Macular Degeneration: Gilson MM

Solomon SD, Dong LM, Haller JA, Gilson MM, Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Anonymous00207. · Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #19516120 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with the development of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in patients enrolled in the Submacular Surgery Trials. METHODS: One thousand fifteen patients with eligible subfoveal neovascular lesions in the study eye were assigned randomly to observation or to surgery. Eyes were examined at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after enrollment to assess study outcomes and adverse events, including RRDs. Adverse events also were reported at other times as clinical personnel became aware of them. Potential risk factors for the development of RRD in study eyes were evaluated using recursive partitioning and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 506 eyes assigned to surgery, RRD developed in 44 (8.7%) compared with 4 (0.8%) of 509 eyes assigned to observation. Of the 44 eyes in which RRD developed, 27 had age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and large (>3.5 MPS disk areas) hemorrhagic subfoveal neovascular lesions at baseline and represented 16.1% of all eyes with such lesions assigned to surgery. Eyes with AMD and larger hemorrhagic lesions (>16 MPS disk areas) together with relatively poor visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity < or =20/1280) had a higher risk of RRD (odds ratio = 6.2, 95% confidence interval: 2.2-16.7) compared with those with smaller lesions and better visual acuity at baseline. CONCLUSION: Poor visual acuity and very large, predominantly hemorrhagic subfoveal neovascular AMD lesion type were the greatest risk factors for RRD after submacular surgery. Submacular surgery should be undertaken in such eyes with full awareness of the risk of RRD during subsequent follow-up.

Anonymous00153, Gilson MM, Bressler NM, Jabs DA, Solomon SD, Thorne JE, Wilson DJ. · Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #17822977 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate fluorescein angiographic and visual acuity (VA) outcomes from patients enrolled in a trial of a single periocular corticosteroid injection immediately before photodynamic therapy (PDT) versus PDT alone for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Randomized 2-center clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven subjects with AMD, subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, and best-corrected VA of 20/20 to 20/320 in the study eye who had received no more than 1 prior PDT treatment. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive PDT alone (no corticosteroid) or a single periocular corticosteroid injection given via the posterior superior sub-Tenon's capsule route before PDT (corticosteroid) and assessed 1, 3, and 6 months after enrollment. Best-corrected VA and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were taken during each examination. Color photographs and fluorescein angiograms were taken at baseline and 3 and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Presence or absence of fluorescein leakage from choroidal neovascularization 3 months after randomization. RESULTS: Between the 34 participants randomized to periocular corticosteroid and 33 to no corticosteroid, baseline features appeared balanced. Thirty-three corticosteroid participants and 30 no corticosteroid participants returned for the 3-month follow-up, at which time 56 had fluorescein leakage. Proportions of participants with leakage at 3 months for the 2 treatment groups did not statistically significantly differ; 94% of the corticosteroid group and 90% of the no corticosteroid group had fluorescein leakage at 3 months (P = 0.66). Mean VAs at 3 months after enrollment were 20/100 and 20/125 in the corticosteroid and no corticosteroid groups, respectively, decreasing on average 1.5 and 0.9 lines from baseline (P = 0.50). Adverse events included IOP > 21 mmHg in 7 corticosteroid participants (21%) and 1 (3%) no corticosteroid participant (P<0.05) and ptosis of the study eyelid in 1 (3%) corticosteroid participant. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previously reported uncontrolled studies and 1 controlled study, this trial did not find a reduction in the amount of fluorescein leakage 3 months after a single periocular injection of corticosteroid and PDT compared with PDT alone.