Osteoporosis: Fordham JN

Hans DB, Shepherd JA, Schwartz EN, Reid DM, Blake GM, Fordham JN, Fuerst T, Hadji P, Itabashi A, Krieg MA, Lewiecki EM. · Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. <> · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18442759 No free full text.

Abstract: Peripheral assessment of bone density using photon absorptiometry techniques has been available for over 40 yr. The initial use of radio-isotopes as the photon source has been replaced by the use of X-ray technology. A wide variety of models of single- or dual-energy X-ray measurement tools have been made available for purchase, although not all are still commercially available. The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) have been developed following a systematic review of the literature by an ISCD task force and a subsequent Position Development Conference. These cover the technological diversity among peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) devices; define whether pDXA can be used for fracture risk assessment and/or to diagnose osteoporosis; examine whether pDXA can be used to initiate treatment and/or monitor treatment; provide recommendations for pDXA reporting; and review quality assurance and quality control necessary for effective use of pDXA.

Francis RM, Baillie SP, Chuck AJ, Crook PR, Dunn N, Fordham JN, Kelly C, Rodgers A. · Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. · QJM. · Pubmed #14747620 links to  free full text

Abstract: Symptomatic vertebral fractures are associated with significant morbidity, excess mortality and health and social service expenditure. Up to 20% of patients with an incident vertebral fracture experience a further vertebral fracture within one year. It is therefore important that vertebral fractures are detected early, and treatment considered as soon as possible. Only a third of vertebral fractures come to medical attention, where they typically present with acute back pain, but other presentations include loss of height and increasing kyphosis. Spine X-rays should then be performed to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other pathology. Bone density measurements are not essential before starting treatment for osteoporosis in patients with low-trauma vertebral fractures, but may be useful to confirm osteoporosis when there is uncertainty about previous trauma. They may also aid in selecting the most appropriate therapy and monitoring response to treatment. Up to 30% of women and 55% of men with symptomatic vertebral crush fractures have underlying secondary osteoporosis, where treatment may lead to large increases in bone density. These conditions should therefore be sought by medical history, physical examination and appropriate investigations. The management of patients with acute vertebral fractures should include measures to reduce pain and improve mobility, as well as starting treatment for osteoporosis. Treatments have now been shown in randomized controlled trials to improve bone density and reduce the incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Choice of treatment will depend on the underlying causes of bone loss, efficacy in any particular situation, cost, patient preference and the potential non-skeletal advantages and disadvantages.

Francis RM, Baillie SP, Chuck AJ, Crook PR, Daymond T, Dunn N, Fordham JN, Kelly C, Rodgers A. · Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. · QJM. · Pubmed #10924531 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Fogelman I, Fordham JN, Fraser WD, Spector TD, Christiansen C, Morris SA, Fox J. · Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, St. London, SE1 9RT, UK. · Calcif Tissue Int. · Pubmed #18626566 No free full text.

Abstract: Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is based primarily on antiresorptive agents, including hormone replacement therapy (HT). To evaluate whether anabolic therapy together with HT provides additional benefits in the treatment of PMO, we evaluated the effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1-84 in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) who were receiving chronic (> or =6 months) HT. Subjects were randomized to receive 100 microg PTH(1-84) or placebo injections daily for 24 months (n = 90/group). The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD. Secondary end points included changes in hip and distal radius BMD, bone turnover markers, and fracture incidence. The study was terminated early following recommendations regarding HT for PMO. At 18 months, the mean increase in lumbar spine BMD was 7.9% for PTH(1-84) subjects vs. 1.5% for those receiving HT alone; between-group differences were significant at 6 months and persisted throughout the study. Lumbar spine BMD increased in 94% of women receiving PTH(1-84) compared to 59% for HT alone. Femoral neck BMD and bone turnover markers were significantly higher in PTH(1-84)-treated subjects, but the changes in total hip and distal radius BMD were not significant. PTH(1-84) treatment was generally well-tolerated, with hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness reported more frequently in the HT + PTH(1-84) group. In conclusion, addition of PTH(1-84) to stable HT produced marked increases in lumbar spine BMD and may represent an additional approach to the treatment of PMO women receiving HT.

Blake GM, Chinn DJ, Steel SA, Patel R, Panayiotou E, Thorpe J, Fordham JN, Anonymous00229. · Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, St Thomas Street, London, SE1 9RT, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #16228104 No free full text.

Abstract: The UK National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) has recently issued new guidelines on the use of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) devices in managing osteoporosis. The NOS guidelines recommend a triage approach in which patients' bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are interpreted using upper and lower thresholds specific to each type of pDXA device. The thresholds are defined so that patients with osteoporosis at the hip or spine are identified with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Patients with a pDXA result below the lower threshold are likely to have osteoporosis at the hip or spine, patients with a result above the upper threshold are unlikely to have osteoporosis, while those between the two thresholds require a hip and spine BMD examination for a definitive diagnosis. This report presents data from a multicenter study to establish the triage thresholds for a range of pDXA devices in use in the UK. The subjects were white female patients aged 55-70 years who met the normal referral criteria for a BMD examination. For each device, at least 70 women with osteoporosis at the hip or spine and 70 women without osteoporosis were enrolled. All women had hip and spine BMD measurements using axial DXA systems that were interpreted using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) reference range for the hip and the manufacturers' reference ranges for the spine. Data are presented for five different devices: the Osteometer DTX-200 (forearm BMD), the Schick AccuDEXA (hand BMD), the GE Lunar PIXI (heel BMD), the Alara MetriScan (hand BMD), and the Demetech Calscan (heel BMD). The clinical measurements were supplemented by theoretical modeling to estimate the age dependence of the triage thresholds and the effect of the correlation coefficient between pDXA and axial BMD on the percentage of women referred for an axial BMD examination. In summary, this study provides thresholds for implementing the new NOS guidelines for managing osteoporosis using pDXA devices. The figures reported apply to postmenopausal white women aged 55-70 years who meet the conventional criteria for a BMD examination. The results confirm that the thresholds are specific to each type of pDXA device and that the NOS triage algorithm requires 40% of women to have an axial DXA examination.

Crabtree NJ, Kibirige MS, Fordham JN, Banks LM, Muntoni F, Chinn D, Boivin CM, Shaw NJ. · Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. · Bone. · Pubmed #15454104 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The correct interpretation of DXA data is critical to the diagnosis and management of children with suspected bone disease. This study examines the various influences on bone mineral content (BMC), as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred and forty-six healthy school children and forty-three children with chronic diseases, aged 5-18 years, had their lumbar spine and whole body measured using a Lunar DPX-L DXA scanner. RESULTS: Stepwise linear regression identified lean body mass (LBM) as the strongest single predictor of BMC in the lumbar spine and the total body. A significant gender difference was observed in the relationship between BMC and LBM with girls having significantly more bone per unit LBM from 9 years of age in the spine and 13 years of age in the total body. To investigate the relationship between LBM and BMC in children with chronic disease, a two-stage algorithm based upon calculation of Z scores from the normative data was applied. Stage 1 assessed LBM for height and stage 2 assessed BMC for LBM. Ten children with spinal muscular atrophy had a mean LBM for height Z score of -1.8(1.4) but a mean BMC for LBM Z score of 1.2(1.3) indicating their primary abnormality was reduced muscle mass (sarcopenia) with no evidence of osteopenia. In contrast, 21 children with osteogenesis imperfecta had a mean LBM for height Z score of 0.4(1.7) but a mean BMC for LBM Z score of -2.5(1.8) indicating normal LBM for size but significantly reduced BMC for LBM (i.e. osteopenia) confirming a primary bone abnormality. A third group consisting of 12 children with low trauma fractures demonstrated little evidence of sarcopenia [mean LBM for height Z score -1.1(2.1)] but significant osteopenia [mean BMC for LBM Z score -1.9(1.5)]. CONCLUSION: The results from this study demonstrate how the relationship between height and lean body mass, and lean body mass and bone mineral content can be a useful method of diagnosing osteoporosis in children and how the relationships can be used to identify if the primary abnormality is in muscle or bone.

Fordham JN, Chinn DJ, Bates J, Pitcher O, Bell L. · Department of Rheumatology, The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #15181257 No free full text.

Abstract: We assessed the utility of os calcis (OC) bone mineral density (BMD) measurements to identify men with low BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was applied to determine the risk of osteoporosis at the lumbar spine or femoral neck. [A total of 230 men with an average age of 59 yr were studied.] The most common reasons for referral were fracture (47%) and steroid use (46%). Twenty-six percent were osteoporotic at the LS, 21% at the FN, and 15% at the OC. Optimal classification with respect to osteoporotic measurements at the LS or FN was obtained at an OC T-score of -1.9 (BMD = 0.45 g/cm2). Osteoporosis was only weakly related to a simple cumulative risk factor score, but was strongly related to a T-score OC categorized into quartiles. Regression analysis of BMD on the major risk factors alone explained only 17% of the variance in BMD at the LS and 5% at the FN. The combination of the T-score at the OC, age, and weight provided the best model. BMD OC is superior to risk factors alone in the clinical evaluation and selection of men referred for axial densitometry.

Fordham JN, Chinn DJ, Kumar N. · Department of Rheumatology, South Cleveland Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #11148807 No free full text.

Abstract: We assessed the clinical usefulness of bone density measurements at the os calcis as a screening tool to identify patients with low bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Bone mineral density (BMD) was recorded in 443 women (mean age 60 years) referred to a bone densitometry service. Measurements were made at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using a Lunar DPXL and at the right os calcis using a Peripheral Instantaneous X-ray Imaging (PIXI) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system. Average T-scores derived using the manufacturer's data were: 1.59 for the lumbar spine, -1.41 for the femoral neck and -0.87 for the os calcis. The prevalence of osteoporosis using WHO criteria (T-scores of -2.5 or less) was 36% for the lumbar spine or femoral neck but only 9.7% for the os calcis. BMD of the os calcis correlated with that at the lumbar spine (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and femoral neck (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve was 0.836 (standard error 0.020) for the os calcis related to osteoporosis at the lumbar spine or femoral neck. Optimal accuracy was obtained at a T-score of < or = -1.3 (BMD 0.39 g/cm2) when the sensitivity was 69.6% (95% confidence interval 65.3, 73.9%) and specificity 82.6% (95% confidence interval 79.1, 86.1%). However, the probability of diagnosing low bone density from a given BMD at the os calcis varied by age and site scanned. Accordingly, for informing management strategies, the choice of a single cutoff BMD at the os calcis may not be appropriate and several thresholds may be adopted based on age, the site of interest (lumbar spine or femoral neck) and consideration of associated clinical features. Thus, the use of heel bone density scanners could reduce the number of axial bone density measurements required. The advantages of portability, low cost and shorter scan times should reduce the cost of detection and provide a greater opportunity for identification of women at risk of fracture.