Multiple Sclerosis: Wolinsky JS

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Barkhof F, Calabresi PA, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Cutter GR, Freedman MS, Kappos L, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Metz LM, Miller AE, Montalban X, O'Connor PW, Panitch H, Richert JR, Petkau J, Schwid SR, Sormani MP, Thompson AJ, Weinshenker BG, Wolinsky JS. · Department of Neurology, Free University Medical Center in Amsterdam, PO Box 4075, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Neurology. · Pubmed #18362273 No free full text.

Abstract: The increasing number of established effective therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and emerging consensus for early treatment raise practical concerns and ethical dilemmas for placebo-controlled clinical trials in this disease. An international group of clinicians, ethicists, statisticians, regulators, and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry convened to reconsider prior recommendations regarding the ethics of placebo-controlled trials in MS. The group concluded that placebo-controlled trials can still be done ethically, with restrictions. For patients with relapsing MS for which established effective therapies exist, placebo-controlled trials should only be offered with rigorous informed consent if the subjects refuse to use these treatments, have not responded to them, or if these treatments are not available to them for other reasons (e.g., economics). Suggestions are provided to protect subject autonomy and improve informed consent procedures. Recommendations are tighter than previously suggested for placebo-controlled trials in "resource-restricted" environments where established therapies may not be available. Guidance is also provided on the ethics of alternative trial designs and the balance between study subject burden and risk, scientific rationale and interpretability of trial outcomes.

Simon JH, Li D, Traboulsee A, Coyle PK, Arnold DL, Barkhof F, Frank JA, Grossman R, Paty DW, Radue EW, Wolinsky JS. · Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA. · AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. · Pubmed #16484429 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Leigh RJ, Wolinsky JS. · No affiliation provided · Neurology. · Pubmed #11551998 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Wolinsky JS. · No affiliation provided · Brain. · Pubmed #10388788 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Sajja BR, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. · Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 981045 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-1045, USA. · Neuroimaging Clin N Am. · Pubmed #19064199 No free full text.

Abstract: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) provides tissue metabolic information in vivo. This article reviews the role of MRS-determined metabolic alterations in lesions, normal-appearing white matter, gray matter, and spinal cord in advancing our knowledge of pathologic changes in multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition, the role of MRS in objectively evaluating therapeutic efficacy is reviewed. This potential metabolic information makes MRS a unique tool to follow MS disease evolution, understand its pathogenesis, evaluate the disease severity, establish a prognosis, and objectively evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.

Wolinsky JS. · University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA. · Adv Neurol. · Pubmed #16400839 No free full text.

Abstract: Glatiramer acetate is a collection of synthetic polypeptides indicated as therapy for relapsing a remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Current understanding of the immunological and neuroprotective mechanisms of action of GA makes it unique among current MS therapies. The clinical efficacy of GA appears similar to that of the recombinant beta interferons. GA has a favorable side effect profile with excellent patient compliance and long-term acceptance. The results of pivotal controlled clinical trials and long-term data derived from organized extension studies are reviewed. Supportive data from open-label comparison, combination treatment and therapeutic switch studies are also provided to enable informed decisions on the appropriate place for GA among other immunomodulatory treatments for relapsing MS.

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Metz LM, McFarland HF, O'Connor PW, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Weinshenker BG, Wolinsky JS. · VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Free University, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #16283615 No free full text.

Abstract: New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis integrating magnetic resonance image assessment with clinical and other paraclinical methods were introduced in 2001. The "McDonald Criteria" have been extensively assessed and used since 2001. New evidence and consensus now strengthen the role of these criteria in the multiple sclerosis diagnostic workup to demonstrate dissemination of lesions in time, to clarify the use of spinal cord lesions, and to simplify diagnosis of primary progressive disease. The 2005 Revisions to the McDonald Diagnostic Criteria for MS should simplify and speed diagnosis, whereas maintaining adequate sensitivity and specificity.

Filippi M, Falini A, Arnold DL, Fazekas F, Gonen O, Simon JH, Dousset V, Savoiardo M, Wolinsky JS, Anonymous00084. · Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute and University Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. · J Magn Reson Imaging. · Pubmed #15906322 No free full text.

Abstract: On October 9-11, 2003, the third meeting of the White Matter Study Group of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine was held in Venice, Italy. This article is the report of the meeting on how to use MRI in the diagnostic workup of multiple sclerosis (MS) and allied white matter disorders, and to define the nature and the extent of MS pathology in vivo. Both of these steps are central to the design of future treatment strategies aimed at limiting the functional consequences of the most disabling aspects of this disease.

Bakshi R, Minagar A, Jaisani Z, Wolinsky JS. · Department of Neurology and Radiology, Partners MS Center, Center for Neurological Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · NeuroRx. · Pubmed #15897951 links to  free full text

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an ever-expanding role in the evaluation of multiple sclerosis (MS). This includes its sensitivity for the diagnosis of the disease and its role in identifying patients at high risk for conversion to MS after a first presentation with selected clinically isolated syndromes. In addition, MRI is a key tool in providing primary therapeutic outcome measures for phase I/II trials and secondary outcome measures in phase III trials. The utility of MRI stems from its sensitivity to longitudinal changes including those in overt lesions and, with advanced MRI techniques, in areas affected by diffuse occult disease (the so-called normal-appearing brain tissue). However, all current MRI methodology suffers from limited specificity for the underlying histopathology. Conventional MRI techniques, including lesion detection and measurement of atrophy from T1- or T2-weighted images, have been the mainstay for monitoring disease activity in clinical trials, in which the use of gadolinium with T1-weighted images adds additional sensitivity and specificity for areas of acute inflammation. Advanced imaging methods including magnetization transfer, fluid attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, functional MRI, and nuclear imaging techniques have added to our understanding of the pathogenesis of MS and may provide methods to monitor therapies more sensitively in the future. However, these advanced methods are limited by their cost, availability, complexity, and lack of validation. In this article, we review the role of conventional and advanced imaging techniques with an emphasis on neurotherapeutics.

Polman CH, Wolinsky JS, Reingold SC. · Department of Neurology, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #15732260 No free full text.

Abstract: New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) were developed by an International Panel in 2001 and have had wide distribution and discussion since publication. These provided the first formal incorporation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a diagnosis work-up for patients suspected of having MS. The so-called McDonald criteria have been studied in retrospective and prospective analyses for sensitivity, specificity and utility, and have been proven to compare favourably or to be an improvement upon prior MS diagnostic criteria. The purpose of the current review is to present and evaluate the key studies that have been performed using the McDonald criteria since 2001 and to set the stage for an upcoming re-evaluation of the new criteria based on data-driven information gathered since their development.

Narayana PA, Wolinsky JS, Rao SB, He R, Mehta M, Anonymous00097. · Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin, Room 6.172, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #15218814 No free full text.

Abstract: Multicentre baseline proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic data on primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) patients are acquired and analysed, using automatic analysis software. The metabolite ratios did not differ from centre to centre. The average N-acetylaspartate/creatine (NAA/Cr) ratio in PPMS was significantly lower compared to normal controls. No significant differences were observed in this ratio between lesion-containing regions (LCR) and normal-appearing tissues (NAT). Strong lipid resonances, even in the absence of lesions, are observed in the both grey and white matter in these patients. These observations suggest extensive diffuse and/or microscopic pathology in PPMS. No significant correlation between any of the metabolite ratios and the Extended Disability Scale Score (EDSS) or with other MR measures such as lesion burden and enhancement volumes is observed.

Wolinsky JS, Anonymous00096. · University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #15218813 No free full text.

Abstract: The PROMiSe trial is a multinational, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effects of glatiramer acetate treatment over 3 years in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). A total of 943 patients were enrolled, and all those remaining on-study had completed at least 24 months as of October 2002. Baseline clinical and MRI characteristics and select correlations are reported here. A total of 3.9% of patients exhibited confirmed relapse over 1904 patient-years of exposure, indicating success of efforts to exclude relapsing MS types. Of the 26.3% of patients who have prematurely withdrawn from the study, only 36% discontinued after meeting the study primary endpoint of disease progression. The progression rate in patients in the low Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) stratum (3.0-5.0) observed thus far is markedly lower than the 50% annual progression rate estimate used for determining size and statistical power of the trial; progression was observed in 16.1% of patients with 12 months of study exposure. These early findings raise some concern about the ability of the trial to demonstrate a significant treatment effect, and suggest that the short-term natural history of PPMS may not be as aggressive as previously assumed.

Wolinsky JS. · University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #15102570 No free full text.

Abstract: Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone, Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd) is a collection of immunomodulatory, synthetic polypeptides indicated for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR MS). Preclinical and clinical studies provide an evolving understanding of the mechanisms by which glatiramer acetate exerts both immunological and potential neuroprotective effects that account for its clinical efficacy. The results of pivotal controlled clinical trials and long-term data, derived from organised extension studies, are evaluated in detail and supportive data from open-label comparison, combination treatment and therapeutic switch studies are considered in order to determine the place of glatiramer acetate among other approved therapies for RR MS. The efficacy of glatiramer acetate is stable or may increase over time and the drug has a favourable side effect profile. Glatiramer acetate is an appropriate first-line immunomodulatory therapy for RR MS.

Wolinsky JS, Toyka KV, Kappos L, Grossberg SE. · No affiliation provided · Lancet Neurol. · Pubmed #12941572 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Wolinsky JS, Anonymous00264. · Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · J Neurol Sci. · Pubmed #12559502 No free full text.

Abstract: Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is a rather unique form of the more common relapsing inflammatory demyelinative disease. The absence of attacks that typify relapsing forms of MS imposes special challenges for diagnosis, but also provides an opportunity to study the pathogenesis of the more progressive aspects of the disease process in isolation of confounding transient clinical events. In this review, recent advances in diagnostic approaches are considered in relationship to baseline data from a large multinational study designed to better characterize and treat this clinical phenotype. PPMS subjects with cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) findings consistent with intrathecal immunoglobulin production may have a more tissue destructive disease process than those whose CSF lacks evidence of a B-cell immunopathogenic disease component.

Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. · Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Curr Opin Neurol. · Pubmed #12045720 No free full text.

Abstract: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides noninvasive insight into the regional and global biochemical alterations that are concomitants of the dynamic processes that underlie the evolution of fundamental pathologic changes in multiple sclerosis. These include now well-recognized alterations of neuronal biochemical markers that accompany tissue destruction readily visualized by magnetic resonance imaging, but also dynamic changes in several metabolites that indicate pathological processes that precede the magnetic resonance imaging-defined lesion, or completely escape current high-resolution imaging.

Wolinsky JS. · The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 77030, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #11936494 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Grossman RI, Kappos L, Wolinsky JS. · Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA. · J Neurol Sci. · Pubmed #10606809 No free full text.

Abstract: There are presently many magnetic resonance (MR) measures that can aid the assessment of damage to the brain. The conventional measures include T2 lesion volume, T1 enhanced lesion volume, and brain atrophy. Newer methodologies include magnetization transfer measures and proton spectroscopy. These methods have the potential for improving the specificity of MR with respect to the underlying pathology. MR spectroscopy offers the ability to quantitate the component of axonal loss in multiple sclerosis. MR techniques can be implemented to assess the effectiveness of treatment algorithms.

Fazekas F, Barkhof F, Filippi M, Grossman RI, Li DK, McDonald WI, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Simon JH, Wolinsky JS, Miller DH. · Department of Neurology and MRI Center, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria. · Neurology. · Pubmed #10449103 No free full text.

Abstract: MRI is very sensitive in showing MS lesions throughout the CNS. Using MRI for diagnostic purposes, however useful, is a complex issue because of limited specificity of findings and a variety of options as to when, how, and which patients to examine. Comparability of data and a common view regarding the impact of MRI are needed. Following a review of the typical appearance and pattern of MS lesions including differential diagnostic considerations, we suggest economic MRI examination protocols for the brain and spine. Recommendations for referral to MRI consider the need to avoid misdiagnosis and the probability of detecting findings of diagnostic relevance. We also suggest MRI classes of evidence for MS to determine the diagnostic weight of findings and their incorporation into the clinical evaluation. These proposals should help to optimize and standardize the use of MRI in the diagnosis of MS.

Filippi M, Rocca MA, Arnold DL, Bakshi R, Barkhof F, De Stefano N, Fazekas F, Frohman E, Wolinsky JS. · Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neurology Scientific Institute and University Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. · Eur J Neurol. · Pubmed #16643308 No free full text.

Abstract: Magnetic resonance (MR)-based techniques are widely used for the assessment of patients with suspected and definite multiple sclerosis (MS). However, despite the publication of several position papers, which attempted to define the utility of MR techniques in the management of MS, their application in everyday clinical practice is still suboptimal. This is probably related, not only, to the fact that the majority of published guidelines focused on the optimization of MR technology in clinical trials, but also to the continuing development of modern, quantitative MR-based techniques, that have not as yet entered the clinical arena. The present report summarizes the conclusions of the 'EFNS Expert Panel of Neuroimaging of MS' on the application of conventional and non-conventional MR techniques to the clinical management of patients with MS. These guidelines are intended to assist in the use of conventional MRI for the diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of patients with MS. In addition, they should provide a foundation for the development of more widespread but rational clinical applications of non-conventional MR-based techniques in studies of MS patients.

McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS. · Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #11456302 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Panel on MS Diagnosis presents revised diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). The focus remains on the objective demonstration of dissemination of lesions in both time and space. Magnetic resonance imaging is integrated with dinical and other paraclinical diagnostic methods. The revised criteria facilitate the diagnosis of MS in patients with a variety of presentations, including "monosymptomatic" disease suggestive of MS, disease with a typical relapsing-remitting course, and disease with insidious progression, without clear attacks and remissions. Previously used terms such as "clinically definite" and "probable MS" are no longer recommended. The outcome of a diagnostic evaluation is either MS, "possible MS" (for those at risk for MS, but for whom diagnostic evaluation is equivocal), or "not MS."

Nelson F, Poonawalla A, Hou P, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. · University of Texas, Medical School at Houston, Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Research Group, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 7.044 Houston, Texas 77030, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #18952832 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Gray matter lesions are known to be common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and are suspected to play an important role in disease progression and clinical disability. A combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, double-inversion recovery (DIR), and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), has been used for detection and classification of cortical lesions. This study shows that high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) improves the classification of cortical lesions by allowing more accurate anatomic localization of lesion morphology. METHODS: 11 patients with MS with previously identified cortical lesions were scanned using DIR, PSIR, and 3D MPRAGE. Lesions were identified on DIR and PSIR and classified as purely intracortical or mixed. MPRAGE images were then examined, and lesions were re-classified based on the new information. RESULTS: The high signal-to-noise ratio, fine anatomic detail, and clear gray-white matter tissue contrast seen in the MPRAGE images provided superior delineation of lesion borders and surrounding gray-white matter junction, improving classification accuracy. 119 lesions were identified as either intracortical or mixed on DIR/PSIR. In 89 cases, MPRAGE confirmed the classification by DIR/PSIR. In 30 cases, MPRAGE overturned the original classification. CONCLUSION: Improved classification of cortical lesions was realized by inclusion of high-spatial resolution 3D MPRAGE. This sequence provides unique detail on lesion morphology that is necessary for accurate classification.

Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA, O'Connor P, Coyle PK, Ford C, Johnson K, Miller A, Pardo L, Kadosh S, Ladkani D, Anonymous00241. · Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #17262850 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether glatiramer acetate (GA) slows accumulation of disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. METHODS: A total of 943 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis were randomized to GA or placebo (PBO) in this 3-year, double-blind trial. The primary end point was an intention-to-treat analysis of time to 1- (entry expanded disability status scale, 3.0-5.0) or 0.5-point expanded disability status scale change (entry expanded disability status scale, 5.5-6.5) sustained for 3 months. The trial was stopped after an interim analysis by an independent data safety monitoring board indicated no discernible treatment effect on the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat analyses of disability and magnetic resonance imaging end points were performed. RESULTS: There was a nonsignificant delay in time to sustained accumulated disability in GA- versus PBO-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.07]; p = 0.1753), with significant decreases in enhancing lesions in year 1 and smaller increases in T2 lesion volumes in years 2 and 3 versus PBO. Post hoc analysis showed that survival curves for GA-treated male patients diverged early from PBO-treated male subjects (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.95]; p = 0.0193). INTERPRETATION: The trial failed to demonstrate a treatment effect of GA on primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Both the unanticipated low event rate and premature discontinuation of study medication decreased the power to detect a treatment effect. Post hoc analysis suggests GA may have slowed clinical progression in male patients who showed more rapid progression when untreated.

Filippi M, Wolinsky JS, Comi G, Anonymous00163. · Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology and University Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. · Lancet Neurol. · Pubmed #16488376 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Parenterally administered glatiramer acetate reduces the frequency of relapses and the formation of active brain lesions seen with MRI in multiple sclerosis. This study assessed whether two doses of glatiramer acetate given orally could improve clinical and MRI measures of inflammation and neurodegeneration in a large cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS: 1912 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened and 1651 were randomised to receive 50 mg or 5 mg of glatiramer acetate or placebo by daily oral administration over 14 months. The intention-to-treat cohort consisted of 1644 patients who took at least one dose of study medication (50 mg glatiramer acetate [n=543], 5 mg glatiramer acetate [n=553], placebo [n=548]). After baseline investigation, clinical assessments were done every 2 months and MRI was obtained for all patients at baseline and at study exit. Additionally, MRI was undertaken every 2 months for a cohort of 486 patients. The primary outcome was the total number of confirmed relapses observed during the study period. Several prespecified clinical and MRI secondary and tertiary outcomes assessed treatment efficacy on inflammation and neurodegeneration due to multiple sclerosis. FINDINGS: The cumulative number of confirmed relapses did not differ between the two active treatment groups and the placebo group. Relative to placebo, the rate ratio for the 50 mg glatiramer acetate treated group was 0.92 (95% CI 0.77-1.08, p=0.30) and for the 5 mg glatiramer acetate treated group was 0.98 (0.83-1.15, p=0.76). No drug effect was seen for any of the secondary and tertiary endpoints. The study drug was safe and well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: 5 mg and 50 mg glatiramer acetate administered orally on a daily basis do not affect relapse rate or other clinical and MRI parameters of disease activity and burden in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Treatment with oral formulations of glatiramer acetate at the doses tested cannot be recommended.

Sriram S, Yao SY, Stratton C, Moses H, Narayana PA, Wolinsky JS. · Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. · J Neurol Sci. · Pubmed #15935383 No free full text.

Abstract: This trial examined the safety and possible MRI and clinical effects of anti-chlamydial antibiotic therapy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Newly diagnosed MS patients were selected to participate if they showed Chlamydia pneumoniae gene in their CSF and had one or more enhancing lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After a 4-month run in phase of monthly MRI, patients were randomized to receive rifampin (300 mg twice daily) and azithromycin (500 mg every other day) for 6 months or placebo (PBO). Patients then had monthly MRI on therapy and two additional scans on months 12 and 14. Lumbar punctures were repeated between months 7 and 8 and within 2 weeks of termination of the study. Data on 4 patients on treatment and 4 on PBO were available for analysis. The primary outcome measure of showing a beneficial effect on enhancing lesions was not met. However, there was a significant difference in brain parenchymal fraction loss favoring those patient receiving antibiotics compared with PBO (p< or =0.02). Three of the four patients on antibiotic therapy cleared the organism from the CSF by month 12; in the PBO group one patient cleared the organism. The reduction in atrophy in patients receiving antibiotics must be viewed with caution, due to the small number of patients studied.