Multiple Sclerosis: McFarland HF

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Barkhof F, Calabresi PA, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Cutter GR, Freedman MS, Kappos L, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Metz LM, Miller AE, Montalban X, O'Connor PW, Panitch H, Richert JR, Petkau J, Schwid SR, Sormani MP, Thompson AJ, Weinshenker BG, Wolinsky JS. · Department of Neurology, Free University Medical Center in Amsterdam, PO Box 4075, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Neurology. · Pubmed #18362273 No free full text.

Abstract: The increasing number of established effective therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and emerging consensus for early treatment raise practical concerns and ethical dilemmas for placebo-controlled clinical trials in this disease. An international group of clinicians, ethicists, statisticians, regulators, and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry convened to reconsider prior recommendations regarding the ethics of placebo-controlled trials in MS. The group concluded that placebo-controlled trials can still be done ethically, with restrictions. For patients with relapsing MS for which established effective therapies exist, placebo-controlled trials should only be offered with rigorous informed consent if the subjects refuse to use these treatments, have not responded to them, or if these treatments are not available to them for other reasons (e.g., economics). Suggestions are provided to protect subject autonomy and improve informed consent procedures. Recommendations are tighter than previously suggested for placebo-controlled trials in "resource-restricted" environments where established therapies may not be available. Guidance is also provided on the ethics of alternative trial designs and the balance between study subject burden and risk, scientific rationale and interpretability of trial outcomes.

McFarland HF. · No affiliation provided · AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. · Pubmed #10588096 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

McFarland HF. · No affiliation provided · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #10443877 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

McFarland HF, Martin R. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Nat Immunol. · Pubmed #17712344 No free full text.

Abstract: Understanding of autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, has expanded considerably in recent years. New insights have been provided by not only animal models but also studies of patients, often in conjunction with experimental therapies. It is accepted that autoimmune T cells mediate the early steps of new multiple sclerosis lesions, and although uncertainties remain about the specific targets of autoreactive T cells, several studies indicate myelin antigens. Recent findings obtained with both animal models and patients with multiple sclerosis indicate involvement of a T helper cell with a T(H)-17 phenotype, in contrast to previous data indicating that T helper type 1 cells are critical. Evidence has also been presented for CD8(+) and regulatory T cell populations, although their involvement remains to be established. Despite evidence supporting the idea that autoreactive T cells are involved in disease induction, cells of myeloid lineage, antibodies and complement as well as processes intrinsic to the central nervous system seem to determine the effector stages of tissue damage. Careful analysis of the alterations in immune processes should further advance knowledge of the relationship between the inflammatory component of this disease and the more diffuse degeneration of progressive multiple sclerosis.

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Metz LM, McFarland HF, O'Connor PW, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Weinshenker BG, Wolinsky JS. · VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Free University, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #16283615 No free full text.

Abstract: New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis integrating magnetic resonance image assessment with clinical and other paraclinical methods were introduced in 2001. The "McDonald Criteria" have been extensively assessed and used since 2001. New evidence and consensus now strengthen the role of these criteria in the multiple sclerosis diagnostic workup to demonstrate dissemination of lesions in time, to clarify the use of spinal cord lesions, and to simplify diagnosis of primary progressive disease. The 2005 Revisions to the McDonald Diagnostic Criteria for MS should simplify and speed diagnosis, whereas maintaining adequate sensitivity and specificity.

Morgen K, McFarland HF, Pillemer SR. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. · Semin Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15609267 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of central nervous system (CNS) disease in primary Sjogrens syndrome (pSS) and indicate ways in which cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help determine the significance of CNS involvement. METHODS: The current review was based on a Medline (Pubmed) literature search through May 2003, focused on Sjogrens syndrome, other vasculitides, multiple sclerosis (MS), specific MRI techniques, and MRI findings with regard to the above-mentioned diseases. Additional literature was identified in the reference sections of articles listed in Medline. RESULTS: Severe CNS manifestations reminiscent of MS have been described in pSS patients. Moreover, the prevalence of nonfocal neuropsychological abnormalities has been found to be elevated in some pSS patient populations. MRI studies suggest discrete cerebral tissue damage even in neurologically asymptomatic patients. However, small white matter lesions are nonspecific and may be related to age or cerebrovascular risk factors such as hypertension. A large controlled study, complementing established T2-weighted MRI with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) to achieve high sensitivity in lesion detection, could indicate the disease specificity of white matter lesions in pSS. Newer MR techniques, such as spectroscopy and magnetization transfer imaging, applied, for example, in MS and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to evaluate CNS tissue injury, could help determine the extent and mechanisms of macroscopic and microscopic CNS lesions in pSS. CONCLUSIONS: Future controlled studies will be necessary to more precisely estimate the prevalence of CNS lesions in pSS, specifically of discrete white matter abnormalities. Newer MRI techniques have the potential to provide information on the severity and pathophysiological mechanisms of CNS tissue damage.

Filippi M, Dousset V, McFarland HF, Miller DH, Grossman RI. · Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute and University San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. · J Magn Reson Imaging. · Pubmed #11997889 No free full text.

Abstract: On June 24-26, 2001, the first meeting of the White Matter Study Group (WMSG) of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) was held in Bordeaux, France. This paper is the report of the consensus reached among the delegates of the meeting on how to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to make an early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), to measure MS activity accurately and reliably, and to monitor the effect of treatment on disease evolution.

McFarland HF. · National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #11936491 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

McFarland HF, Barkhof F, Antel J, Miller DH. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #11936488 No free full text.

Abstract: The need for more specific and more sensitive outcome measures for use in testing new therapies in multiple sderosis (MS) is generally accepted. This need has been accentuated by the realization that the ability to conduct large placebo-controlled trials will be limited in the future. From the first use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study MS, the ability of this imaging technique to identify areas of the central nervous system damage by the disease process in MS has been impressive. Thus, the possibility that MRI could serve as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials in MS has been attractive. The use of MRI as a surrogate outcome measure has been examined by an international group of investigators with expertise in clinical aspects of MS, the use of MRI in MS, and in experimental therapeutics. The group agreed that MRI does not represent a validated surrogate in any clinical form of MS. It was also agreed, however, that MRI does provide a reflection of the underlying pathology in the disease, but no single MRI measurement in isolation was seen as sufficient to monitor disease. The use for multiple imaging techniques, especially new, emerging techniques that may better reflect the underlying pathology, was seen as particularly important in monitoring studies of patients with either secondary or primary progressive MS. The choice of MRI techniques used to monitor new therapies needs to be consistent with the proposed mechanisms of the new therapy and phase of the disease. It was also noted, however, that additional validation is required for nonconventional imaging techniques. Finally, the participants noted that clinical trials using MRI as a primary outcome measure may fail to fully identify the effects of the therapy on dinical measures and that the risk and cost-benefit ratio of the treatment might be unresolved. Thus, before MRI is used as a primary outcome measure, new approaches to trial design must be given careful consideration.

Markovic-Plese S, McFarland HF. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute for Neurological Diseases and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 5B-16, 10 Center Drive MSC 1400, Bethesda, MD 20892-1400, USA. · Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. · Pubmed #11898527 No free full text.

Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is thought to be an autoimmune disease with a chronic inflammatory response directed against central nervous system (CNS) myelin antigens. Immunologic studies indicate that autoreactive CD4+ lymphocytes migrate into the CNS causing blood brain barrier (BBB) disruption, an initial event in the evolution of the MS lesion. Subsequent antigen recognition within the CNS initiates inflammatory responses that, through the multiple effector mechanisms, lead to demyelination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies provide new insights into the evolution of the MS lesion, revealing an active and continuous pathologic process that is not only localized to focal lesions, but also diffusely affects normal appearing white matter (NAWM). Standard T2-weighted images are exquisitely sensitive, showing changes due to inflammation, edema, demyelination, and axonal loss, but because of the lack of pathologic specificity, they only moderately correlate with the clinical parameters. New MRI techniques, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetization transfer, and diffusion imaging, provide a better measure of axonal loss and demyelination, the most clinically relevant components of MS lesions. Hopefully, they will enable us to more accurately monitor disease activity and evaluate the effects of new therapies on the progression of the disease.

Frank JA, McFarland HF. · Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology Research, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive MSC 1074, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Neuroimaging Clin N Am. · Pubmed #11359727 No free full text.

Abstract: MR imaging has made a significant contribution to the understanding of the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS). MR imaging is an important technique for investigating the pathologic process in the MS patient's brain and spinal cord, and it is now considered an essential part of all clinical trials being performed on new agents in the treatment of MS. This article provides an overview for those wishing to become involved in MS clinical research. Discussion includes the use of conventional and newer MR imaging techniques in clinical trials, current thoughts regarding the role of MR imaging as a surrogate outcome measure, and various types of trial designs.

Martin R, Gran B, Zhao Y, Markovic-Plese S, Bielekova B, Marques A, Sung MH, Hemmer B, Simon R, McFarland HF, Pinilla C. · Neuroimmunology Branch, NINDS, NIH Building, 10 Room 5B-16, 10 Center DR MSC 1400, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1400, USA. · J Autoimmun. · Pubmed #11334482 No free full text.

Abstract: The concept of molecular mimicry provides and elegant framework as to how cross-reactivity between antigens from a foreign agent with self proteins may trigger autoimmune diseases. While it was previously thought that sequence and structural homology between foreign and self proteins or the sharing of T cell receptor (TCR) and MHC-binding motifs are required for molecular mimicry to occur, we have shown that even completely unrelated peptide sequences may lead to cross-recognition by T cells. The use of synthetic combinatorial peptide libraries in the positional scanning format (PS-SCL) together with novel biometric prediction approaches has allowed us to describe the recognition profiles of individual autoreactive T cell clones (TCC) with unprecedented accuracy. Through studies of myelin-specific TCC as well as clones from the nervous system of patients suffering from chronic central nervous (CNS) Lyme disease it has become clear that at least some T cells are more degenerate than previously anticipated. These data will not only help us to redefine what constitutes specific T cell recognition, but also allow us to study in more detail the biological role of molecular mimicry. A recent clinical trial with an altered peptide ligand (APL) of one of the candidate myelin basic protein (MBP) epitopes in MS (amino acids 83-99) has shown that such a modified MBP peptide may not only have therapeutic efficacy, but also bears the potential to exacerbate disease. Thus, we provide firm evidence that the basic principles of cross-recognition and their pathogenetic significance are relevant in MS.

Martin R, Bielekova B, Gran B, McFarland HF. · Neuroimmunology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1400, USA. · J Neural Transm Suppl. · Pubmed #11205154 No free full text.

Abstract: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is considered a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease of central nervous system myelin. Based on elegant experiments in an animal model of MS, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), a number of myelin proteins and peptides derived from these can induce inflammatory demyelinating lesions. Recent studies with transgenic mice expressing human HLA-DR molecules and a myelin basic protein (MBP)-specific T cell receptor as well as data from a phase II clinical trial with an altered peptide ligand based on MBP peptide (83-99) provide convincing evidence that the pathogenetic concepts which largely stem from the above EAE studies are valid in MS, too.

Berti R, Soldan SS, Akhyani N, McFarland HF, Jacobson S. · Viral Immunology Section, Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, MD 20892, USA. · J Neurovirol. · Pubmed #10871792 No free full text.

Abstract: Throughout the years, a long list of viruses has been associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), however no virus to date has been definitively identified as the etiologic agent of this disease. Recently, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), a newly described herpesvirus, has been suggested to play a role in MS based on: immunohistochemical demonstration of HHV-6 in MS plaques, increased antibodies response to HHV-6 in sera and CSF of MS patients, and the demonstration of HHV-6 DNA in the serum of MS patients but not in normal individuals. To extend these observations we have focused our research in multiple directions. We have increased the number of MS patients tested for HHV-6 serum DNA providing confirmation of our previous study. Additionally we have investigated a possible correlation between HHV-6 viremia and clinical activity. Finally to provide insight into the pathogenesis of this disease, we have begun to characterize the cellular immune response of MS patients to HHV-6. Collectively these studies will help to define the role that HHV-6 may play in the pathogenesis of MS.

Fazekas F, Barkhof F, Filippi M, Grossman RI, Li DK, McDonald WI, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Simon JH, Wolinsky JS, Miller DH. · Department of Neurology and MRI Center, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria. · Neurology. · Pubmed #10449103 No free full text.

Abstract: MRI is very sensitive in showing MS lesions throughout the CNS. Using MRI for diagnostic purposes, however useful, is a complex issue because of limited specificity of findings and a variety of options as to when, how, and which patients to examine. Comparability of data and a common view regarding the impact of MRI are needed. Following a review of the typical appearance and pattern of MS lesions including differential diagnostic considerations, we suggest economic MRI examination protocols for the brain and spine. Recommendations for referral to MRI consider the need to avoid misdiagnosis and the probability of detecting findings of diagnostic relevance. We also suggest MRI classes of evidence for MS to determine the diagnostic weight of findings and their incorporation into the clinical evaluation. These proposals should help to optimize and standardize the use of MRI in the diagnosis of MS.

Gran B, Hemmer B, Vergelli M, McFarland HF, Martin R. · Cellular Immunology Section, Neuroimmunology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #10319877 No free full text.

Abstract: Various mechanisms have been proposed for the initiation of autoimmune responses by autoreactive T-cell clones. One of these, the molecular mimicry hypothesis, postulates that myelin-reactive T-cell clones are activated by foreign antigens. Until recently, sequence homology between self- and foreign antigens was considered necessary for cross-recognition to occur in multiple sclerosis. This article reviews current progress in T-cell receptor immunology that led to modify this view and proposes a role for degenerate T-cell antigen recognition in the induction of autoimmunity.

McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS. · Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #11456302 No free full text.

Abstract: The International Panel on MS Diagnosis presents revised diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). The focus remains on the objective demonstration of dissemination of lesions in both time and space. Magnetic resonance imaging is integrated with dinical and other paraclinical diagnostic methods. The revised criteria facilitate the diagnosis of MS in patients with a variety of presentations, including "monosymptomatic" disease suggestive of MS, disease with a typical relapsing-remitting course, and disease with insidious progression, without clear attacks and remissions. Previously used terms such as "clinically definite" and "probable MS" are no longer recommended. The outcome of a diagnostic evaluation is either MS, "possible MS" (for those at risk for MS, but for whom diagnostic evaluation is equivocal), or "not MS."

Bielekova B, Howard T, Packer AN, Richert N, Blevins G, Ohayon J, Waldmann TA, McFarland HF, Martin R. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 5C103, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1400, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #19364933 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Several questions arise concerning the use of the anti-CD25 antibody daclizumab to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: To answer the following 3 questions related to the efficacy of daclizumab therapy in patients with MS: Is the therapeutic effect of daclizumab dependent on combination with interferon beta? Is a higher dosage of daclizumab more efficacious in patients with persistent disease activity? Can biomarkers predict full vs partial therapeutic response to daclizumab? DESIGN: An open-label baseline vs treatment phase II clinical trial of daclizumab in patients having MS with inadequate response to interferon beta. Three months of interferon beta treatment at baseline were followed by 5.5 months of interferon beta-daclizumab combination therapy. If patients experienced more than 75% reduction of contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) on brain magnetic resonance imaging at month 5.5 compared with baseline, daclizumab was continued as monotherapy for 10 months. Otherwise, the dosage of daclizumab was doubled. SETTING: Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with MS receiving standard preparations of interferon beta who experienced more than 1 MS exacerbation or whose clinical disability increased in the preceding 12 months and who had at least 2 CELs on baseline brain magnetic resonance images. INTERVENTION: Daclizumab (1 mg/kg) as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks in combination with interferon beta (months 0-5.5) and as monotherapy (months 6.5-15.5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the reduction of CELs among interferon beta monotherapy, interferon beta-daclizumab combination therapy, and daclizumab monotherapy. The secondary outcomes included immunologic biomarkers and changes in clinical disability. RESULTS: Overall, 5 of 15 patients (33%) experienced adverse effects of therapy. Two patients developed systemic adverse effects, and daclizumab therapy was discontinued. Although daclizumab monotherapy was efficacious in 9 of 13 patients with MS, interferon beta-daclizumab combination therapy was necessary to stabilize disease activity in the other 4 patients. Daclizumab therapy led to 72% inhibition of new CELs and significant improvement in clinical disability. Pilot biomarkers (increase in CD56bright natural killer cells and decrease in CD8+ T cells) were identified that can differentiate between full and partial daclizumab responders. CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab monotherapy is effective in most patients who experienced persistent MS disease activity with interferon beta therapy. Interferon beta-daclizumab combination therapy or higher dosages of daclizumab may be necessary to achieve optimal therapeutic response in all patients. Biomarkers may identify patients with suboptimal response to daclizumab monotherapy. Administration among a large patient sample during a longer period is needed to fully define the safety and long-term efficacy of daclizumab as treatment for high-inflammatory MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00001934.

Chiu AW, Richert N, Ehrmantraut M, Ohayon J, Gupta S, Bomboi G, Gaindh D, Cantor FK, Frank JA, McFarland HF, Bagnato F. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1400, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #19001157 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the heterogeneity in magnetic resonance image (MRI) patterns of response to interferon beta across patients with multiple sclerosis or within an individual patient over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis underwent monthly MRIs and clinical examinations (6-month pretherapy phase and 36-month therapy phase) and bimonthly neutralizing antibody tests. On each MRI, the total number of contrast-enhancing lesions was noted. Therapy MRI responders were defined as those with a reduction of 60% or more in the total number of contrast-enhancing lesions during each semester of therapy. INTERVENTION: Subcutaneous administration of interferon beta-1b, 250 microg, every other day for 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reduction in the number of contrast-enhancing lesions. RESULTS: Eight patients (53.3%) were MRI responders and 7 (46.7%) were nonresponders. Of those 7, 3 (20.0%) had only an initial optimal reduction of the total number of contrast-enhancing lesions, 2 (13.3%) never reached an optimal response, and 2 (13.3%) had a delayed optimal response. No clear association between neutralizing antibody profile and MRI response was evident. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple MRI evaluations disclose that approximately only half of the patients treated with interferon beta achieve and maintain a full response to the drug over time, although an additional small number of individuals may still restore an optimal response to the drug after an initial failure.

Gupta S, Solomon JM, Tasciyan TA, Cao MM, Stone RD, Ostuni JL, Ohayon JM, Muraro PA, Frank JA, Richert ND, McFarland HF, Bagnato F. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #16320725 No free full text.

Abstract: Interferon-beta (IFNbeta) reduces the number and load of new contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the ability of IFNbeta to reduce lesion sizes and re-enhancements of pre-existing CELs has not been examined extensively. Activity of contrast re-enhancing lesions (Re-CELs) and contrast single-enhancing lesions (S-CELs) were monitored in ten patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS. These patients underwent monthly post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) for an 18-month natural history phase and an 18-month therapy phase with subcutaneous IFNbeta-1b, totaling 37 images per patient. The activity was analysed using the first image as a baseline and registering subsequent active monthly images to the baseline. There was a 76.4% reduction in the number of CELs with IFNbeta therapy. The decrease was greater (P = 0.003) for S-CELs (82.3%) than for Re-CELs (57.4%). S-CELs showed no changes in durations of enhancement and maximal lesion sizes with treatment. Exclusively for Re-CELs, IFNbeta-1b significantly decreased maximal lesion sizes, total number of enhancement periods and total months of enhancement. Thus, IFNbeta appears to be effective in reducing the degree of severity of inflammation among Re-CELs, as reflected by their reduced maximal lesion sizes and durations of enhancement.

Bagnato F, Gupta S, Richert ND, Stone RD, Ohayon JM, Frank JA, McFarland HF. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1400, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #16157739 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Chronic, hypointense black holes (BHs) are recognized as a sign of permanent damage in patients with multiple sclerosis. Although the effects of interferon beta-1b in reducing the formation of new BHs are established, it is not clear whether the drug may reduce BH duration after these lesions are formed. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of interferon beta-1b in reducing the duration of T1 BHs in patients with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Patients were clinically assessed and imaged monthly over a 36-month natural history phase and 36-month therapy phase. Numbers of contrast-enhanced lesions and newly formed BHs were counted on each scan. Each BH was counted until it was no longer seen. SETTING: Outpatient service of the Neuroimmunology Branch at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. PATIENTS: Six patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were included. One patient did not form any BHs during the therapy phase. Analyses were performed on the remaining 5 individuals. INTERVENTIONS: Interferon beta-1b at the dosage of 8 million international units every other day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and duration (in months) of newly formed BHs. RESULTS: Rate of BH accumulation decreased with treatment (P = .01), but Kaplan-Meier models revealed that the duration of BHs did not shorten (chi2(1) = 2.47, P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Interferon beta-1b reduces the frequency of new BH formation but does not appear to decrease their duration in time. Analyses with larger patient cohorts are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Morgen K, Crawford AL, Stone RD, Martin R, Richert ND, Frank JA, McFarland HF. · National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA · Mult Scler. · Pubmed #15794386 No free full text.

Abstract: T1 black holes (BH) have been found to represent focal areas of substantial central nervous system tissue damage in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. We examined the development of T1 BH over a three-year period of treatment with interferon (IFN)beta-1b in a group of 20 patients with relapsing-remitting MS. The number of contrast-enhancing lesions (CEL) after one year of treatment predicted a change in the T1 BH volume in the following two years. In patients without CEL, the T1 BH volume remained stable, whereas it increased in patients with CEL. The occurrence of CEL in patients treated with IFNbeta may indicate a heightened risk of accumulating T1 BH.

Muraro PA, Douek DC, Packer A, Chung K, Guenaga FJ, Cassiani-Ingoni R, Campbell C, Memon S, Nagle JW, Hakim FT, Gress RE, McFarland HF, Burt RK, Martin R. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · J Exp Med. · Pubmed #15738052 links to  free full text

Abstract: Clinical trials have indicated that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can persistently suppress inflammatory disease activity in a subset of patients with severe multiple sclerosis (MS), but the mechanism has remained unclear. To understand whether the beneficial effects on the course of disease are mediated by lympho-depletive effects alone or are sustained by a regeneration of the immune repertoire, we examined the long-term immune reconstitution in patients with MS who received HSCT. After numeric recovery of leukocytes, at 2-yr follow-up there was on average a doubling of the frequency of naive CD4(+) T cells at the expense of memory T cells. Phenotypic and T cell receptor excision circle (TREC) analysis confirmed a recent thymic origin of the expanded naive T cell subset. Analysis of the T cell receptor repertoire showed the reconstitution of an overall broader clonal diversity and an extensive renewal of clonal specificities compared with pretherapy. These data are the first to demonstrate that long-term suppression of inflammatory activity in MS patients who received HSCT does not depend on persisting lymphopenia and is associated with profound qualitative immunological changes that demonstrate a de novo regeneration of the T cell compartment.

Bielekova B, Richert N, Howard T, Blevins G, Markovic-Plese S, McCartin J, Frank JA, Würfel J, Ohayon J, Waldmann TA, McFarland HF, Martin R. · Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. · Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. · Pubmed #15161974 links to  free full text

Abstract: Identifying effective treatment combinations for MS patients failing standard therapy is an important goal. We report the results of a phase II open label baseline-to-treatment trial of a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD25 (daclizumab) in 10 multiple sclerosis patients with incomplete response to IFN-beta therapy and high brain inflammatory and clinical disease activity. Daclizumab was very well tolerated and led to a 78% reduction in new contrast-enhancing lesions and to a significant improvement in several clinical outcome measures.

Frank JA, Richert N, Bash C, Stone L, Calabresi PA, Lewis B, Stone R, Howard T, McFarland HF. · Experimental Neuroimaging Section, Lab of Diagnostic Radiology Research, NINDS, NIH, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #15007120 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of interferon-beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) treatment on total contrast-enhancing lesions (CEL), white matter lesion load (WMLL), and cerebral atrophy (CA) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using serial monthly MRI. METHODS: An open-label baseline-vs-treatment crossover trial was conducted with 30 RRMS patients monitored during a 6-month baseline and up to 36 months on treatment with IFNbeta-1b. Monthly MRI exams and neurologic exams using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were performed. RESULTS: The percentage changes from baseline for years 1, 2, and 3 on IFNbeta-1b were as follows: brain volume (BV) = -1.35, -1.48, and -1.68%; CEL = -76.5, -60.1, and -54.7%; WMLL = -12.2, -9.8, and -10.4%. There was no difference in the BV, CEL, or WMLL for between-year comparisons, and the decrease in BV from year 1 to years 2 and 3 was less than the change from baseline to year 1. EDSS did increase (p < 0.001) when comparing the last 3 months of baseline (2.8 +/- 2.1) and the last 3 months on IFNbeta-1b (3.6 +/- 2.1). Eleven patients developed neutralizing antibody (NAb) during the study. The effect of IFNbeta-1b on CEL and WMLL was significantly reduced in NAb+ patients compared with NAb- patients (p < 0.003). CONCLUSION: IFNbeta-1b decreases contrast-enhancing lesions and white matter lesion load over 3 years on therapy and slows the progression in cerebral atrophy during years 2 and 3.