Multiple Sclerosis: Ebers G

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 11 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Multiple Sclerosis," originating from Planet Earth —» Ebers G.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline Guidelines for autologous blood and marrow stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a consensus report written on behalf of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European Charcot Foundation. BMT-MS Study Group. 2000

Comi G, Kappos L, Clanet M, Ebers G, Fassas A, Fazekas F, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Hertenstein B, Karussis D, Martino G, Tyndall A, van der Meché FG. · Multiple Sclerosis Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. · J Neurol. · Pubmed #10896270 No free full text.

Abstract: Recent reports suggest the possible beneficial effects of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). The definition of the risk/benefit ratio for such a treatment is perceived as a major issue for the neurological community worldwide. The First Consensus Conference on Bone Marrow Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis was held in Milan, Italy on 21 February 1998. Participants from 16 European, North American, and South American countries discussed the guidelines for performing HSCT in MS. This conference was organized in order to: (a) define criteria for patient selection; (b) define transplantation procedures to maximize efficacy of the treatment and minimize its toxicity; (c) standardize patient outcome evaluation; and (d) establish an international working group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HSCT in MS and to study the immunological changes related to HSCT in MS patients. During the meeting in Milan agreement was reached on: (a) the preparation and distribution of a consensus report on HSCT in MS and (b) the design of an open trial for an initial assessment of the safety and efficacy of HSCT in MS. The consensus reached during the meeting and the design of the clinical trial are summarized in this contribution.

2 Editorial Passive smoking and replication. 2008

Ebers G. · No affiliation provided · Eur J Neurol. · Pubmed #19049541 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

3 Editorial MRI: measure of efficacy. free! 2000

Ebers G. · No affiliation provided · Brain. · Pubmed #11050019 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

4 Review Multiple sclerosis: the environment and causation. 2007

Giovannoni G, Ebers G. · Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University London, London, UK. · Curr Opin Neurol. · Pubmed #17495618 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review current thinking on the aetiology of multiple sclerosis, how genetic susceptibility interacts with environmental risk factors at the population level, multiple sclerosis-associated risk factors and contemporary causation theory. RECENT FINDINGS: Two large genomic studies have confirmed the unambiguous associations with the DRB1 and DQB alleles of the human leucocyte antigen class II region. No other region with genome-wide significance has been identified. Family-based genetic epidemiological approaches have found no evidence of nongenetic transmissibility. This indicates that the action of the environment in influencing multiple sclerosis risk is operative at a macroenvironmental or population level, and not within families or the microenvironment. Environmental factors receiving renewed attention include vitamin D status, Epstein-Barr virus infection and smoking. Bradford Hill's criteria for causation have been modified and should be adopted as a framework for demonstrating causation in relationship to multiple sclerosis. SUMMARY: Multiple sclerosis is a complex disease because of interaction between genes and the environment. Any theory of causation for a specific agent will have to be congruent with the biology of the disease.

5 Review Interferon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. 2001

Rice GP, Incorvaia B, Munari L, Ebers G, Polman C, D'Amico R, Filippini G. · Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #11687131 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recombinant interferons have been shown to suppress both the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of disease activity in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVES: We performed a Cochrane review of all randomised, placebo-controlled trials of recombinant interferons in RRMS. SEARCH STRATEGY: Of 208 articles identified by a predefined search strategy, seven of these, reporting randomised trials, met all the selection criteria and form the subject of this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: The trials selected were double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trials of RRMS patients who were treated with recombinant interferon, given by the subcutaneous or the intramuscular route. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The quality of the trials was variable, with substantial methodological inadequacies in allocation concealment, high proportion and incomplete description of dropouts and failure to adhere to the principles of intention to treat analysis. The baseline characteristics were largely comparable between treatment and placebo groups. Because of prominent treatment-associated side effects, which could be easily identified by patients, these trials could be considered as single blind rather than double-blind. MAIN RESULTS: Although 1215 patients were included in this review, only 919 (76%) contributed to the results concerning exacerbations and progression of the disease at two years. Specifically interferon significantly reduced the occurrence of exacerbations (RR =0.80, 95% CI [0.73,0.88], p<0.001) and progression of the disease (RR =0.69, 95% CI [0.55,0.87], p= 0.002) two years after randomisation. However, the correct assignment of dropouts was essential to the demonstration of efficacy, most conspicuously concerning the effect of the drug on disease progression. If interferon-treated patients who dropped out were deemed to have progressed (worst case scenario) the significance of these effects was lost (RR = 1.31, CI [0.60,2.89], p = 0.5). The evolution in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology in the decade in which these trials were performed and different reporting of data among trials made it impossible to perform a quantitative analysis of the MRI results. Both clinical and laboratory side effects reported in the trials were more frequent in treated patients than in controls. No information was available regarding side effects and adverse events after two years of follow-up. The impact of interferon treatment (and its side effects) on the quality of life of patients was not reported in any trial included in this review. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of interferon on exacerbations and disease progression in patients with relapsing remitting MS was modest after one and two years of treatment. It was not possible to conduct a quantitative analysis beyond two years. Longer follow-up and more uniform reporting of clinical and MRI outcomes among these trials might have allowed for a more convincing conclusion.

6 Clinical Conference The evolution of neutralizing antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta-1b. 1999

Rice GP, Paszner B, Oger J, Lesaux J, Paty D, Ebers G. · London MS Clinic, Ontario, Canada. · Neurology. · Pubmed #10214759 No free full text.

Abstract: The fate of the neutralizing antibody (NAB) in MS patients treated with interferons remains unclear. We conducted a follow-up survey of NAB titers in 59 long-term treated patients from the London and Vancouver cohorts of the pivotal trial of interferon alpha-1b. NAB were measured with the myxovirus protein A assay and an ELISA, at a mean follow-up that exceeded 8 years. NAB disappeared in the majority of patients.

7 Article The Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme Monitoring Study--early results and lessons for the future. free! 2009

Pickin M, Cooper CL, Chater T, O'Hagan A, Abrams KR, Cooper NJ, Boggild M, Palace J, Ebers G, Chilcott JB, Tappenden P, Nicholl J. · Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. · BMC Neurol. · Pubmed #19126193 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Risk sharing schemes represent an innovative and important approach to the problems of rationing and achieving cost-effectiveness in high cost or controversial health interventions. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of risk sharing schemes, looking at long term clinical outcomes, to determine the price at which high cost treatments would be acceptable to the NHS. METHODS: This case study of the first NHS risk sharing scheme, a long term prospective cohort study of beta interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in 71 specialist MS centres in UK NHS hospitals, recruited adults with relapsing forms of MS, meeting Association of British Neurologists (ABN) criteria for disease modifying therapy. Outcome measures were: success of recruitment and follow up over the first three years, analysis of baseline and initial follow up data and the prospect of estimating the long term cost-effectiveness of these treatments. RESULTS: Centres consented 5560 patients. Of the 4240 patients who had been in the study for a least one year, annual review data were available for 3730 (88.0%). Of the patients who had been in the study for at least two years and three years, subsequent annual review data were available for 2055 (78.5%) and 265 (71.8%) patients respectively. Baseline characteristics and a small but statistically significant progression of disease were similar to those reported in previous pivotal studies. CONCLUSION: Successful recruitment, follow up and early data analysis suggest that risk sharing schemes should be able to deliver their objectives. However, important issues of analysis, and political and commercial conflicts of interest still need to be addressed.

8 Article Reducing the probability of false positive research findings by pre-publication validation - experience with a large multiple sclerosis database. free! 2008

Daumer M, Held U, Ickstadt K, Heinz M, Schach S, Ebers G. · Sylvia Lawry Centre for MS Research, Hohenlindener Str, 1, 81677 Munich, Germany. · BMC Med Res Methodol. · Pubmed #18402689 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Published false positive research findings are a major problem in the process of scientific discovery. There is a high rate of lack of replication of results in clinical research in general, multiple sclerosis research being no exception. Our aim was to develop and implement a policy that reduces the probability of publishing false positive research findings.We have assessed the utility to work with a pre-publication validation policy after several years of research in the context of a large multiple sclerosis database. METHODS: The large database of the Sylvia Lawry Centre for Multiple Sclerosis Research was split in two parts: one for hypothesis generation and a validation part for confirmation of selected results. We present case studies from 5 finalized projects that have used the validation policy and results from a simulation study. RESULTS: In one project, the "relapse and disability" project as described in section II (example 3), findings could not be confirmed in the validation part of the database. The simulation study showed that the percentage of false positive findings can exceed 20% depending on variable selection. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the validation policy has prevented the publication of at least one research finding that could not be validated in an independent data set (and probably would have been a "true" false-positive finding) over the past three years, and has led to improved data analysis, statistical programming, and selection of hypotheses. The advantages outweigh the lost statistical power inherent in the process.

9 Article Evidence of linkage with HLA-DR in DRB1*15-negative families with multiple sclerosis. free! 2001

Ligers A, Dyment DA, Willer CJ, Sadovnick AD, Ebers G, Risch N, Hillert J, Anonymous00336. · Division of Neurology, Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. · Am J Hum Genet. · Pubmed #11519010 links to  free full text

Abstract: The importance of the HLA-DR locus to multiple sclerosis (MS) susceptibility was assessed in 542 sib pairs with MS and in their families. By genotyping 1,978 individuals for HLA-DRB1 alleles, we confirmed the well-established association of MS with HLA-DRB1*15 (HLA-DRB1*1501 and HLA-DRB5*0101), by the transmission/disequilibrium test (chi2=138.3; P<.0001). We obtained significant evidence of linkage throughout the whole data set (mlod=4.09; 59.9% sharing). Surprisingly, similar sharing was also observed in 58 families in which both parents lacked the DRB1*15 allele (mlod=1.56; 62.7% sharing; P=.0081). Our findings suggest that the notion that HLA-DRB1*15 is the sole major-histocompatibility-complex determinant of susceptibility in northern-European populations with MS may be incorrect. It remains possible that the association of MS with HLA-DRB1*15 is due to linkage disequilibrium with a nearby locus and/or to the presence of disease-influencing allele(s) in DRB1*15-negative haplotypes.

10 Minor Controversies across continents. Report from the MS Forum Symposium, September 2002, Baltimore, USA. free! 2003

Bates D, Ebers G. · No affiliation provided · Int MS J. · Pubmed #12906769 links to  free full text

Abstract: The personal views of speakers from North America and Europe concerning the diagnosis and management of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) were presented at an MS Forum symposium before ACTRIM/ECTRIMS Meeting in Baltimore, USA. There were more areas of agreement than controversy and the overall impression was that MS is managed similarly across the continents. Four topics were discussed: diagnosing the clinically isolated syndrome; guidelines for using disease-modifying therapy; people who fail to respond to disease-modifying treatment; and treating the patient with rapid deterioration to disability.

11 Minor Modelling multiple sclerosis. 1999

Ebers G. · No affiliation provided · Nat Genet. · Pubmed #10545935 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.