Macular Degeneration: Bressler NM

Solomon SD, Bressler SB, Hawkins BS, Marsh MJ, Bressler NM, Anonymous00106. · Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2005, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #15805900 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To describe the guidelines followed by the Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) Research Group in the interpretation of color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms of subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions evaluated in the SST and to assist ophthalmologists in applying the results of the SST. METHODS: Stereoscopic color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms of the study eye and nonstudy eye of 1,015 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions secondary to age-related macular degeneration, ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, or idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) were obtained and graded by certified SST fundus photograph readers at the baseline examination in three randomized clinical trials comparing surgery with observation. Adherence to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and ocular features that might affect visual outcome were documented. Stereoscopic color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography were repeated 1 month after randomization for patients assigned to surgery to provide documentation that surgery was performed and to assess compliance with the surgery protocol. Photographs and fluorescein angiograms of both the study eye and the fellow eye in all patients then were obtained 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization and then annually up to 48 months. The kappa statistic was used to evaluate interobserver reliability of photograph gradings. RESULTS: Lesion components at baseline included classic CNV, occult CNV, and features contiguous to CNV, including blood, fibrous tissue, hypofluorescence not corresponding to blood, serous detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium, and prior areas of laser photocoagulation. At follow-up, fluorescein leakage from CNV was assessed peripheral to or within the area of the retinal pigment epithelium abnormality after surgery. The lesion at follow-up could include any of the features identified at baseline as well as retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, such as mottling of the retinal pigment epithelium with a subtle transition to normal retinal pigment epithelium or a very sharply demarcated, markedly hypopigmented area that was easily distinguished from the surrounding retinal pigment epithelium. kappa statistics for interobserver reliability ranged from good (0.47) to excellent (1.00) for features graded at baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although some of the definitions essential to the interpretation of the SST are similar to those used in the Macular Photocoagulation Study and randomized clinical trials of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, this guideline provides new information regarding lesion components at baseline as well as standardized descriptions of lesions after submacular surgery. These descriptions from the SST assist in understanding what lesions were studied, when additional treatment was considered after surgery, and how anatomical results should be interpreted.

Bressler NM, Hawkins BS, Sternberg P, McDonald HR, Steinberg P. · No affiliation provided · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #11237895 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Bressler NM. · No affiliation provided · BMJ. · Pubmed #11110721 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Kim SJ, Bressler NM. · Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8808, USA. · Curr Opin Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #19093330 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an unstructured review of the recent literature on the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in cataract surgery with specific focus on cystoid macular edema (CME) on the basis of expert opinion of the authors. RECENT FINDINGS: OCT appears to be a useful method to reveal clinically relevant postsurgical CME and is complementary to fluorescein angiography. A majority of eyes demonstrate minimal increases in postoperative retinal thickness after cataract surgery on OCT, though those eyes that do develop clinically relevant CME show substantial increases. Using at least 40% increase in retinal thickness from baseline on OCT may be a valid, objective, and uniform method of defining CME. Preoperative and postoperative OCT evaluations in selected eyes at high risk (diabetes, uveitis) for CME may be warranted. SUMMARY: OCT has become a useful diagnostic tool to assess CME after cataract surgery.

Browning DJ, Altaweel MM, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Scott IU, Anonymous00050. · Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #18774122 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To review the available information on classification of diabetic macular edema (DME) as focal or diffuse. DESIGN: Interpretive essay. METHODS: Literature review and interpretation. RESULTS: The terms focal diabetic macular edema and diffuse diabetic macular edema frequently are used without clear definitions. Published definitions often use different examination methods and often are inconsistent. Evaluating published information on the prevalence of focal and diffuse DME, the responses of focal and diffuse DME to treatments, and the importance of focal and diffuse DME in assessing prognosis is hindered because the terms are used inconsistently. A newer vocabulary may be more constructive, one that describes discrete components of the concepts such as extent and location of macular thickening, involvement of the center of the macula, quantity and pattern of lipid exudates, source of fluorescein leakage, and regional variation in macular thickening and that distinguishes these terms from the use of the term focal when describing one type of photocoagulation technique. Developing methods for assessing component variables that can be used in clinical practice and establishing reproducibility of the methods are important tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Little evidence exists that characteristics of DME described by the terms focal and diffuse help to explain variation in visual acuity or response to treatment. It is unresolved whether a concept of focal and diffuse DME will prove clinically useful despite frequent use of the terms when describing management of DME. Further studies to address the issues are needed.

Virgili G, Do DV, Bressler NM, Menchini U. · Department of Oto-Neuro-Ophthalmological Surgical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. · Acta Ophthalmol Scand. · Pubmed #17244204 No free full text.

Abstract: During the past 20 years, several multicentre clinical trials have investigated different therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). These landmark studies have provided the scientific community with powerful data regarding the ability of laser photocoagulation, verteporfin therapy, pegaptanib sodium and submacular surgery to treat particular choroidal neovascular lesion types. Accurate interpretation of data from these trials is essential to enable clinicians to make informed decisions about therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, several new treatment options are likely to become available in the next few years and clinicians will have to decide how effective these therapies may be, and how (or if) they should be used in clinical practice. It is therefore timely to review the strengths and weaknesses of the body of evidence for the currently available therapeutic options for patients with choroidal neovascularization due to AMD. Evaluation of the quality of reporting in past clinical trials will also enable critical review of new studies that will be published in the future. This review summarizes the design, reporting and results of key randomized clinical trials, in addition to evaluating the available evidence for new therapies and identifying the important issues that need to be considered when evaluating their efficacy.

Bressler NM. · The Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205-2005, USA. · J Am Board Fam Pract. · Pubmed #12002198 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The neovascular form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) can rapidly lead to severe loss of central vision and adversely affect the patient's quality of life. During the 1990s the only proven treatment for neovascular AMD was laser photocoagulation. Only a minority of patients are eligible to receive this treatment, however, and the treatment itself can cause acute retinal damage with immediate vision loss. Verteporfin therapy is a new treatment option involving photodynamic therapy that was recently shown to be relatively safe and effective in reducing the risk of vision loss in selected cases. METHODS: Recent literature was reviewed on management of choroidal neovascularization caused by AMD that proved beneficial in large-scale randomized clinical trials. These studies were selected through a MEDLINE search of files from 1982 to the present using the keywords "randomized clinical trials," "choroidal neovascularization," and "age-related macular degeneration," as well as through personal knowledge of recently completed trials. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians can effect good treatment outcomes by detecting early signs of AMD and educating patients about the necessity of prompt referral to an ophthalmologist. Immediate referral is increasingly important because, compared with laser photocoagulation, current photodynamic therapy with verteporfin is applicable to more patients. Greater patient awareness of neovascular AMD and the importance of self-testing of vision can also be communicated to patients in primary care.

Soubrane G, Bressler NM. · Clinique Ophtalmologique Universitaire de Créteil, Université Paris-Val-de-Marne, Créteil, France. · Br J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #11264143 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Bressler NM, Bressler SB. · Retinal Vascular Center, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2010, USA. · Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. · Pubmed #10711673 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous00148, Brucker AJ, Qin H, Antoszyk AN, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Glassman AR, Gross JG, Kollman C, Wells JA. · No affiliation provided · Arch Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #19204228 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of single-sitting vs 4-sitting panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on macular edema in subjects with severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy with relatively good visual acuity and no or mild center-involved macular edema. METHODS: Subjects were treated with 1 sitting or 4 sittings of PRP in a nonrandomized, prospective, multicentered clinical trial. Main Outcome Measure Central subfield thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: Central subfield thickness was slightly greater in the 1-sitting group (n = 84) than in the 4-sitting group (n = 71) at the 3-day (P = .01) and 4-week visits (P = .003). At the 34-week primary outcome visit, the slight differences had reversed, with the thickness being slightly greater in the 4-sitting group than in the 1-sitting group (P = .06). Visual acuity differences paralleled OCT differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that clinically meaningful differences are unlikely in OCT thickness or visual acuity following application of PRP in 1 sitting compared with 4 sittings in subjects in this cohort. More definitive results would require a large randomized trial. Application to Clinical Practice These results suggest PRP costs to some patients in terms of travel and lost productivity as well as to eye care providers could be reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00687154.

Bressler NM, Chang TS, Fine JT, Dolan CM, Ward J, Anonymous00039. · Department of Ophthalmology, Retina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2002, USA. · Arch Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #19139332 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported visual function in those with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab or verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT). DESIGN: Multicenter, double-masked, phase 3 trial (ANCHOR). Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 0.3 or 0.5 mg of intravitreal ranibizumab plus sham verteporfin or sham injections plus active verteporfin monthly. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) was administered at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean change from baseline in NEI VFQ-25 scores at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, patients treated with ranibizumab (0.3 mg [n = 137] or 0.5 mg [n = 139]) had mean improvements in NEI VFQ-25 composite scores of 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6 to 8.3) and 8.1 (95% CI, 5.3 to 10.8) points, respectively; patients treated with PDT (n = 142) had a mean improvement of 2.2 points (95% CI, -0.3 to 4.7; vs 0.5 mg of ranibizumab, P < .001; vs 0.3 mg of ranibizumab, P = .003). At each dose through 24 months, patients treated with ranibizumab were more likely to improve in most subscales, including the prespecified subscales (near activities, distance activities, and vision-specific dependency). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with ranibizumab were more likely to report clinically meaningful improvements in visual function through 24 months compared with those treated with verteporfin PDT. Application to Clinical Practice Ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration can improve patient-reported visual function. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00061594.

Scott IU, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Browning DJ, Chan CK, Danis RP, Davis MD, Kollman C, Qin H, Anonymous00398. · Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #18185135 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate agreement in diabetic retinopathy severity classification by retina specialists performing ophthalmoscopy versus reading center (RC) grading of seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs in a phase 2 clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for center-involved diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Clinicians' grading scale used four levels: microaneurysms only, mild/moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), severe NPDR, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or prior panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or both. The RC scale used eight levels: microaneurysms only, mild NPDR, moderate NPDR, moderately severe NPDR, severe NPDR, mild PDR, moderate PDR, and high-risk PDR. Percent agreement and kappa statistic were defined by collapsing RC categories to match those used by clinicians. RESULTS: There was agreement in 89/118 eyes (75%) with kappa = 0.55 (95% confidence interval [0.41, 0.68]). In six eyes, disagreements were of potential substantial clinical importance: five eyes with subtle retinal neovascularization and one with a small preretinal hemorrhage identified only in photographs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician grading of retinopathy severity had moderate agreement with RC grading and might be useful for placing eyes into broad baseline categories.

Rosenfeld PJ, Boyer DS, Bressler NM, Fish G, Grizzard WS, Hao Y, Hnik P, Hudson HL, Singerman L, Slakter JS, Anonymous00049. · Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #18036873 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin (Visudyne; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) using either standard or delayed light application. DESIGN: Phase II, multicenter, masked, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Sixty patients with occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from age-related macular degeneration were assigned randomly (1:1) to verteporfin infusion followed by light application either at 15 minutes (standard light) or 30 minutes (delayed light) after the start of the infusion. The assigned treatment was repeated every three months if fluorescein leakage was detected. RESULTS: At month 12, patients lost a mean of 15.7 letters and 11.4 letters from baseline in the standard and delayed light groups, respectively (P = .38). Twelve (52%) of 23 patients in the standard light group and 11 (42%) of 26 in the delayed light group lost at least 15 letters of visual acuity (P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between verteporfin therapy using the delayed light regimen of 30 minutes or the standard light regimen of 15 minutes in eyes with occult with no classic CNV.

Anonymous00409, Scott IU, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Chan CK, Elman MJ, Friedman SM, Greven CM, Maturi RK, Pieramici DJ, Shami M, Singerman LJ, Stockdale CR. · Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #17698196 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To provide data on the short-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Randomized phase II clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-one eyes of 121 subjects (109 eligible for analysis) with DME and Snellen acuity equivalent ranging from 20/32 to 20/320. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to 1 of 5 groups: (A) focal photocoagulation at baseline (n = 19), (B) intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and 6 weeks (n = 22), (C) intravitreal injection of 2.5 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and 6 weeks (n = 24), (D) intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and sham injection at 6 weeks (n = 22), or (E) intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and 6 weeks with photocoagulation at 3 weeks (n = 22). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) were measured at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, median CST was 411 mum and median Snellen VA equivalent was 20/50. Compared with group A, groups B and C had a greater reduction in CST at 3 weeks and about 1 line better median VA over 12 weeks. There were no meaningful differences between groups B and C in CST reduction or VA improvement. A CST reduction > 11% (reliability limit) was present at 3 weeks in 36 of 84 (43%) bevacizumab-treated eyes and 5 of 18 (28%) eyes treated with laser alone, and at 6 weeks in 31 of 84 (37%) and 9 of 18 (50%) eyes, respectively. Combining focal photocoagulation with bevacizumab resulted in no apparent short-term benefit or adverse outcomes. Endophthalmitis developed in 1 eye. The following events occurred during the first 24 weeks in subjects treated with bevacizumab without attributing cause to the drug: myocardial infarction (n = 2), congestive heart failure (n = 1), elevated blood pressure (n = 3), and worsened renal function (n = 3). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that intravitreal bevacizumab can reduce DME in some eyes, but the study was not designed to determine whether treatment is beneficial. A phase III trial would be needed for that purpose.

Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Haynes LA, Hao Y, Kaiser PK, Miller JW, Naor J, Potter MJ, Pournaras CJ, Reaves A, Rosenfeld PJ, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Slakter JS, Strong A, Vannier S. · No affiliation provided · Arch Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #16157822 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Cunningham ET, Adamis AP, Altaweel M, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, D'Amico DJ, Goldbaum M, Guyer DR, Katz B, Patel M, Schwartz SD, Anonymous00243. · Stanford University, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #16154196 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegaptanib sodium injection (pegaptanib) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, dose-ranging, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with a best-corrected visual acuity (VA) between 20/50 and 20/320 in the study eye and DME involving the center of the macula for whom the investigator judged photocoagulation could be safely withheld for 16 weeks. INTERVENTION: Intravitreous pegaptanib (0.3 mg, 1 mg, 3 mg) or sham injections at study entry, week 6, and week 12 with additional injections and/or focal photocoagulation as needed for another 18 weeks. Final assessments were conducted at week 36. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected VA, central retinal thickness at the center point of the central subfield as assessed by optical coherence tomography measurement, and additional therapy with photocoagulation between weeks 12 and 36. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients appeared balanced for baseline demographic and ocular characteristics. Median VA was better at week 36 with 0.3 mg (20/50), as compared with sham (20/63) (P = 0.04). A larger proportion of those receiving 0.3 mg gained VAs of > or =10 letters (approximately 2 lines) (34% vs. 10%, P = 0.003) and > or =15 letters (18% vs. 7%, P = 0.12). Mean central retinal thickness decreased by 68 microm with 0.3 mg, versus an increase of 4 microm with sham (P = 0.02). Larger proportions of those receiving 0.3 mg had an absolute decrease of both > or =100 microm (42% vs. 16%, P = 0.02) and > or =75 microm (49% vs. 19%, P = 0.008). Photocoagulation was deemed necessary in fewer subjects in each pegaptanib arm (0.3 mg vs. sham, 25% vs. 48%; P = 0.04). All pegaptanib doses were well tolerated. Endophthalmitis occurred in 1 of 652 injections (0.15%/injection; i.e., 1/130 [0.8%] pegaptanib subjects) and was not associated with severe visual loss. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase II trial, subjects assigned to pegaptanib had better VA outcomes, were more likely to show reduction in central retinal thickness, and were deemed less likely to need additional therapy with photocoagulation at follow-up.

Azab M, Boyer DS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Cihelkova I, Hao Y, Immonen I, Lim JI, Menchini U, Naor J, Potter MJ, Reaves A, Rosenfeld PJ, Slakter JS, Soucek P, Strong HA, Wenkstern A, Su XY, Yang YC, Anonymous00313. · No affiliation provided · Arch Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #15824216 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment effect and safety of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin using a standard (SF) or reduced (RF) light fluence rate with that of placebo therapy in patients with subfoveal minimally classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Phase 2, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Nineteen ophthalmology practices in North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with initial best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/250 and a lesion size of no greater than 6 Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) disc areas. METHODS: We randomly assigned 117 patients (1:1:1) to verteporfin infusion (6 mg/m(2)) and light application with an RF rate (300 mW/cm(2)) for 83 seconds (light dose of 25 J/cm(2)) or an SF rate (600 mW/cm(2)) for 83 seconds (light dose of 50 J/cm(2)) or to placebo infusion with RF or SF. Treatment was repeated every 3 months if the treating physician noted fluorescein leakage from CNV on angiography. Patients in whom a predominantly classic lesion developed could receive open-label standard verteporfin treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured every 3 months, and angiographic changes were assessed by the Photograph Reading Center through the 3-month examination unless an ocular adverse event or conversion to a predominantly classic lesion was identified by an investigator. Safety was assessed throughout the study. All outcomes were on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: One hundred three (88%) of 117 patients completed the 24-month examination. Twelve (30%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo received open-label standard verteporfin treatment after confirmation of presence of predominantly classic CNV. At month 12, a loss of at least 3 lines of visual acuity occurred in 5 (14%) of 36 eyes assigned to RF and 10 (28%) of 36 eyes assigned to SF, compared with 18 (47%) of 38 eyes assigned to placebo (RF, P = .002; SF, P = .08; RF + SF, P = .004). At month 24, this loss occurred in 9 (26%) of 34 eyes assigned to RF and 17 (53%) of 32 assigned to SF, compared with 23 (62%) of 37 eyes assigned to placebo (RF, P = .003; SF, P = .45; RF + SF, P = .03). Progression to predominantly classic CNV by 24 months was more common in the placebo group (11 [28%] of 39 patients compared with 2 [5%] of 38 in the RF group [P = .007] and 1 [3%] of 37 in the SF group [P = .002]). No unexpected ocular or systemic adverse events were identified. Treatment-related, usually transient visual disturbances were 13% with SF, 10% with placebo, and 5% with RF. CONCLUSIONS: Verteporfin therapy safely reduced the risks of losing at least 15 letters (> or =3 lines) of visual acuity and progression to predominantly classic CNV for at least 2 years in individuals with subfoveal minimally classic lesions due to age-related macular degeneration measuring 6 MPS disc areas or less. Based on the overall evidence available on verteporfin therapy for these lesions, the VIM Study Group would consider recommending verteporfin therapy for relatively small minimally classic lesions similar to those enrolled in the VIM Trial.

Goldstein M, Loewenstein A, Barak A, Pollack A, Bukelman A, Katz H, Springer A, Schachat AP, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Cooney MJ, Alster Y, Rafaeli O, Malach R, Anonymous00107. · Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Israel. · Retina. · Pubmed #15805906 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the preferential hyperacuity perimeter (PHP) with an Amsler grid in detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Patients underwent refraction, visual acuity examination, PHP, Amsler grid examination, and macular photography. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients participated in the trial. Of 19 eyes with neovascular AMD, 19 (100%) were positive on the PHP, and 10 (53%), on the Amsler grid. Of 27 eyes with geographic atrophy, 26 (96%) were positive on the PHP, and 12 (44%), on the Amsler grid. Of 20 eyes with intermediate AMD, 14 (70%) were positive on the PHP, and 4 (20%), on the Amsler grid. Of 51 eyes with early AMD, 21 (41%) were positive on the PHP, and 4 (8%), on the Amsler grid. Of 33 eyes with no AMD, 6 (18%) were positive on the PHP, and none, on the Amsler grid. Thus, 80 (68%) of 117 patients with AMD had a positive PHP, while 30 (26%) had positive results of Amsler grid examination (P < 0.001, McNemar test). CONCLUSION: The PHP had greater sensitivity, although with a relatively high rate of false-positive results for healthy individuals, than the Amsler grid in detecting AMD-related lesions.

Childs AL, Bressler NM, Bass EB, Hawkins BS, Mangione CM, Marsh MJ, Miskala PH, Anonymous00092. · SST Coordinating Center, 550 North Broadway, 9th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #15522365 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To present and compare findings from health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) interviews conducted with patients enrolled in the SST Group B Trial evaluating surgical removal of subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions associated with age-related macular degeneration versus observation. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients had predominantly hemorrhagic subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions (total lesion size of >3.5 disc areas, area of blood at least 50% of the lesion area, and at least 75% of blood posterior to the equator) and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) of 20/100 to <20/1600 but at least light perception in the study eye. Three hundred thirty-six patients enrolled after baseline quality-of-life interviews, 168 assigned to each of surgery or observation. METHODS: Clinical and HRQOL data were collected before randomization and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after enrollment. Baseline clinical evidence was used to stratify patients as having unilateral or bilateral neovascularization at the time of randomization. The HRQOL interviews included the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Two-year change in NEI-VFQ. RESULTS: At 24 months after enrollment, overall NEI-VFQ scores had a median decrease of 1 point from baseline in the observation arm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4 to 3 points) and no change in the surgery arm (95% CI: -3 to 3 points) (P = 0.70). Changes from baseline on NEI-VFQ subscales also were similar between treatment arms. Differences in scores by unilateral or bilateral involvement seen at baseline in each treatment arm persisted throughout follow-up for most outcomes. Planned analyses stratified by VA showed trends (P = 0.17) in favor of surgery at 24 months in the patients with baseline VA greater than 20/200 for the NEI-VFQ scale (3.5-point median increase from baseline in the surgery arm [95% CI: -4 to 7] vs. a 1-point median loss from baseline in the observation arm [95% CI: -6 to 4]). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was detected with respect to vision-targeted quality-of-life outcomes for patients randomized to surgery or observation in the SST Group B Trial. This article contains additional online-only material available at www.ophsource.com/periodicals/ophtha.

Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Childs AL, Haller JA, Hawkins BS, Lewis H, MacCumber MW, Marsh MJ, Redford M, Sternberg P, Thomas MA, Williams GA, Anonymous00091. · SST Coordinating Center, Wilmer Clinical Trials and Biometry, 550 North Broadway, 9th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205-2010, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #15522364 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To present best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) findings and other clinical outcomes from eyes of patients enrolled in one of the Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) evaluating surgical removal versus observation of predominantly hemorrhagic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial (SST Group B Trial). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients had subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions greater than 3.5 disk areas (8.9 mm2) composed of at least 50% blood (either blood or CNV underlying the center of the foveal avascular zone) and BCVA of 20/100 to light perception in the study eye. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned randomly at time of enrollment to observation or surgical removal of blood and any associated CNV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A successful outcome was defined a priori as either improvement in visual acuity (VA), no change in VA, or a decline in VA of no more than 1 line (7 letters) from baseline to the 24-month examination based on an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Of 336 patients enrolled, 168 were assigned to each treatment arm; treatment arms were balanced by baseline characteristics. Of 1501 expected examinations 3 months through 36 months after baseline, 1370 (91%) were performed. Loss of > or =2 lines (> or =8 letters) of VA occurred in 56% of surgery eyes, versus 59% of observation eyes examined at 24 months. Although severe loss of VA was not the primary outcome of interest, surgery more often prevented such loss: 36% in the observation arm versus 21% in the surgery arm at the 24-month examination (chi2 P = 0.004). Of initially phakic eyes, the cumulative percentage that had undergone cataract surgery by 24 months was 44% in the surgery arm, compared with 6% in the observation arm. Twenty-seven eyes (16%) in the surgical arm, compared with 3 eyes (2%) in the observation arm, had a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD). CONCLUSIONS: Submacular surgery as performed in the SST Group B Trial did not increase the chance of stable or improved VA (the primary outcome of interest) and was associated with a high risk of rhegmatogenous RD, but did reduce the risk of severe VA loss in comparison with observation. This article contains additional online-only material available at http://www.ophsource.com/periodicals/ophtha.

Miskala PH, Bass EB, Bressler NM, Childs AL, Hawkins BS, Mangione CM, Marsh MJ, Anonymous00090. · SST Coordinating Center, 550 North Broadway, 9th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205-2010, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #15522363 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To describe health-related quality of life (HRQOL), overall and in patients with unilateral or bilateral choroidal neovascularization (CNV), in a clinical trial (Group N Trial) comparing observation and surgical removal of subfoveal CNV secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients had untreated subfoveal CNV and AMD, best-corrected visual acuity (VA) of 20/100 to 20/800, classic CNV on fluorescein angiography, and a total subfoveal lesion size of < or =9.0 disc areas in the study eye. METHODS: Health-related quality of life data (the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire [NEI-VFQ], 36-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) and clinical data were collected at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. Patients were divided into unilateral and bilateral CNV subgroups based on fluorescein angiographic and clinical evidence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Two-year change in the NEI-VFQ. RESULTS: Of 454 patients enrolled, 228 were assigned to observation and 226 to surgery. At baseline, median overall NEI-VFQ scores were 67 in the observation group and 69 in the surgery group; by 2 years, the observation group had lost a median of 3 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: -6 to -2), and the surgery group gained a median of 1 point (CI: -1 to 3). The largest difference was observed for the mental health subscale, where the observation group lost a median of 5 points (CI: -5 to 0), and the surgery group gained a median of 5 points (CI: 0-10) by 2 years. Treatment differences in median 2-year changes in NEI-VFQ scores favored surgery by up to 10 points for unilateral cases and up to 8 points for bilateral cases. No treatment difference in 2-year change was observed for the SF-36 physical component summary; 2-year change in the mental component summary favored surgery by 2 points. Few patients (2%-4%) had HADS definite anxiety or depression at baseline or at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although HRQOL outcomes were better in the submacular surgery arm than in the observation arm, surgery (per protocol) is not recommended because VA outcomes (reported elsewhere) were similar in the treatment arms. This article contains additional online-only material available at http://www.ophsource.com/periodicals/ophtha.

Hawkins BS, Bressler NM, Miskala PH, Bressler SB, Holekamp NM, Marsh MJ, Redford M, Schwartz SD, Sternberg P, Thomas MA, Wilson DJ, Anonymous00089. · SST Coordinating Center, Wilmer Clinical Trials and Biometry, 550 North Broadway, 9th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205-2010, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #15522362 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To present visual acuity (VA) and related findings from patients enrolled in one of the Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) evaluating surgical removal versus observation of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (SST Group N Trial). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients had age-related macular degeneration with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, some with a classic pattern on fluorescein angiography, and best-corrected VA (BCVA) of 20/100 to 20/800 in one eye (study eye) that had received no treatment in the macula. Any contiguous blood had to account for <50% of the total area occupied by the subfoveal lesion (maximum size, 9.0 disc areas [22.9 mm2]). METHODS: Randomization was stratified by VA and by clinical center. All patients were scheduled for study examinations at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment for assessment of study outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A successful outcome was defined a priori to be either improvement of BCVA or VA no more than 1 line (7 letters) worse than baseline at the 24-month examination. RESULTS: Of 454 patients enrolled, 228 study eyes were assigned to observation and 226 to surgery. The percentages of eyes that had successful outcomes were similar in the 2 arms: 44% assigned to observation and 41% assigned to surgery. Median VA losses from baseline to the 24-month examination were 2.1 lines (10.5 letters) in the observation arm and 2.0 lines (10 letters) in the surgery arm. Median VA declined from 20/100 at baseline to 20/400 at 24 months in both arms. No subgroup of patients was identified in which submacular surgery led to better VA outcomes. In the surgery arm, 55 (39%) of 142 initially phakic eyes had cataract surgery by the 24-month examination, compared with 6 (5%) of 133 eyes in the observation arm. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment occurred in 12 surgery eyes (5%) and 1 observation eye. CONCLUSIONS: Submacular surgery, as performed in this clinical trial, did not improve or preserve VA for 24 months in more eyes than observation and is not recommended for patients with similar lesions. This article contains additional online-only material available at http://www.ophsource.com/periodicals/ophtha.

Dong LM, Childs AL, Mangione CM, Bass EB, Bressler NM, Hawkins BS, Marsh MJ, Miskala P, Jaffee HA, McCaffrey LA, Anonymous00315. · Wilmer Clinical Trials and Biometry, The Wilmer Ophthalmologic Institute, 550 N. Broadway, 9th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205-2010, USA. · Am J Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #15234287 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To describe the effect of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients at enrollment in two randomized clinical trials; to examine the relation of visual acuity to HRQOL; to compare HRQOL scores between participants with unilateral and bilateral CNV independent of other characteristics. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trials. METHODS: Two Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) recruited patients with AMD and either new subfoveal CNV (Group N Trial) or predominantly hemorrhagic CNV (Group B Trial). Health-related quality of life interviews included the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire [NEI-VFQ], the SF-36 Health Survey, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]. Linear correlation and regression analyses were used to relate baseline HRQOL scores to visual acuity and bilateral disease. RESULTS: Interview data were analyzed for 789 AMD patients: 454 patients in the Group N Trial and 335 patients in the Group B Trial. Participants reported poor vision-related functioning in many domains measured by the NEI-VFQ (mean overall scores of 65 for Group N and 63 for Group B). Visual acuity of the better eye was strongly associated with NEI-VFQ scores but not with SF-36 or HADS scores. After adjusting for visual acuity of the better eye and other factors, bilateral cases had NEI-VFQ overall scores six points lower than unilateral cases in Group N Trial and 10 points lower than unilateral cases in the Group B Trial. CONCLUSIONS: Subfoveal CNV profoundly affects vision-related quality of life. The effect is more pronounced with bilateral disease, even after controlling for visual acuity.

Miskala PH, Hawkins BS, Mangione CM, Bass EB, Bressler NM, Dong LM, Marsh MJ, McCaffrey LD, Anonymous00023. · Submacular Surgery Trials Coordinating Center, Wilmer Clinical Trials and Biometry, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Arch Ophthalmol. · Pubmed #12695250 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) measures vision-targeted quality of life, but it is unclear whether it is sensitive to changes within individuals over time. OBJECTIVE: To determine the responsiveness of the NEI-VFQ to "within-individual" changes in visual acuity in patients who had subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in at least one eye secondary to age-related macular degeneration, ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, or idiopathic causes, and who participated in randomized trials of submacular surgery. METHODS: Trained telephone interviewers administered the NEI-VFQ as part of annual follow-up data collection for pilot trials and larger clinical trials of submacular surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured by local vision examiners at 12 months after enrollment and, typically, by central "traveling" vision examiners at 24 months after enrollment. Changes in visual acuity and NEI-VFQ scores from 12 to 24 months were analyzed using linear regression methods. RESULTS: Two-hundred eighteen patients had both interviews and visual acuity measurements at 12 and 24 months after enrollment. Changes in the overall NEI-VFQ score and in 9 of the subscales (near activities, dependency, driving, role difficulties, distance activities, mental health, general vision, peripheral vision, and social functioning) were related to changes in visual acuity of the better-seeing eye based on linear regression analysis (P<.05). In our analysis, a 3-line decrease in the visual acuity of the better-seeing eye was associated with 3.6- to 16.2-point decreases in the overall NEI-VFQ score and 9 subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the NEI-VFQ subscales were responsive to changes in the visual acuity of the better-seeing eye over a 12-month interval in this patient population. Thus, the NEI-VFQ can be used to measure change in vision-targeted quality of life over time to augment clinical measurements of visual acuity.

Rubin GS, Bressler NM, Anonymous00278. · Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom. · Retina. · Pubmed #12441717 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) investigation, verteporfin therapy reduced the risk of at least moderate vision loss (defined as a loss of at least 15 letters of visual acuity) in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). This report presents detailed analyses of 24-month contrast sensitivity outcomes in these patients. METHODS: The patients included in the TAP investigation had subfoveal CNV secondary to ARMD and received verteporfin therapy (n = 402) or placebo (n = 207) at the first visit, with retreatment at each 3-month follow-up visit if angiography revealed fluorescein leakage from CNV. Contrast sensitivity was determined at each visit using a Pelli-Robson chart. RESULTS: At the month 24 examination, verteporfin-treated patients were less likely to lose at least 6 or 15 letters of contrast sensitivity than placebo-treated patients (86 [21%] versus 94 [45%], and 27 [7%] versus 24 [12%], respectively; P < 0.05 for both comparisons). The superiority of verteporfin therapy over placebo was greater in patients with predominantly classic CNV at baseline, although verteporfin-treated patients with minimally classic CNV also had better contrast sensitivity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with visual acuity outcomes, verteporfin therapy reduced the risk of a clinically relevant loss of contrast sensitivity in the total study population, with the greatest effect in patients with predominantly classic subfoveal CNV secondary to ARMD. Verteporfin-treated patients with minimally classic CNV also had better contrast sensitivity outcomes than patients who received placebo. Given the association between contrast sensitivity and visual disability, the beneficial effects of verteporfin therapy on contrast sensitivity outcomes are expected to have a favorable impact on patients' daily activities.