Macular Degeneration: Brown DM

Brown DM, Regillo CD. · Vitreoretinal Consultants, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #17893015 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The vision gains reported with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab in the MARINA and ANCHOR trials led to an immediate paradigm shift in the treatment of neovascular AMD with retina physicians universally switching to the pan-VEGF blocking agents ranibizumab and bevacizumab, and patients expecting visual improvement. As these agents are primarily used on a pro re nata (PRN) dosing schedule (because neither patients nor physicians want monthly injections), the factors involved in making the treatment and retreatment decisions are very important in any attempt to maximize vision gain. DESIGN: Analysis of literature, ongoing clinical trials, and the clinical assessments that can aid clinicians in treatment and retreatment decisions. METHODS: Literature review and perspective. RESULTS: If a monthly injection protocol is not used, clinicians should use both functional and anatomic criteria to attempt to guide treatment and retreatment decisions. Qualitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) appears to be the most sensitive and practical assessment tool to determine anatomic response to treatment but should be used in conjunction with clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS: If monthly intravitreal injections are not performed, a combination of clinical examination (looking for new hemorrhage) and qualitative OCT (to assess response to treatment and early signs of recurrent leakage) can be used to guide anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), treatments with the goal of maintaining a "normal" retinal anatomy in an attempt to maximize the benefit (visual acuity gains) to risk (number of injections required) ratio.

Brown DM, Michels M, Kaiser PK, Heier JS, Sy JP, Ianchulev T, Anonymous00115. · Vitreoretinal Consultants, Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #19118696 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The 2-year, phase III trial designated Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) in Age-related Macular Degeneration (ANCHOR) compared ranibizumab with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating predominantly classic CNV. DESIGN: Multicenter, international, randomized, double-masked, active-treatment-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with predominantly classic, subfoveal CNV not previously treated with PDT or antiangiogenic drugs. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to verteporfin PDT plus monthly sham intraocular injection or to sham verteporfin PDT plus monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) injection. The need for PDT (active or sham) retreatment was evaluated every 3 months using fluorescein angiography (FA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary, intent-to-treat efficacy analysis was at 12 months, with continued measurements to month 24. Key measures included the percentage losing <15 letters from baseline visual acuity (VA) score (month 12 primary efficacy outcome measure), percentage gaining >or=15 letters from baseline, and mean change over time in VA score and FA-assessed lesion characteristics. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Of 423 patients (143 PDT, 140 each in the 2 ranibizumab groups), the majority (>or=77% in each group) completed the 2-year study. Consistent with results at month 12, at month 24 the VA benefit from ranibizumab was statistically significant (P<0.0001 vs. PDT) and clinically meaningful: 89.9% to 90.0% of ranibizumab-treated patients had lost <15 letters from baseline (vs. 65.7% of PDT patients); 34% to 41.0% had gained >or=15 letters (vs. 6.3% of PDT group); and, on average, VA was improved from baseline by 8.1 to 10.7 letters (vs. a mean decline of 9.8 letters in PDT group). Changes in lesion anatomic characteristics on FA also favored ranibizumab (all comparisons P<0.0001 vs. PDT). Overall, there was no imbalance among groups in rates of serious ocular and nonocular adverse events. In the pooled ranibizumab groups, 3 of 277 (1.1%) patients developed presumed endophthalmitis in the study eye (rate per injection = 3/5921 [0.05%]). CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-year study, ranibizumab provided greater clinical benefit than verteporfin PDT in patients with age-related macular degeneration with new-onset, predominantly classic CNV. Rates of serious adverse events were low. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Regillo CD, Brown DM, Abraham P, Yue H, Ianchulev T, Schneider S, Shams N. · Retina Service, Wills Eye Institute, 840 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #18222192 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab administered monthly for three months and then quarterly in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Phase IIIb, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection-controlled trial in patients with predominantly or minimally classic or occult with no classic CNV lesions. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 0.3 mg ranibizumab (n = 60), 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 61), or sham (n = 63) treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline visual acuity (VA) at month 12. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline VA at 12 months were -16.3, -1.6, and -0.2 letters for the sham, 0.3 mg, and 0.5 mg groups, respectively (P < or = .0001, each ranibizumab dose vs sham). Ranibizumab arrested CNV growth and reduced leakage from CNV. However, the treatment effect declined in the ranibizumab groups during quarterly dosing (e.g., at three months the mean changes from baseline VA had been gains of 2.9 and 4.3 letters for the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg doses, respectively). Results of subgroups analyses of mean change from baseline VA at 12 months by baseline age, VA, and lesion characteristics were consistent with the overall results. Few serious ocular or nonocular adverse events occurred in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab administered monthly for three months and then quarterly provided significant VA benefit to patients with AMD-related subfoveal CNV and was well tolerated. The incidence of serious ocular or nonocular adverse events was low.

Kaiser PK, Brown DM, Zhang K, Hudson HL, Holz FG, Shapiro H, Schneider S, Acharya NR. · Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #17949673 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Subgroup data from a pivotal phase 3 study comparing ranibizumab (LUCENTIS) with verteporfin (VISUDYNE) photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with predominantly classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were retrospectively analyzed to identify patient and disease characteristics that may predict visual acuity (VA) treatment outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective subgroup analysis of 12-month data from the ANCHOR study. METHODS: Univariate analyses were performed to assess VA outcomes across subgroups based on patients' gender and baseline age, VA score, CNV lesion size, CNV lesion type, and duration of neovascular AMD, followed by multivariate analyses to identify predictors of the VA score change from baseline at 12 months. main outcome measures: Proportion of patients losing <15 letters and proportion gaining > or =15 letters from baseline VA; mean change from baseline VA. RESULTS: On average, all subgroups of ranibizumab-treated patients did better than PDT patients for all three VA outcome measures. In the multivariate analysis, lower baseline VA score, smaller baseline CNV lesion size, and younger baseline age were associated with greater gain of letters with ranibizumab treatment and less loss of letters with PDT. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroup analysis of 12-month data from the ANCHOR study showed ranibizumab to be superior to PDT in all subgroups evaluated, and was consistent with the subgroup analysis of 24-month data from the other pivotal phase 3 study of ranibizumab (MARINA) in showing that the most important predictors of VA outcomes were, in decreasing order of impact, the patient's baseline VA score, CNV lesion size, and age.

Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, Kim RY, Anonymous00301. · Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #17021318 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ranibizumab--a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody Fab that neutralizes all active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A--has been evaluated for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: In this multicenter, 2-year, double-blind, sham-controlled study, we randomly assigned patients with age-related macular degeneration with either minimally classic or occult (with no classic lesions) choroidal neovascularization to receive 24 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (either 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) or sham injections. The primary end point was the proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline visual acuity at 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 716 patients in the study. At 12 months, 94.5% of the group given 0.3 mg of ranibizumab and 94.6% of those given 0.5 mg lost fewer than 15 letters, as compared with 62.2% of patients receiving sham injections (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Visual acuity improved by 15 or more letters in 24.8% of the 0.3-mg group and 33.8% of the 0.5-mg group, as compared with 5.0% of the sham-injection group (P<0.001 for both doses). Mean increases in visual acuity were 6.5 letters in the 0.3-mg group and 7.2 letters in the 0.5-mg group, as compared with a decrease of 10.4 letters in the sham-injection group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The benefit in visual acuity was maintained at 24 months. During 24 months, presumed endophthalmitis was identified in five patients (1.0%) and serious uveitis in six patients (1.3%) given ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal administration of ranibizumab for 2 years prevented vision loss and improved mean visual acuity, with low rates of serious adverse events, in patients with minimally classic or occult (with no classic lesions) choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056836 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Luviano DM, Benz MS, Kim RY, Fish RH, Wong TP, Kegley EN, Brown DM. · Greater Houston Retina Research Center, Vitreoretinal Consultants, Houston, Texas, USA. · Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. · Pubmed #19485303 No free full text.

Abstract: The authors report four cases where spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaged pathology not captured by time domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT). These cases include one of angioid streaks, two of juxtafoveal telangiectasia, and one of age-related macular degeneration. In each case, the improved images provided by SD-OCT changed either the management of the patient or the counseling of their disease process.

Bélair ML, Kim SJ, Thorne JE, Dunn JP, Kedhar SR, Brown DM, Jabs DA. · Department of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #19403110 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME) after cataract surgery among eyes with and without uveitis using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to determine risk factors for postoperative CME among eyes with uveitis. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative cohort study. METHODS: Single-center, academic practice. Forty-one eyes with uveitis and 52 eyes without uveitis underwent clinical examination and OCT testing within 4 weeks before cataract surgery and at 1-month and 3-month postoperative visits. The main outcome measure was incidence of CME at 1 and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Both uveitic and control eyes gained approximately 3 lines of vision (P = .6). Incidence of CME at 1 month was 12% (5 eyes) for uveitis and 4% (2 eyes) for controls (P = .2). Incidence of CME at 3 months was 8% (3 eyes) for uveitis and 0% for eyes without uveitis (P = .08). Eyes with uveitis treated with perioperative oral corticosteroids had a 7-fold reduction in postoperative CME (relative risk [RR], 0.14; P = .05). In uveitic eyes, active inflammation within 3 months before surgery increased the risk of CME when compared with eyes without inflammation (RR, 6.19; P = .04). CME was significantly associated with poorer vision (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with well-controlled uveitis may obtain similar outcomes to control eyes after cataract surgery (up to 3 months). Use of perioperative oral corticosteroids and control of uveitis for more than 3 months before surgery seemed to decrease the risk of postoperative CME among uveitic eyes in this study.

Anonymous00052, Browning DJ, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Brown DM, Fong DS, Bressler NM, Danis RP, Kinyoun JL, Nguyen QD, Bhavsar AR, Gottlieb J, Pieramici DJ, Rauser ME, Apte RS, Lim JI, Miskala PH. · Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #17123615 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured retinal thickness and visual acuity in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) both before and after macular laser photocoagulation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ten patients (251 eyes) with DME enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of laser techniques. METHODS: Retinal thickness was measured with OCT and visual acuity was measured with the electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Optical coherence tomography-measured center point thickness and visual acuity. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for visual acuity versus OCT center point thickness were 0.52 at baseline and 0.49, 0.36, and 0.38 at 3.5, 8, and 12 months after laser photocoagulation. The slope of the best fit line to the baseline data was approximately 4.4 letters (95% confidence interval, 3.5-5.3) of better of visual acuity for every 100-mum decrease in center point thickness at baseline with no important difference at follow-up visits. Approximately one third of the variation in visual acuity could be predicted by a linear regression model that incorporated OCT center point thickness, age, hemoglobin A1C, and severity of fluorescein leakage. The correlation between change in visual acuity and change in OCT center point thickening 3.5 months after laser treatment was 0.44, with no important difference at the other follow-up times. A subset of eyes showed paradoxical improvements in visual acuity with increased center point thickening (7%-17% at the 3 time points) or paradoxical worsening of visual acuity with a decrease in center point thickening (18%-26% at the 3 time points). CONCLUSIONS: There is modest correlation between OCT-measured center point thickness and visual acuity, and modest correlation of changes in retinal thickening and visual acuity after focal laser treatment for DME. However, a wide range of visual acuity may be observed for a given degree of retinal edema. Thus, although OCT measurements of retinal thickness represent an important tool in clinical evaluation, they cannot substitute reliably as a surrogate for visual acuity at a given point in time. This study does not address whether short-term changes on OCT are predictive of long-term effects on visual acuity.

Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY, Sy JP, Schneider S, Anonymous00302. · Vitreoretinal Consultants, Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #17021319 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We compared ranibizumab--a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody Fab that neutralizes all active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A--with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in the treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: During the first year of this 2-year, multicenter, double-blind study, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) plus sham verteporfin therapy or monthly sham injections plus active verteporfin therapy. The primary end point was the proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline visual acuity at 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 423 patients enrolled, 94.3% of those given 0.3 mg of ranibizumab and 96.4% of those given 0.5 mg lost fewer than 15 letters, as compared with 64.3% of those in the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visual acuity improved by 15 letters or more in 35.7% of the 0.3-mg group and 40.3% of the 0.5-mg group, as compared with 5.6% of the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Mean visual acuity increased by 8.5 letters in the 0.3-mg group and 11.3 letters in the 0.5-mg group, as compared with a decrease of 9.5 letters in the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Among 140 patients treated with 0.5 mg of ranibizumab, presumed endophthalmitis occurred in 2 patients (1.4%) and serious uveitis in 1 (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab was superior to verteporfin as intravitreal treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with low rates of serious ocular adverse events. Treatment improved visual acuity on average at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00061594 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Smith SV, Benz MS, Brown DM. · No affiliation provided · Arch Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #19001234 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.