Osteoporosis: Bogado CE

Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM. · Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Germany; Synarc, Hamburg, Germany. <> · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18442757 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and non-DXA technologies. While only DXA can be used for diagnostic classification according to criteria established by the World Health Organization, DXA and some other technologies may predict fracture risk and be used to monitor skeletal changes over time. ISCD task forces reviewed the evidence for clinical applications of non-DXA techniques and presented reports with recommendations at the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. Here we present the ISCD Official Positions for quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and peripheral QCT (pQCT), with supporting medical evidence, rationale, controversy, and suggestions for further study. QCT is available for bone mineral density measurements at the spine, hip, forearm, and tibia. The ISCD Official Positions presented here focus on QCT of the spine and pQCT of the forearm. Measurements at the hip may have clinical relevance, as this is an important fracture site; however, due to limited medical evidence, definitive advice on its use in clinical practice cannot be provided until more data emerge.

Uusi-Rasi K, Semanick LM, Zanchetta JR, Bogado CE, Eriksen EF, Sato M, Beck TJ. · Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Outpatient Center, 601 N. Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-0849, USA. · Bone. · Pubmed #15878318 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: We evaluated effects of teriparatide (rDNA origin) injection [teriparatide, rhPTH (1-34), TPTD] on hip structure among a subset 558 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Fracture Prevention Trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to once-daily, self-administered subcutaneous injections of placebo (N = 189), teriparatide 20 mug (TPTD20; N = 186), or 40 mug (TPTD40; N = 183) for a median of 20 months. Repeated dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip scans were analyzed with the Hip Structure Analysis (HSA) program to derive structural geometry. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in age or body size between groups at baseline, 1 year, or study termination. At the femoral neck, teriparatide increased bone mass and improved bone geometric strength in both treatment groups compared to the placebo group, with the response being dose-related. The mean difference (95% CI) in bone cross-sectional area (CSA) in the TPTD20 was 3.5% (1.8% to 5.3%), and 6.3% (4.5% to 8.2%) in TPTD40 at study termination, compared to placebo controls. Teriparatide treatment increased bending strength, with the mean difference in section modulus being 3.6% (1.4% to 5.8%) and 6.8% (4.6% to 9.1%) greater in the TPTD20 and TPTD40 groups, respectively. Compared to placebo, local cortical instability characterized by the buckling ratio decreased by 5.5% (3.5% to 7.5%) and 8.6% (6.6% to 10.5%) in the TPTD20 and TPTD40 groups, respectively, during the study period. The changes at the intertrochanteric region were comparable to those at the narrow neck although between-group differences were slightly smaller. Except for an inconsequential (1%) improvement in section modulus in TPTD20, teriparatide effects did not reach significance at the femoral shaft. In conclusion, teriparatide treatment improved axial and bending strength, and increased cortical thickness and stability at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric region. Teriparatide treatment effects were not apparent at the purely cortical femoral shaft.

Zanchetta JR, Bogado CE, Ferretti JL, Wang O, Wilson MG, Sato M, Gaich GA, Dalsky GP, Myers SL. · Instituto de Investigaciones Metabolicas y Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #12619939 No free full text.

Abstract: Treatment with teriparatide (rDNA origin) injection [teriparatide, recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) [rhPTH(1-34)]] reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fragility fractures and increases cancellous bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, but its effects on cortical bone are less well established. This cross-sectional study assessed parameters of cortical bone quality by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in the nondominant distal radius of 101 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were randomly allocated to once-daily, self-administered subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 35) or teriparatide 20 microg (n = 38) or 40 microg (n = 28). We obtained measurements of moments of inertia, bone circumferences, bone mineral content, and bone area after a median of 18 months of treatment. The results were adjusted for age, height, and weight. Compared with placebo, patients treated with teriparatide 40 microg had significantly higher total bone mineral content, total and cortical bone areas, periosteal and endocortical circumferences, and axial and polar cross-sectional moments of inertia. Total bone mineral content, total and cortical bone areas, periosteal circumference, and polar cross-sectional moment of inertia were also significantly higher in the patients treated with teriparatide 20 microg compared with placebo. There were no differences in total bone mineral density, cortical thickness, cortical bone mineral density, or cortical bone mineral content among groups. In summary, once-daily administration of teriparatide induced beneficial changes in the structural architecture of the distal radial diaphysis consistent with increased mechanical strength without adverse effects on total bone mineral density or cortical bone mineral content.

Zanchetta JR, Bogado CE. · Instituto de Investigaciones Metabolicas and USAL University School of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #11149484 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Negri AL, Barone R, Bogado CE, Zanchetta JR. · Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. · Nefrologia. · Pubmed #16053008 No free full text.

Abstract: Patients in chronic dialysis show a decrease in total bone mass. The factors that determine this decrease are not well known. In normal populations weight and its compartments are important determinants of bone mass. We studied total bone mineral content (TBMC), a measure of bone mass, and body composition using DEXA densitometry in 65 patients (45 females and 20 males) who had been in peritoneal dialysis for a mean of 40.3 +/- 23.2 months. Forty-eight patients (73.8%) had been previously in hemodialysis. The mean total time in dialysis for these patients was 76.8 months. As a group patients showed a very significant positive correlation between TBMC and weight, height, and lean body mass. A negative correlation was found between TBMC with the time in dialysis and iPTH. In men we found significant simple positive correlations between TBMC and weight, height and lean body mass. In women we found simple positive correlations of TBMC with weight, height and lean body mass and a negative correlation with iPTH. In the multiple regression analysis, lean body mass was the only body composition parameter that had a significantly positive correlation with TBMC in men; in women only height correlated positively with TBMC and iPTH continued to correlate negatively with bone mass. When we considered pre and postmenopausal women separately, bone mass was correlated positively with height and lean body mass and negatively with iPTH in postmenopausal women and only with height in pre-menopausal females. We conclude that the lean body mass compartment. is the most important component of weight that determines TBMC in peritoneal dialysis patients particularly in males and postmenopausal women. In postmenopausal women, secondary hyperparathyroidism seems to be particularly detrimental on bone mass.

Negri AL, Barone R, Quiroga MA, Bravo M, Marino A, Fradinger E, Bogado CE, Zanchetta JR. · Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. · Perit Dial Int. · Pubmed #15119637 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The usefulness of bone mass measurements and bone turnover markers to estimate the risk of fracture and the type of underlying renal osteodystrophy are not well established in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). OBJECTIVE: To assess bone mass using total and regional bone densitometry in a group of patients on PD and to determine if serum markers of bone turnover identify patients with low bone mass. METHODS: Bone densitometry was studied by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and bone turnover using several serum markers, in 65 patients on PD. Bone mass was classified as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic according to World Health Organization criteria based on bone mineral density (BMD) T scores. RESULTS: T scores in the osteopenia range were present at the lumbar spine (LS) in 44.6% (45% of men and 44.4% of women) of patients and at the femoral neck (FN) in 56.9% (55% of men and 58% of women). T scores in the osteoporosis range were present at the LS in 13.8% of patients (10% of men and 15.5% of women) and at the FN in 21.5% (30% of men and 17.7% of women). Patients with BMD T scores in the osteoporosis range at both regions had increased serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels compared to patients in the osteopenic/normal range. Bone mineral content in the whole skeleton (TBMC) correlated negatively with iPTH (r = -0.34) and with total time on dialysis (r = -0.26); in multivariate analysis, only iPTH correlated negatively with TBMC (B = -0.26, p = 0.03). No correlations were found between the other bone markers and BMD T scores at the FN or LS. There were no significant differences in absolute BMD or BMD T scores at the LS or FN between patients with and patients without fractures. CONCLUSIONS: BMD T scores in the osteopenia/osteoporosis range were observed at the LS in 58.4% of these patients on PD and at the FN in 78.4%. TBMC correlated negatively with iPTH. There were no correlations between markers of bone turnover and bone mass measurements at the two skeletal regions, although patients with BMD T scores in the osteoporosis range had increased serum iPTH levels. Bone mass measurements were not different between patients with and patients without fractures.