Melanoma: Coindre JM

Lesimple T, Voigt JJ, Bataillard A, Coindre JM, Culine S, Lortholary A, Merrouche Y, Ganem G, Kaminsky MC, Negrier S, Perol M, Bedossa P, Bertrand G, Bugat R, Fizazi K, Anonymous00330. · Oncologue médical, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes. · Bull Cancer. · Pubmed #14715428 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To define Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the diagnosis of carcinomas of unknown primary site. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the diagnosis of carcinomas of unknown primary site are: 1) Diagnostic strategy should aim to identify anatomoclinical entities of carcinomas of unknown primary site for which there is a specific treatment. For other anatomoclinical entities, identification of the primary tumour has no impact on the prognostic or therapeutic consequences, thus a systematic complete assessment is unnecessary. 2) An immunohistochemical investigation for the diagnosis should be performed using an appropriate panel of specific antibodies. This should enable the diagnosis of lymphoma, melanoma, germ cell tumour and sarcoma to be eliminated and the diagnosis of prostate, breast, ovary, thyroid or neuroendocrine tumours to be positively identified. 3) A sample can be frozen to enable typing, cytogenetic and, particularly, molecular biological studies to be performed later. 4) The clinician and pathologist should compare their opinions before and after the pathological diagnosis.

Lapeyrere N, Parrens M, Coindre JM, Soubeyran I, de Mascarel A, Merlio JP, Lebail B, Lepreux S, Jaffre A, Gilleron V, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Vergier B, Anonymous00019. · Réseau de cancérologie d'Aquitaine, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France. · Ann Pathol. · Pubmed #19084716 No free full text.

Abstract: AIMS: The goal of this work was to evaluate the impact of expert pathological second opinion on the diagnosis and management of patients with cancer, in a French region (Aquitaine) and with an economic point of view. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was first quantitative, performed retrospectively on all cases of cancer, voluntary sent for a second opinion to an expert pathologist of two centers. Secondly, we restricted the study to lymphoid, melanocytic and soft tissue tumors sent for second opinion. We considered that the expert review had an important diagnostic impact either when the initial pathologist sent the specimen to identify or classify malignant tumor or hesitated between benign and malignant tumor or had no hypothesis, or if there were discordant diagnoses (malignant/benign) between the two pathologists. We considered that the expert review had a high therapeutic impact if the disagreement between initial and expert diagnoses induced a complete modification in therapy. We evaluated the cost of second opinion for the expert centers and the cost of care management. RESULTS: Over the year 2006, the expert centers received 5077 lesions for consultation: 3769 specimens were sent by a pathologist for a second review, 1324 by pathologists of Aquitania and of these, 751 samples were submitted for lymphoid (55%), soft tissues (30%) or melanocytic tumors (15%). There was an important diagnostic impact for 75% of the samples; the impact of the expert review on patient management was considered high for 46% of specimens and the expert pathological diagnosis modified the clinical prognosis for 40% of the specimens. We estimated that for 53 discordant diagnoses (malignant/benign), second opinion allowed an economy of 500,000 euro. CONCLUSION: Expert second opinion is very important not only for diagnosis and management for patient with cancer but also for economic reasons.

Coindre JM, Hostein I, Terrier P, Bouvier-Labit C, Collin F, Michels JJ, Trassard M, Marques B, Ranchere D, Guillou L. · Department of Pathology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France. · Cancer. · Pubmed #16878328 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare tumor with a very poor prognosis that occurs predominantly in the distal extremities of young adults. Most patients bear the t(12;22) reciprocal translocation, which involves the EWS and ATF1 genes. The diagnosis of CCS usually is easy but may be challenging in unusual sites, and the detection of EWS-ATF1 fusion transcripts is helpful to rule out a metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Forty-four patients with CCS and 14 conventional melanomas were examined for the presence of EWS-ATF1 transcripts by using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis on paraffin embedded tissues, including frozen samples for 9 CCS samples and 9 melanoma samples. Prior to molecular analysis, the diagnosis of CCS was considered certain in 35 patients and as probable in 9 patients on the basis of location, histologic features, and immunohistochemical profile. Treatment modalities and follow-up were available for 41 patients with CCS. RESULTS: EWS-ATF1 fusion transcripts were detected in 38 paraffin embedded CCS tissues (86% of all samples; 93% of interpretable samples), 3 samples (7%) were negative, and 3 samples (7%) were considered uninterpretable. Fusion transcripts were detected in 7 of 9 samples for which the diagnosis of CCS was considered probable. EWS-ATF1 transcripts were not detected in the 14 samples of melanoma. Results from frozen tissues were concordant with those from all corresponding paraffin embedded samples. Twenty-eight of 41 patients (68%) experienced lymph node and/or distant metastasis, and the 5 year-survival rate was 44%. Mitotic index and histologic grade were predictive of survival and distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the molecular detection of EWS-ATF1 fusion transcript by real-time PCR on paraffin embedded tissues is a sensitive and specific method for the diagnosis of CCS. It is an efficient tool for the diagnosis of unusual tumors, especially with regard to its distinction from melanoma. The current results also confirmed the poor prognosis for patients with this tumor type. Mitotic index and grade were predictive factors for survival and distant metastasis.

Marquès B, Terrier P, Voigt JJ, Mihura J, Coindre JM. · Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse. · Ann Pathol. · Pubmed #11015646 No free full text.

Abstract: Thirty six cases of clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue are reported. The median age was 44 years (5 to 80 years). The principal sites were the foot (11 cases), the hand and wrist (7 cases) and the knee (6 cases). The architecture was fascicular with lobular arrangement of cells delimited by delicate fibrous septa intimately bound to tendons or aponeuroses. Tumoral cells were round or fusiform with abundant clear cytoplasm sometimes epithelioid with round nuclei and prominent nucleoli. The mitotic rate was evaluated to 9/10 HPF. S100 protein was expressed in 33/36 cases and HMB45 marked 29/31 cases, without expression of cytokeratin. Three-year and 5-year survival rate were respectively 72% and 62%. Prognosis factors for global survival were efficiency of initial treatment with distal location and necrosis and FNCLCC grade. The distinction of clear cell sarcoma from metastatic melanoma is important because of the difference of prognosis.