| 1 |
Editorial Resistin and adiponectin--of mice and men. 2002
Stumvoll M, Häring H. · No affiliation provided · Obes Res. · Pubmed #12429885 No free full text.
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 2 |
Review Intramyocellular lipids and insulin resistance. 2004
Machann J, Häring H, Schick F, Stumvoll M. · Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Pathobiochemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. · Diabetes Obes Metab. · Pubmed #15171747 No free full text.
Abstract: Lipids are stored not only in adipocytes but also 'ectopically' in tissues such as muscle, liver, beta cells and others. From a metabolic perspective, intramyocellular lipids (IMCLs) have recently become a focus of interest. This review summarizes history, measurement techniques and interpretation of muscle lipid data. Problems in biopsies with the separation of those metabolically active lipid droplets in the cytoplasm of myocytes from further lipids in adipocytes are discussed as well as considerations important for analysis of correlations between IMCL content and insulin sensitivity under various circumstances. The relatively new approach to non-invasive assessment of the IMCL content by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is described in detail and exemplary spectra from different skeletal muscle types in humans are presented. The MRS technique allows human examinations of large cohorts for a detailed assessment of the interactions among metabolic parameters such as age, measures of adiposity, hormonal and ethnic factors and insulin resistance. IMCLs are generally positively correlated with measures of obesity and negatively with insulin sensitivity. Paradoxically, physical fitness (maximal aerobic capacity) increases both IMCL content and insulin sensitivity and therefore has to be taken into account as a confounding factor. Intervention studies with MRS further allowed to elucidate the regulation of IMCL. Molecular mechanisms and potential genetic factors on IMCL regulation are discussed as well as possible mechanisms of current treatment strategies for improving insulin sensitivity.
|
| 3 |
Review The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism. free! 2002
Stumvoll M, Häring H. · University Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Pathobiochemistry, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany. · Diabetes. · Pubmed #12145143 links to free full text
Abstract: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma is a transcription factor with a key role in adipocyte differentiation. The Ala allele of the common Pro12Ala polymorphism in the isoform PPAR-gamma2 is associated with reduced risk for type 2 diabetes. The effect on the individual is weak, but because of a prevalence of >75% of the high-risk Pro allele, the population-attributable risk is enormous. The in vivo effects of the polymorphism are secondary to alterations in adipose tissue, where PPAR-gamma2 is predominantly expressed. Moderate reduction in transcriptional activity of PPAR-gamma as a result of the polymorphism modulates production and release of adipose-derived factors. Both decreased release of insulin-desensitizing free fatty acids, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and resistin and increased release of the insulin-sensitizing hormone adiponectin result in secondary improvement of insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake and suppression of glucose production. The population effect of this polymorphism may be modulated by environmental or genetic factors such as obesity, ethnicity, ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids, and genetic background. Once diabetes has developed, the protective effect of the Ala allele may be lost, since increased vascular complications and more pronounced beta-cell dysfunction have been reported. These observations, however, are currently unexplained. In conclusion, the Pro12Ala polymorphism in PPAR-gamma2 represents the first genetic variant with a broad impact on the risk of common type 2 diabetes. The precise understanding of its mechanism may lead to novel diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic approaches for improving the management of type 2 diabetes.
|
| 4 |
Review Insulin resistance and insulin sensitizers. 2001
Stumvoll M, Häring H. · Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und Pathobiochemie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany. · Horm Res. · Pubmed #11684868 No free full text.
Abstract: Insulin resistance is a key factor in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and a co-factor in the development of dyslipidaemia, hypertension and atherosclerosis. The causes of insulin resistance include factors such as obesity and physical inactivity, and there may also be genetic factors. The mechanism of obesity-related insulin resistance involves the release of factors from adipocytes which exert a negative effect on glucose metabolism: free fatty acids, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and the recently discovered hormone, resistin. The two resulting abnormalities observed consistently in glucose-intolerant states are impaired suppression of endogenous glucose production, and impaired stimulation of glucose uptake. Among the genetic factors, a polymorphism (Pro12Ala) in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and increased insulin sensitivity, primarily that of lipolysis. On the other hand, the association with insulin resistance of a common polymorphism (Gly972Arg) in the insulin receptor substrate 1, long believed to be a plausible candidate gene, is weak at best. This polymorphism may instead be associated with reduced insulin secretion, which, in view of the recent recognition of the insulin signalling system in beta-cells, results in the development of a novel pathogenic concept. Finally, fine-mapping and positional cloning of the susceptibility locus on chromosome 2 resulted in the identification of a polymorphism (UCSNP-43 G/A) in the calpain-10 gene. In non-diabetic Pima Indians, this polymorphism was associated with insulin resistance of glucose disposal. The pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance has recently acquired a novel class of agents: the thiazolidinediones. They act through regulation of PPARgamma-dependent genes and probably interfere favourably with factors released from adipocytes which mediate obesity-associated insulin resistance.
|
| 5 |
Article For debate: Starling's curve of the pancreas--overuse of a concept? 2003
Stumvoll M, Häring H, Fritsche A. · Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und Pathobiochemie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany. · Horm Metab Res. · Pubmed #12931268 No free full text.
Abstract: It is commonly accepted that insulin secretion follows the pattern of an inverted U, also termed 'Starling's curve of the pancreas' during the natural history of hyperglycemia in glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. This concept is based on the cross-sectional observation that insulin concentrations initially increase when insulin sensitivity declines (as a consequence of obesity, for example) and decrease when glucose tolerance deteriorates (impaired glucose tolerance or overt type 2 diabetes). The initial increase in insulin concentrations has been viewed as 'hypersecretion' of insulin, thought to indicate that beta cell dysfunction is not etiological but secondary in nature. However, this view is oblivious to the now well-established fact that assessment of insulin secretion must account for individual insulin sensitivity. Here, we revisit the concept of Starling's curve of the pancreas based on first-phase C-peptide concentrations (hyperglycemic clamp) from subjects with normal glucose tolerance (n=66), impaired glucose tolerance (n=19) and mild type 2 diabetes (n=9). In absolute terms, first-phase C-peptide concentrations plotted against increasing fasting glucose concentrations indeed followed an inverted U. However, adjusted for direct and indirect measures of insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitivity index from the hyperglycemic clamp, body mass index, age and sex), first-phase C-peptide concentrations of the same individuals tended to decrease steadily. In conclusion, while the Starling curve exists for insulin concentrations, and perhaps also for insulin secretion, it does not hold for beta-cell function if that term were to imply appropriateness of insulin secretion (based on a formal test of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion) for the degree of insulin resistance, as it should.
|
| 6 |
Article Association of the T-G polymorphism in adiponectin (exon 2) with obesity and insulin sensitivity: interaction with family history of type 2 diabetes. free! 2002
Stumvoll M, Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Staiger H, Renn W, Weisser M, Machicao F, Häring H. · Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und Pathobiochemie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany. · Diabetes. · Pubmed #11756320 links to free full text
Abstract: The adipocyte-derived hormone adiponectin seems to protect from insulin resistance, a key factor in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Genome-wide scans have mapped a susceptibility locus for type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome to chromosome 3q27, where the adiponectin gene is located. A common silent T-G exchange in nucleotide 94 (exon 2) of the adiponectin gene has been associated with increased circulating adiponectin levels. Metabolic abnormalities associated with the G allele have not been reported. We therefore assessed whether this polymorphism alters insulin sensitivity and/or measures of obesity using the Tübingen Family Study database (prevalence of the G allele, 28%). In 371 nondiabetic individuals, we found a significantly greater BMI in GG + GT (25.5 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) compared with TT (24.1 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2); P = 0.02). Insulin sensitivity (determined by euglycemic clamp, n = 209) was significantly lower in GG + GT (0.089 +/- 0.007 units) compared with TT (0.112 +/- 0.005 units; P = 0.02). This difference disappeared completely on adjustment for BMI. Because our population contains a relatively high proportion of first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes, we stratified by family history (FHD). Much to our surprise, the genotype differences in BMI and insulin sensitivity in the whole population were attributable entirely to differences in the subgroup without FHD, whereas in the subgroup with FHD, the G allele had absolutely no effect. Moreover, individuals without FHD had a significantly lower BMI than individuals with FHD (25.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 26.2 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2); P = 0.01), which was not the case for the GG + GT subgroup without FHD (27.0 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2); NS). This suggests that in individuals without familial predisposition for type 2 diabetes, the adiponectin polymorphism may mildly increase the obesity risk (and secondarily insulin resistance). In contrast, in individuals who are already burdened by other genetic factors, this small effect may be very hard to detect.
|
| 7 |
Article Acute stimulation of leptin concentrations in humans during hyperglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Influence of free fatty acids and fasting. 2001
Stefan N, Fritsche A, Häring H, Stumvoll M. · Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und Pathobiochemie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany. · Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. · Pubmed #11244470 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the acute regulation of leptin concentrations by insulin, glucose and free fatty acids (FFAs). DESIGN: Four protocols: saline control experiment (CON); hyperglycemic clamps (approximately 8.3 mmol/l, 120 min) after an overnight fast (12 FAST); after a 36 h fast (36 FAST); and after a 36 h fast during which Intralipid/heparin was given over the last 24 h (36 FAST+FFA). SUBJECTS: Lean, young, healthy volunteers; control group (n=6), experimental group (n=6). MEASUREMENTS: Serum leptin concentrations. RESULTS: Glucose and insulin concentrations were similar during the three clamp protocols. Average FFAs during the last 60 min of the clamp were 671+/-68 microM (CON),109+/-15 microM (12 FAST), 484+/-97 microM (36 FAST) and 1762+/-213 microM (36 FAST+FFA). Leptin concentrations decreased similarly during 36 FAST and 36 FAST+FFA. Leptin concentrations at 120 min (expressed as percentage of mean basal value) were 0.82+/-0.02 (CON), 0.93+/-0.08 (12 FAST) (P=0.29), 1.19+/-0.06 (36 FAST) (P<0.01) and 1.44+/-0.12 (36 FAST+FFA) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: During a one-day fast leptin concentrations decrease regardless of maintainance of an isocaloric balance. During acute hyperinsulinemic hyperglycemia leptin concentrations increase only after a preceding fast. This increase was most pronounced during simultaneous elevation of FFAs. Overall, our findings are compatible with the hypothesis that leptin secretion may be coupled to triglyceride synthesis rather than to the absolute lipid content of the adipocyte. International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 138-142
|
| 8 |
Retraction Two novel prevalent polymorphisms in the hormone-sensitive lipase gene have no effect on insulin sensitivity of lipolysis and glucose disposal. free! 2001
Stumvoll M, Wahl HG, Jacob S, Rettig A, Machicao F, Häring H. · Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. · J Lipid Res. · Pubmed #11714847 links to free full text
Abstract: Free fatty acids released during triglyceride lipolysis play an important role in obesity-associated insulin resistance of glucose disposal. Individual sensitivity of lipolysis to the suppressive effect of insulin varies greatly among healthy subjects. It is possible that genetic factors contribute to this variation. Among the many proteins involved in the regulation of lipolysis, hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) represents a prime candidate for genetic variants contributing to the biological variation of insulin sensitivity of lipolysis. We determined the insulin sensitivity of lipolysis (suppression of isotopically [primed-continuous infusion of d5 glycerol] measured glycerol rate of appearance) and of glucose disposal, using a three-step (n = 20) or standard (n = 53) hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in 73 healthy, unrelated subjects. To assess the possible role of genetic polymorphisms, we directly sequenced the coding region of the HSL gene and the noncoding exon B from these subjects. We identified two silent mutations and three amino acid polymorphisms: Arg262Met (prevalence, 5%), Glu620Asp (prevalence, 31%) and Ser681Ile (prevalence, 22%). The latter two are located in the regulatory domain of HSL but neither had a significant impact on insulin sensitivity of lipolysis or glucose disposal (with and without adjustment for obesity and age as covariates; all P values > 0.20). We conclude that a number of genetic polymorphisms in HSL exist, some of which are highly prevalent. Neither of the polymorphisms we identified in the coding region, however, contributed measurably to the biological variation of insulin sensitivity in our lean, healthy population.
|
|
|