| 1 |
Clinical Conference Use of a mild sedative helps to identify true non-dippers by ABPM: a study in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. 2004
Rachmani R, Shenhav G, Slavachevsky I, Levy Z, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Meir-Hospital Kfar-Sava and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. · Blood Press Monit. · Pubmed #15096902 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The interplay between the continuity or quality of sleep and diurnal variation in blood pressure has not been directly examined before. We examined the influence of a mild, non-hypotensive sedative on nocturnal dipping. DESIGN: This was a randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: The study took place in an out-patient clinic in an academic hospital. INTERVENTION: Zolpidem 10 mg or placebo was given randomly for the first or second night, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was instigated for 48 h. PATIENTS: The population under study comprised 96 male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension (mean age 54 +/- 6 years, mean blood pressure 158/94 +/- 9/6 mmHg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Nocturnal dipping (nocturnal blood pressure >/= 10% lower than daytime pressure) was found in 71% of the patients taking the sedative compared with 27% of those on placebo (P=0.001). RESULTS: On placebo, non-dippers and dippers had similar profiles of cardiovascular risk parameters. In contrast, non-dippers taking zolpidem had significantly higher values for most cardiovascular risk parameters compared with dippers: higher systolic blood pressure, higher low-density lipoproteins, lower high-density lipoproteins, higher serum creatinine, a higher urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, higher serum insulin and insulin resistance. CONCLUSION: The use of a mild sedative during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may help to identify the patients with a very high cardiovascular risk. These are the patients with a blunted nocturnal hypotension despite sedation.
|
| 2 |
Clinical Conference The effect of acarbose on insulin resistance in obese hypertensive subjects with normal glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled study. 2004
Rachmani R, Bar-Dayan Y, Ronen Z, Levi Z, Slavachevsky I, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Meir Hospital Kfar Sava and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. · Diabetes Obes Metab. · Pubmed #14686965 No free full text.
Abstract: AIM: Acarbose, a glucose oxidase inhibitor, delays the absorption of glucose thus reducing post-prandial blood glucose level, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and insulin resistance in patients with diabetes mellitus and in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. The effect of acarbose in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) has hitherto not been examined. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of acarbose in obese hypertensive subjects with NGT. METHODS: A double-blinded, parallel group study was performed on 56 male subjects with hypertension, body mass index (BMI) 27-35 kg/m2, fasting blood glucose < or =6 mmol/l and a normal oral glucose tolerance test. Blood pressure, HbA1c, lipid profile and insulin resistance [homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index] were determined initially and following 24 weeks of acarbose, 150 mg/day or placebo. The primary end point was the change in insulin resistance. Anti-hypertensive treatment and diet were kept constant during the study. RESULTS: Insulin resistance decreased in acarbose users but not on placebo. HOMA index declined from 5.36 +/- 1.7 to 4.10 +/- 1.6 (p=0.001) on acarbose, the corresponding values on placebo were 5.44 +/- 1.9 and 5.53 +/- 1.7. A decrease in serum triglyceride values (2.16 +/- 0.16 mmol/l to 1.76 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, p=0.02) took place on acarbose with no change on placebo. There was no change in BMI, low-density lipoprotein or high-density lipoprotein values in either group. Blood pressure declined equally in both the groups, probably due to better patient compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose may reduce insulin resistance and triglycerides also in obese hypertensive subjects with normal glucose tolerance.
|
| 3 |
Retraction The effect of spironolactone, cilazapril and their combination on albuminuria in patients with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy is independent of blood pressure reduction: a randomized controlled study. 2004
Rachmani R, Slavachevsky I, Amit M, Levi Z, Kedar Y, Berla M, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Meir-Hospital Kfar-Sava and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. · Diabet Med. · Pubmed #15089793 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The effect of spironolactone, cilazapril and their combination on albuminuria was examined in a randomized prospective study in female patients with diabetes and hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty female diabetic patients aged 45-70 years with blood pressure (BP) 140-180/90-110 mmHg, serum creatinine (sCr) < or = 160 micro mol/l, HbA(1c) < or = 10%, and albuminuria were treated by atenolol 12.5-75 mg/d and hydrochlorothiazide 6.25-25 mg/d. Titration-to-target helped to reach BP values < or = 135/85 mmHg in 46 patients after 12 weeks. These patients were randomized to spironolactone 100 mg/d or cilazapril 5 mg/d for 24 weeks. Then both groups received spironolactone 50 mg/d and cilazapril 2.5 mg/d for 24 weeks. BP was stabilized by tapering the dose of the initial agents. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), BP, K(+). sCr and HbA(1c) were assessed at baseline and at weeks 12, 16, 36 and 60. RESULTS: The average BP at week 12 was 128 +/- 4/81 +/- 3 mmHg and remained constant, in both groups, throughout the study. ACR declined on spironolactone from a median value (range) of 452 (124-1571) to 216 (64-875) mg/g (P = 0.001), and on cilazapril to 302 (90-975) mg/g (P = 0.001). The difference between spironolactone and cilazapril was significant (P = 0.002). Combined treatment resulted in a further modest decline in ACR. Serum creatinine was unaltered by spironolactone and rose slightly (121 to 126 micro mol/l, P = 0.02) on cilazapril. CONCLUSION: At the doses tested, spironolactone was superior to cilazapril in reducing albuminuria. Combined administration was more effective than either drug alone. These effects were independent of BP values. Hyperkalaemia was the main side-effect.
|
|
|