Multiple Sclerosis: Sharief M

Freedman MS, Thompson EJ, Deisenhammer F, Giovannoni G, Grimsley G, Keir G, Ohman S, Racke MK, Sharief M, Sindic CJ, Sellebjerg F, Tourtellotte WW. · Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Multiple Sclerosis Research Clinic, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #15956157 links to  free full text

Abstract: New criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) were published as the result of an internationally formed committee. To increase the specificity of diagnosis and to minimize the number of false diagnoses, the committee recommended the use of both clinical and paraclinical criteria, the latter involving information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Although rigorous magnetic resonance imaging requirements were provided, the "new criteria paper" fell short in terms of guidelines as to how the CSF analysis should be performed and simply equated the IgG index with isoelectric focusing, without any justification. The spectrum of parameters analyzed and methods for CSF analysis differ worldwide and often yield variable results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reliability, with no decided "optimal" CSF test for the diagnosis of MS. To address this question specifically, an international panel of experts in MS and CSF diagnostic techniques was convened and the result was this article, representing a consensus of all the participants. These recommendations for establishing a standard for the evaluation of CSF in patients suspected of having MS should greatly complement the new criteria in ensuring that a correct diagnosis of MS is being made.

Goodin DS, Biermann LD, Bohlega S, Boiko A, Chofflon M, Gebeily S, Gouider R, Havrdova E, Jakab G, Karabudak R, Karussis D, Miller A, Pakdaman H, Selmaj K, Sharief M, Anonymous00295. · Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA. email: · Curr Med Res Opin. · Pubmed #17908370 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: As results from an increasing number of clinical trials with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) become available, the challenge for the treating neurologist is how to decide on the appropriate therapy for an individual patient. OBJECTIVE: An International Working Group for Treatment Optimization in MS met to consider how the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) should be used to assess the current best evidence regarding the treatment of MS. This report summarizes the outcome from the workshop at which this topic was addressed. RESULTS: Class I evidence from head-to-head studies provides the best tool for direct comparisons of DMDs. However, other EBM approaches to data analysis from placebo-controlled trials can be used to help determine the benefits and risks of a particular DMD relative to placebo by calculating the number needed to treat to achieve a positive outcome, such as avoiding a relapse, and the number needed to harm to produce an additional adverse event, such as having a therapy-related dropout. This provides a structured basis for comparisons between DMDs. CONCLUSION: While such comparisons have their limitations, particularly when drugs with substantially different side-effect profiles are to be compared, they can provide useful information to guide treatment decisions.

Schwid SR, Thorpe J, Sharief M, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Rammohan K, Wendt J, Panitch H, Goodin D, Li D, Chang P, Francis G, Anonymous00131, Anonymous00132. · Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #15883267 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The EVIDENCE (Evidence of Interferon Dose-Response: European North American Comparative Efficacy) Study demonstrated that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who initiate interferon beta-1a therapy with 44 microg 3 times weekly (TIW) were less likely to have a relapse or activity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with those who initiate therapy at a dosage of 30 microg 1 time weekly (QW). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of changing the dosage from 30 microg QW to 44 microg TIW in this extension of the EVIDENCE Study. DESIGN/PATIENTS: Patients with relapsing MS originally randomized to interferon beta-1a, 30 microg QW, during the comparative phase of the study changed to 44 microg TIW, whereas patients originally randomized to 44 microg TIW continued that regimen. Patients were followed up, on average, for an additional 32 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The within-patient pretransition to post-transition change in relapse rate. RESULTS: At the transition visit, 223 (73%) of 306 patients receiving 30 microg QW converted to 44 microg TIW, and 272 (91%) of 299 receiving 44-microg TIW continued the same therapy. The post-transition annualized relapse rate decreased from 0.64 to 0.32 for patients increasing the dose (P<.001) and from 0.46 to 0.34 for patients continuing 44-microg TIW (P = .03). The change was greater in those increasing dose and frequency (P = .047). Patients converting to the 44-mug TIW regimen had fewer active lesions on T2-weighted MRI compared with before the transition (P = .02), whereas those continuing the 44-microg TIW regimen had no significant change in T2 active lesions. Patients who converted to high-dose/high-frequency interferon beta-1a therapy had increased rates of adverse events and treatment terminations consistent with the initiation of high-dose subcutaneous interferon therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving interferon beta-1a improved on clinical and MRI disease measures when they changed from 30 microg QW to 44 microg TIW.

Eikelenboom MJ, Petzold A, Lazeron RH, Silber E, Sharief M, Thompson EJ, Barkhof F, Giovannoni G, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM. · Department of Neurology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · Neurology. · Pubmed #12552034 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate markers of axonal damage in CSF and serum of patients with different subtypes of MS in relation to measures of disease progression on MRI. METHODS: In 51 patients with MS (21 relapsing-remitting, 20 secondary progressive, 10 primary progressive), levels of heavy and light neurofilaments (NfH and NfL) and antibodies to neurofilaments (anti-NfL and -NfH) as well as the total immunoglobulin G (IgG) were analyzed. MRI analysis included T2 hyperintense, T1 hypointense, and gadolinium enhancing lesions and markers of cerebral atrophy (ventricular and parenchymal fractions). RESULTS: For the total group, correlations were found between the anti-NfL index and the parenchymal fraction (PF) (r = -0.51, p < 0.001), T2 lesion load (r = 0.41, p < 0.05), ventricular fraction (r = 0.37, p < 0.05), and T1 lesion load (r = 0.37, p < 0.05). For the anti-NfH index, a correlation was found with the PF (r = -0.39, p < 0.05). No correlations were found between the IgG index and MRI measures. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal production of anti-NfL antibodies may serve as a marker of tissue damage, particularly axonal loss, in MS.

Freedman M, King J, Oger J, Sharief M, Hartung HP, Anonymous00117. · No affiliation provided · Lancet. · Pubmed #12781558 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Jeffery D, Bashir K, Buchwald L, Coyle P, Freedman M, Markowitz C, Rammohan K, Reder T, Sharief M, Wolinsky J. · No affiliation provided · J Neurol Sci. · Pubmed #12163200 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.