Macular Degeneration: Singerman L

Rosenfeld PJ, Boyer DS, Bressler NM, Fish G, Grizzard WS, Hao Y, Hnik P, Hudson HL, Singerman L, Slakter JS, Anonymous00049. · Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #18036873 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin (Visudyne; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) using either standard or delayed light application. DESIGN: Phase II, multicenter, masked, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Sixty patients with occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from age-related macular degeneration were assigned randomly (1:1) to verteporfin infusion followed by light application either at 15 minutes (standard light) or 30 minutes (delayed light) after the start of the infusion. The assigned treatment was repeated every three months if fluorescein leakage was detected. RESULTS: At month 12, patients lost a mean of 15.7 letters and 11.4 letters from baseline in the standard and delayed light groups, respectively (P = .38). Twelve (52%) of 23 patients in the standard light group and 11 (42%) of 26 in the delayed light group lost at least 15 letters of visual acuity (P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between verteporfin therapy using the delayed light regimen of 30 minutes or the standard light regimen of 15 minutes in eyes with occult with no classic CNV.

D'Amico DJ, Goldberg MF, Hudson H, Jerdan JA, Krueger DS, Luna SP, Robertson SM, Russell S, Singerman L, Slakter JS, Yannuzzi L, Zilliox P, Anonymous00262. · No affiliation provided · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #14644721 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of the angiostatic agent anecortave acetate, compared with a placebo, for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV). DESIGN: Ongoing masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel evaluation of anecortave acetate (30 mg, 15 mg, and 3 mg) versus a placebo. PARTICIPANTS: There were 128 eyes of 128 patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to age-related macular degeneration who were enrolled and treated, with 80% (102/128) of eyes presenting with predominantly classic lesions at baseline. METHODS: All eyes received a posterior juxtascleral depot application of masked study medication or a placebo, with retreatment at 6-month intervals if the masked investigator believed the patient could benefit. Patients received periodic detailed ophthalmic examinations with both fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, general physical examinations with electrocardiograms, and hematology/serum chemistry/urinalysis. All ophthalmic and systemic safety data were periodically reviewed by the Independent Safety Committee overseeing the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vision and fluorescein angiographic lesion characteristics were compared over time and among treatment groups. RESULTS: At month 12, anecortave acetate (15 mg) administered at 6-month intervals was statistically superior to the placebo for 3 measures of clinical efficacy: mean change from baseline vision (P = 0.0131), stabilization of vision (<3 logMAR line change; P = 0.0323), and prevention of severe vision loss (decrease of > or = 6 logMAR lines from baseline; P = 0.0224). Subgroup analysis of predominantly classic lesions revealed that anecortave acetate (15 mg) was also superior to the placebo at 1 year for each of these 3 measures of visual outcome (Ps = 0.0022, 0.0100, and 0.0299, respectively). Anecortave acetate (15 mg) trended toward significance over the placebo at month 12 for inhibition of total lesion growth and for inhibition of both the total CNV component and the classic CNV component in both the overall and subgroup analyses. The Independent Safety Committee identified no clinically relevant treatment-related safety issues. CONCLUSIONS: Anecortave acetate (15 mg) is safe and clinically efficacious at 1 year for maintaining vision, preventing severe vision loss, and inhibiting subfoveal CNV lesion growth.

D'Amico DJ, Goldberg MF, Hudson H, Jerdan JA, Krueger S, Luna S, Robertson SM, Russell S, Singerman L, Slakter JS, Sullivan EK, Yannuzzi L, Zilliox P, Anonymous00326. · No affiliation provided · Retina. · Pubmed #12652226 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical safety and efficacy of the angiostatic agent anecortave acetate for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD. METHODS: 128 patients were randomized to placebo treatment or one of three anecortave acetate doses. Study medication was administered as a posterior juxtascleral injection onto the posterior scleral surface. Best-corrected logMAR vision was obtained at baseline and follow-up visits. Fluorescein angiograms were evaluated for eligibility before enrollment and posttreatment. RESULTS: Six months after a single treatment, visual acuity (mean change from baseline logMAR values) was significantly better (P = 0.003) after anecortave acetate 15 mg than placebo. More patients treated with anecortave acetate 15 mg than placebo maintained vision (88% versus 70%, P = 0.080), especially those with predominantly classic lesions (92% versus 65%, P = 0.021). Anecortave acetate 15 mg inhibited lesion growth significantly better than placebo (P = 0.001). Trends favoring the other doses over placebo were observed for vision preservation and lesion inhibition, but statistical significance was not achieved. The Independent Safety Committee overseeing this study identified no clinically relevant treatment-related changes. CONCLUSION: Anecortave acetate 15 mg is safe and effective for preserving or improving vision and for inhibiting lesion growth in patients with subfoveal AMD.

Singerman L. · Retina Associates of Cleveland, Case University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Cleveland, Ohio 44122, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #19553802 No free full text.

Abstract: Bevasiranib, the first small interfering RNA agent developed for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, has demonstrated clinical promise. Injected intravitreally, this small interfering RNA acts by inducing catalytic destruction of messenger RNA to silence gene expression. Bevasiranib targets the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein. It does not affect existing VEGF protein, suggesting that it may offer a synergistic effect when given in combination with anti-VEGF treatments, such as ranibizumab. The safety of bevasiranib has been supported by preclinical and clinical research.

Hudson HL, Lane SS, Heier JS, Stulting RD, Singerman L, Lichter PR, Sternberg P, Chang DF, Anonymous00087. · Retina Centers, Tucson, Arizona, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #16989902 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an implantable visual prosthetic device (IMT; VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies, Saratoga, CA) in patients with bilateral, end-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical trial with fellow eye controls. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 217 patients (mean age, 76 years) with AMD and moderate to profound bilateral central visual acuity loss (20/80-20/800) resulting from bilateral untreatable geographic atrophy, disciform scars, or both were enrolled. METHODS: A visual prosthetic device (implantable telescope), designed to enlarge retinal images of the central visual field, was implanted monocularly in the capsular bag after lens extraction. Fellow eyes were not implanted to provide peripheral vision and served as controls. Study patients participated in 6 visual rehabilitation visits after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and best-corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), quality-of-life scores from the National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the Activities of Daily Life scale, endothelial cell density (ECD), and incidence of complications and adverse events. RESULTS: At 1 year, 67% of implanted eyes achieved a 3-line or more improvement in BCDVA versus 13% of fellow eye controls (P<0.0001). Fifty-three percent of implanted eyes achieved a 3-line or more improvement in both BCDVA and BCNVA versus 10% of fellow eyes (P<0.0001). Mean BCDVA and BCNVA improved 3.5 lines and 3.2 lines, respectively, in implanted eyes versus 0.8 lines and 1.8 lines, respectively, in fellow eyes (P<0.0001). Change in visual acuity was not related to lesion type. Mean NEI VFQ-25 scores improved by more than 7 points from baseline (P<0.01) on 7 of 8 relevant subscales. Eleven eyes did not receive the device because of an aborted procedure. Endothelial cell density was reduced by 20% at 3 months and 25% at 1 year. The decrease in ECD was correlated with postsurgical edema (P<0.0001), and there was no evidence that endothelial cell loss is accelerated by ongoing endothelial trauma after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This implantable visual prosthesis can improve visual acuity and quality of life in patients with moderate to profound visual impairment caused by bilateral, end-stage AMD.