Macular Degeneration: Schneider S

Regillo CD, Brown DM, Abraham P, Yue H, Ianchulev T, Schneider S, Shams N. · Retina Service, Wills Eye Institute, 840 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #18222192 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab administered monthly for three months and then quarterly in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Phase IIIb, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection-controlled trial in patients with predominantly or minimally classic or occult with no classic CNV lesions. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 0.3 mg ranibizumab (n = 60), 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 61), or sham (n = 63) treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline visual acuity (VA) at month 12. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline VA at 12 months were -16.3, -1.6, and -0.2 letters for the sham, 0.3 mg, and 0.5 mg groups, respectively (P < or = .0001, each ranibizumab dose vs sham). Ranibizumab arrested CNV growth and reduced leakage from CNV. However, the treatment effect declined in the ranibizumab groups during quarterly dosing (e.g., at three months the mean changes from baseline VA had been gains of 2.9 and 4.3 letters for the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg doses, respectively). Results of subgroups analyses of mean change from baseline VA at 12 months by baseline age, VA, and lesion characteristics were consistent with the overall results. Few serious ocular or nonocular adverse events occurred in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab administered monthly for three months and then quarterly provided significant VA benefit to patients with AMD-related subfoveal CNV and was well tolerated. The incidence of serious ocular or nonocular adverse events was low.

Kaiser PK, Brown DM, Zhang K, Hudson HL, Holz FG, Shapiro H, Schneider S, Acharya NR. · Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #17949673 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Subgroup data from a pivotal phase 3 study comparing ranibizumab (LUCENTIS) with verteporfin (VISUDYNE) photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with predominantly classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were retrospectively analyzed to identify patient and disease characteristics that may predict visual acuity (VA) treatment outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective subgroup analysis of 12-month data from the ANCHOR study. METHODS: Univariate analyses were performed to assess VA outcomes across subgroups based on patients' gender and baseline age, VA score, CNV lesion size, CNV lesion type, and duration of neovascular AMD, followed by multivariate analyses to identify predictors of the VA score change from baseline at 12 months. main outcome measures: Proportion of patients losing <15 letters and proportion gaining > or =15 letters from baseline VA; mean change from baseline VA. RESULTS: On average, all subgroups of ranibizumab-treated patients did better than PDT patients for all three VA outcome measures. In the multivariate analysis, lower baseline VA score, smaller baseline CNV lesion size, and younger baseline age were associated with greater gain of letters with ranibizumab treatment and less loss of letters with PDT. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroup analysis of 12-month data from the ANCHOR study showed ranibizumab to be superior to PDT in all subgroups evaluated, and was consistent with the subgroup analysis of 24-month data from the other pivotal phase 3 study of ranibizumab (MARINA) in showing that the most important predictors of VA outcomes were, in decreasing order of impact, the patient's baseline VA score, CNV lesion size, and age.

Cameron DJ, Yang Z, Tong Z, Zhao Y, Praggastis A, Brinton E, Harmon J, Chen Y, Pearson E, Bernstein PS, Brinton G, Li X, Jorgensen A, Schneider S, Gibbs D, Chen H, Wang C, Howes K, Camp NJ, Zhang K. · Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Moran Eye Center and Program in Human Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. · Adv Exp Med Biol. · Pubmed #18188952 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY, Sy JP, Schneider S, Anonymous00302. · Vitreoretinal Consultants, Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #17021319 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We compared ranibizumab--a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody Fab that neutralizes all active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A--with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in the treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: During the first year of this 2-year, multicenter, double-blind study, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) plus sham verteporfin therapy or monthly sham injections plus active verteporfin therapy. The primary end point was the proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline visual acuity at 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 423 patients enrolled, 94.3% of those given 0.3 mg of ranibizumab and 96.4% of those given 0.5 mg lost fewer than 15 letters, as compared with 64.3% of those in the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visual acuity improved by 15 letters or more in 35.7% of the 0.3-mg group and 40.3% of the 0.5-mg group, as compared with 5.6% of the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Mean visual acuity increased by 8.5 letters in the 0.3-mg group and 11.3 letters in the 0.5-mg group, as compared with a decrease of 9.5 letters in the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Among 140 patients treated with 0.5 mg of ranibizumab, presumed endophthalmitis occurred in 2 patients (1.4%) and serious uveitis in 1 (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab was superior to verteporfin as intravitreal treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with low rates of serious ocular adverse events. Treatment improved visual acuity on average at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00061594 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).