Macular Degeneration: Anonymous00106

Solomon SD, Bressler SB, Hawkins BS, Marsh MJ, Bressler NM, Anonymous00106. · Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2005, USA. · Retina. · Pubmed #15805900 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To describe the guidelines followed by the Submacular Surgery Trials (SST) Research Group in the interpretation of color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms of subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions evaluated in the SST and to assist ophthalmologists in applying the results of the SST. METHODS: Stereoscopic color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms of the study eye and nonstudy eye of 1,015 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions secondary to age-related macular degeneration, ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, or idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) were obtained and graded by certified SST fundus photograph readers at the baseline examination in three randomized clinical trials comparing surgery with observation. Adherence to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and ocular features that might affect visual outcome were documented. Stereoscopic color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography were repeated 1 month after randomization for patients assigned to surgery to provide documentation that surgery was performed and to assess compliance with the surgery protocol. Photographs and fluorescein angiograms of both the study eye and the fellow eye in all patients then were obtained 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization and then annually up to 48 months. The kappa statistic was used to evaluate interobserver reliability of photograph gradings. RESULTS: Lesion components at baseline included classic CNV, occult CNV, and features contiguous to CNV, including blood, fibrous tissue, hypofluorescence not corresponding to blood, serous detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium, and prior areas of laser photocoagulation. At follow-up, fluorescein leakage from CNV was assessed peripheral to or within the area of the retinal pigment epithelium abnormality after surgery. The lesion at follow-up could include any of the features identified at baseline as well as retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, such as mottling of the retinal pigment epithelium with a subtle transition to normal retinal pigment epithelium or a very sharply demarcated, markedly hypopigmented area that was easily distinguished from the surrounding retinal pigment epithelium. kappa statistics for interobserver reliability ranged from good (0.47) to excellent (1.00) for features graded at baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although some of the definitions essential to the interpretation of the SST are similar to those used in the Macular Photocoagulation Study and randomized clinical trials of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, this guideline provides new information regarding lesion components at baseline as well as standardized descriptions of lesions after submacular surgery. These descriptions from the SST assist in understanding what lesions were studied, when additional treatment was considered after surgery, and how anatomical results should be interpreted.

Adamis AP, Altaweel M, Bressler NM, Cunningham ET, Davis MD, Goldbaum M, Gonzales C, Guyer DR, Barrett K, Patel M, Anonymous00106. · No affiliation provided · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #16343627 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To study effects of intravitreal pegaptanib (Macugen) on retinal neovascularization. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individuals with retinal neovascularization identified from a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial evaluating pegaptanib for treatment of diabetic macular edema, with a best-corrected visual acuity letter score between 68 and 25 (approximate Snellen equivalent between 20/50 and 20/320) and receiving a sham injection or intravitreal pegaptanib (0.3 mg, 1 mg, 3 mg) administered at study entry, week 6, and week 12, with additional injections and/or focal photocoagulation as needed during the ensuing 18 weeks, up to a maximum of 6 pegaptanib/sham therapies, were evaluated. Scatter panretinal photocoagulation before study enrollment was permitted, but not within 6 months of randomization and study entry. Changes in retinal neovascularization were assessed on fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms graded at a reading center in a masked fashion. RESULTS: Of 172 participants, 19 had retinal neovascularization in the study eye at baseline. Excluding 1 who had scatter photocoagulation 13 days before randomization and 2 with no follow-up photographs, 1 of the remaining 16 subjects had panretinal photocoagulation during study follow-up. Of these 16 subjects, 8 of 13 (62%) in a pegaptanib treatment group (including the one receiving panretinal photocoagulation), 0 of 3 in the sham group, and 0 of 4 fellow (nonstudy) eyes showed either regression of neovascularization on fundus photographs or regression or absence of fluorescein leakage from neovascularization (or both) at 36 weeks. In 3 of 8 with regression, neovascularization progressed at week 52 after cessation of pegaptanib at week 30. CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects with retinal neovascularization at baseline assigned to pegaptanib showed regression of neovascularization by week 36. These findings suggest a direct effect of pegaptanib upon retinal neovascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus.