Macular Degeneration: Alster Y

Goldstein M, Loewenstein A, Barak A, Pollack A, Bukelman A, Katz H, Springer A, Schachat AP, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Cooney MJ, Alster Y, Rafaeli O, Malach R, Anonymous00107. · Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Israel. · Retina. · Pubmed #15805906 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the preferential hyperacuity perimeter (PHP) with an Amsler grid in detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Patients underwent refraction, visual acuity examination, PHP, Amsler grid examination, and macular photography. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients participated in the trial. Of 19 eyes with neovascular AMD, 19 (100%) were positive on the PHP, and 10 (53%), on the Amsler grid. Of 27 eyes with geographic atrophy, 26 (96%) were positive on the PHP, and 12 (44%), on the Amsler grid. Of 20 eyes with intermediate AMD, 14 (70%) were positive on the PHP, and 4 (20%), on the Amsler grid. Of 51 eyes with early AMD, 21 (41%) were positive on the PHP, and 4 (8%), on the Amsler grid. Of 33 eyes with no AMD, 6 (18%) were positive on the PHP, and none, on the Amsler grid. Thus, 80 (68%) of 117 patients with AMD had a positive PHP, while 30 (26%) had positive results of Amsler grid examination (P < 0.001, McNemar test). CONCLUSION: The PHP had greater sensitivity, although with a relatively high rate of false-positive results for healthy individuals, than the Amsler grid in detecting AMD-related lesions.

Zur D, Ben Simon GJ, Loewenstein A, Alster Y, Moisseiev J, Ullman S. · Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. · Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. · Pubmed #15497550 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine a new high-resolution kinetic mapping method for scotoma in age-related macular degeneration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A computer-based program for kinetic visual field mapping was tested in 10 healthy subjects and 14 patients with age-related macular degeneration and fixed preferred retinal locus. The stimulus was presented using a back projector on a screen located 40 cm from the subject. The findings were then compared with static results. RESULTS: Control group mapping revealed good congruency with the anatomic blind spot. Mapping of the 14 patients with age-related macular degeneration was rapid and revealed good accuracy. The average deviation of the mapping border from the anatomic scotoma border was no more than 3.1% of the scotoma radius. Static mapping of 7 of the patients with age-related macular degeneration was longer and revealed lower accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method is more rapid, accurate, and consistent than static mapping. It allows accurate mapping of central scotoma with suprathreshold stimulus, and may be used in the future for detecting the early stages of age-related macular degeneration using subthreshold stimulus.

Loewenstein A, Malach R, Goldstein M, Leibovitch I, Barak A, Baruch E, Alster Y, Rafaeli O, Avni I, Yassur Y. · Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #12750099 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate a method that uses hyperacuity, the Macular Computerized Psychophysical Test (MCPT), to evaluate the central macular visual field in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective case-control study of a diagnostic test. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: One hundred eight eyes of 108 Patients with AMD and 51 eyes of 51 age-matched patients with no retinal disease. Patients with AMD included 32 (30%) patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV), 23 (21%) with geographic atrophy (GA), 35 (32%) with AMD with high-risk characteristics (HRC), and 18 (17%) with early AMD with non-HRC. TESTING: Each subject underwent the MCPT, in which a virtual line composed of dots (white dots on a black background, maximal contrast) is flashed across different macular loci to a perifoveal radius of 7 degrees. Patients' responses were recorded and automatically analyzed using a specific algorithm developed before the onset of the study. All patients also underwent a supervised Amsler grid examination on the encounter before or after the MCPT in random order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distortion, scotoma, or blurring perceived by the patient after a swift change of fixation was considered positive on the MCPT. Any perception of distortion, scotoma, or blurring was considered positive on the Amsler grid. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients with CNV, 30 (94%) were found positive on the MCPT and 11 (34%) were found positive on the Amsler grid. Of the 23 GA patients, 21 (91%) were found positive on the MCPT and 7 (30%) were found positive on the Amsler grid. Of the 35 HRC patients, 28 (80%) were found positive on the MCPT and 3 (9%) were found positive on the Amsler grid, and of the 18 early AMD with non-HRC patients, 8 (44%) were found positive on the MCPT and 3 (17%) were found positive on the Amsler grid. Of the 51 controls, 3 (6%) were positive on the MCPT and 1 (2%) was positive on the Amsler grid. CONCLUSIONS: The MCPT was superior to the Amsler grid in detecting AMD-related lesions in this cohort. Studies are underway to determine whether the MCPT is feasible for home monitoring to provide early detection of progression to CNV.

Alster Y, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Brimacombe JA, Crompton RM, Duh YJ, Gabel VP, Heier JS, Ip MS, Loewenstein A, Packo KH, Stur M, Toaff T, Anonymous00244. · Clin Reg Consulting Services Inc., Irvine, California, USA. · Ophthalmology. · Pubmed #16154198 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the ability of the Preferential Hyperacuity Perimeter (PreView PHP; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) to detect recent-onset choroidal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to differentiate it from an intermediate stage of AMD. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, concurrent, nonrandomized, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants' study eyes had a corrected visual acuity of 20/160 or better and either untreated CNV from AMD diagnosed within the last 60 days or an intermediate stage of AMD. METHODS: After obtaining consent, visual acuity with habitual correction, masked PHP testing, stereoscopic color fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography were performed. Photographs and angiograms were evaluated by graders masked to diagnosis and PHP results. The reading center's diagnosis determined if the patient was categorized as having intermediate AMD or neovascular AMD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A successful study outcome was defined a priori as a sensitivity of at least 80% and a specificity of at least 80%. RESULTS: Of 185 patients who gave consent to be enrolled, 11 (6%) had PHP results judged to be unreliable. An additional 52 were not included because they did not meet all eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 122 patients, 57 had an intermediate stage of AMD and 65 had neovascular AMD. The sensitivity to detect newly diagnosed CNV using PHP testing was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-90%). The specificity to differentiate newly diagnosed CNV from the intermediate stage of AMD using PHP testing was 88% (95% CI, 76%-95%). CONCLUSIONS: Preferential Hyperacuity Perimeter testing can detect recent-onset CNV resulting from AMD and can differentiate it from an intermediate stage of AMD with high sensitivity and specificity. These data suggest that monitoring with PHP should detect most cases of CNV of recent onset with few false-positive results at a stage when treatment usually would be beneficial. Thus, this monitoring should be considered in the management of the intermediate stage of AMD.