Obesity: Fanelli RD

Anonymous00176, Anderson MA, Gan SI, Fanelli RD, Baron TH, Banerjee S, Cash BD, Dominitz JA, Harrison ME, Ikenberry SO, Jagannath SB, Lichtenstein DR, Shen B, Lee KK, Van Guilder T, Stewart LE. · No affiliation provided · Gastrointest Endosc. · Pubmed #18577471 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, Kohn GP, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD. · Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7081, USA. · Surg Endosc. · Pubmed #19125308 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of U.S. adults are obese. Current evidence suggests that surgical therapies offer the morbidly obese the best hope for substantial and sustainable weight loss, with a resultant reduction in morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive methods have altered the demand for bariatric procedures. However, no evidence-based clinical reviews yet exist to guide patients and surgeons in selecting the bariatric operation most applicable to a given situation. METHODS: This evidenced-based review is presented in conjunction with a clinical practice guideline developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). References were reviewed by the authors and graded as to the level of evidence. Recommendations were developed and qualified by the level of supporting evidence available at the time of the associated SAGES guideline publication. The guideline also was reviewed and co-endorsed by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. RESULTS: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, producing durable weight loss, improvement of comorbid conditions, and longer life. Patient selection algorithms should favor individual risk-benefit considerations over traditional anthropometric and demographic limits. Bariatric care should be delivered within credentialed multidisciplinary systems. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RGB), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD + DS) are validated procedures that may be performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) also is a promising procedure. Comparative data find that procedures with more dramatic clinical benefits carry greater risks, and those offering greater safety and flexibility are associated with less reliable efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RGB, AGB, BPD + DS, and primary LSG have been proved effective. Currently, the choice of operation should be driven by patient and surgeon preferences, as well as by considerations regarding the relative importance placed on discrete outcomes.

Fanelli RD, Mellinger DN, Crowell RM, Gersin KS. · Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School at Berkshire Medical Center, Surgical Specialists of Western New England PC, Pittsfield 01201, USA. · Surg Endosc. · Pubmed #10948300 No free full text.

Abstract: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is an important therapeutic technique. Placement of the abdominal portion of VPS can be difficult in the setting of previous abdominal surgery, prior failure of VPS, or obesity. Even under ideal circumstances, standard mini-laparotomy does not allow precision in VPS positioning. We describe a single-port technique for VPS placement. While the neurosurgeon places a right frontal ventricular catheter and valve, an infraumbilical trocar is placed utilizing the open Hasson technique. A 12-mm operating laparoscope with an 8-mm channel is used to inspect the abdomen and identify the VPS entry site. Adhesions interfering with shunt placement can be lysed through the working channel of the laparoscope. Under laparoscopic visualization, an 18-gauge needle is introduced through a 5-mm incision in the right upper quadrant and the VPS tubing is tunneled to that site. A J-tipped guidewire is introduced, and the needle is exchanged for a dilator and peel-away sheath. The VPS is delivered through the sheath, which is sectioned and removed. An atraumatic grasper, placed through the laparoscope, directs the VPS to the desired intraabdominal location. Function of the VPS is assessed visually while compressing the valve. Suture closure of the trocar site and VPS entry site completes the procedure. We used this method successfully in a series of five patients with excellent outcome. A 14-month follow-up has revealed no failures or postoperative complications. This method is less invasive than mini-laparotomy, allows for precision placement of the abdominal portion of VPS, and confirms appropriate function.