Multiple Sclerosis: Stuart WH

Frohman EM, Goodin DS, Calabresi PA, Corboy JR, Coyle PK, Filippi M, Frank JA, Galetta SL, Grossman RI, Hawker K, Kachuck NJ, Levin MC, Phillips JT, Racke MK, Rivera VM, Stuart WH, Anonymous00118. · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #12963748 No free full text.

Abstract: Advancements in imaging technologies and newly evolving treatments offer the promise of more effective management strategies for MS. Until recently, confirmation of the diagnosis of MS has generally required the demonstration of clinical activity that is disseminated in both time and space. Nevertheless, with the advent of MRI techniques, occult disease activity can be demonstrated in 50 to 80% of patients at the time of the first clinical presentation. Prospective studies have shown that the presence of such lesions predicts future conversion to clinically definite (CD) MS. Indeed, in a young to middle-aged adult with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), once alternative diagnoses are excluded at baseline, the finding of three or more white matter lesions on a T2-weighted MRI scan (especially if one of these lesions is located in the periventricular region) is a very sensitive predictor (>80%) of the subsequent development of CDMS within the next 7 to 10 years. Moreover, the presence of two or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions at baseline and the appearance of either new T2 lesions or new Gd enhancement on follow-up scans are also highly predictive of the subsequent development of CDMS in the near term. By contrast, normal results on MRI at the time of clinical presentation makes the future development of CDMS considerably less likely.

Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany GP, Halper J, Likosky WH, Lublin FD, Silberberg DH, Stuart WH, van den Noort S, Anonymous00242. · No affiliation provided · Neurology. · Pubmed #11805241 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Stuart WH. · MS Center of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30327, USA. · Curr Med Res Opin. · Pubmed #17559719 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex, heterogeneous disease. Standard treatment of relapsing MS includes interferon beta (IFNbeta) and glatiramer acetate. These agents reduce relapse rates, and IFNbeta-1a is associated with a slowing of disease progression. Despite treatment, many patients experience disease progression, prompting neurologists to use combination therapies to delay this progression. Agents that may be considered for combination therapy are those with unique mechanisms of action that exert additive or synergistic efficacy. This article reviews combination treatment with immunosuppressive therapies and new agents for the management of MS. METHODS: The Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for clinical trials using the following search terms: multiple sclerosis, interferon, Avonex, Betaseron, Rebif, glatiramer, copolymer 1, Copaxone, immunosuppressant, cytotoxic, corticosteroid, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, combination therapy. The National MS Society website was searched for clinical trials of combination therapies. RESULTS: Several small studies have analyzed the effects of immunosuppressive therapy added to IFNbeta treatment, and some encouraging results have been obtained. Few data are available on combination therapy with new drug classes; however, current data suggest that combination therapy with new agents is effective. Although the available data on combination regimens are promising, interpretation is limited by lack of controlled study design, small patient population, and short study duration. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of standard therapies with immunosuppressive agents or with new therapies may provide synergistic effects that will likely benefit patients with MS. Larger, well-controlled trials need to be conducted.

Stuart WH, Vermersch P. · Peachtree Neurological Clinic, 3200 Downwood Circle, Suite 550, Atlanta, Georgia 30327, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #15596733 No free full text.

Abstract: Interferon beta (IFNbeta) is the first-line treatment for patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). In patients with MS who experience breakthrough disease while receiving treatment with IFNbeta, it is common clinical practice to administer additional therapeutic agents. The rationale for use of concomitant therapies in the long-term management of MS is derived from the heterogeneous and multifactorial etiology of this disease. Agents used concomitantly have the potential to exert synergistic effects and slow the progression of disease in patients who experience breakthrough disease. Concomitant therapies that have been reported in patients with MS are reviewed here.

Stuart WH, Cohan S, Richert JR, Achiron A. · Peachtree Neurological Clinic, 3200 Downwood Circle, Suite 550, Atlanta, Georgia 30327, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #15596732 No free full text.

Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex, incurable disease. Treatment consists of lifelong disease and symptom management. FDA-approved therapies for relapsing MS include subcutaneous (SC) interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta1b, Betaseron), IM interferon-beta-1a (Avonex), SC interferon-beta-1a (Rebif), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), and mitoxantrone (Novantrone), all of which are known as disease-modifying agents (DMAs). DMAs that can be initiated and continued on a long-term basis can be referred to as platform therapies. During periods of disease instability with increased disease activity, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents can be used in combination with appropriate DMA platform therapy to help control symptoms. To date, long-term comparative studies of DMAs are not available. However, based on the effects of these agents on disability progression, relapse rates, MRI outcomes, and neutralizing antibodies observed in phase III randomized clinical trials, IFNbeta1a products are the DMAs of choice for platform therapy for MS. Evidence indicates that IFNbeta1a may also be beneficial in the early stages of the disease. Research is ongoing to identify other appropriate add-on agents (e.g., antigen-specific therapies) to be used in combination with existing DMAs to effectively manage MS.

Rich SR, Coleman IC, Cook R, Hum DS, Johnson B, Maves T, Mazanec WJ, Miller JR, Proveaux WJ, Rossman HS, Stuart WH. · SJR Associates LLC, West Bloomfield, Michigan 48323-3207, USA. · J Manag Care Pharm. · Pubmed #15253687 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To introduce a model treatment algorithm for use in the managed care setting as a strategy to provide ongoing disease management and long-term care for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with the goal of delaying disease progression and the associated disability and cognitive dysfunction. SUMMARY: MS is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system that is associated with progressive disability and cognitive dysfunction. Currently, management of MS involves planning an effective long-term treatment strategy that can delay the progression of the disease. This article reviews a typical stepped-care approach to treating MS that is based on the concept of a platform drug, which is an agent that provides baseline immunomodulatory action throughout the course of the disease. Considerations for selecting a platform therapy include the effect on the full spectrum of MS (disability, relapses, lesion load, and atrophy as well as patient compliance and the potential impact of neutralizing antibodies [NAbs]). Currently, 4 first-line therapies are approved for relapsing MS: the 3 interferon beta (IFNbeta) products and glatiramer acetate. Of these, the IFNbetas are generally recommended as platform therapy because all have shown significant effects on relapses, magnetic resonance imaging parameters of the disease, and because intramuscular (i.m.) IFNbeta-1a (Avonex) and subcutaneous (s.c.) IFNbeta-1a (Rebif) have been shown to slow the progression of sustained disability. Patients being treated with IFNbetas can develop NAbs to the drug, which can lead to a loss of efficacy and subsequent occurrence of breakthrough disease. The 3 different formulations of IFNbeta are associated with a varying incidence of NAbs (i.m. IFNbeta-1a, 5%; s.c. IFNbeta-1a, 24%; IFNbeta-1b [Betaseron], 45%). Antibodies also form against glatiramer acetate, although their clinical significance needs to be elucidated. As the disease progresses or has periods of aggressive activity, the stepped-care approach is to add other agents onto the platform therapy to improve control of the disease. CONCLUSION: Stepped care, as outlined in this model treatment algorithm for the managed care setting, is an effective method to achieve the fundamental goal of MS treatment, that is, to delay disease progression and the associated disability and cognitive impairment.

Stuart WH. · Multiple Sclerosis Center of Atlanta, Peachtree Neurological Clinic, Georgia 30327, USA. · J Manag Care Pharm. · Pubmed #15253686 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To summarize the conclusions of an expert panel of neurologists specializing in multiple sclerosis (MS) convened for the purpose of creating a treatment algorithm with regard to the clinical management of MS. The panel was sponsored by the Health Science Center for Continuing Medical Education and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and supported by an educational grant from Biogen Idec, Inc. SUMMARY: MS is a chronic demyelinating disease characterized by a variable clinical course. Currently, there is no cure for MS, and the management of MS requires lifelong treatment with disease-modifying agents. Some patients respond well to therapy for many years, whereas others may have aggressive disease that is more difficult to manage. Hence, given the variable nature in the course of MS and patients. response to treatment, neurologists must individualize care for their patients. An MS treatment algorithm was recently developed by a panel of neurologists who are MS experts to provide community neurologists with best-practice protocols for treating and managing their MS patients. The panel of experts categorized MS into 3 different stages, with patients transitioning between the stages based on their response to therapy and disease progression. Stage I represents MS early in the progression of the disease, during which platform drug therapy is recommended (i.e., interferon beta-1b [IFNbeta-1b], IFNbeta-1a, or glatiramer acetate). The results of randomized, controlled clinical trials suggest that IFNbeta is the optimal choice for platform therapy. Despite treatment with platform therapy, it is common for patients to experience some ongoing symptoms and periodic exacerbations of the disease (annual relapse rate of 0.59 to 0.84 on treatment); such relapses should not be considered treatment failures and are best managed with steroids. Stage II represents acute breakthrough disease (i.e., when the clinical activity becomes more frequent or severe). This stage is best managed by the addition of pulse corticosteroids to the platform drug. Stage III represents continued breakthrough disease and is best managed by the addition of immunosuppressants to the platform drug. CONCLUSION: The MS treatment algorithm provides an educational resource for physicians. It should assist all health care professionals involved in the management of MS patients and enhance their ability to improve quality of life for these patients over the course of the disease.

Balcer LJ, Galetta SL, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Giovannoni G, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Miller DH, O'Connor PW, Phillips JT, Polman CH, Radue EW, Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Wajgt A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA. · Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #17438220 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of natalizumab on low-contrast letter acuity as a prespecified tertiary endpoint in two randomized clinical trials and to evaluate the usefulness of low-contrast letter acuity testing as a candidate test of visual function in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: AFFIRM and SENTINEL were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trials of natalizumab in relapsing MS. Natalizumab was evaluated as monotherapy in AFFIRM and as add-on to interferon beta-1a in SENTINEL. Vision testing was performed at 100% contrast (visual acuity) and low-contrast (2.5% and 1.25%). RESULTS: The risk of clinically significant visual loss (predefined as a two-line worsening of acuity sustained over 12 weeks) at the lowest contrast level (1.25%) was reduced in the natalizumab treatment arms by 35% in AFFIRM (hazard ratio = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.90; p = 0.008) and by 28% in SENTINEL (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.98; p = 0.038, Cox proportional hazards models). Mean changes in vision scores from baseline were also significantly different, reflecting worsening in non-natalizumab groups. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab reduces visual loss in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Low-contrast acuity testing has the capacity to demonstrate treatment effects and is a strong candidate for assessment of visual outcomes in future multiple sclerosis trials.

Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Galetta SL, Radue EW, Lublin FD, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Sandrock AW, Anonymous00011. · Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #16510745 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Interferon beta is used to modify the course of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Despite interferon beta therapy, many patients have relapses. Natalizumab, an alpha4 integrin antagonist, appeared to be safe and effective alone and when added to interferon beta-1a in preliminary studies. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1171 patients who, despite interferon beta-1a therapy, had had at least one relapse during the 12-month period before randomization to receive continued interferon beta-1a in combination with 300 mg of natalizumab (589 patients) or placebo (582 patients) intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 116 weeks. The primary end points were the rate of clinical relapse at 1 year and the cumulative probability of disability progression sustained for 12 weeks, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, at 2 years. RESULTS: Combination therapy resulted in a 24 percent reduction in the relative risk of sustained disability progression (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.96; P=0.02). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of progression at two years were 23 percent with combination therapy and 29 percent with interferon beta-1a alone. Combination therapy was associated with a lower annualized rate of relapse over a two-year period than was interferon beta-1a alone (0.34 vs. 0.75, P<0.001) and with fewer new or enlarging lesions on T(2)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (0.9 vs. 5.4, P<0.001). Adverse events associated with combination therapy were anxiety, pharyngitis, sinus congestion, and peripheral edema. Two cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, one of which was fatal, were diagnosed in natalizumab-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab added to interferon beta-1a was significantly more effective than interferon beta-1a alone in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Additional research is needed to elucidate the benefits and risks of this combination treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00030966.).

Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Giovannoni G, Galetta SL, Havrdova E, Lublin FD, Miller DH, O'Connor PW, Phillips JT, Polman CH, Radue EW, Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Wajgt A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Anonymous00112. · Dept. of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. · J Neurol. · Pubmed #19308305 No free full text.

Abstract: The AFFIRM and SENTINEL studies showed that natalizumab was effective both as monotherapy and in combination with interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Further analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL data were conducted to determine the efficacy of natalizumab in prespecified patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics: relapse history 1 year before randomization (1, 2, > or = 3), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (< or = 3.5, > 3.5), number of T2 lesions (< 9, > or = 9), presence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions (0, > or = 1), age (< 40, > or = 40) and gender (male, female). A post hoc analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy of natalizumab in patients with highly active disease (i. e., > or = 2 relapses in the year before study entry and > or = 1 Gd+ lesion at study entry). In both AFFIRM and SENTINEL studies natalizumab reduced the annualized relapse rates across all subgroups (except the small subgroups with < 9 baseline T2 lesions) over 2 years. In AFFIRM, natalizumab significantly reduced the risk of sustained disability progression in most subgroups. In SENTINEL, natalizumab significantly reduced the risk of sustained disability progression in the following subgroups: > or = 9 T2 lesions at baseline, > or = 1 Gd+ lesions at baseline, female patients and patients < 40 years of age. Natalizumab reduced the risk of disability progression by 64 % and relapse rate by 81 % in treatment- naive patients with highly active disease and by 58 % and 76 %, respectively, in patients with highly active disease despite IFNbeta-1a treatment. These results indicate that natalizumab is effective in reducing disability progression and relapses in patients with relapsing MS, particularly in patients with highly active disease.

Calabresi PA, Giovannoni G, Confavreux C, Galetta SL, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Miller DH, O'Connor PW, Phillips JT, Polman CH, Radue EW, Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Lublin FD, Wajgt A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Anonymous00406. · Johns Hopkins Multiple Sclerosis Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #17761550 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and clinical effects of antibodies that develop during treatment with natalizumab. METHODS: In two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (natalizumab safety and efficacy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis [MS, AFFIRM] and safety and efficacy of natalizumab in combination with interferon beta-1a [INF beta]1a] in patients with relapsing remitting MS [SENTINEL]) of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, blood samples were obtained at baseline and every 12 weeks to determine the presence of antibodies against natalizumab. Antibodies to natalizumab were measured using an ELISA. Patients were categorized as "transiently positive" if they had detectable antibodies (>or=0.5 microg/mL) at a single time point or "persistently positive" if they had antibodies at two or more time points >or=6 weeks apart. RESULTS: In the AFFIRM study, antibodies were detected in 57 of 625 (9%) of natalizumab-treated patients: Twenty (3%) were transiently positive and 37 (6%) were persistently positive. Persistently positive patients showed a loss of clinical efficacy as measured by disability progression (p <or= 0.05), relapse rate (p = 0.009), and MRI (p <or= 0.05) compared with antibody-negative patients. In transiently positive patients, full efficacy was achieved after approximately 6 months of treatment, the time when patients were becoming antibody negative. The incidence of infusion-related adverse events was significantly higher in persistently positive patients. Results of SENTINEL were similar to AFFIRM, except with regard to sustained disability progression; differences between persistently positive and antibody-negative patients were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of persistent antibody positivity associated with natalizumab is 6%. Reduced clinical efficacy is apparent in persistently positive patients. Patients with a suboptimal clinical response or persistent infusion-related adverse events should be considered for antibody testing.

Rudick RA, Miller D, Hass S, Hutchinson M, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Galetta SL, Giovannoni G, Havrdova E, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Miller DH, O'Connor PW, Phillips JT, Polman CH, Radue EW, Stuart WH, Wajgt A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Anonymous00338. · Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #17696126 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To report the relationship between disease activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in relapsing multiple sclerosis, and the impact of natalizumab. METHODS: HRQoL data were available from 2,113 multiple sclerosis patients in natalizumab clinical studies. In the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study, patients received natalizumab 300 mg (n = 627) or placebo (n = 315); in the Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in Combination with Interferon Beta-1a in Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SENTINEL) study, patients received interferon beta-1a (IFN-beta-1a) plus natalizumab 300 mg (n = 589), or IFN-beta-1a plus placebo (n = 582). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) and a subject global assessment visual analog scale were administered at baseline and weeks 24, 52, and 104. Prespecified analyses included changes from baseline to week 104 in SF-36 and visual analog scale scores. Odds ratios for clinically meaningful improvement or worsening on the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary were calculated. RESULTS: Mean baseline SF-36 scores were significantly less than the general US population and correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, sustained disability progression, relapse number, and increased volume of brain magnetic resonance imaging lesions. Natalizumab significantly improved SF-36 PCS and Mental Component Summary scores at week 104 in AFFIRM. PCS changes were significantly improved by week 24 and at all subsequent time points. Natalizumab-treated patients in both studies were more likely to experience clinically important improvement and less likely to experience clinically important deterioration on the SF-36 PCS. The visual analog scale also showed significantly improved HRQoL with natalizumab. INTERPRETATION: HRQoL was impaired in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients, correlated with severity of disease as measured by neurological ratings or magnetic resonance imaging, and improved significantly with natalizumab.

Balcer LJ, Baier ML, Cohen JA, Kooijmans MF, Sandrock AW, Nano-Schiavi ML, Pfohl DC, Mills M, Bowen J, Ford C, Heidenreich FR, Jacobs DA, Markowitz CE, Stuart WH, Ying GS, Galetta SL, Maguire MG, Cutter GR. · Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #14638957 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Visual dysfunction is one of the most common causes of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), a new clinical trial outcome measure, does not currently include a test of visual function. OBJECTIVE: To examine contrast letter acuity as a candidate visual function test for the MSFC. METHODS: Binocular contrast letter acuity testing (Sloan charts) was performed in a subgroup of participants from the International Multiple Sclerosis Secondary Progressive Avonex Controlled Trial (IMPACT Substudy) and in MS patients and disease-free control subjects from a cross-sectional study of visual outcome measures (Multiple Sclerosis Vision Prospective cohort [MVP cohort]). High-contrast visual acuity was measured in both studies; MVP cohort participants underwent additional binocular testing for contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), color vision (D-15 desaturated test), and visual field (Esterman test, Humphrey Field Analyzer II). RESULTS: Contrast letter acuity (Sloan charts, p < 0.0001, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) and contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart, p = 0.003) best distinguished MS patients from disease-free control subjects in the MVP cohort. Correlations of Sloan chart scores with MSFC and Expanded Disability Statue Scale (EDSS) scores in both studies were significant and moderate in magnitude, demonstrating that Sloan chart scores reflect visual and neurologic dysfunction not entirely captured by the EDSS or MSFC. CONCLUSIONS: Among clinical measures, contrast letter acuity (Sloan charts) and contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart) demonstrate the greatest capacity to identify binocular visual dysfunction in MS. Sloan chart testing also captures unique aspects of neurologic dysfunction not captured by current EDSS or MSFC components, making it a strong candidate visual function test for the MSFC.

Kipp B, Bar-Or A, Gausling R, Oliveira EM, Fruhan SA, Stuart WH, Hafler DA. · Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA. · Eur J Immunol. · Pubmed #10940899 No free full text.

Abstract: We identified a novel population of human T cells, studied directly ex vivo, that co-express surface B7-1 and intracellular IL-4. These peripheral blood B7-1+/CD4+ T cells expressed cell surface molecules associated with differentiation including CD45RO and MHC class II, yet were CD69(-) and CD25(-). In short-term cultures, T cell receptor (TCR) cross-linking induced further IL-4 production with little IFN-gamma or TNF-alpha. In marked contrast, CD4+ T cells negative for B7-1 expressed intracellular IFN-gamma and high amounts of TNF-alpha but little IL-4 upon TCR cross-linking. The CD4+/B7-1+/IL-4-expressing T cells were of polyclonal origin based on their diverse TCR repertoire. To explore the biological significance of this B7-1+/IL-4+ T cell population and to assess its potential regulatory role in autoimmune disease, we examined whether these T cells isolated ex vivo were altered in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS). While the frequency of B7-1+ T cells was enhanced in patients with MS as compared to normal subjects, there was a significant diminution of B7-1+/IL-4+ T cells in the patients. The decrease in these IL-4-producing T cells in patients with autoimmune disease is consistent with a possible role as immunoregulatory T cells.