Macular Degeneration: Awh CC

Boyer DS, Antoszyk AN, Awh CC, Bhisitkul RB, Shapiro H, Acharya NR, Anonymous00222. · Retina-Vitreous Associates, Beverly Hills, California, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #17270674 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: An examination of clinically relevant subgroups of patients in the MARINA study of ranibizumab in treatment of minimally classic or occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was done. Objectives were to determine the effectiveness of ranibizumab across subgroups, compare the effectiveness of ranibizumab with that of sham injection within subgroups, and evaluate the relationship between selected baseline characteristics and visual acuity (VA) outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective subgroup analyses of 24-month data from the MARINA study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Seven hundred sixteen patients were randomly assigned to 0.3 mg ranibizumab (n = 238), 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 240), or sham treatment (n = 238). METHODS: Efficacy outcomes were compared across subgroups based on patients' gender, age, baseline VA score, baseline CNV lesion size, CNV lesion type, and duration of neovascular AMD using univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses were performed on the change from baseline to 24 months in VA score to assess further the correlation between baseline characteristics and VA outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients losing <15 letters from baseline, proportion gaining > or =15 letters from baseline, and mean VA score change from baseline. RESULTS: For each of the 3 VA end points, all subgroups of ranibizumab-treated patients did better on average than the sham-treated patients. Increasing age, larger CNV lesion size at baseline, and a higher baseline VA score were all associated with greater loss of letters in the sham group or less gain of letters in the ranibizumab groups. However, the net benefit of ranibizumab versus sham treatment was greater in patients who scored higher than in those who scored lower in baseline VA. CONCLUSIONS: This subgroup analysis of 24-month data from the MARINA study indicates that ranibizumab treatment was associated with an average increase from baseline VA in all subgroups evaluated, and that ranibizumab treatment was superior to sham treatment across all subgroups. The most important predictors of VA outcomes were, in decreasing order of importance, baseline VA score, CNV lesion size, and age.

Olivier S, Chow DR, Packo KH, MacCumber MW, Awh CC. · Retina-Vitreous Associates, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #15177972 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anatomic and visual outcomes after a surgical procedure for displacement of thick submacular hemorrhage in patients with age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine consecutive eyes of 28 patients with thick submacular hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration. INTERVENTION: The procedure consisted of a pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator injection (125 micrograms/ml) through a translocation microcannula, followed by fluid-air exchange and postoperative prone positioning [correction]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuities, postoperative fluorescein angiography results, and additional postoperative treatments. RESULTS: Total subfoveal blood displacement was achieved in 25 eyes, with subtotal displacement in the others. Based on fluorescein angiography results, 8 eyes were eligible for additional postoperative treatments. At 3 months, 17 eyes had gained more than 2 lines of visual acuity, whereas 3 had lost more than 2 lines. The difference between preoperative and 3-month postoperative visual acuity was statistically significant (P = 0.0167). Complications consisted of 2 cases of vitreous hemorrhage that cleared within 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This surgical technique seems useful in displacing thick submacular hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration, allowing postoperative fluorescein angiography testing and, potentially, subsequent treatments. No significant complication from the procedure was identified. However, further controlled studies will be required to assess its efficacy in the management of this difficult clinical problem.