Macular Degeneration: Sorenson J

Spaide RF, Sorenson J, Maranan L. · Vitreous-Retina-Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York 10021, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #12917166 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To examine combined photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with CNV secondary to AMD. Thirteen with CNV, without restriction to type, were not treated with prior PDT and were called the Newly Treated group. Thirteen patients with prior PDT therapy who experienced visual loss during treatment with PDT alone comprised the remainder and were termed the Prior PDT group. METHODS: Patients with CNV were treated with PDT immediately followed by an intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. Visual acuity was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol refraction. Need for retreatment was based on fluorescein angiographic evidence of leakage at 3-month follow-up intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and retreatment rate. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients in the Newly Treated group the mean visual acuity change at 3 months was an improvement of 1.9 lines, and 4 (30.8%) had an improvement of at least 3 lines. Two patients (15.4%) required retreatment at 3 months. At the 6-month follow-up, available for 12 patients in the Newly Treated group, the mean visual acuity change from baseline was an improvement of 2.4 lines, 4 patients (33%) had an improvement of at least 3 lines and 1 patient required retreatment. At both time points the visual acuity was significantly greater than at baseline (P = 0.023 and P = 0.007, at the 3-month and 6-month time points, Wilcoxon signed ranks test) for patients in the Newly Treated group. Among the 13 patients in the Prior PDT group, the mean change in visual acuity from baseline at the 3-month follow-up was 0.31 lines and 1 patient (7.7%) had an improvement of at least 3 lines. Six-month follow-up was available for 11 patients in the Prior PDT group and the mean change from baseline visual acuity was 0.1 lines and 1 patient (9.1%) experienced an improvement of 3 or more lines. No patient in the Prior PDT group required retreatment at 3 or 6 months. At the 3-month and 6-month time points the visual acuity was not significantly different than the baseline acuity in the Prior PDT group. No patient in either group at any time point experienced a loss of visual acuity of 3 or more lines. Five patients (19.2%), 3 in the Newly Treated group and 2 in the Prior PDT group, required monodrop therapy to control their intraocular pressure. No patient developed endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: Although the number of patients in this pilot study was limited, the improvement of acuity and the lack of fluorescein leakage in these patients suggest combination therapy with PDT and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, particularly when used as first-line therapy, merits further investigation.

Spaide RF, Laud K, Fine HF, Klancnik JM, Meyerle CB, Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson J, Slakter J, Fisher YL, Cooney MJ. · Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York and the LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center at Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, 460 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #16603955 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To describe the short-term anatomical and visual acuity responses after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with CNV secondary to AMD who were treated with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg) during a 3-month period. Patients underwent best-corrected Snellen visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography, and ophthalmoscopic examination at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were 266 consecutive eyes of 266 patients who received injections, and follow-up information was available for 251 (94.4%). The mean age of the patients was 80.3 years, the mean baseline visual acuity was 20/184, and 175 (69.7%) had inadequate response to alternate methods of treatment. At the 1-month follow-up (data available for 244 patients), the mean visual acuity was 20/137 (P < 0.001 as compared with baseline), and 74 (30.3%) of patients had improvement in visual acuity as defined by a halving of the visual angle. At the 2-month follow-up (data available for 222 patients), the mean visual acuity was 20/122 (P < 0.001), and 78 (31.1%) of patients had visual improvement. At the 3-month follow-up (data available for 141 patients), the mean visual acuity was 20/109 (P < 0.001), and 54 (38.3%) of patients had visual acuity improvement. The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 340 mum and decreased to a mean of 247 microm at month 1 (P < 0.001) and 213 microm at month 3 (P < 0.001). At 1 month, two patients had mild vitritis, as did one patient at 2 months, who had a history of recurrent uveitis. No endophthalmitis, increased intraocular pressure, retinal tear, or retinal detachment occurred. The risk for thromboembolic disorders did not seem to be different than reported previously in studies concerning macular degeneration. CONCLUSION: There were no apparent short-term safety concerns for intravitreal bevacizumab injection for CNV. Treated eyes had a significant decrease in macular thickness and improvement in visual acuity. The follow-up was too short to make any specific treatment recommendations, but the favorable short-term results suggest further study is needed.

Iturralde D, Spaide RF, Meyerle CB, Klancnik JM, Yannuzzi LA, Fisher YL, Sorenson J, Slakter JS, Freund KB, Cooney M, Fine HF. · Vitreous, Retina, Macula Consultants of New York, NY, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #16508427 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To report the short term anatomic and visual acuity response after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) in patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of patients with macular edema due to CRVO who were treated with at least one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg in 0.05 mL. Patients underwent Snellen visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, and ophthalmoscopic examination at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were 16 eyes of 15 consecutive patients with a mean age of 76.1 years (SD 9.8 years). Intravitreal triamcinolone had been previously administered to 9 patients, but all of these patients either had no improvement or had excessive intraocular pressure caused by the triamcinolone. The patients received a mean of 2.8 injections of bevacizumab per eye. No adverse events were observed, including endophthalmitis, clinically evident inflammation, increased intraocular pressure, retinal tears, retinal detachment, or thromboembolic events in any patient. The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 887 microm and decreased to a mean of 372 microm at month 1 (P < 0.001). The mean baseline acuity was 20/600 (logMAR = 1.48) and the mean acuity at month 1 was 20/200 (logMAR = 1.05), a difference that was highly significant (P = 0.001). At last follow-up, a mean of 3 months after the first injection, the mean visual acuity was 20/138 (logMAR = 0.84), which was significantly better than baseline (P < 0.001). Visual acuity improvement, defined as a halving of the visual angle, was seen in 14 of the 16 eyes. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment results of patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO did not reveal any short-term safety concerns. Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in a significant decrease in macular edema and improvement in visual acuity. The number of patients in this pilot study was limited and the follow-up is too short to make any specific treatment recommendations, but the favorable short-term results suggest further study is needed.

Spaide RF, Sorenson J, Maranan L. · LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #15691567 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To examine the 12-month results of a group of patients treated with combined photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with CNV secondary to AMD. Thirteen with CNV, without restriction to type, were not treated with prior PDT (newly treated group). Thirteen patients with prior PDT therapy who experienced visual loss while being treated with PDT alone comprised the remainder (prior PDT group). METHODS: Patients with CNV were treated with PDT, immediately followed by an intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. Visual acuity was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol refraction. Need for retreatment was based on fluorescein angiographic evidence of leakage at 3-month follow-up intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and retreatment rate. RESULTS: In the newly treated group, the mean acuity change was an improvement of 2.5 lines (last observation carried forward [LOCF], +2.4 lines; P = 0.011, Wilcoxon signed ranks test, as compared with baseline acuity) for patients completing the 12-month follow-up. In the prior PDT group, the mean change was an improvement of +0.44 lines (LOCF, +0.31 lines; P = 0.53). Retreatment rates were 1.24 for the newly treated group and 1.2 for the prior PDT group over the first year. Ten patients (38.5%) developed an intraocular pressure (IOP) of >24 mmHg during follow-up, a threshold used to institute pressure reduction therapy. No patient developed endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: Although the number of patients in this pilot study was limited, the improvement of acuity and the reduced treatment frequency in these patients suggest that combination therapy with PDT and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, particularly when used as first-line therapy, merits further investigation. Elevated IOP seems to be the most frequent early side effect of the treatment.

Yannuzzi LA, Negrão S, Iida T, Carvalho C, Rodriguez-Coleman H, Slakter J, Freund KB, Sorenson J, Orlock D, Borodoker N. · LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center of Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #11642370 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: It is known that choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) may erode through the retinal pigment epithelium, infiltrate the neurosensory retina, and communicate with the retinal circulation in what has been referred to as a retinal-choroidal anastomosis (RCA). This is extremely common in the end stage of disciform disease. In recent years, the reverse also seems to be possible, as angiomatous proliferation originates from the retina and extends posteriorly into the subretinal space, eventually communicating in some cases with choroidal new vessels. This form of neovascular ARMD, termed retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) in this article, can be confused with CNV. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is 1) to review the clinical and angiographic characteristics of a series of patients with RAP and 2) to propose a theoretical sequence of events that accounts for the neovascularized process. METHODS: In this retrospective clinical and angiographic analysis, 143 eyes with RAP (108 patients) were reviewed and classified based on their vasogenic nature and course. Clinical biomicroscopic examination, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography were used to evaluate patients. RESULTS: The results of this series suggest that angiomatous proliferation within the retina is the first manifestation of the vasogenic process in this form of neovascular ARMD. Dilated retinal vessels and pre-, intra-, and subretinal hemorrhages and exudate evolve, surrounding the angiomatous proliferation as the process extends into the deep retina and subretinal space. One or more dilated compensatory retinal vessels perfuse and drain the neovascularization, sometimes forming a retinal-retinal anastomosis. Fluorescein angiography in these patients usually revealed indistinct staining simulating occult CNV. Indocyanine green angiography was useful to make an accurate diagnosis in most cases. It revealed a focal area of intense hyperfluorescence corresponding to the neovascularization ("hot spot") and other characteristic findings. Based on understanding of the nature and progression of the neovascularized process, patients with RAP were classified into three vasogenic stages. Stage I involved proliferation of intraretinal capillaries originating from the deep retinal complex (intraretinal neovascularization [IRN]). Stage II was determined by growth of the retinal vessels into the subretinal space (subretinal neovascularization [SRN]). Stage III occurred when CNV could clearly be determined clinically or angiographically. A vascularized pigment epithelial detachment and RCA were inconsistent features of this stage. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal angiomatous proliferation appears to be a distinct subgroup of neovascular ARMD. It may present in one of three vasogenic stages: IRN, SRN, or CNV. Whereas ICG angiography is helpful in diagnosing RAP and in documenting the stage of the neovascularized process, it is frequently difficult to determine the precise nature and location of the new vessel formation. It is important for clinicians to recognize the vasogenic potential and the associated manifestations of this peculiar form of neovascular ARMD so that a proper diagnosis can be made, and when possible, an appropriate management administered.