Melanoma: Kraybill WG

Houghton AN, Coit DG, Daud A, Dilawari RA, Dimaio D, Gollob JA, Haas NB, Halpern A, Johnson TM, Kashani-Sabet M, Kraybill WG, Lange JR, Martini M, Ross MI, Samlowski WE, Sener SF, Tanabe KK, Thompson JA, Trisal V, Urist MM, Walker MJ, Anonymous00370. · No affiliation provided · J Natl Compr Canc Netw. · Pubmed #16884669 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Kane JM, Kraybill WG. · Department of Surgical Oncology-Melanoma/Sarcoma, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. · Surg Oncol Clin N Am. · Pubmed #15978433 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Cornett WR, McCall LM, Petersen RP, Ross MI, Briele HA, Noyes RD, Sussman JJ, Kraybill WG, Kane JM, Alexander HR, Lee JE, Mansfield PF, Pingpank JF, Winchester DJ, White RL, Chadaram V, Herndon JE, Fraker DL, Tyler DS, Anonymous00218. · The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #16943537 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine in a randomized prospective multi-institutional trial whether the addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) to a melphalan-based hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) treatment would improve the complete response rate for locally advanced extremity melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced extremity melanoma were randomly assigned to receive melphalan or melphalan plus TNF-alpha during standard HILP. Patient randomization was stratified according to disease/treatment status and regional nodal disease status. RESULTS: The intervention was completed in 124 patients of the 133 enrolled. Grade 4 adverse events were observed in 14 (12%) of 129 patients, with three (4%) of 64 in the melphalan-alone arm and 11 (16%) of 65 in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm (P = .0436). There were two toxicity-related lower extremity amputations in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm, and one disease progression-related upper extremity amputation in the melphalan-alone arm. There was no treatment-related mortality in either arm of the study. One hundred sixteen patients were assessable at 3 months postoperatively. Sixty-four percent of patients (36 of 58) in the melphalan-alone arm and 69% of patients (40 of 58) in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm showed a response to treatment at 3 months, with a complete response rate of 25% (14 of 58 patients) in the melphalan-alone arm and 26% (15 of 58 patients) in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm (P = .435 and P = .890, respectively). CONCLUSION: In locally advanced extremity melanoma treated with HILP, the addition of TNF-alpha to melphalan did not demonstrate a significant enhancement of short-term response rates over melphalan alone by the 3-month follow-up, and TNF-alpha plus melphalan was associated with a higher complication rate.

Vaquerano J, Kraybill WG, Driscoll DL, Cheney R, Kane JM. · Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA. · Ann Surg Oncol. · Pubmed #16418885 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of newly diagnosed melanomas are thin lesions (< or = 1.00 mm). Because tumor thickness correlates with the risk for nodal metastases, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in this subset is controversial. Incorporating other prognostic factors (Clark level and ulceration), we evaluated the 6th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage as a simple and widely applicable guideline for offering SLN biopsy for thin melanoma. METHODS: This study was a review of a prospective melanoma SLN database from 1993 to 2003 with emphasis on SLN positivity rates based on the 6th edition AJCC primary tumor thickness intervals and clinical stage. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients underwent SLN biopsy, with an overall positivity rate of 17.7%. By the 6th edition AJCC, lesions < or = 1.00 mm had an SLN positivity rate of 6.6%. By 6th edition clinical stage, SLN positivity rates were 4.9% for stage IA and 10.4% for stage IB. By using stage IA as the criterion for not offering SLN biopsy, this procedure would have been avoided in 46% (39 of 85) of < or = 1.00-mm melanoma patients with a negative SLN. CONCLUSIONS: Sixth edition AJCC clinical stage IB as a selection criterion for performing SLN biopsy in thin melanoma identifies most patients with a positive SLN while also avoiding a negative SLN biopsy in many patients. Until additional widely accepted and validated selection criteria are available, SLN biopsy for clinical stage IB, but not stage IA, thin melanomas is a reasonable approach.

Hinrichs CS, Gibbs JF, Driscoll D, Kepner JL, Wilkinson NW, Edge SB, Fassl KA, Muir R, Kraybill WG. · Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA. · J Surg Oncol. · Pubmed #14991874 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Groin dissection is performed for the treatment of melanoma and other malignancies. Lymphedema rates as high as 47% have been reported. In 1996, we began using complete decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) in selected patients with lymphedema following groin dissection. Here, we review our results in a small cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of 14 patients, treated with CDP for lymphedema secondary to groin dissection for melanoma was conducted. All patients were treated with CDP at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI), between 1996 and 2002. Of the 14 patients, 12 underwent groin dissection at RPCI. Response to therapy was measured by limb volume determinations. Patient gender, age, body mass index (BMI), type of operation, type of adjuvant therapy, time to treatment, patient compliance, lymphedema stage, and initial edema were analyzed for association with response to treatment. Incidence was estimated by a review of the operative logs. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated with CDP for lymphedema secondary to groin dissection for melanoma, with a median decrease in lymphedema of 60% (range: 35-145%; P = 0.0003). Increased BMI was associated with a decreased response to treatment (P = 0.02). Response to CDP was not effected by time to treatment, patient compliance, lymphedema stage, and initial edema. During this time, 39 groin dissections were done at RPCI. The incidence of lymphedema treated with CDP at RPCI was 31% (12/39; standard error 7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: With a decrease in lymphedema of 60%, CDP may provide relief for patients with lymphedema following groin dissection. Elevated BMI was associated with a decreased response to CDP.

Pidhorecky I, Lee RJ, Proulx G, Kollmorgen DR, Jia C, Driscoll DL, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF. · Division of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York, Buffalo 14263, USA. · Ann Surg Oncol. · Pubmed #11258774 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The risk and outcome of regional failure after elective and therapeutic lymph node dissection (ELND/TLND) for microscopically and macroscopically involved lymph nodes without adjuvant radiotherapy were evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective melanoma database review of 338 patients (ELND 85, TLND 253) from 1970 to 1996 with pathologically involved lymph nodes. RESULTS: Regional recurrence occurred in 14% of patients treated with ELND (n = 12) and 28% of patients treated with TLND (n = 72; P = .009). Risk factors associated with nodal recurrence were advanced age, primary lesion in the head and neck region, depth of the primary lesion, number of involved lymph nodes, and extracapsular extension (ECE). For each nodal basin, the ELND group had a lower incidence of recurrence than the TLND group. The TLND group had larger lymph nodes, greater number of involved lymph nodes, and a higher incidence of ECE. The 10-year disease-specific survival was 51% vs. 30% for ELND and TLND, respectively (P = .0005). Nodal basin failure was predictive of distant metastasis, with 87% developing distant disease compared with 54% of patients without nodal recurrence (P < .0001). Of six patients who underwent a second dissection after isolated nodal recurrence, five patients have had a median disease-free interval of 79 months. CONCLUSIONS: After ELND or TLND, patients who have a large tumor burden (thick primary melanoma, multiply involved lymph nodes, ECE), advanced age, and a primary lesion located in the head and neck have a significantly increased likelihood of relapse and a decreased survival. Few patients present with an isolated nodal recurrence, but the majority can be salvaged by a second dissection.

Sabel MS, Gibbs JF, Cheney R, McKinley BP, Lee JS, Kraybill WG. · Division of Surgery and Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute and State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. · Surgery. · Pubmed #11015088 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has rapidly evolved into the standard of care for clinically node-negative melanoma. Since adopting sentinel lymph node (SLN) technology in 1993, we have periodically reviewed our institution's results and made several modifications. METHODS: From January 1993 to December 1998, 182 patients with clinically node-negative primary cutaneous melanoma underwent SLNB. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and assessed for the technique for the identification of the SLN, the pathologic analysis, and the use of intraoperative frozen section. RESULTS: The accuracy of SLN identification improved from 91% to 100% with the combination of isosulfan blue dye and radiolabeled colloid over isosulfan blue dye alone. Routine versus selective lymphoscintigraphy identified 7 in-transit SLNs and increased detection of dual nodal basin drainage (15%-27%). Identification of micrometastases in the SLN increased from 14% to 24% after a modification of pathologic evaluation. The positive SLN was the only involved node in most patients (80%). Intraoperative frozen section had a sensitivity of 58% and was of benefit in only 13 of 124 patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Several modifications to the identification of the SLNs and the detection of metastatic melanoma have improved our outcome with SLNB. A careful, periodic review of results to identify areas for improvement at each institution is crucial to the success of SLNB for melanoma.

Lee RJ, Gibbs JF, Proulx GM, Kollmorgen DR, Jia C, Kraybill WG. · Division of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #10661355 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze patterns of failure in malignant melanoma patients with lymph node involvement who underwent complete lymph node dissection (LND) of the nodal basin. To determine prognostic factors predictive of local recurrence in the lymph node basin in order to select patients who may benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of 338 patients undergoing complete LND for melanoma between 1970 and 1996 who had pathologically involved lymph nodes was performed. Mean follow-up from the time of LND was 54 months (range: 12-306 months). Lymph node basins dissected included the neck (56 patients), axilla (160 patients), and groin (122 patients). Two hundred fifty-three patients (75%) underwent therapeutic LND for clinically involved nodes, while 85 patients (25%) had elective dissections. Forty-four percent of patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. No patients received adjuvant radiotherapy to the lymph node basin. RESULTS: Overall and disease-specific survival for all patients at 10 years was 30% and 36%, respectively. Overall nodal basin recurrence was 30% at 10 years. Mean time to nodal basin recurrence was 12 months (range: 2-78 months). Site of nodal involvement was prognostic with 43%, 28%, and 23% nodal basin recurrence at 10 years with cervical, axillary, and inguinal involvement, respectively (p = 0.008). Extracapsular extension (ECE) led to a 10-year nodal basin failure rate of 63% vs. 23% without ECE (p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing a therapeutic dissection for clinically involved nodes had a 36% failure rate in the nodal basin at 10 years, compared to 16% for patients found to have involved nodes after elective dissection (p = 0.002). Lymph nodes larger than 6 cm led to a failure rate of 80% compared to 42% for nodes 3-6 cm and 24% for nodes less than 3 cm (p < 0.001). The number of lymph nodes involved also predicted for nodal basin failure with 25%, 46%, and 63% failure rates at 10 years for 1-3, 4-10, and > 10 nodes involved (p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in nodal basin control in patients with synchronous or metachronous lymph node metastases, nor in patients receiving or not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. Nodal basin failure was predictive of distant metastasis with 87% of patients with nodal basin recurrence developing distant disease compared to 54% of patients without nodal failure (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, number of positive nodes and type of dissection (elective vs. therapeutic) were significant predictors of overall and disease-specific survival. Size of the largest lymph node was also predictive of disease-specific survival. Site of nodal involvement and ECE were significant predictors of nodal basin failure. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant melanoma patients with nodal involvement have a significant risk of nodal basin failure after LND if they have cervical involvement, ECE, >3 positive lymph nodes, clinically involved nodes, or any node larger than 3 cm. Patients with these risk factors should be considered for adjuvant radiotherapy to the lymph node basin to reduce the incidence of nodal basin recurrence. Patients with nodal basin failure are at higher risk of developing distant metastases.

Gibbs JF, Huang PP, Zhang PJ, Kraybill WG, Cheney R. · Division of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, 14263, USA. · Ann Surg Oncol. · Pubmed #10560857 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can accurately predict the presence of metastatic melanoma (MM) and has been used to identify patients with occult metastases. We present an analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of standard pathological techniques including intraoperative frozen section, permanent section, and immunohistochemistry in diagnosing MM within the SLN. METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive patients with primary malignant melanoma thickness of >1.0 mm or thinner lesions invading the reticular dermis (Clark level IV) who underwent SLN biopsy were reviewed. Lymph nodes were examined intraoperatively by frozen section (FS), permanent section (H&E), and by immunohistochemistry (IH) for S-100 protein and HMB45. RESULTS: MM was found in 14 of 69 cases (20%). Permanent section H&E was performed in all cases, FS in 64 cases, and IH in 65 cases. FS analysis diagnosed MM in 4 of 14 cases (29%), was suspicious in 2 of 14 (14%), and falsely negative (FN) in 8 of 14 (57%) ultimately found to be positive with further workup. Within the FN group, MM was identified on review of the original FS slides in 3 of 8 cases (38%). Furthermore, within the FN group, the remaining 5 cases were identified as positive for MM by either permanent and/or deeper H&E sections and IH. IH alone with permanent H&E sections would have diagnosed MM in only 8 of 10 cases (80%) that were FS negative or suspicious. In no cases was MM identified by IH alone with the permanent and deeper H&E sections being negative. It is noteworthy that no false-positive cases were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative FS has low sensitivity in identifying MM within the SLN. IH alone does not increase the diagnostic yield. A combination of permanent H&E sections with deeper levels and S-100 and HMB45 IH dramatically increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity of SLN biopsy. Definitive diagnosis should await permanent H&E sections and IH staining.