Migraine Disorders: Planet Earth

Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J, Wang SJ, Anonymous00408. · Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. [corrected] · Cephalalgia. · Pubmed #18294250 No free full text.

Abstract: In 1991 the Clinical Trials Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (IHS) developed and published its first edition of the Guidelines on controlled trials of drugs in episodic migraine because only quality trials can form the basis for international collaboration on drug therapy, and these Guidelines would 'improve the quality of controlled clinical trials in migraine'. With the current trend for large multinational trials, there is a need for increased awareness of methodological issues in clinical trials of drugs and other treatments for chronic migraine. These Guidelines are intended to assist in the design of well-controlled clinical trials of chronic migraine in adults, and do not apply to studies in children or adolescents.

Gunner KB, Smith HD, Ferguson LE. · University of Texas Health Science Center at Houton, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · J Pediatr Health Care. · Pubmed #18174091 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Láinez JM, Castillo J, González VM, Otero M, Mateos V, Leira R, Pascual J, Anonymous00353. · Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología. · Rev Clin Esp. · Pubmed #17475183 No free full text.

Abstract: Migraine is the most frequent neurological reason for consultation. The differences regarding health care system, type of professional seeing these patients and therapeutic armamentarium available in the different countries are important, which makes it very recommendable to have an action guide that reflects the local clinical practice. Following the year 2005 WHO recommendations in its "Global Campaign" against migraine, the coordinators of the Headache Study Groups of the Spanish Society of Neurology, the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine, the Spanish Society of Rural and General Medicine, the Spanish Society of General Medicine and the Global Campaign decided to jointly make this guide. To do so, they made a search in MEDLINE, using the terms "migraine", "migraine treatment" and "headache guidelines" and "migraine guidelines". The most relevant articles were analyzed, including the references that we considered to be of interest. Furthermore, we reviewed the most important textbooks on headache and migraine. In this paper, we detail the recommendations agreed on, according to the evidence grade, on symptomatic and preventive treatment of migraine.

Anonymous00234, Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, Sándor PS. · Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Germany. European Federation of NeurologicalSocieties · Eur J Neurol. · Pubmed #16796580 No free full text.

Abstract: Migraine is one of the most frequent disabling neurological conditions with a major impact on the patients' quality of life. To give evidence-based or expert recommendations for the different drug treatment procedures of the different migraine syndromes based on a literature search and an consensus in an expert panel. All available medical reference systems were screened for all kinds of clinical studies on migraine with and without aura and on migraine-like syndromes. The findings in these studies were evaluated according to the recommendations of the EFNS resulting in level A,B, or C recommendations and good practice points. For the acute treatment of migraine attacks, oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans are recommended. The administration should follow the concept of stratified treatment. Before intake of NSAIDs and triptans, oral metoclopramide or domperidon is recommended. In very severe attacks, intravenous acetylsalicylic acid or subcutaneous sumatriptan are drugs of first choice. A status migrainosus can probably be treated by steroids. For the prophylaxis of migraine, betablockers (propranolol and metoprolol), flunarizine, valproic acid, and topiramate are drugs of first choice. Drugs of second choice for migraine prophylaxis are amitriptyline, naproxen, petasites, and bisoprolol.

Anonymous00104. · No affiliation provided · Obstet Gynecol. · Pubmed #16738183 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous00401, Olesen J, Bousser MG, Diener HC, Dodick D, First M, Goadsby PJ, Göbel H, Lainez MJ, Lance JW, Lipton RB, Nappi G, Sakai F, Schoenen J, Silberstein SD, Steiner TJ. · Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, Demark. · Cephalalgia. · Pubmed #16686915 No free full text.

Abstract: After the introduction of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache as diagnostic entities in The International Classification of Headache Disorders, Second Edition, ICHD-2, it has been shown that very few patients fit into the diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine (CM). The system of being able to use CM and the medication overuse headache (MOH) diagnosis only after discontinuation of overuse has proven highly unpractical and new data have suggested a much more liberal use of these diagnoses. The International Headache Classification Committee has, therefore, worked out the more inclusive criteria for CM and MOH presented in this paper. These criteria are included in the appendix of ICHD-2 and are meant primarily for further scientific evaluation but may be used already now for inclusion into drug trials, etc. It is now recommended that the MOH diagnosis should no longer request improvement after discontinuation of medication overuse but should be given to patients if they have a primary headache plus ongoing medication overuse. The latter is defined as previously, i.e. 10 days or more of intake of triptans, ergot alkaloids mixed analgesics or opioids and 15 days or more of analgesics/NSAIDs or the combined use of more than one substance. If these new criteria for CM and MOH prove useful in future testing, the plan is to include them in a future revised version of ICHD-2.

Lewis D, Ashwal S, Hershey A, Hirtz D, Yonker M, Silberstein S, Anonymous00323, Anonymous00324. · Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #15623677 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on the pharmacologic treatment of the child with migraine headache. METHODS: The authors reviewed, abstracted, and classified relevant literature. Recommendations were based on a four-tiered scheme of evidence classification. Treatment options were separated into medications for acute headache and preventive medications. RESULTS: The authors identified and reviewed 166 articles. For acute treatment, five agents were reviewed. Sumatriptan nasal spray and ibuprofen are effective and are well tolerated vs placebo. Acetaminophen is probably effective and is well tolerated vs placebo. Rizatriptan and zolmitriptan were safe and well tolerated but were not superior to placebo. For preventive therapy, 12 agents were evaluated. Flunarizine is probably effective. The data concerning cyproheptadine, amitriptyline, divalproex sodium, topiramate, and levetiracetam were insufficient. Conflicting data were found concerning propranolol and trazodone. Pizotifen, nimodipine, and clonidine did not show efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: For children (>age 6 years), ibuprofen is effective and acetaminophen is probably effective and either can be considered for the acute treatment of migraine. For adolescents (>12 years of age), sumatriptan nasal spray is effective and should be considered for the acute treatment of migraine. For preventive therapy, flunarizine is probably effective and can be considered, but is not available in the United States. There are conflicting or insufficient data to make any other recommendations for the preventive therapy of migraine in children and adolescents. For a clinical problem so prevalent in children and adolescents, there is a disappointing lack of evidence from controlled, randomized, and masked trials.

Géraud G, Lantéri-Minet M, Lucas C, Valade D, Anonymous00362. · Department of Neurology, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #15476911 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The French Recommendations for Clinical Practice: Diagnosis and Therapy of Migraine are guidelines concerning the overall management of patients with migraine, including diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and assessment of disability. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the guidelines as they apply to adults and children, and proposes future direction for steps toward optimal treatment of migraine in patients in France. METHODS: The recommendations were categorized into 3 levels of proof (A-C) according to the National Agency for Accreditation and Evaluation in Health (ANAES) methodology and were based on a professional consensus reached among members of the Working Group and the Guidelines Review Group of the ANAES. RESULTS: The International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine should be used in routine clinical practice. Recommended agents for the treatment of migraine in adults include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) monotherapy or in combination with metoclopramide, acetaminophen monotherapy, triptans, ergotamine tartrate, and dihydroergotamine mesylate. Patients should use the medication as early as possible after the onset of migraine headache. For migraine prophylaxis in adults, the following can be used: propranolol, metoprolol, oxetorone, or amitriptyline as first-line treatment, and pizotifen, flunarizine, valproate sodium, or topiramate as second-line treatment. Migraine in children can be distinguished from that in adults by shorter duration (2-48 hours in children aged <15 years), more frequent bilateral localization, frequent predominant gastrointestinal disturbances, and frequent pallor hailing the onset of the attack. The following drugs are recommended in children and adolescents: ibuprofen in children aged >6 months, diclofenac in children weighing >16 kg, naproxen in children aged >6 years or weighing >25 kg, ASA alone or in combination with metoclopramide, acetaminophen alone or in combination with metoclopramide, and ergotamine tartrate in children aged >10 years. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines are intended to help general practitioners to manage migraine patients according to the rules of evidence-based medicine.

Wenzel RG, Sarvis CA, Krause ML. · Diamond Headache Clinic Inpatient Unit, St. Joseph Hospital, Resurrection Health Care, 2900 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60657, USA. · Pharmacotherapy. · Pubmed #12680479 No free full text.

Abstract: Migraines affect 28 million people in the United States, and most of these individuals experience attack-related morbidity. Six of every 10 patients with migraine treat their headache exclusively with over-the-counter (OTC) products. Overreliance on OTC agents contributes to preventable morbidity and drug-induced headaches. To evaluate the role of OTC drugs in the management of migraine headaches, we performed a qualitative systematic literature search by using MEDLINE (January 1966-April 2002), analyzed the references of articles returned by the MEDLINE search, and reviewed other pertinent literature. In the studied populations, acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, and an aspirin-acetaminophen-caffeine combination product were shown to be more effective than placebo at reducing moderate or severe migraine pain to mild or no pain by 2 hours after administration. However, published trials of OTC agents have systematically excluded patients enduring morbidity with 50% or more of attacks and/or vomiting with 20% or more of attacks. Patients who experience disability during the predominance of their attacks are poor candidates for OTC-exclusive therapy and should seek a physician's help for migraine-specific prescription drugs. For those with migraine who encounter disability with less than 50% of attacks and/or vomiting with less than 20% of attacks, sole treatment with OTC products is a feasible option. Patients who fail to obtain acceptable relief after an adequate trial of OTC agents also should be referred to a physician. Pharmacists are well positioned to assess whether patients could benefit from OTC agents or should seek a physician's assistance.

Schroeder BM, Anonymous00171, Anonymous00172. · No affiliation provided · Am Fam Physician. · Pubmed #12674472 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Dowson AJ, Lipscombe S, Sender J, Rees T, Watson D, Anonymous00006. · King's Headache Service, King's College Hospital, London, UK. · Curr Med Res Opin. · Pubmed #12487508 No free full text.

Abstract: Despite repeated initiatives over the past decade, migraine remains under-recognised, under-diagnosed and under-treated in everyday clinical practice. The Migraine in Primary Care Advisors (MIPCA) group has produced new guidelines for migraine management to attempt to rectify this situation. MIPCA is a group of physicians, nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals dedicated to the improvement of headache management in primary care, who have also worked closely with the Migraine Action Association (the UK patients' group) in the development of these guidelines. The principles of the new MIPCA guidelines are: To arrange specific consultations for headache. To institute a system of detailed history taking, patient education and buy-in at the outset of the consultation. To utilise a new screening algorithm for the differential diagnosis of headache, which can be confirmed by further questioning, if necessary. To institute a process of management that is individualised for each patient, using a new algorithm. Assessing the impact on the patient's daily life is a key aspect of diagnosis and management. To prescribe only treatments that have objective evidence of favourable efficacy and tolerability. To utilise prospective follow-up procedures to monitor the success of treatment. To organise a team approach to headache management in primary care.

Aukerman G, Knutson D, Miser WF, Anonymous00321. · Department of Family Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA. · Am Fam Physician. · Pubmed #12484694 links to  free full text

Abstract: As many as 30 million Americans have migraine headaches. The impact on patients and their families can be tremendous, and treatment of migraines can present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for family physicians. Abortive treatment options include nonspecific and migraine-specific therapy. Nonspecific therapies include analgesics (aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opiates), adjunctive therapies (antiemetics and sedatives), and other nonspecific medications (intranasal lidocaine or steroids). Migraine-specific abortive therapies include ergotamine and its derivatives, and triptans. Complementary and alternative therapies can also be used to abort the headache or enhance the efficacy of another therapeutic modality. Treatment choices for acute migraine should be based on headache severity, migraine frequency, associated symptoms, and comorbidities.

Snow V, Weiss K, Wall EM, Mottur-Pilson C, Anonymous00196, Anonymous00197. · American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas, USA. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #12435222 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous00237. · No affiliation provided · Duodecim. · Pubmed #12269238 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Lewis DW, Ashwal S, Dahl G, Dorbad D, Hirtz D, Prensky A, Jarjour I, Anonymous00174, Anonymous00175. · Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #12196640 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society develop practice parameters as strategies for patient management based on analysis of evidence. For this parameter, the authors reviewed available evidence on the evaluation of the child with recurrent headaches and made recommendations based on this evidence. METHODS: Relevant literature was reviewed, abstracted, and classified. Recommendations were based on a four-tiered scheme of evidence classification. RESULTS: There is inadequate documentation in the literature to support any recommendation as to the appropriateness of routine laboratory studies or performance of lumbar puncture. EEG is not recommended in the routine evaluation, as it is unlikely to define or determine an etiology or distinguish migraine from other types of headaches. In those children undergoing evaluation for recurrent headache found to have a paroxysmal EEG, the risk for future seizures is negligible; therefore, further investigation for epilepsy or treatments aimed at preventing future seizures is not indicated. Obtaining a neuroimaging study on a routine basis is not indicated in children with recurrent headaches and a normal neurologic examination. Neuroimaging should be considered in children with an abnormal neurologic examination or other physical findings that suggest CNS disease. Variables that predicted the presence of a space-occupying lesion included 1) headache of less than 1-month duration; 2) absence of family history of migraine; 3) abnormal neurologic findings on examination; 4) gait abnormalities; and 5) occurrence of seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent headaches occur commonly in children and are diagnosed on a clinical basis rather than by any testing. The routine use of any diagnostic studies is not indicated when the clinical history has no associated risk factors and the child's examination is normal.

Anonymous00120. · No affiliation provided · Arq Neuropsiquiatr. · Pubmed #11965429 links to  free full text

Abstract: The Brazilian Headache Society assigned an Ad Hoc Committee with the purpose of establishing a consensus about prophylactic treatment for migraine and of elaborating recommendations for professionals. The recommendations of the Committee are based in evidences of the world medical literature and on the personal experience of the members, respecting the reality of the existing medication resources in our country.

Silberstein SD. · American Academy of Neurology, St. Paul, MN 55116, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #10993991 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous58732. · No affiliation provided · Arq Neuropsiquiatr. · Pubmed #10849644 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Conway AJ, Handelsman DJ, Lording DW, Stuckey B, Zajac JD. · Endocrine Society of Australia, Sydney, NSW. · Med J Aust. · Pubmed #10776394 links to  free full text

Abstract: Androgen replacement therapy (ART) is usually life-long, and should only be started after androgen deficiency has been proven by hormone assays. The therapeutic goal is to maintain physiological testosterone levels. Testosterone rather than synthetic androgens should be used. Oral 17 alpha-alkylated androgens are hepatotoxic and should not be used for ART. There is no indication for androgen therapy in male infertility. Although androgen deficiency is an uncommon cause of erectile dysfunction, all men presenting with erectile dysfunction should be evaluated for androgen deficiency. If androgen deficiency is confirmed, investigation for the underlying pathological cause is required. Contraindications to androgen therapy are prostate and breast cancer. Precautions include using lower starting doses for older men and induction of puberty. Intramuscular injections should be avoided in men with bleeding disorders. Androgen-sensitive epilepsy, migraine, sleep apnoea, polycythaemia or fluid overload need to be considered. Competitive athletes should be warned about the risks of disqualification. ART should be initiated with intramuscular injections of testosterone esters, 250 mg every two weeks [corrected]. Maintenance requires tailoring treatment modality to the patient's convenience. Modalities currently available include testosterone injections, implants, or capsules. Choice depends on convenience, cost, availability and familiarity. There is no convincing evidence that, in the absence of proven androgen deficiency, androgen therapy is effective and safe for older men per se, in men with chronic non-gonadal disease, or for treatment of non-specific symptoms. Until further evidence is available, such treatment cannot be recommended.

Ducharme J. · Dalhousie University, Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. · J Emerg Med. · Pubmed #9950404 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of this article is to provide an evidence-based guideline on the management of acute migraine headaches in the Emergency Department setting. After a Medline search that covered 1965 to the present, all randomized controlled trials were reviewed. Recommendations as to the efficacy of abortive anti-migraine medications were based on the Canadian Medical Association's Guideline for Guidelines. Classes of medications that are discussed include: dopamine antagonists, serotonin agonists, opioids, local anesthetics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and steroids. The recommendations are limited to discussing the efficacy of specific medications, adverse effects to be expected, as well as associated headache rates after discharge. Specific recommendations as to which medication might offer a superior treatment have not been proposed due to lack of proper comparative trials as well as lack of information on headache and quality of life after discharge from the Emergency Department.

Kurth T, Tzourio C. · No affiliation provided · JAMA. · Pubmed #19549979 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Li BU. · No affiliation provided · Pediatr Ann. · Pubmed #19476294 No free full text.

Abstract: From the array of articles, one can readily see the clinical and scientific progress made in symptom-based diagnosis and management of functional abdominal pain disorders over the past 5 years. We have provided a series of useful tools to approach these patients. We have provided the symptom-based diagnostic criteria plus the red flags to help you avoid missing an organic diagnosis. We have placed these disorders squarely within the complex biopsychosocial framework by identifying early life stress and many environmental factors that are key factors in the development of pain. We have identified the role of psychological comorbidities of anxiety and depression and the need to address them directly in order to rehabilitate a disabled child. Finally, pharmacologic, psychological, dietary, and complementary approaches are reviewed and recommended as empiric therapy in functional abdominal pain, functional dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Use these new tools well.

Cady RK. · Banyan Group, Inc, Headache Care Center, Springfield, MO 65807, USA. · Mayo Clin Proc. · Pubmed #19411434 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Pascual-Gómez J. · No affiliation provided · Rev Neurol. · Pubmed #19319812 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Chitnis T, Pirko I. · No affiliation provided · Neurology. · Pubmed #19289735 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.