniques may increase costs. One problem that precludes comparison of most published studies is that they use either relative risk, or absolute risk, or sensitivity and specificity. The absolute risk of individuals given their risk factors and bone assessment results would be a more appropriate model for decision-making than relative risk. Currently, a group appointed by the World Health Organization and lead by Professor John Kanis is working on such a model. It will therefore be possible to further assess the best choice of threshold to optimize the number of women needed to screen for each country and each treatment.

Lewiecki EM, Kendler DL, Kiebzak GM, Schmeer P, Prince RL, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Hans D. · New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, 300 Oak Street NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #15278247 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) periodically holds Position Development Conferences (PDCs) for the purpose of establishing standards and guidelines for indications, acquisition, and interpretation of bone density tests. Topics are selected for consideration by the ISCD Scientific Advisory Committee, reviewed by scientific working groups, and presented to an international panel of experts. Topic categories addressed to date include indications for bone density testing, selection of reference databases for T-scores and Z-scores, clinical applications for central and peripheral bone densitometry, serial bone density testing, instrument precision assessment, phantom scanning and calibration testing, requirements for a bone density report, nomenclature, and diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, premenopausal women, men, and children. Following an open session for public comment and discussion, the panel convenes for consideration of each topic and makes recommendations for positions to the ISCD Board of Directors. Recommendations that are accepted become the Official Positions of the ISCD. This Special Report summarizes the methodology of the ISCD PDCs and presents selected Official Positions of general interest.

Genant HK, Gordon C, Jiang Y, Link TM, Hans D, Majumdar S, Lang TF. · Osteoporosis and Arthritis Research Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif., 94143-0628, USA. · Horm Res. · Pubmed #11146376 No free full text.

Abstract: Noninvasive and/or nondestructive techniques are capable of providing more macro- or microstructural information about bone than standard bone densitometry. Although the latter provides important information about osteoporotic fracture risk, numerous studies indicate that bone strength is only partially explained by bone mineral density. Quantitative assessment of macro- and microstructural features may improve our ability to estimate bone strength. The methods available for quantitatively assessing macrostructure include (besides conventional radiographs) quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). Methods for assessing microstructure of trabecular bone noninvasively and/or nondestructively include high-resolution computed tomography (hrCT), micro-computed tomography (muCT), high-resolution magnetic resonance (hrMR), and micromagnetic resonance (muMR). vQCT, hrCT and hrMR are generally applicable in vivo; muCT and muMR are principally applicable in vitro. Although considerable progress has been made in the noninvasive and/or nondestructive imaging of the macro- and microstructure of bone, considerable challenges and dilemmas remain. From a technical perspective, the balance between spatial resolution versus sampling size, or between signal-to-noise versus radiation dose or acquisition time, needs further consideration, as do the trade-offs between the complexity and expense of equipment and the availability and accessibility of the methods. The relative merits of in vitro imaging and its ultrahigh resolution but invasiveness versus those of in vivo imaging and its modest resolution but noninvasiveness also deserve careful attention. From a clinical perspective, the challenges for bone imaging include balancing the relative advantages of simple bone densitometry against the more complex architectural features of bone or, similarly, the deeper research requirements against the broader clinical needs. The considerable potential biological differences between the peripheral appendicular skeleton and the central axial skeleton have to be addressed further. Finally, the relative merits of these sophisticated imaging techniques have to be weighed with respect to their applications as diagnostic procedures requiring high accuracy or reliability on one hand and their monitoring applications requiring high precision or reproducibility on the other.

Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK. · Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, USA. · Appl Radiat Isot. · Pubmed #10028639 No free full text.

Abstract: Osteoporosis is a systematic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue which leads to diminished biomechanical competence of the skeleton and low-trauma or atraumatic fractures. Due to increased awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population, the use of bone densitometric techniques is becoming more widespread. Considerable progress has been made in the development of non-invasive methods for the assessment of the skeleton. While DXA and QCT are commonly used techniques, the popularity of other approaches such as RA, SXA and QUS is gaining grounds. QCT has an advantage over the other techniques in its ability to measure the true volumetric density of trabecular or cortical bone. We therefore present an overview of these current techniques for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. In the second section we discuss the radiation doses incurred in BMD measurements by patients and methods for reducing patient and staff radiation exposure are given. Studies of radiation dose to patient from DXA confirms that patient dose is small (0.08-4.6 muSv) compared to that given by many other investigations involving ionizing radiation. Fan beam technology with increased resolution has resulted in increase patient dose radiation dose (6.7-31 muSv) but this is still relatively small. Carrying vertebral morphometry using DXA also incurs less radiation dose (< 60 muSv) than standard lateral radiographs QCT has radiation dose (25-360 muSv) comparable to simple radiological examination such as chest X-ray but lower than imaging CT. Radiation dose from other techniques such as RA and SXA are in the same order of magnitude as pencil beam DXA. For pencil beam DXA and SXA systems the time average dose to staff from scatter is very low even with the operator sitting as close as 1 m from the patient during measurement. However the scatter dose from fan beam DXA systems is considerable higher and approaches limits set by regulator bodies for occupational exposure.

Chevalley T, Bonjour JP, Ferrari S, Hans D, Rizzoli R. · Service of Bone Diseases, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. · J Clin Endocrinol Metab. · Pubmed #15755866 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Calcium supplementation during childhood and adolescence is considered an early means of preventing osteoporosis in adults. Prepuberty is an opportune time for detecting the benefits of calcium in girls. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess whether calcium supplementation increases bone mass gain in prepubertal boys in a skeletal site-specific manner. METHODS: In a 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 1-yr follow-up, 235 healthy prepubertal boys aged 7.4 +/- 0.4 yr (mean +/- sd) were randomized to receive two food products providing 850 mg/d calcium (calcium supplement group, n = 116) or an isocaloric placebo (n = 119). Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at radius (two sites), hip (two sites), femoral diaphysis (FDia), and L2-L4 vertebrae. RESULTS: At 12 months, aBMD gain was greater at the FDia and at the mean of the five appendicular skeletal sites in the calcium supplement group in both intention-to-treat analysis [76 +/- 32 vs. 64 +/- 33 mg/cm(2).yr; difference, 12.0 (95% confidence interval, CI, 3.6-20.3), P = 0.006; and 33 +/- 16 vs. 28 +/- 16 mg/cm(2).yr; difference, 5.1 (95% CI, 0.9-9.2); P = 0.018, respectively] and active treatment analysis [81 +/- 32 vs. 64 +/- 31 mg/cm(2).yr; difference, 17.2 (95% CI, 7.9-26.5); n = 174, P < 0.001; and 35 +/- 16 vs. 28 +/- 14 mg/cm(2).yr; difference, 7.5 (95% CI, 2.9-12.2); P = 0.002]. There was no beneficial effect of calcium on lumbar spine. The calcium effect was still detectable by ANOVA repeated measures analysis at the FDia (P = 0.004) and at the mean of the five appendicular skeletal sites (P = 0.002) 1 yr after the end of intervention (active treatment analysis). There was no change in bone size. CONCLUSION: In prepubertal boys, calcium-enriched foods increased aBMD at several appendicular skeleton sites, but not at the lumbar spine, and this without any bone size change. This effect was maintained 1 yr after treatment discontinuation.

Chevalley T, Rizzoli R, Hans D, Ferrari S, Bonjour JP. · Service of Bone Diseases [WHO Collaborating Center for Osteoporosis Prevention], Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. · J Clin Endocrinol Metab. · Pubmed #15507508 links to  free full text

Abstract: Both late menarcheal age and low calcium intake (Ca intake) during growth are risk factors for osteoporosis, probably by impairing peak bone mass. We investigated whether lasting gain in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in response to increased Ca intake varies according to menarcheal age and, conversely, whether Ca intake could influence menarcheal age. In an initial study, 144 prepubertal girls were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive either a Ca supplement (Ca-suppl.) of 850 mg/d or placebo from age 7.9-8.9 yr. Mean aBMD gain determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at six sites (radius metaphysis, radius diaphysis, femoral neck, trochanter, femoral diaphysis, and L2-L4) was significantly (P = 0.004) greater in the Ca-suppl. than in the placebo group (27 vs. 21 mg/cm(2)). In 122 girls followed up, menarcheal age was recorded, and aBMD was determined at 16.4 yr of age. Menarcheal age was lower in the Ca-suppl. than in the placebo group (P = 0.048). Menarcheal age and Ca intake were negatively correlated (r = -0.35; P < 0.001), as were aBMD gains from age 7.9-16.4 yr and menarcheal age at all skeletal sites (range: r = -0.41 to r = -0.22; P < 0.001 to P = 0.016). The positive effect of Ca-suppl. on the mean aBMD gain from baseline remained significantly greater in girls below, but not in those above, the median of menarcheal age (13.0 yr). Early menarcheal age (12.1 +/- 0.5 yr): placebo, 286 +/- 36 mg/cm(2); Ca-suppl., 317 +/- 46 (P = 0.009); late menarcheal age (13.9 +/- 0.5 yr): placebo, 284 +/- 58; Ca-suppl., 276 +/- 50 (P > 0.05). The level of Ca intake during prepuberty may influence the timing of menarche, which, in turn, could influence long-term bone mass gain in response to Ca supplementation. Thus, both determinants of early menarcheal age and high Ca intake may positively interact on bone mineral mass accrual.

Hans D, Schott AM, Duboeuf F, Durosier C, Meunier PJ, Anonymous00206. · INSERM U 403, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. · Bone. · Pubmed #15268884 No free full text.

Abstract: While the potential of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the management of osteoporosis has been accepted, its interaction with follow-up time has never been investigated. The aim of our study is to prospectively evaluate the influence of follow-up time on the prediction of hip fracture by ultrasound parameters in the elderly as compared to bone mineral density (BMD) and to establish a long-term fracture prediction model. In the multicenter prospective study EPIDOS, 5898 Caucasian healthy women, aged 75 and over, had femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and heel ultrasound measurements at baseline. A survey of fracture occurrence was conducted every 4 months. Statistical analyses were performed for three different average lengths of follow-up, namely, 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 years. Relative risks per standard deviation decrease (RR) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves were given. Estimates of the long-term hip fracture prediction by DXA and QUS were extrapolated. During an average of 3.5 years follow-up, 227 women sustained their first non-traumatic hip fracture. For the three categories of follow-up, low values of both calcaneal ultrasound and hip BMD were associated with a significant increased risk of hip fracture [e.g. ultrasound Stiffness index RR = 2.8 (2.1-3.8), 2.1 (1.7-2.6) and 1.9 (1.7-2.3) for 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 years of follow-up, respectively]. The combination of femoral neck BMD with the Stiffness showed an improvement of the hip fracture prediction model. Using extrapolation, the prediction of hip fracture by the Stiffness remained significant up to 7.5 years [RR = 1.2 (1.03-1.41)], whereas the limit of significance was reached at 10 years for the femoral neck BMD [RR = 1.25 (1.04-1.52)]. Our results indicate that the Stiffness tends to be the best short- and long-term predictor of hip fracture among ultrasound parameters. This paper provides additional information on the long-term prediction of hip fracture, which has always been an important issue in routine clinical practice as it influences the management of the disease. Our model should give a relatively good estimation of the fracture risk prediction at 5 years with the ultrasound and 10 years for the femoral neck BMD.

Hans D, Genton L, Drezner MK, Schott AM, Pacifici R, Avioli L, Slosman DO, Meunier PJ. · Nuclear Medicine Division, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. · Calcif Tissue Int. · Pubmed #12200644 No free full text.

Abstract: Many studies have been done involving exercise, impact loading, and the effect on BMD. In some of these studies, particularly those involving outpatient activity, compliance and the specific parameters of an individual's impact loading have been difficult to monitor effectively. In this study, an individual, home-use platform was used to record daily, specific, and reproducible impact forces generated during a heel drop exercise. At three centers over 24 months, we conducted a randomized, prospective study of 157 osteoporotic and osteopenic women, aged 60-85 years. A total of 99 patients used the home Osteocare device (OrthoGenesis Incorporated, Northborough, Massachusetts USA) to generate a reproducible and specific daily impact program (active group). Controls (32) performed a similar motion on the unit but without trying to trigger an impact force (sham group), and 26 patients did no prescribed heel drop exercise (control group). All groups had the same calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Hip DXA was performed at baseline and every 6 months during the entire study duration. Compliance with the 3-5 min routine was high, and patients were able to consistently achieve the specific targeted impact range. Pooled BMD results showed no significant differences between groups in overall BMD measurements. However, a classification model that looked at individual site-specific BMD changes showed that more than 75% of the active group responded (versus 62% for both the sham and the control groups) by maintaining or increasing site-specific hip BMD over the 2-year trial. In fact, at the end of the study, 45% of the actives were gainers versus 12% and 22% in the sham and control groups, respectively. This study suggests that hip BMD may be maintained through a brief, safe, at-home, monitored impact loading program.

Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, Barkmann R, Njeh CF, Kantorovich E, Glüer CC, Genant HK. · Osteoporosis and Arthritis Research Group, University of California, San Francisco, USA. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #10234587 No free full text.

Abstract: There is a growing interest in the use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements as an alternative to current radiation-based bone densitometry techniques for the noninvasive assessment of fracture risk. While most of the commercialized ultrasound devices measure only single predefined peripheral skeletal sites, the Omnisense prototype (Sunlight Ltd., Israel) can be used on multiple bones, including the spinous processes. In this study, we examined the ability of speed of sound measured at the calcaneus, distal third and ultradistal radius, proximal third phalanx, metacarpal, capitate, patella, and the posterior process of the thoracic spine to differentiate subjects with hip fractures from normal controls. Seventy-nine postmenopausal Caucasian Israeli women who had sustained an atraumatic fracture of the proximal femur within the last 6 months were recruited from the local population (mean age 80 +/- 8.9 years). As controls, 295 postmenopausal Caucasian Israeli women without osteoporotic fractures were also included (mean age 70 +/- 8.7 years). Discrimination of hip fractures with QUS at all ultrasound sites was highly statistically significant (p < 0.01) (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.4-3.0; area under the ROC curve [AUC] 77-92%), except for the hand metacarpal. Distal radius and calcaneus measurements (ORs = 2.4 and 3.0) were the best discriminators of hip fracture patients from controls. Using a forward selective linear regression model, the discriminator values of combined assessment at two sites were investigated. There was moderate improvement in diagnostic value, but the best combination was the calcaneus with the distal radius, which improved the AUC by 3% and raised both the sensitivity and specificity to 94%. These data demonstrate the encouraging potential of improving discrimination of hip fracture by using multiple-site ultrasonic measurements.

Wu SY, Jia HH, Hans D, Lan J, Wang LY, Li JX, Cai YZ. · Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China. · J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. · Pubmed #19585667 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the validity and reliability of volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT) with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for hip bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, and to compare the differences between the two techniques in discriminating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures from those without. METHODS: Ninety subjects were enrolled and divided into three groups based on the BMD values of the lumbar spine and/or the femoral neck by DXA. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of postmenopausal women with BMD changes <-2SD, with and without radiographically confirmed vertebral fracture (n=11 and 33, respectively). Group 3 comprised normal controls with BMD changes > or =-1SD (n=46). Post-MSCT (GE, LightSpeed16) scan reconstructed images of the abdominal-pelvic region, 1.25 mm thick per slice, were processed by OsteoCAD software to calculate the following parameters: volumetric BMD values of trabecular bone (TRAB), cortical bone (CORT), and integral bone (INTGL) of the left femoral neck, femoral neck axis length (NAL), and minimum cross-section area (mCSA). DXA BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (AP-SPINE) and the left femoral neck (NECK) also were performed for each subject. RESULTS: The values of all seven parameters were significantly lower in subjects of Groups 1 and 2 than in normal postmenopausal women (P<0.05, respectively). Comparing Groups 1 and 2, 3D-TRAB and 3D-INTGL were significantly lower in postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture(s) [(109.8+/-9.61) and (243.3+/-33.0) mg/cm3, respectively] than in those without [(148.9+/-7.47) and (285.4+/-17.8) mg/cm(3), respectively] (P<0.05, respectively), but no significant differences were evident in AP-SPINE or NECK BMD. CONCLUSION: the femoral neck-derived volumetric BMD parameters using vQCT appeared better than the DXA-derived ones in discriminating osteoporotic postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures from those without. vQCT might be useful to evaluate the effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture status on changes in bone mass in the femoral neck.

Pothuaud L, Barthe N, Krieg MA, Mehsen N, Carceller P, Hans D. · Plate-forme Technologique d'Innovation Biomédicale, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Xavier Arnozan Hospital, Pessac, France. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #19181553 No free full text.

Abstract: The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new parameter that is determined from gray-level analysis of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images. It relies on the mean thickness and volume fraction of trabecular bone microarchitecture. This was a preliminary case-control study to evaluate the potential diagnostic value of TBS as a complement to bone mineral density (BMD), by comparing postmenopausal women with and without fractures. The sample consisted of 45 women with osteoporotic fractures (5 hip fractures, 20 vertebral fractures, and 20 other types of fracture) and 155 women without a fracture. Stratification was performed, taking into account each type of fracture (except hip), and women with and without fractures were matched for age and spine BMD. BMD and TBS were measured at the total spine. TBS measured at the total spine revealed a significant difference between the fracture and age- and spine BMD-matched nonfracture group, when considering all types of fractures and vertebral fractures. In these cases, the diagnostic value of the combination of BMD and TBS likely will be higher compared with that of BMD alone. TBS, as evaluated from standard DXA scans directly, potentially complements BMD in the detection of osteoporotic fractures. Prospective studies are necessary to fully evaluate the potential role of TBS as a complementary risk factor for fracture.

Durosier C, Hans D, Krieg MA, Schott AM. · Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18456531 No free full text.

Abstract: Using a large prospective cohort of over 12,000 women, we determined 2 thresholds (high risk and low risk of hip fracture) to use in a 10-yr hip fracture probability model that we had previously described, a model combining the heel stiffness index measured by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and a set of easily determined clinical risk factors (CRFs). The model identified a higher percentage of women with fractures as high risk than a previously reported risk score that combined QUS and CRF. In addition, it categorized women in a way that was quite consistent with the categorization that occurred using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system; the 2 methods identified similar percentages of women with and without fractures in each of their 3 categories, but the 2 identified only in part the same women. Nevertheless, combining our composite probability model with DXA in a case findings strategy will likely further improve the detection of women at high risk of fragility hip fracture. We conclude that the currently proposed model may be of some use as an alternative to the WHO classification criteria for osteoporosis, at least when access to DXA is limited.

Hollaender R, Hartl F, Krieg MA, Tyndall A, Geuckel C, Buitrago-Tellez C, Manghani M, Kraenzlin M, Theiler R, Hans D. · Departmant of Rheumatology, Felix Platter-Hospital, University of Basel, Bugfelderstrasse 101, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18417517 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Prospective studies have shown that quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques predict the risk of fracture of the proximal femur with similar standardised risk ratios to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Few studies have investigated these devices for the prediction of vertebral fractures. The Basel Osteoporosis Study (BOS) is a population-based prospective study to assess the performance of QUS devices and DXA in predicting incident vertebral fractures. METHODS: 432 women aged 60-80 years were followed-up for 3 years. Incident vertebral fractures were assessed radiologically. Bone measurements using DXA (spine and hip) and QUS measurements (calcaneus and proximal phalanges) were performed. Measurements were assessed for their value in predicting incident vertebral fractures using logistic regression. RESULTS: QUS measurements at the calcaneus and DXA measurements discriminated between women with and without incident vertebral fracture, (20% height reduction). The relative risks (RRs) for vertebral fracture, adjusted for age, were 2.3 for the Stiffness Index (SI) and 2.8 for the Quantitative Ultrasound Index (QUI) at the calcaneus and 2.0 for bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. The predictive value (AUC (95% CI)) of QUS measurements at the calcaneus remained highly significant (0.70 for SI, 0.72 for the QUI, and 0.67 for DXA at the lumbar spine) even after adjustment for other confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: QUS of the calcaneus and bone mineral density measurements were shown to be significant predictors of incident vertebral fracture. The RRs for QUS measurements at the calcaneus are of similar magnitude as for DXA measurements.

Hans D, Durosier C, Kanis JA, Johansson H, Schott-Pethelaz AM, Krieg MA. · Nuclear Medicine Division, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #18302507 No free full text.

Abstract: This study aimed to develop a hip screening tool that combines relevant clinical risk factors (CRFs) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the heel to determine the 10-yr probability of hip fractures in elderly women. The EPISEM database, comprised of approximately 13,000 women 70 yr of age, was derived from two population-based white European cohorts in France and Switzerland. All women had baseline data on CRFs and a baseline measurement of the stiffness index (SI) derived from QUS at the heel. Women were followed prospectively to identify incident fractures. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the CRFs that contributed significantly to hip fracture risk, and these were used to generate a CRF score. Gradients of risk (GR; RR/SD change) and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated for the CRF score, SI, and a score combining both. The 10-yr probability of hip fracture was computed for the combined model. Three hundred seven hip fractures were observed over a mean follow-up of 3.2 yr. In addition to SI, significant CRFs for hip fracture were body mass index (BMI), history of fracture, an impaired chair test, history of a recent fall, current cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus. The average GR for hip fracture was 2.10 per SD with the combined SI + CRF score compared with a GR of 1.77 with SI alone and of 1.52 with the CRF score alone. Thus, the use of CRFs enhanced the predictive value of SI alone. For example, in a woman 80 yr of age, the presence of two to four CRFs increased the probability of hip fracture from 16.9% to 26.6% and from 52.6% to 70.5% for SI Z-scores of +2 and -3, respectively. The combined use of CRFs and QUS SI is a promising tool to assess hip fracture probability in elderly women, especially when access to DXA is limited.

Durosier C, Hans D, Krieg MA, Ruffieux C, Cornuz J, Meunier PJ, Schott AM. · Division of Nuclear Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #17622478 No free full text.

Abstract: We hypothesized that combining clinical risk factors (CRF) with the heel stiffness index (SI) measured via quantitative ultrasound (QUS) would improve the detection of women both at low and high risk for hip fracture. Categorizing women by risk score improved the specificity of detection to 42.4%, versus 33.8% using CRF alone and 38.4% using the SI alone. This combined CRF-SI score could be used wherever and whenever DXA is not readily accessible. INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Several strategies have been proposed to identify women at high risk for osteoporosis-related fractures; we wanted to investigate whether combining clinical risk factors (CRF) and heel QUS parameters could provide a more accurate tool to identify women at both low and high risk for hip fracture than either CRF or QUS alone. METHODS: We pooled two Caucasian cohorts, EPIDOS and SEMOF, into a large database named "EPISEM", in which 12,064 women, 70 to 100 years old, were analyzed. Amongst all the CRF available in EPISEM, we used only the ones which were statistically significant in a Cox multivariate model. Then, we constructed a risk score, by combining the QUS-derived heel stiffness index (SI) and the following seven CRF: patient age, body mass index (BMI), fracture history, fall history, diabetes history, chair-test results, and past estrogen treatment. RESULTS: Using the composite SI-CRF score, 42% of the women who did not report a hip fracture were found to be at low risk at baseline, and 57% of those who subsequently sustained a fracture were at high risk. Using the SI alone, corresponding percentages were 38% and 52%; using CRF alone, 34% and 53%. The number of subjects in the intermediate group was reduced from 5,400 (including 112 hip fractures) and 5,032 (including 111 hip fractures) to 4,549 (including 100 including fractures) for the CRF and QUS alone versus the combination score. CONCLUSIONS: Combining clinical risk factors to heel bone ultrasound appears to correctly identify more women at low risk for hip fracture than either the stiffness index or the CRF alone; it improves the detection of women both at low and high risk.

Schott AM, Ganne C, Hans D, Monnier G, Gauchoux R, Krieg MA, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ, Colin C. · Epidemiology Unit, Département d'Information Médicale des Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 avenue Lacassagne, 69424, Lyon Cedex 03, France. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #17039393 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are responsible for excessive mortality, decreasing the 5-year survival rate by about 20%. From an economic perspective, they represent a major source of expense, with direct costs in hospitalization, rehabilitation, and institutionalization. The incidence rate sharply increases after the age of 70, but it can be reduced in women aged 70-80 years by therapeutic interventions. Recent analyses suggest that the most efficient strategy is to implement such interventions in women at the age of 70 years. As several guidelines recommend bone mineral density (BMD) screening of postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors, our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies applied to elderly women aged 70 years and older. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using decision-tree analysis and a Markov model. Two alternative strategies, one measuring BMD of all women, and one measuring BMD only of those having at least one risk factor, were compared with the reference strategy "no screening". Cost-effectiveness ratios were measured as cost per year gained without hip fracture. Most probabilities were based on data observed in EPIDOS, SEMOF and OFELY cohorts. RESULTS: In this model, which is mostly based on observed data, the strategy "screen all" was more cost effective than "screen women at risk." For one woman screened at the age of 70 and followed for 10 years, the incremental (additional) cost-effectiveness ratio of these two strategies compared with the reference was 4,235 euros and 8,290 euros, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this model, under the assumptions described in the paper, suggest that in women aged 70-80 years, screening all women with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) would be more effective than no screening or screening only women with at least one risk factor. Cost-effectiveness studies based on decision-analysis trees maybe useful tools for helping decision makers, and further models based on different assumptions should be performed to improve the level of evidence on cost-effectiveness ratios of the usual screening strategies for osteoporosis.

Goerres GW, Frey D, Hany TF, Seifert B, Häuselmann HJ, Studer A, Hauser D, Zilic N, Michel BA, Hans D, Uebelhart D. · Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. · Eur Radiol. · Pubmed #16953374 No free full text.

Abstract: This study assessed the ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) to identify osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). One hundred and sixty-one patients with painful knee OA (81 men, 80 women; age 62.6+/-9.2 years, range 40-82 years) were included in this cross-sectional study and underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of both hips and the lumbar spine, QUS of the phalanges and calcanei of both hands and heels, and DXR using radiographs of both hands. Unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, ROC analysis and Spearman's rank correlation were used for comparisons and correlation of methods. Using DXA as the reference standard, we defined a low bone mineral density (BMD) as a T-score < or =-1.0 at the lumbar spine or proximal femur. In contrast to phalangeal or calcaneal QUS, DXR was able to discriminate patients with a low BMD at the lumbar spine (p<0.0001) or hips (p<0.0001). ROC analysis showed that DXR had an acceptable predictive power in identifying OA patients a low hip BMD (sensitivity 70%, specificity 71%). Therefore, DXR used as a screening tool could help in identifying patients with knee OA for DXA.

Hans D, Alekxandrova I, Njeh C, Le-Floch C, Conicella G, Laugier P, Slosman DO. · Division of Nuclear Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #15536540 No free full text.

Abstract: In bone status assessment, proper quality assurance/quality control is crucial since changes due to disease or therapeutic treatment are very small, in the order of 2-5%. Unlike for dual X-ray absorptiometry, quality control procedures have not been extensively developed and validated for quantitative ultrasound technology, limiting its use in longitudinal monitoring. While the challenge of developing an ideal anthropometric phantom is still open, some manufacturers use the concept of the internal digital phantom mimicking human characteristics to check the stability of their device. The objective of the study was to develop a sensitive model of quality control suitable for the correction of QUS patient data. In order to achieve this goal, we simulated a longitudinal device lifetime with both correct and malfunctioning behaviors. Then, we verified the efficiency of digital phantoms in detecting those changes and subsequently established the in vitro/in vivo relationship. This is the first time that an attempt to validate an internal digital phantom has made, and that this type of validation approach is used. The digital phantom (DP) was designed to mimic normal bone (BUAP2) and osteoporotic bone (BUAP1) properties. The DP was studied using the UBIS 5000 ultrasound device (DMS, France). Diverse malfunctions of the UBIS-5000 were simulated. Several series of measurements were performed on both BUAP1 and 2 and on 12 volunteers at each grade of malfunction. The effect of each simulated malfunction on in vivo and in vitro results was presented graphically by plotting the average BUA values against the percentage change from baseline. The change from baseline in BUA was modeled using linear regression, and the in vivo/in vitro ratio was obtained from the model. All experimentations influenced the measure of BUAP1 and 2 as well as the measure of our 12 volunteers. However, the degree of significance varied as a function of the severity of the malfunction, and the results also differed substantially in magnitude between in vivo and in vitro. Indeed, the DP was about 10 times more sensitive to variations of the transfer function than was the in vivo measurement, which is very reassuring. The sensitivity of the digital phantoms was reliable in the determination of simulated malfunctions of the UBIS-5000. The digital phantoms provided an accurate evaluation of the acoustic performance of the scanner, including the fidelity of transducers. In light of these results, the QC approach of the UBIS-5000 will be extremely simple to implement compared with other devices. Indeed, since the digital phantom was automatically measured during every patient measurement, the QC approach could be built on an individual level basis rather than on an average basis.