Osteoporosis: Armbrecht G

Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM. · Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Germany; Synarc, Hamburg, Germany. <> · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18442757 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and non-DXA technologies. While only DXA can be used for diagnostic classification according to criteria established by the World Health Organization, DXA and some other technologies may predict fracture risk and be used to monitor skeletal changes over time. ISCD task forces reviewed the evidence for clinical applications of non-DXA techniques and presented reports with recommendations at the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. Here we present the ISCD Official Positions for quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and peripheral QCT (pQCT), with supporting medical evidence, rationale, controversy, and suggestions for further study. QCT is available for bone mineral density measurements at the spine, hip, forearm, and tibia. The ISCD Official Positions presented here focus on QCT of the spine and pQCT of the forearm. Measurements at the hip may have clinical relevance, as this is an important fracture site; however, due to limited medical evidence, definitive advice on its use in clinical practice cannot be provided until more data emerge.

Ferrar L, Jiang G, Armbrecht G, Reid DM, Roux C, Glüer CC, Felsenberg D, Eastell R. · Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Division of Clinical Sciences (North), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. · Bone. · Pubmed #17499570 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Diagnosis of prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fracture is complicated by normal or developmental variation in vertebral shape or size and non-osteoporotic deformities that appear to have 'reduced' height. Using our visual approach, the algorithm-based qualitative method (ABQ) a vertebra with apparent "reduced" height without evidence of osteoporotic endplate depression is classified as non-osteoporotic short vertebral height (SVH). We aimed to determine whether ABQ classification of SVH represents true or false negative diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture, by testing the associations with clinical outcomes of osteoporosis or vertebral fracture. METHODS: The ABQ method was used to assess spinal radiographs acquired at baseline for a subset of 904 postmenopausal women participating in the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS). The sample was enriched with vertebral fracture cases. Subjects were categorized by ABQ diagnosis as (i) normal, (ii) non-osteoporotic short vertebral height (SVH) or (iii) osteoporotic vertebral fracture. RESULTS: Women were classified by ABQ as follows: osteoporotic vertebral fracture, n=231; SVH, n=376 and normal, n=297. Women with vertebral fracture were older, with lower height, weight and height loss than those classified as SVH or normal. Women with SVH were heavier and older, with greater historical height loss than normal women. Age-adjusted SD units (z-scores) for BMD were lower than expected among women with osteoporotic vertebral fracture, but not among those with SVH. There was a significant association between diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture and history of low-trauma non-vertebral and vertebral fracture (p<0.001, odds ratios=3.2 and 20.6, respectively). There was also an association between diagnosis of SVH and previous low-trauma non-vertebral fracture (p<0.05, odds ratio=1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Short vertebral height without evidence of central endplate fracture in postmenopausal women is largely unrelated to osteoporosis. Quantitative morphometry should not be used alone for the assessment of vertebral fracture in clinical decision making: we recommend differential diagnosis of morphometric vertebral deformities by an expert reader to rule out non-osteoporotic deformities with short vertebral height.

Felsenberg D, Miller P, Armbrecht G, Wilson K, Schimmer RC, Papapoulos SE. · Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Centre of Muscle and Bone Research, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12200, Germany. · Bone. · Pubmed #16126016 No free full text.

Abstract: In a recent multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III study (BONE: IBandronate Osteoporosis Vertebral Fracture trial in North America and Europe), oral daily ibandronate (2.5 mg) significantly and substantially reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures by 62% relative to placebo after 3 years of treatment. The objective of the present study was to retrospectively analyze data from the BONE study to examine the efficacy of oral ibandronate in preventing incident vertebral fractures of greater severity. This analysis was conducted on the placebo and oral daily ibandronate (2.5 mg) arms of the BONE study, comprising a total of 1964 women (aged 55-80 years, >or=5 years postmenopause) with osteoporosis. Vertebral fractures on annual lateral radiographs of the spine were graded as mild, moderate, or severe, using criteria derived from an established semiquantitative technique. The findings demonstrate that in addition to being effective in significantly reducing the risk of new vertebral fractures of all severities, oral daily ibandronate has a pronounced effect on the more severe, most clinically relevant, vertebral fractures: a significant and sustained reduction of 59% in the relative risk of combined new moderate and severe vertebral fractures was observed at years 1 (P = 0.0164), 2 (P = 0.0004), and 3 (P < 0.0001).

Glüer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM, Felsenberg D, Roux C, Barkmann R, Timm W, Blenk T, Armbrecht G, Stewart A, Clowes J, Thomasius FE, Kolta S. · Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #15068502 No free full text.

Abstract: We compared the performance of five QUS devices with DXA in a population-based sample of 2837 women. All QUS approaches discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS of the calcaneus performed as well as central DXA. INTRODUCTION: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods have found widespread use for the assessment of bone status in osteoporosis, but their optimal use remains to be established. To determine QUS performance for current devices in direct comparison with central DXA, we initiated a large population-based investigation, the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 463 women 20-39 years of age and 2374 women 55-79 years of age were measured on five different QUS devices along with DXA of the spine and the proximal femur. Their vertebral fracture status was evaluated radiographically. The association of QUS and DXA with vertebral fracture status was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: All QUS approaches tested discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (20% height reduction), with age-adjusted standardized odds ratios ranging 1.2-1.3 for amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SOS) at the finger phalanges, 1.2-1.4 for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) at the calcaneus, and 1.4-1.5 for speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus, 1.4-1.6 for DXA of the total femur, and 1.5-1.6 for DXA at the spine. For more severe fractures (40% height reduction), age-adjusted standardized odds ratios increased to up to 1.9 for DXA of the spine and 2.3 for SOS of the calcaneus. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, all five QUS devices tested showed significant age-adjusted differences between subjects with and without vertebral fracture. When selecting the strongest variable, QUS of the calcaneus worked as well as central DXA for identification of women at high risk for prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS-based case-finding strategies would allow halving the number of radiographs in high-risk populations, and this strategy works increasingly well for women with more severe vertebral fractures. It is likely that the good performance of QUS was in part achieved by rigorous quality assurance measures that should also be used in clinical practice.

Armbrecht G, Blenk T, Chesnut CH, Gardner JC, von Ingersleben G, Mahoney P, Felsenberg D. · Center of Muscle and Bone Research, Charite--Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. · J Clin Densitom. · Pubmed #18158264 No free full text.

Abstract: A multicenter trial has established the antifracture efficacy of oral daily (2.5mg) as well as intermittent (20mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 mo) ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. As diagnostic spinal radiographs for this trial were read at 2 centers, the study protocol included rigorous procedures for diagnosis of morphometric vertebral fractures. These included standardized qualitative and morphometric assessment methods for diagnosing vertebral osteoporotic fractures and consensus cross-validation procedures for maximizing fracture diagnostic accuracy and consistency between the 2 radiographic reading centers. Using these stringent measures, the between-center discrepancy in the diagnosis of prevalent fractures was only 8%. Furthermore, after cross-validation, discrepancy in the final diagnosis of incident fractures between centers was found for only 4 patients, resulting in a net gain of only 2 fractures in the trial. This meticulous methodology provided a highly effective means of identifying vertebral fractures and recruiting the trial population in which to assess the efficacy of ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, Weber K, Boonen S, Jajic I, Stepan JJ, Banzer D, Reisinger W, Janott J, Kragl G, Scheidt-Nave C, Felsch B, Matthis C, Raspe HH, Lyritis G, Póor G, Nuti R, Miazgowski T, Hoszowski K, Armas JB, Vaz AL, Benevolenskaya LI, Masaryk P, Cannata JB, Johnell O, Reid DM, Bhalla A, Woolf AD, Todd CJ, Cooper C, Eastell R, Kanis JA, O'Neill TW, Silman AJ, Reeve J. · Department of Medicine & Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #16821002 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fracture is a strong risk factor for future spine and hip fractures; yet recent data suggest that only 5-20% of subjects with a spine fracture are identified in primary care. We aimed to develop easily applicable algorithms predicting a high risk of future spine fracture in men and women over 50 years of age. METHODS: Data was analysed from 5,561 men and women aged 50+ years participating in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were taken at baseline and at an average of 3.8 years later. These were evaluated by an experienced radiologist. The risk of a new (incident) vertebral fracture was modelled as a function of age, number of prevalent vertebral fractures, height loss, sex and other fracture history reported by the subject, including limb fractures occurring between X-rays. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive ability of models. RESULTS: In a negative binomial regression model without baseline X-ray data, the risk of incident vertebral fracture significantly increased with age [RR 1.74, 95% CI (1.44, 2.10) per decade], height loss [1.08 (1.04, 1.12) per cm decrease], female sex [1.48 (1.05, 2.09)], and recalled fracture history; [1.65 (1.15, 2.38) to 3.03 (1.66, 5.54)] according to fracture site. Baseline radiological assessment of prevalent vertebral fracture significantly improved the areas subtended by ROC curves from 0.71 (0.67, 0.74) to 0.74 (0.70, 0.77) P=0.013 for predicting 1+ incident fracture; and from 0.74 (0.67, 0.81) to 0.83 (0.76, 0.90) P=0.001 for 2+ incident fractures. Age, sex and height loss remained independently predictive. The relative risk of a new vertebral fracture increased with the number of prevalent vertebral fractures present from 3.08 (2.10, 4.52) for 1 fracture to 9.36 (5.72, 15.32) for 3+. At a specificity of 90%, the model including X-ray data improved the sensitivity for predicting 2+ and 1+ incident fractures by 6 and 4 fold respectively compared with random guessing. At 75% specificity the improvements were 3.2 and 2.4 fold respectively. With the modelling restricted to the subjects who had BMD measurements (n=2,409), the AUC for predicting 1+ vs. 0 incident vertebral fractures improved from 0.72 (0.66, 0.79) to 0.76 (0.71, 0.82) upon adding femoral neck BMD (P=0.010). CONCLUSION: We conclude that for those with existing vertebral fractures, an accurately read spine X-ray will form a central component in future algorithms for targeting treatment, especially to the most vulnerable. The sensitivity of this approach to identifying vertebral fracture cases requiring anti-osteoporosis treatment, even when X-rays are ordered highly selectively, exceeds by a large margin the current standard of practice as recorded anywhere in the world.

Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, O'Neill TW, Silman AJ, Reeve J, Anonymous00251. · Department of Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #15537441 No free full text.

Abstract: Vertebral fractures are common but usually remain unrecognized in primary care. Data from 2908 women and 2653 men in the EPOS study were used to derive algorithms to indicate the need for a spine X-ray to identify a fracture using easily elicited determinants. At a sensitivity of 50% for identifying cases, the specificity was increased from 50% to 78% in women and from 50% to 72% in men compared with a random allocation of X-rays. Use of X-rays can be optimized by selecting patients at high risk using a short screening procedure. INTRODUCTION: Previous osteoporotic fracture is an independent risk factor for further fractures and an indication for treatment. Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures before age 75, accounting for 48% of all fractures in men and 39% in women over 50. They usually remain unrecognized, so many patients requiring treatment are denied it, doubling their risk of a further fracture. Our objective was to develop an efficient algorithm indicating the need for an X-ray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 2908 women and 2653 men >or=50 years of age in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) were analyzed. Lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were taken at baseline and at an average of 3.8 years later. Prevalent fractures were qualitatively diagnosed by an experienced radiologist. Fracture risk was modeled as a function of age, statural height loss since age 25, gender, and fracture history including limb fractures in the last 3 years using negative binomial regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to summarize a model's predictive ability, and a prediction algorithm was devised to identify those most likely to have a fracture. RESULTS: In a multivariate model for women, the risk of prevalent vertebral fracture significantly increased with age (RR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.46, 1.93] per decade), statural height loss (1.06, [1.03, 1.10] per centimeter decrease), self-reported history of spine fracture (7.52 [5.52, 10.23]), and history of other major fracture (1.83 [1.46, 2.28]). Higher body weight reduced risk (0.86 [0.79, 0.95] per 10-kg increase). In men, the respective RR estimates were as follows: age (1.32 [1.18, 1.49]); height loss (1.06 [1.04, 1.09]); self-reported spine fracture (5.05 [3.69, 6.90]); other major fracture (1.42 [1.12, 1.81]); and weight (0.86 [0.79, 0.94]). Using algorithms based on these easily elicited determinants, specificity was increased from 50% to 78% in women and from 50% to 72% in men at a sensitivity of 50% compared with a random allocation of X-rays. At a sensitivity of 75%, the specificity was 50% in women and 40% in men. Inclusion of hip BMD (femoral neck or trochanter), measured in 1360 women and 1046 men, significantly improved the area under the ROC curves by 4% in women (p < 0.002) but not in men (p > 0.350). Spine BMD, measured in 982 women and 847 men, produced a significant 5% AUC improvement in women (p = 0.007) but not in men (p = 0.554). CONCLUSION: A woman 65 years of age with one vertebral fracture has a one in four chance of another fracture over 5 years, which can be reduced to one in eight by treatment. Positive treatment decisions are often contingent on identifying a vertebral fracture. Selective use of lateral vertebral X-rays can be optimized using a 2-minute screening procedure administered by a nurse.

Reeve J, Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Scheidt-Nave C, Poor G, Gennari C, Weber K, Lorenc R, Masaryk P, Cannata JB, Dequeker J, Reid DM, Pols HA, Benevolenskaya LI, Stepan JJ, Miazgowski T, Bhalla A, Bruges Armas J, Eastell R, Lopes-Vaz A, Lyritis G, Jajic I, Woolf AD, Banzer D, Reisinger W, Todd CJ, Felsch B, Havelka S, Hoszowski K, Janott J, Johnell O, Raspe HH, Yershova OB, Kanis JA, Armbrecht G, Finn JD, Gowin W, O'Neill TW, Anonymous00161. · Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. · J Bone Miner Res. · Pubmed #12968676 No free full text.

Abstract: More severe vertebral fractures have more personal impact. In the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study, more severe vertebral collapse was predictable from prior fracture characteristics. Subjects with bi-concave or crush fractures at baseline had a 2-fold increase in incident fracture size and thus increased risk of a disabling future fracture. INTRODUCTION: According to Euler's buckling theory, loss of horizontal trabeculae in vertebrae increases the risk of fracture and suggests that the extent of vertebral collapse will be increased in proportion. We tested the hypothesis that the characteristics of a baseline deformity would influence the size of a subsequent deformity. METHODS: In 207 subjects participating in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study who suffered an incident spine fracture in a previously normal vertebra, we estimated loss of volume (fracture size) from plane film images of all vertebral bodies that were classified as having a new fracture. The sum of the three vertebral heights (anterior, mid-body, and posterior) obtained at follow-up was subtracted from the sum of the same measures at baseline. Each of the summed height loss for vertebrae with a McCloskey-Kanis deformity on the second film was expressed as a percentage. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In univariate models, the numbers of baseline deformities and the clinical category of the most severe baseline deformity were each significantly associated with the size of the most severe incident fracture and with the cumulated sum of all vertebral height losses. In multivariate modeling, age and the clinical category of the baseline deformity (crush > bi-concave > uni-concave > wedge) were the strongest determinants of both more severe and cumulative height loss. Baseline biconcave and crush fractures were associated at follow-up with new fractures that were approximately twice as large as those seen with other types of deformity or who previously had undeformed spines. In conclusion, the characteristics of a baseline vertebral deformity determines statistically the magnitude of vertebral body volume lost when a subsequent fracture occurs. Because severity of fracture and number of fractures are determinants of impact, the results should improve prediction of the future personal impact of osteoporosis once a baseline prevalent deformity has been identified.

Roy DK, O'Neill TW, Finn JD, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Felsenberg D, Armbrecht G, Banzer D, Benevolenskaya LI, Bhalla A, Bruges Armas J, Cannata JB, Cooper C, Dequeker J, Diaz MN, Eastell R, Yershova OB, Felsch B, Gowin W, Havelka S, Hoszowski K, Ismail AA, Jajic I, Janott I, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kragl G, Lopez Vaz A, Lorenc R, Lyritis G, Masaryk P, Matthis C, Miazgowski T, Gennari C, Pols HA, Poor G, Raspe HH, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan JJ, Todd CJ, Weber K, Woolf AD, Reeve J, Anonymous00444. · ARC Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #12577181 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of this analysis was to determine the influence of lifestyle, anthropometric and reproductive factors on the subsequent risk of incident vertebral fracture in men and women aged 50-79 years. Subjects were recruited from population registers from 28 centers across Europe. At baseline, they completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and had lateral thoraco-lumbar spine radiographs performed. Repeat spinal radiographs were performed a mean of 3.8 years later. Incident vertebral fractures were defined morphometrically and also qualitatively by an experienced radiologist. Poisson regression was used to determine the influence of the baseline risk factor variables on the occurrence of incident vertebral fracture. A total of 3173 men (mean age 63.1 years) and 3402 women (mean age 62.2 years) contributed data to the analysis. In total there were 193 incident morphometric and 224 qualitative fractures. In women, an age at menarche 16 years or older was associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture (RR = 1.80; 95%CI 1.24, 2.63), whilst use of hormonal replacement was protective (RR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.34, 0.99). None of the lifestyle factors studied including smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity or milk consumption showed any consistent associations with incident vertebral fracture. In men and women, increasing body weight and body mass index were associated with a reduced risk of vertebral fracture though, apart from body mass index in men, the confidence intervals embraced unity. For most variables the strengths of the associations observed were similar using the qualitative and morphometric approaches to fracture definition. In conclusion our data suggest that modification of other lifestyle risk factors is unlikely to have a major impact on the population occurrence of vertebral fractures. The important biological mechanisms underlying vertebral fracture risk need to be explored using new investigational strategies.

Klaus J, Armbrecht G, Steinkamp M, Brückel J, Rieber A, Adler G, Reinshagen M, Felsenberg D, von Tirpitz C. · Department of Medicine I, University of Ulm, Germany. · Gut. · Pubmed #12377802 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Osteopenia and osteoporosis are frequent in Crohn's disease. However, there are few data on related vertebral fractures. Therefore, we evaluated prospectively the prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in these patients. METHODS: A total of 293 patients were screened with dual energy x ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal right femur. In 156 patients with lumbar osteopenia or osteoporosis (T score <-1), x ray examinations of the thoracic and lumbar spine were performed. Assessment of fractures included visual reading of x rays and quantitative morphometry of the vertebral bodies (T4-L4), analogous to the criteria of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. RESULTS: In 34 (21.8%; 18 female) of 156 Crohn's disease patients with reduced bone mineral density, 63 osteoporotic vertebral fractures (50 fx. (osteoporotic fracture with visible fracture line running into the vertebral body and/or change of outer shape) and 13 fxd. (osteoporotic fracture with change of outer shape but without visible fracture line)) were found, 50 fx. in 25 (16%, 15 female) patients and 13 fxd. in nine (5.8%, three female) patients. In four patients the fractures were clinically evident and associated with severe back pain. Approximately one third of patients with fractures were younger than 30 years. Lumbar bone mineral density was significantly reduced in patients with fractures compared with those without (T score -2.50 (0.88) v -2.07 (0.66); p<0.025) but not at the hip (-2.0 (1.1) v -1.81 (0.87); p=0.38). In subgroups analyses, no significant differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Crohn's disease and reduced bone mineral density, the prevalence of vertebral fractures-that is, manifest osteoporosis-was strikingly high at 22%, even in those aged less than 30 years, a problem deserving further clinical attention.

Vergnaud P, Lunt M, Scheidt-Nave C, Poor G, Gennari C, Hoszowski K, Vaz AL, Reid DM, Benevolenskaya L, Grazio S, Weber K, Miazgowski T, Stepan JJ, Masaryk P, Galan F, Armas JB, Lorenc R, Havelka S, Perez Cano R, Seibel M, Armbrecht G, Kaptoge S, O'Neill TW, Silman AJ, Felsenberg D, Reeve J, Delmas PD. · U. INSERM 403, Lyon, France. · Clin Chim Acta. · Pubmed #12104091 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS), a past spine fracture increased risk of an incident fracture 3.6 - 12-fold even after adjusting for BMD. We examined the possibility that biochemical marker levels were associated with this unexplained BMD-independent element of fracture risk. METHODS: Each of 182 cases in EPOS of spine or non-spine fracture that occurred in 3.8 years of follow-up was matched by age, sex and study centre with two randomly assigned never-fractured controls and one case of past fracture. Analytes measured blind were: osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, total alkaline phosphatase, serum creatinine, calcium, phosphate and albumin, together with the collagen cross-links degradation products serum CTS and urine CTX. Most subjects also had bone density measured by DXA. RESULTS: Cases who had recent fractures did not differ in marker levels from cases who had their last fracture more than 3 years previously. No statistically significant effect of recent fracture was found for any marker except osteocalcin, which was 17.6% lower in recent peripheral cases compared to unfractured controls (p<0.05) and this was independent of BMD. CONCLUSION: Past fracture as a risk indicator for future fracture is not strongly mediated through increased bone turnover.

Lunt M, Gowin W, Johnell, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, Anonymous00063. · Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #11804017 No free full text.

Abstract: Incident vertebral deformities are commonly defined by observed changes in height between measurements on two consecutive radiographs. However, conventional radiographs are subject to magnification, and this magnification may differ between films, leading to artifactual changes in height. In order to minimize this effect, it is common practice to record the spine-film and film-focus distances, and from this to calculate a magnification factor for each film. We present a simple statistical method for correcting for differences in magnification between two films if the spine-film and film-focus distances are unknown. This method is shown to reduce the variance of the magnification differences in vertebral heights by 14%, considerably more than is possible using the spine-film distance. Using the statistical method, the number of vertebrae that showed not only a reduction in one or more height of 15%, but were also judged clinically to be free from any incident deformity by an expert radiologist, was reduced from 100 to 46. The number showing a reduction of 20% that were judged fracture-free was reduced from 15 to 9. In the subset of subjects for whom the spine-film distance was known, the reduction in false positives was similar, whichever method was used to correct for magnification. There was no difference in the number of confirmed incident fractures detected when magnification correction by either method was employed. It is concluded that correcting for magnification differences using the statistical method outlined here reduces the number of false positive deformities very substantially and by a similar extent as correcting the magnification using reliable, measured spine-film and film-focus distances. A further advantage of this method is that it can be used retrospectively.

McGuigan FE, Armbrecht G, Smith R, Felsenberg D, Reid DM, Ralston SH. · Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. · Osteoporos Int. · Pubmed #11303720 No free full text.

Abstract: Osteoporosis is a common disease with a strong genetic component, characterized by reduced bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Although the genetic basis of osteoporosis is incompletely understood, previous studies have identified a polymorphism affecting an Sp1 binding site in the COLIA1 gene that predicts bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures in several populations. Here we investigated the role of COLIA1 genotyping and bone densitometry in the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in a prospective, population-based study of men (n = 156) and women (n = 185) who were followed up for a mean (+/- SEM) of 4.88+/-0.03 years. There was no significant difference in bone density, rate of bone loss, body weight, height, or years since menopause between the genotype groups but women with the 'ss' genotype were significantly older than the other genotype groups (p = 0.03). Thirty-nine individuals sustained 54 fractures during follow-up and these predominantly occurred in women (45 fractures in 30 individuals). Fractures were significantly more common in females who carried the COLIA1 's' allele (p = 0.001), although there was no significant association between COLIA1 genotype and the occurrence of fractures in men. Logistic regression analysis showed that carriage of the COLIA1 's' allele was an independent predictor of fracture in women with an odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] of 2.59 [1.23-5.45], along with spine bone mineral density (OR = 1.57 [1.04-2.37] per Z-score unit) and body weight (OR = 1.05 [1.01-1.10] per kilogram). Moreover, bone densitometry and COLIA1 genotyping interacted significantly to enhance fracture prediction in women (p = 0.01), such that the incidence of fractures was 45 times higher in those with low BMD who carried the 's' allele (24.3 fractures/100 patient-years) compared with those with high BMD who were 'SS' homozygotes (0.54 fracture/100 patient-years). We conclude that in our population, COLIA1 genotyping predicts fractures independently of bone mass and interacts with bone densitometry to help identify women who are at high and low risk of sustaining osteoporotic fractures.

Weber K, Lunt M, Gowin W, Lauermann T, Armbrecht G, Wieland E, Leb G, O'Neill T, Felsenberg D, Reeve J. · Medizinische Klinik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Graz, Austria. · Br J Radiol. · Pubmed #10673947 links to  free full text

Abstract: Several algorithms are currently in use for evaluating vertebral deformities from plain lateral radiographs of the lumbar and thoracic spine. However, the effects of measurement imprecision as well as uncertainties over image magnification on the correct identification of prevalent and incident vertebral deformities with these algorithms has been little studied. In a pilot study for the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS), plain radiographs were submitted to a single central evaluating centre for measurement of vertebral height from T4 to L4. The thoracic and lumbar spines were imaged on separate films, and we have assessed the precision of measurement of vertebral heights and height ratios. The standard deviation of the differences between films of each of three height measurements ranged from 1.1 to 1.2 mm. A two-stage strategy for identifying incident deformities was devised. This required that the vertebra be a prevalent deformity at the time of the second radiograph and also that at least one of the vertebral ratios should have changed significantly since the first radiograph. The second stage removed all but two of the 18 vertebrae flagged positive in the first stage but not considered to be certain incident fractures by clinical reading of the radiographs.