Macular Degeneration: Evans J

Evans J. · No affiliation provided · BMJ. · Pubmed #17923719 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Evans J. · No affiliation provided · Practitioner. · Pubmed #12132263 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Evans J. · International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK. · Eye. · Pubmed #18425071 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to examine the evidence as to whether antioxidant vitamin or mineral supplements prevent the development of AMD or slow down its progression. METHODS: Randomised trials comparing antioxidant vitamin and/or mineral supplement to control were identified by systematic electronic searches (updated August 2007) and contact with investigators. Data were pooled after investigating clinical and statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS: There was no evidence that antioxidant (vitamin E or beta-carotene) supplementation prevented AMD. A total of 23 099 people were randomised in three trials with treatment duration of 4-12 years; pooled risk ratio=1.03 (95% CI, 0.74-1.43). There was evidence that antioxidant (beta-carotene, vitamin C, and vitamin E) and zinc supplementation slowed down the progression to advanced AMD and visual acuity loss in people with signs of the disease (adjusted odds ratio=0.68, 95% CI, 0.53-0.87 and 0.77, 95% CI, 0.62-0.96, respectively). The majority of people were randomised in one trial (AREDS, 3640 people randomised). There were seven other small trials (total randomised 525). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support the use of antioxidant vitamin supplements to prevent AMD. People with AMD, or early signs of the disease, may experience some benefit from taking supplements as used in the AREDS trial. Potential harms of high-dose antioxidant supplementation must be considered. These may include an increased risk of lung cancer in smokers (beta-carotene), heart failure in people with vascular disease or diabetes (vitamin E) and hospitalisation for genitourinary conditions (zinc).

Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L, Henshaw K. · London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, International Centre for Eye Health, Keppel Street, London, UK, WC1E 7HT. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #17636693 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) new vessels grow under the retina distorting vision and leading to scarring. This is exacerbated if the blood vessels leak. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been investigated as a way to treat the neovascular membranes without affecting the retina. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to examine the effects of PDT in the treatment of neovascular AMD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2007), EMBASE (1980 to March 2007). We contacted experts in the field and searched the reference lists of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of PDT in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to AMD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted the data. Risk ratios were combined using a fixed-effect model after testing for heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: Three published trials were identified that randomised 1022 participants to verteporfin therapy compared to 5% dextrose in water. The TAP and VIP trials were performed by the same investigators using largely the same clinical centres and funded by manufacturers of verteporfin. Outcome data were available at 12 and 24 months after the first treatment. Participants received on average five treatments over two years. The risk ratio of losing three or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.87). The risk ratio of losing six or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.76). The results at 12 months were similar to those at 24 months. The most serious adverse outcome, acute (within seven days of treatment) severe visual acuity decrease, occurs in about one in 50 patients. Some outcomes from the more recent VIM trial could be included in the meta-analysis but have not greatly altered the findings. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to AMD is probably effective in preventing visual loss though there is doubt about the size of the effect. Outcomes and potential adverse effects of this treatment should be monitored closely. Further independent trials of verteporfin are required to establish that the effects seen in this study are consistent and to examine important issues not yet addressed, particularly relating to quality of life and cost. However, the advent of new interventions for AMD make this unlikely.

Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L, Henshaw K. · Moorfields Eye Hospital and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Research and Development Department, City Road, London, UK EC1V 2PD. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #16235294 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) new vessels grow under the retina distorting vision and leading to scarring. This is exacerbated if the blood vessels leak. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been investigated as a way to treat the neovascular membranes without affecting the retina. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to examine the effects of PDT in the treatment of neovascular AMD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which includes the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005), EMBASE (1980 to January 2005). We used the Science Citation Index to search for reports that cited relevant studies. We contacted experts in the field and searched the reference lists of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of PDT in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to AMD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted the data. Relative risks were combined using a fixed-effect model after testing for heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: Two published trials were identified that randomised 948 participants to verteporfin therapy compared to 5% dextrose in water. Both trials were performed by the same investigators using largely the same clinical centres and funded by manufacturers of verteporfin. Outcome data were available at 12 and 24 months after the first treatment. Participants received on average five treatments over two years. The relative risk of losing three or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.87). The relative risk of losing six or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.76). The results at 12 months were similar to those at 24 months. The most serious adverse outcome, acute (within 7 days of treatment) severe visual acuity decrease, occurs in about one in 50 patients. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to AMD is probably effective in preventing visual loss though there is doubt about the size of the effect. Outcomes and potential adverse effects of this treatment should be monitored closely. Further independent trials of verteporfin are required to establish that the effects seen in this study are consistent and to examine important issues not yet addressed, particularly relating to quality of life and cost.

Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L, Henshaw K. · Research and Development Department, Moorfields Eye Hospital and Institute of Ophthalmology (UCL), City Road, London, UK, EC1V 2PD. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #12804420 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration, new vessels grow under the retina, distorting vision and leading to scarring. This is further exacerbated if the blood vessels leak. Photodynamic therapy, originally used in cancer treatment, has been investigated as a way to treat the neovascular membranes without affecting the retina. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to examine the effects of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched for trials in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register) on the Cochrane Library (Issue 4 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to November 2002). We used the Science Citation Index to search for reports that cited relevant study reports. We contacted experts in the field and we searched the reference lists of relevant studies for further trial reports. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of photodynamic therapy in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted the data independently. Relative risks were combined using a fixed effect model after testing for heterogeneity using a chi-square test. MAIN RESULTS: Two published trials were identified that randomised 948 participants to verteporfin therapy compared to 5% dextrose in water. Both trials were performed by the same investigators using largely the same clinical centres and funded by manufacturers of verteporfin. Outcome data were available at 12 and 24 months after the first treatment. Participants received on average five treatments over two years. The relative risk of losing three or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.87). The relative risk of losing six or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.76). The results at 12 months were similar to those at 24 months. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration is effective in preventing visual loss. Outcomes and potential adverse effects of this treatment should be monitored closely. Further independent trials of Verteporfin are required to establish that the effects seen in this study are consistent and to determine important questions not yet addressed, particularly relating to quality of life and cost.

Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L, Henshaw K. · Research and Development Department, Moorfields Eye Hospital and Institute of Ophthalmology (UCL), City Road, London, UK, EC1V 2PD. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #11687007 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration, new vessels grow under the retina, distorting vision and leading to scarring. This is further exacerbated if the blood vessels leak. Photodynamic therapy, originally used in cancer treatment, has been investigated as a way to treat the neovascular membranes without affecting the retina. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to examine the effects of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched for trials in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register - CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group specialised register), MEDLINE and EMBASE. We used the Science Citation Index to search for reports that cited relevant study reports. We contacted experts in the field and we searched the reference lists of relevant studies for further trial reports. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of photodynamic therapy in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted the data independently. As only one trial met the inclusion criteria, meta-analysis was not performed. MAIN RESULTS: One published trial was identified which randomised 609 participants. Outcome data were available at 12 and 24 months after the first treatment. Participants in the treatment group received an average of 3.4 treatments in the first year, and 2.2 in the second year. The relative risk of losing three or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.88). The relative risk of losing six or more lines of visual acuity at 24 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.81). The results at 12 months were similar to those at 24 months. Subgroup analyses suggest that the benefits may be confined to people with no occult choroidal neovascularisation. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy in people with classic choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration is effective in preventing visual loss. This evidence is drawn from a subgroup analysis of 143 participants in one trial. Outcomes and potential adverse effects of this treatment should be monitored closely. There is no evidence that photodynamic therapy is beneficial for people with evidence of occult choroidal neovascularisation. These people should be offered treatment only in the context of a randomised trial.

Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L. · 'Glaxo' Department of Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Institute of Ophthalmology (UCL) and Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, UK, EC1V 2PD. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #10796845 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration, new vessels grow under the retina, distorting vision and leading to scarring. This is further exacerbated if the blood vessels leak. Photodynamic therapy, originally used in cancer treatment, has been investigated as a way to treat the neovascular membranes without affecting the retina. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to examine the evidence for the safety and effectiveness of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched for trials in the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register (available in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase. We used the Science Citation Index to search for reports that cited identified relevant study reports. We contacted experts in the field for further trials information, and we searched the reference lists of identified relevant studies for further trial reports. Searches were conducted in December 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of photodynamic therapy in people with choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted the data independently. Meta analysis was not performed. MAIN RESULTS: One published trial was identified. Outcome data were available at 12 months after the first treatment. Patients received an average of 3.7 treatments. The relative risk of losing three or more lines of visual acuity at 12 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.86). The relative risk of losing six or more lines of visual acuity at 12 months comparing the intervention with the control group was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.87). Subgroup analyses suggest that the benefits may be confined to people with no occult choroidal neovascularisation. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy in people with classic choroidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration is effective in preventing visual loss. This evidence is drawn from a subgroup analysis of 143 participants in one trial. Outcomes and potential adverse effects of this treatment should be monitored closely. There is no evidence that photodynamic therapy is beneficial for people with evidence of occult choroidal neovascularisation. These people should be offered treatment in the context of a randomised trial.

Nitsch D, Evans J, Roderick PJ, Smeeth L, Fletcher AE. · Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. · Ophthalmic Epidemiol. · Pubmed #19437313 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and renal impairment are both associated with cardiovascular risk factors and with alterations in the complement pathways. There are few data on the association of AMD with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: People who were visually impaired (binocular acuity < 6/18) due to AMD (ascertained from review of medical notes; n = 516) were compared to people with normal vision (6/6 or better; n = 2755). Cases with AMD and controls derive from a population-based cross-sectional study of people aged 75 years and over registered with 49 family practices in Britain. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula and proteinuria assessed by dipsticks. RESULTS: After adjusting for a wide range of confounding factors, the presence of proteinuria was positively associated with AMD among men (odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05, 4.04) but not in women (OR 0.62 95%CI 0.36,1.08). Among men, eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was associated with AMD but not after adjusting for proteinuria. This was not observed for women. Both proteinuria and eGFR showed different associations with AMD by sex (p-values for interaction < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Proteinuria appears to be a risk factor for AMD among men but not among women, possibly due to measurement errors in detecting proteinuria in women.