Melanoma: Schadendorf D

Garbe C, Hauschild A, Volkenandt M, Schadendorf D, Stolz W, Reinhold U, Kortmann RD, Kettelhack C, Frerich B, Keilholz U, Dummer R, Sebastian G, Tilgen W, Schuler G, Mackensen A, Kaufmann R. · University Department of Dermatology, Tübingen, Germany. · Melanoma Res. · Pubmed #18337653 No free full text.

Abstract: Systemic medical treatment of melanoma is administered in the adjuvant and palliative setting. Adjuvant therapy may be considered in patients with primary melanoma with more than 1.5 mm tumor thickness and with regional node metastasis. Presently no indication for systemic adjuvant chemotherapy or for adjuvant therapy with nonspecific immune-stimulatory agents outside controlled studies is seen. Interferon-alpha is the first substance in the adjuvant therapy of melanoma, which has shown to present a significant advantage to the patients in some prospective randomized studies. Good arguments for using adjuvant interferon-alpha therapy in high-risk melanoma patients exist. Both high-dose and low-dose interferon-alpha show promise. The major indications for systemic chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy are inoperable recurrent tumors, inoperable regional metastases and distant metastases (stage IV). As treatment in such situations is primarily palliative, the effect of any regimen on the quality of life must be carefully weighed. As a first line treatment, single agent therapy is recommended, as polychemotherapy or biochemotherapy did not show significant advantages for prolongation of survival; hence they are more toxic. An urgent need for development of new treatment modalities is necessary and general principles of experimental immunotherapy are outlined.

Garbe C, Hauschild A, Volkenandt M, Schadendorf D, Stolz W, Reinhold U, Kortmann RD, Kettelhack C, Frerich B, Keilholz U, Dummer R, Sebastian G, Tilgen W, Schuler G, Mackensen A, Kaufmann R. · University Department of Dermatology, Tübingen, Germany. · Melanoma Res. · Pubmed #18227710 No free full text.

Abstract: The primary treatment of a melanoma is surgical excision. An excisional biopsy is preferred, and safety margins of 1 cm for tumor thickness up to 2 mm and 2 cm for higher tumor thickness should be applied either at primary excision or in a two-step procedure. When dealing with facial, acral or anogenital melanomas, micrographic control of the surgical margins may be preferable to allow reduced safety margins and conservation of tissue. The sentinel lymph node biopsy should be performed in patients whose primary melanoma is thicker than 1.0 mm and this operation should be performed in centers where both the operative and nuclear medicine teams are experienced. In clinically identified lymph node metastases, radical lymph node dissection is considered standard therapy. If distant metastases involve just one internal organ and operative removal is feasible, then surgery should be seen as therapy of choice. Radiation therapy for the primary treatment of melanoma is indicated only in those cases in which surgery is impossible or not reasonable. In regional lymph nodes, radiation therapy is usually recommended when excision is not complete (R1 resection) or if the nodes are inoperable. In distant metastases, radiation therapy is particularly indicated in bone metastases, brain metastases and soft tissue metastases.

Dummer R, Schadendorf D. · No affiliation provided · Arch Dermatol. · Pubmed #18490596 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Hauschild A, Schadendorf D, Garbe C, Ugurel S, Kähler KC. · Department of Dermatology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. · Cancer Treat Res. · Pubmed #17953423 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Utikal J, Schadendorf D, Ugurel S. · Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135 Mannheim, Germany. · Arch Dermatol Res. · Pubmed #17221215 links to  free full text

Abstract: Biomarkers are important tools in clinical diagnosis and prognostic classification of various cutaneous malignancies. Besides clinical and histopathological aspects (e.g. anatomic site and type of the primary tumour, tumour size and invasion depth, ulceration, vascular invasion), an increasing variety of molecular markers have been identified, providing the possibility of a more detailed diagnostic and prognostic subgrouping of tumour entities, up to even changing existing classification systems. Recently published gene expression or proteomic profiling data relate to new marker molecules involved in skin cancer pathogenesis, which may, after validation by suitable studies, represent future prognostic or predictive biomarkers in cutaneous malignancies. We, here, give an overview on currently known serologic and newer immunohistochemical biomarker molecules in the most common cutaneous malignancies, malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma and cutaneous lymphoma, particularly emphasizing their prognostic and predictive significance.

Garbe C, Hauschild A, Volkenandt M, Schadendorf D, Stolz W, Kortmann RD, Kettelhack C, Frerich B, Keilholz U, Dummer R, Sebastian G, Tilgen W, Schuler G, Mackensen A, Kaufmann R. · Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. · Pubmed #16638065 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Thoelke A, Willrodt S, Hauschild A, Schadendorf D. · Skin Cancer Unit (German Cancer Research Center) and Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany. · Onkologie. · Pubmed #15585982 No free full text.

Abstract: Extracutaneous malignant melanomas (EMM) require special consideration in the field of oncology due to their rareness and--depending on the localization--the frequency of late diagnosis with consecutive poor prognosis. Only 4-5% of all primary melanomas do not arise from the skin. Most frequently they originate from the mucous membranes lining the respiratory, digestive, and genitourinary tracts or in the eyes as well as in the cerebral meninges. Extracutaneous melanomas are considered to be biologically more aggressive than cutaneous melanomas. The Clark level and Breslow index used for evaluation of cutaneous melanomas are not applicable to EMM and, at present, there are no consistent, internationally accepted therapy standards for this form of the disease. For this reason, this review focuses primarily on the literature pertaining to therapeutic strategies as well as epidemiologic, biological, and diagnostic aspects of this disease.

Röckmann H, Schadendorf D. · Skin Cancer Unit at the German Cancer Research Center, University of Heidelberg, Germany. · Onkologie. · Pubmed #14709935 No free full text.

Abstract: In malignant melanoma chemotherapy is very ineffective. This poor prognosis largely results from resistance to conventional chemotherapy. The cellular mechanisms involved in melanoma chemoresistance have yet to be fully elucidated. The relevance of well analyzed drug-resistance mechanisms such as intra-/extracellular transport, drug-resistance by induction of certain enzyme systems and DNA repair is reviewed. The results of many studies suggest that drug resistance in melanoma is most likely caused by a dysregulation of apoptotic processes. Identification of genes and gene products that are responsible for apoptosis, together with emerging information about the mechanism of action and structures of apoptotic regulatory and effector proteins, has laid a foundation for the discovery of drugs, some of which are now undergoing evaluation in human clinical trails for melanoma treatment. The complexity of the molecular variants involved in signal transduction along apoptotic pathways suggests that the cell may have a variety of possibilities for regulating apoptosis and generating apoptosis deficiency. However, identification of drug resistance mechanisms provides new therapeutic targets to overcome chemoresistance in this and other malignancies.

Garbe C, Schadendorf D. · Section Dermatological Oncology, Dermatology Department, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. · Onkologie. · Pubmed #12845208 No free full text.

Abstract: The main goal of follow-up examinations of patients with cutaneous melanomas is early diagnosis of developing recurrent or second tumors. Timely recognition of recurrence has a relevant effect on the prognosis. In 80% of the cases recurrences are diagnosed for the first time in the course of follow-up when follow-up procedures are carried out systematically. Most recurrences are discovered during a physical examination. Sonographic examination of the lymph nodes is also a very sensitive method which can lead to the diagnosis of locoregional recurrences before they are palpable. Further image-producing techniques are not necessary for surveillance of primary tumors. In contrast to former recommendations, new research indicates that less extensive diagnostic procedures are sufficient in primary tumor stages, especially when the tumor thickness of the melanoma is less than 1 mm. Consequently, costs can be reduced considerably without additional risk to the patient.

Ugurel S, Schadendorf D. · Klinische Kooperationseinheit Dermato-Onkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg/Universitäts-Hautklinik Mannheim, Germany. · Onkologie. · Pubmed #12845207 No free full text.

Abstract: Malignant melanoma is a tumor of increasing incidence. Patients with early diagnosed and surgically excised primary tumors have a high probability to be completely cured. In contrast, the prognosis of patients with distant organ metastases is still extremely poor despite a variety of therapeutical efforts that have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials. Cytotoxic treatment using single agents as well as polychemotherapy revealed only temporary clinical responses but no improvement of patients' overall survival. Likewise, therapy regimens combining cytostatics with cytokines showed no substantial benefit compared to cytostatics alone. Due to these disappointing results, recent research strategies focused on the elucidation of the mechanisms responsible for the complex therapy resistance of melanoma. New treatment concepts have been developed to overcome some of these mechanisms. Another promising approach is the development of advanced vaccination strategies. This paper reviews a selection of innovative therapeutic strategies that are currently tested in clinical trials; in particular pretherapeutic chemosensitivity testing, chemosensitization by downregulation of bcl-2, vaccination with autologous peptide-pulsed dendritic cells and immunomodulation by histamine.

Helmbach H, Sinha P, Schadendorf D. · Klinische Kooperationseinheit für Dermatoonkologie (DKFZ) an der Universitäts-Hautklinik Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, 68135 Mannheim, Germany. · Recent Results Cancer Res. · Pubmed #12528802 No free full text.

Abstract: Advanced malignant melanoma has a poor prognosis since chemotherapy is mostly ineffective because, in part, of the intrinsic and/or extrinsic resistance of melanoma cells to systemic treatment with antineoplastic agents. The reasons for the chemoresistant phenotype are currently unknown. The relevance of well-analyzed drug resistance mechanisms in melanoma such as intracellular and extracellular transport, drug resistance by induction of certain enzyme systems, and altered drug-target interaction is reviewed. It has been shown that most anticancer drugs kill susceptible cells through induction of apoptosis. Therefore, the significance of apoptotic deficiency caused by alteration in the apoptotic pathway is discussed in relation to specific molecules and apoptotic mechanisms like death-receptors, the Bcl-2 family, and the Hsp family of proteins. The complexity of the molecular variants involved in signal transduction along apoptotic pathways suggests that the cell may possess a variety of possibilities for regulating apoptosis and generating apoptosis deficiency. Thus apoptosis and apoptosis deficiency should be analyzed to understand the mechanisms of melanoma resistance.

Schadendorf D. · Skin Cancer Unit of the German Cancer Research Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. · Semin Oncol. · Pubmed #12407515 No free full text.

Abstract: Melanoma continues to present a major therapeutic challenge to oncologists, oncologic surgeons, and dermatologists. Recent advances in molecular genetics and improvement in our understanding of immune responses to tumors have generated an interest in using gene-based treatment strategies to fight melanoma. Several basic strategies have emerged: (1) strengthening of the immune response against tumors by genetic modification of some target cell populations of the host using immunostimulatory genes such as cytokines and by genetic immunization with the genes coding for melanoma-associated antigens recognized by cytotoxic T cells; (2) interference with signaling cascades; and (3) suicide gene strategies. This article reviews these novel strategies and summarizes the most recent data generated by European groups either in experimental studies or in clinical trials.

Sun Y, Schadendorf D. · Klinische Kooperationseinheit für Dermatoonkologie (DKFZ) an der Universitats-Hautklinik Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Germany. · Recent Results Cancer Res. · Pubmed #12079212 No free full text.

Abstract: Skin cancers continue to present a major therapeutic challenge to physicians. Recent advances in molecular genetics and improved understanding of immune responses to tumors have generated an interest in using gene-based immunotherapy for treating these malignancies. Two major forms of gene-based immunotherapy are currently being investigated. One focuses on genetic modification of some target cell populations of the host using immunostimulatory genes such as cytokines, in order to improve tumor immunogenicity and antitumor responses; the other is genetic immunization with the genes coding for melanoma-associated antigens recognized by cytotoxic T cells. This paper reviews these novel strategies and summarizes the most recent data recorded in either experimental studies or clinical trials.

Poland J, Schadendorf D, Lage H, Schnölzer M, Celis JE, Sinha P. · Institut für Laboratoriumsmedizin und Pathobiochemie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany. · Clin Chem Lab Med. · Pubmed #12005211 No free full text.

Abstract: Different types of cancer are naturally resistant to many anticancer drugs. Additionally, these tumours develop acquired drug resistance, which includes the classical multidrug resistance (MDR) accompanied by the synthesis of P-glycoprotein, a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Furthermore, atypical MDR is mediated by several different, some unknown, mechanisms. To overcome chemoresistance problems, antineoplastic drugs are often combined with other modes of therapy, e.g. hyperthermia, where good response has been reported in several experimental tumour models and in advanced cancer patients. The success of this combined anticancer treatment may be limited by an increase in chemoresistance and thermoresistance. A model system to study resistance phenomena is the use of chemoresistant and thermoresistant cancer cell lines. We have established chemoresistant cancer cell lines (gastric and pancreatic carcinoma, fibrosarcoma, melanoma) and now thermoresistant cell lines derived from gastric and pancreatic carcinoma cells and their counterparts that were resistant towards daunorubicin (classical MDR) and mitoxantrone (atypical MDR). Using proteomics, in this paper we evaluate the drug resistance of chemoresistant melanoma cells (parental cell line MeWo and sublines exhibiting drug resistance towards etoposide, cisplatin, fotemustine and vindesine) as a paradigm for analysis of drug resistance phenomena. Additionally, we investigate heat resistance and the interaction of chemoresistance and thermoresistance to identify common pathways using the parental and drug resistant stomach cancer cell lines EPG85-257, EPG85-257RNOV, EPG85-257RDB and their thermoresistant counterparts. Possible implications of differential protein expression will be discussed.

Helmbach H, Rossmann E, Kern MA, Schadendorf D. · Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. · Int J Cancer. · Pubmed #11477569 No free full text.

Abstract: Advanced malignant melanoma has a poor prognosis since chemotherapy is mostly ineffective due in part to the intrinsic and/or extrinsic resistance of melanoma cells to systemic treatment with anti-neoplastic agents. The reasons for the chemoresistant phenotype are unknown. The relevance of well-analyzed drug-resistance mechanisms, e.g., intracellular/extracellular transport and induction of certain enzyme systems, is reviewed. Most anti-cancer drugs kill susceptible cells through induction of apoptosis. Therefore, it appears that differences in the apoptotic pathways which lead to apoptotic deficiency may account for the ability of some tumor cells to resist drug therapy. Human melanomas, which are characteristically drug-resistant, are more likely to have altered apoptotic pathways and fewer pro-apoptotic molecules. Tumor cells with these characteristics are seldom sensitive to drugs. The complexity of the molecular variants involved in signal transduction along apoptotic pathways suggests that the cell may have a variety of possibilities for regulating apoptosis and generating apoptotic deficiency. Thus, apoptosis and apoptotic deficiency should be analyzed to better clarify the mechanisms of melanoma resistance.

Schadendorf D, Nestle FO. · Department of Dermatology, Mannheim Clinics, Germany. · Recent Results Cancer Res. · Pubmed #11092051 No free full text.

Abstract: Dendritic cells (DC) are commonly viewed as the professional antigen-presenting cell. They capture antigens, migrate to appropriate lymphoid organs and initiate an antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell response. Much is known about DC physiology, and it is now possible to culture, maintain and expand DC from different human sources, including hematopoietic progenitors in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Combined with the detection of an increasing number of tumor-associated antigens and T cell-recognized peptide epitopes, this has led to a new enthusiasm in the field of tumor immunotherapy and to various clinical applications in phase I/II studies on the treatment of different malignancies. This chapter will review the latest developments and give a brief update of the results obtained in studies of advanced melanoma, as well as provide a short overview of published results for other tumors.

Schadendorf D, Paschen A, Sun Y. · Department of Dermatology, Clinical Cooperation Unit for Dermato-Oncology (DKFZ), Clinics Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1, 68135, Mannheim, Germany. · Immunol Lett. · Pubmed #10996630 No free full text.

Abstract: Melanoma is a prototype of immunogenic tumor to which various types of immunotherapy have been applied extensively over the past decades. Melanoma vaccines are designed for the purpose of immune modulation and subsequent anti-tumor effects in the process of an active specific immunotherapy. Previous attempts of these vaccines include immunization with whole tumor cells/cell lysates admixed with nonspecific adjuvants. While these vaccines generated enhanced anti-tumor immunity in a subset of patients, some of which showing prolonged survival compared to historical controls, no clinical benefit has so far been demonstrated in a properly controlled phase III study. New-generation melanoma vaccines, which are based on genetic modifications of tumor cells to express cytokines, generated long-lasting systemic anti-tumor immunity in animal models. Translation of these preclinical results primarily into melanoma patients with advanced diseases, shows the potential of these vaccines to induce systemic anti-tumor immune responses and in some instances tumor regression with acceptably low toxicity. Higher efficacy of this novel vaccine approach would be expected when used in a postsurgical adjuvant setting when the tumor load is small. Also other novel vaccine approaches such as dendritic cell-based therapy hold promise for the treatment of melanoma. But the clinical value of all these new approaches has to be analysed in prospectively randomized clinical studies.

Sun Y, Paschen A, Schadendorf D. · Department of Dermatology, Clinics Mannheim, Germany. · J Mol Med. · Pubmed #10543391 No free full text.

Abstract: Melanoma is the prototype of a tumor to which many forms of immunotherapy have been applied extensively over the past two decades. Melanoma vaccines (active specific immunotherapy) are designed to modulate the immune system and have subsequent anti-tumor effects with minimal toxicity. Previous attempts to produce melanoma vaccines include immunization with whole tumor cells/cell lysates admixed with nonspecific adjuvants. While these vaccines generate enhanced anti-tumor immunity in a subset of patients, some of whom survive for longer than historical controls, no clinical benefit has so far been demonstrated in a properly controlled phase III study. Genetic modifications of tumor cells to make them express cytokines afford new-generation melanoma vaccines, and generate long-lasting systemic antitumor immunity in animal models. Translation of these preclinical results primarily into melanoma patients with advanced diseases shows the potential to induce systemic antitumor immune responses and in some instances tumor regression with acceptably low toxicity. The efficacy of this novel vaccine approach would be expected to be higher when used in a postsurgical adjuvant setting when the tumor load is small. Other novel vaccine approaches such as dendritic cell-based therapy also hold promise for the treatment of melanoma. The clinical value of all these new approaches will eventually have to be established in prospectively randomized clinical studies.

Bottomley A, Coens C, Suciu S, Santinami M, Kruit W, Testori A, Marsden J, Punt C, Salès F, Gore M, Mackie R, Kusic Z, Dummer R, Patel P, Schadendorf D, Spatz A, Keilholz U, Eggermont A. · Quality of Life Department, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #19433686 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Interferon (IFN) -based adjuvant therapy in melanoma is associated with significant side effects, which necessitates evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Our trial examined the HRQOL effects of adjuvant pegylated IFN-alpha-2b (PEG-IFN-alpha-2b) versus observation in patients with stage III melanoma. METHODS: A total of 1,256 patients with stage III melanoma were randomly assigned after full lymphadenectomy to receive either observation (n = 629) or PEG-IFN-alpha-2b (n = 627): induction 6 g/kg/wk for 8 weeks then maintenance 3 g/kg/wk for an intended total duration of 5 years. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 was used to assess HRQOL. RESULTS: At 3.8 years of median follow-up, for the primary end point, recurrence-free survival (RFS), risk was reduced by 18% (hazard rate = 0.82; P = .01) in the PEG-IFN-alpha-2b arm compared with observation. Significant and clinically meaningful differences occurred with the PEG-IFN-alpha-2b treatment arm compared with the observation group, showing decreased global HRQOL at month 3 (-11.6 points; 99% CI, -8.2 to -15.0) and year 2 (-10.5 points; 99% CI, -6.6 to -14.4). Many of the other scales showed statistically significant differences between scores when comparing the two arms. From a clinical point of view, important differences were found for five scales: two functioning scales (social and role functioning) and three symptom scales (appetite loss, fatigue, and dyspnea), with the PEG-IFN-alpha-2b arm being most impaired. CONCLUSION: PEG-IFN-alpha-2b leads to a significant and sustained improvement in RFS. There is an expected negative effect on global HRQOL and selected symptoms when patients undergo PEG-IFN-alpha-2b treatment.

Hauschild A, Agarwala SS, Trefzer U, Hogg D, Robert C, Hersey P, Eggermont A, Grabbe S, Gonzalez R, Gille J, Peschel C, Schadendorf D, Garbe C, O'Day S, Daud A, White JM, Xia C, Patel K, Kirkwood JM, Keilholz U. · University of Kiel, Kiel, Charité Berlin. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #19349552 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in patients with advanced melanoma who had progressed on a dacarbazine- or temozolomide-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 270 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 plus intravenous carboplatin at area under curve 6 (AUC 6) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle followed by either placebo (n = 135) or oral sorafenib 400 mg (n = 135) twice daily on days 2 to 19. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary and tertiary end points included overall survival and incidence of best response, respectively. RESULTS: The median PFS was 17.9 weeks for the placebo plus CP arm and 17.4 weeks for the sorafenib plus CP arm (hazard ratio, 0.91; 99% CI, 0.63 to 1.31; two-sided log-rank test P = .49). Response rate was 11% with placebo versus 12% with sorafenib. Dermatologic events, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and fatigue were more common in patients treated with sorafenib plus CP versus placebo plus CP. CONCLUSION: In this study, the addition of sorafenib to CP did not improve any of the end points over placebo plus CP and cannot be recommended in the second-line setting for patients with advanced melanoma. Both regimens had clinically acceptable toxicity profiles with no unexpected adverse events. A trial of similar design for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma (intergroup trial E2603) is currently ongoing.

Hauschild A, Trefzer U, Garbe C, Kaehler KC, Ugurel S, Kiecker F, Eigentler T, Krissel H, Schott A, Schadendorf D. · Department of Dermatology, University of Kiel bCharité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany. · Melanoma Res. · Pubmed #18626312 No free full text.

Abstract: Systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma is of low efficacy, and new therapeutic strategies are needed. Histone deacetylase inhibitors are supposed to restore the expression of tumor suppressor genes and induce tumor cell differentiation, growth arrest, and apoptosis. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the histone deacetylase inhibitor pyridylmethyl-N-{4-[(2-aminophenyl)-carbamoyl]-benzyl}-carbamate (MS-275) in patients with pretreated metastatic melanoma. Patients with unresectable AJCC stage IV melanoma refractory to at least one earlier systemic therapy were randomized to receive MS-275 3 mg biweekly (days 1+15, arm A) or 7 mg weekly (days 1+8+15, arm B), in 4-week cycles. The primary study endpoint was objective tumor response, secondary endpoints were safety and time-to-progression. On the basis of Simon's two-stage design, the study initially allowed an entry of 14 patients per arm; if there was at least one responder, additional 33 patients were to be enrolled. Among 28 patients enrolled, no objective response was detected. Four (29%) patients in arm A and three (21%) patients in arm B showed disease stabilizations. Median time-to-progression was comparable in both arms with 55.5 versus 51.5 days, respectively; median overall survival was 8.84 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate with nausea (39%) and hypophosphatemia (29%) as the most frequently reported events. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Single-agent treatment with MS-275 was well-tolerated and showed long-term tumor stabilizations, but no objective responses in pretreated metastatic melanoma. Further evaluation of MS-275 in combination schedules is warranted.

Hauschild A, Dummer R, Ugurel S, Kaehler KC, Egberts F, Fink W, Both-Skalsky J, Laetsch B, Schadendorf D. · Department of Dermatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. · Cancer. · Pubmed #18615619 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Dacarbazine (DTIC) and pegylated interferon (IFN)-alpha-2a have both demonstrated some efficacy as single agents in metastatic melanoma. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to test a combination of these 2 agents in a phase 2 trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with stage IV melanoma without brain metastases were treated with DTIC (at a dose of 850 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) combined with weekly pegylated IFN-alpha-2a at a dose of 180 microg. The study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination. The primary study endpoint was objective response. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (8.0%) achieved a complete response that continued for >480 days and 746 days, respectively. Four patients (16.0%) demonstrated a partial response, and another patient experienced stable disease. Six of 7 nonprogressive patients had either not received treatment or had not developed disease progression during adjuvant IFN treatment for stage II/III disease. The median duration of response was 236 days, the median progression-free survival was 56 days, and the overall survival time was 403 days. Few grade 3 toxicities and only 1 grade 4 toxicity were observed (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DTIC and pegylated IFN-alpha-2a was found to be well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma. The response rate of 24%, including 2 long-lasting complete responses, is encouraging, but must be confirmed in larger trials.

Dummer R, Hauschild A, Becker JC, Grob JJ, Schadendorf D, Tebbs V, Skalsky J, Kaehler KC, Moosbauer S, Clark R, Meng TC, Urosevic M. · Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #18245549 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: A topical Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist induces regression of cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms. We explored antitumor activity of a systemically administered TLR7 agonist, 852A, in patients with metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We undertook a phase II, multicenter, open-label study in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic melanoma. Patients received i.v. 852A, starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) and increasing to 0.9 mg/m(2) based on tolerance, thrice per week for 12 weeks. Clinical response was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Immune effects of 852A were monitored by measuring serum type I IFN and IP-10 together with assessment of immune cell markers in peripheral blood. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Thirteen patients completed the initial 12-week treatment cycle, with two discontinuing for adverse events considered to be possibly related to study drug. Four (19%) patients had disease stabilization for >100 days. One patient had a partial remission after two treatment cycles, but progressed during the third. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two patients. Serum type I IFN and IP-10 increased in most patients on 852A administration. Serum type I IFN increases were greater after dosing with 852A 0.9 mg/m(2) than after 0.6 mg/m(2) (P = 0.009). The maximal increase in IP-10 compared with baseline correlated with the maximal increase in type I IFN (P = 0.003). In the eight patients with immune cell marker data, CD86 expression on monocytes increased significantly post-first dose (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Intravenous 852A was well tolerated and induced systemic immune activation that eventually resulted in prolonged disease stabilization in some patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma who had failed chemotherapy.

Spieth K, Kaufmann R, Dummer R, Garbe C, Becker JC, Hauschild A, Tilgen W, Ugurel S, Beyeler M, Bröcker EB, Kaehler KC, Pföhler C, Gille J, Leiter U, Schadendorf D. · Department of Dermatology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #18178958 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Combination of temozolomide (TMZ) with nonpegylated interferon alfa is associated with increased efficacy in terms of response rates compared with monotherapy. A multicenter phase II study was carried out to assess the activity and toxicity of TMZ plus pegylated interferon alfa-2b (peg-IFNalpha-2b), hypothesizing improved efficacy due to modified pharmacokinetic properties of the novel interferon (IFN) formulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 124 patients with stage IV melanoma without prior chemotherapy and no cerebral metastases were treated with 100 mug peg-IFNalpha-2b s.c. per week and oral TMZ 200 mg/m(2) (days 1-5, every 28 days). Primary study end point was objective response, and secondary end points were overall and progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: In all, 116 patients were assessable for response: 2 (1.7%) had a complete response and 19 (16.4%) a partial response (overall response rate 18.1%). Of total, 25.0% achieved disease stabilization and 56.9% progressed. Overall survival was 9.4 months; PFS was 2.8 months. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 20.7% and grade 3/4 leukopenia in 23.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of TMZ plus peg-IFNalpha-2b in this large phase II study is moderate and comparable to published results of the combination of TMZ with non-peg-IFN. Likewise, the safety profile of peg-IFNalpha-2b seems to be similar to non-peg-IFN when combined with TMZ.

Schadendorf D, Hauschild A, Ugurel S, Thoelke A, Egberts F, Kreissig M, Linse R, Trefzer U, Vogt T, Tilgen W, Mohr P, Garbe C. · Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center & University Hospital Mannheim, Department of Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #17005632 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Temozolomide has shown some efficacy in metastatic melanoma and recently received extended approval to treat brain tumours. The purpose of this study was to test a dose-intensified regimen of temozolomide in melanoma patients with brain metastases in a prospective, open-label, multicentre phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with asymptomatic brain metastases from melanoma were stratified into arm A (no prior chemotherapy; n = 21) and arm B (previous chemotherapy; n = 24). Patients received oral temozolomide either 150 mg/m(2)/day (arm A) or 125 mg/m(2)/day (arm B), days 1-7 and 15-21, every 28 days. The primary study end point was objective response, and secondary end points were overall survival and safety. RESULTS: Two patients (4.4%) achieved a partial response (PR) in brain metastases (one in each arm), one of them (2.2%) also showing a PR in extracerebral disease. An additional five patients (11.1%; two in arm A, three in arm B) showed disease stabilisation (SD) in brain and other sites. However, 82% revealed progressive disease (PD) already evident 8 weeks after therapy initiation. Median survival time from therapy onset was 3.5 months (range 0.7-8.3; arm B) and 4.3 months (range 1.6-11.8; arm A), P = 0.43. Dose modifications and prolongations of therapy cycles due to toxicity were required in 20% of patients. Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in one patient only (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of temozolomide given bi-weekly is well-tolerated in melanoma patients with cerebral involvement. However, the efficacy is limited, with lower than 5% objective responses observed in brain and extracerebral metastases.